Summary of a sample of Zavtra.ru articles published in 2020

LLM-generated content, may include inaccuracies

This page includes LLM-generated summaries of articles published on Russian weekly newspaper Zavtra. They may be useful for a first overview of the contents published by Zavtra, but they have not been reviewed and they almost certainly include inaccuracies.

Clicking on the title of each article will bring you to the original publication on Zavtra’s official website.

This page includes an LLM-generated summary of a random sample of 100 articles out of a total of 1 020 articles published in 2020 (coverage: 10%). For more context, details on how this was implemented, and links to other years, see the index page.

Falsehood

2020-01-04 - Galina Ivankina

This text offers a detailed and somewhat nostalgic review of two Soviet-era films, “Star of Felicitous Happiness” (Zvezda Plezhitelnogo Schastya) and “Union of Salvation” (Soyuz Spaseniya), both centered around the Decembrist revolt. The reviewer initially praises “Union of Salvation” as a surprisingly successful and creative film after its initial failure. He highlights the film’s strong performances, particularly those of Sergey Trubetskoy and Kondraty Ryelyov, and the compelling story of Nicholas I, portraying him as a complex and ultimately tragic figure.

The reviewer contrasts this with “Star of Felicitous Happiness,” which he finds somewhat disappointing due to its melodramatic tone and focus on a romanticized, almost fairytale-like depiction of the events. He criticizes the film’s tendency to lean into a “star-crossed lovers” narrative, detracting from the historical significance of the Decembrists’ rebellion.

Ultimately, the reviewer argues that both films, despite their flaws, capture a certain yearning for freedom and a critique of societal constraints, a theme that resonates across time. He notes the film’s reliance on familiar cinematic tropes and a somewhat heavy-handed approach to conveying its message, particularly in the final scene with Nicholas I. He concludes that while “Union of Salvation” is a genuinely impressive achievement, “Star of Felicitous Happiness” falls short of its potential.

Councilwoman, who is she?

2020-01-09 - Mariya Mamikonyan

This text is a strongly worded critique directed at Оксана Викторовна, a representative of the Duma and member of PACE, regarding her stance on a proposed law against domestic violence. The core argument is that her justifications – citing international precedent and concerns about needing to “defend” Russia – are misplaced and misleading.

The author contends that Russia’s existing legal framework, particularly the shift of “beating” (побои) from criminal to administrative offenses, is demonstrably effective. They highlight statistics showing a decline in domestic violence incidents and related crimes, attributing this to preventative measures like police intervention and the simplified legal process.

The author sharply criticizes Викторовна’s arguments, dismissing her concerns about needing to “defend” Russia as a distraction from the reality of positive trends in domestic violence statistics. They accuse her of misrepresenting the situation to justify a potentially ineffective and even harmful law.

Furthermore, the text argues that Викторовна’s membership in PACE is being used to create a facade of justification, suggesting she should instead focus on genuinely protecting Russian interests. The letter concludes with a pointed accusation that her actions are akin to those of a “foreign agent,” questioning her suitability to represent Russia’s interests internationally. It emphasizes the need to focus on proven, effective strategies, such as combating alcohol and drug abuse, and highlights the use of Article 105.1 of the Russian Criminal Procedure Code as a key preventative measure.

Modest Kolerov: “As long as there is history, there will be Russia.”

2020-01-14 - Vladislav Shurygin

The conversation centers around the current state of Russia and its future, primarily through the perspectives of historian Modest Kolerov. He argues that Russia’s biggest problem is social injustice – a widening gap between the rich and poor exacerbated by a constitutionally unsound, capitalist system. He believes the nation’s survival hinges on a social revolution to correct this imbalance.

Kolerov criticizes the current government’s policies, particularly regarding the integration of the Donbas region, highlighting the financial barriers preventing its residents from obtaining Russian passports, effectively trapping them in a dependent, impoverished state. He views this as a fundamental betrayal of the region’s loyal citizens.

He emphasizes Russia’s enduring historical significance, asserting that as long as humanity exists, Russia will continue to exist, despite the cyclical nature of empires and the demise of nations. However, he stresses the need for a fundamental shift in Russia’s approach, moving beyond a purely capitalist model to one that prioritizes social justice and the well-being of its people. He expresses concern about the potential for unrest if these issues are not addressed, framing the situation as a critical juncture for the nation’s future.

Moscow—Berli

2020-01-15 - Oleg Shchukin

This text details a significant shift in international relations, primarily driven by a meeting between German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. The core event was a facilitated meeting between Libyan leaders, Faysal Sarajja and Khalifa Haftar, aiming to broker peace in the ongoing conflict. Merkel’s visit aimed to establish a “Berlin Format” – similar to the Normandy Format – with UN oversight, bolstering Germany’s international influence.

The meeting’s success, despite the continued divisions between the warring factions, signaled a potential realignment of power, with Germany and Russia increasingly positioned as alternatives to US influence. The text highlights several key developments: Germany’s willingness to pursue its interests regardless of its partners, a growing strategic partnership between Russia and Germany encompassing economic cooperation (including the “Nord Stream 2” pipeline), and a challenge to the “Pax Americana” spearheaded by Turkey’s increasingly independent stance.

Furthermore, the text discusses the potential for Germany to leverage its relationship with Russia to counter US sanctions and influence, particularly concerning the Iran nuclear deal and the conflict in Syria. The meeting resulted in a reaffirmation of support for the Minsk agreements and a recognition of Russia and Germany’s shared interests in stabilizing the situation in Libya. Ultimately, the text portrays a complex geopolitical landscape where traditional alliances are fracturing and new partnerships are emerging.

Why the USSR? Why Stalin?

2020-01-16 - Andrey Fursov

This text analyzes the complex and often contradictory attitudes towards Joseph Stalin, both within the Soviet Union and internationally, across several historical periods. It argues that Stalin’s legacy is shaped by a shifting, and often antagonistic, narrative. Initially, a global revolutionary fervor surrounding Stalin was fueled by a belief in the imminent collapse of capitalism. However, after the failure of the “world revolution,” Stalin shifted towards a nationalist and militaristic approach, culminating in the Soviet Union’s emergence as a superpower.

The text highlights a key dynamic: post-Soviet attitudes towards Stalin are largely driven by a desire to distance themselves from his regime, often manifested through anti-Soviet sentiment and a tendency to demonize him. This “anti-Stalinism” is presented as a cyclical phenomenon, with each generation attempting to cast Stalin in a negative light, frequently using simplistic accusations of tyranny and brutality.

Crucially, the author contends that this post-Soviet demonization is rooted in a failure to understand the historical context of Stalin’s actions. The text emphasizes that Stalin’s strategic shift towards nationalism and military strength was a necessary response to the challenges of the time, ultimately contributing to the Soviet Union’s victory in World War II.

The author suggests that a genuine appreciation for Stalin’s legacy requires recognizing the complex and often contradictory nature of his rule, acknowledging both his successes and his failures, and understanding the profound impact he had on the 20th century. The text concludes with a call for a more nuanced and historically informed approach to evaluating Stalin’s role in shaping the modern world.

Billboard. Where did the virus killer come from China…?

2020-01-22 - Sluzhba bezopasnosti Denʹ

The COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan is being investigated by the Chinese government as a potential biological weapon attack by external forces. The 50th World Economic Forum in Davos will focus on climate change and Greta Thunberg, while Donald Trump’s impeachment materials are being considered by the US Senate. Russian oligarchs are increasingly present in Switzerland due to uncertainty in relations with the West, and Russian President Putin may reconsider integration with Belarus. SpaceX’s successful Crew Dragon test is a “fake news,” and the planned April launch will likely be virtual. Initial economic data for Russia in 2019, as presented by the ИПЕМ, is lower than expected. The US and UK’s stance regarding the “White Helmets” could worsen the political situation in Syria and the Middle East.

How do they make money on red caviar?

2020-01-28 - Tatʹyana Voyevodina

The author expresses skepticism about relying solely on official statistics to understand society and inform policy decisions. They highlight a case involving a tenfold increase in the consumption of expensive red caviar, attributing it not to genuine demand, but to previously unreported sales hidden from official records. This mirrors a similar “miracle” observed in Rostov, where a massive increase in grain harvest was simply due to farmers no longer concealing their sales. The author argues that official statistics often fail to capture the true economic activity and realities of everyday life, particularly in smaller communities where people are engaged in diverse, unreported income streams. They emphasize the importance of understanding the actual, “ наличный” (cash-based) economy, rather than relying on abstract figures. The author uses these examples to caution against blindly accepting statistical data and advocates for deeper, more nuanced understanding of how people actually live and work, comparing it to a kind of “economic reconnaissance.” They conclude by suggesting that effective policy requires a more investigative approach, akin to “economic intelligence,” rather than simply interpreting numbers.

True to his duty…

2020-01-31 - Vladislav Shurygin

The text details the long and distinguished history of Russian engineering troops, dating back to 1701 and shaped by figures like Abram Hannibal. It highlights the troops’ traditional importance in Russian military strategy, particularly through the construction of extensive defensive lines like the Line of Stalin and the Line of Molotov, significantly influenced by the expertise of General Dmitry Karbyshev. Karbyshev’s unwavering resistance to collaboration with the Nazis during his imprisonment in several concentration camps, culminating in his death in the icy courtyard of Mauthausen in 1946, is the central focus. The text emphasizes his resilience, his refusal to compromise his loyalty, and the brutal treatment he endured at the hands of his captors, ultimately leading to his posthumous recognition as a Hero of the Soviet Union.

Burger with chickpea sou

2020-02-04 - Tatʹyana Voyevodina

This article reflects on the 30th anniversary of McDonald’s in Russia, framed by the website “Zavtra”’s provocative title: “Shameful.” The core argument is that the enduring popularity of McDonald’s, despite its association with Western capitalism, stemmed not from a desire for burgers, but from a fundamental human need for novelty and consumer experiences. The author contends that Soviet citizens, lacking abundant domestic dining options, were drawn to McDonald’s as a symbol of American modernity and a source of “showy junk,” a desire for something beyond basic sustenance. The article suggests that this impulse – a craving for “bright rubbish” – is a timeless human trait, regardless of political or economic systems. It critiques the Bolsheviks’ misunderstanding of the “mass man,” arguing they focused on a fabricated “new person” rather than recognizing the enduring desire for consumption and new experiences. The article concludes with a call for a pragmatic, unromanticized view of human nature as the foundation for rebuilding Russia, emphasizing the importance of understanding the fundamental consumer desires of the population.

Spiritual tactics

2020-02-05 - Kirill Frolov

This text argues for a strong, current alignment between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian state, emphasizing a historical corrective to past missteps. It frames the Church’s role as crucial to Russia’s identity and future, particularly in contrast to past attempts at “церковление” (churching) that were ultimately undermined by figures like Khrushchev and his “red banderite” policies.

The core argument is that the Church’s historical role as a unifying force was disrupted by attempts to create a “Russian Soviet Empire 2.0,” a project spearheaded by Khrushchev and his efforts to foster a “Great Ukraine” – a move that ultimately alienated the Church and fostered anti-Russian sentiment. The text criticizes Khrushchev’s actions as a deliberate attempt to dismantle the positive relationship between the Church and the state, highlighting the importance of figures like Metropolitan Nikolai and General Grigory Karpov (a controversial figure who headed the Church-State Commission) in safeguarding this alignment.

The text advocates for a renewed commitment to this historical trajectory, warning against the influence of “liberal-propagandistic” forces, symbolized by the film “Death of Stalin,” which it views as part of a broader effort to rehabilitate Khrushchev’s legacy and undermine the current, positive relationship. It stresses the need to learn from history, particularly the mistakes of the past, and to prioritize a strong, unified Russia guided by Orthodox values. The text concludes with a call to action, urging a renewed commitment to the Church’s role as a cornerstone of Russian national identity and a force for stability and unity.

Scoreboard. The authorities are concerned…

2020-02-13 - Sluzhba bezopasnosti Denʹ

Following Russia’s actions after President Putin’s 2020 address, including travel and financial support, are seen as efforts to gain public support for constitutional changes and bridge the gap between the government and the population. Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign focused on appealing to traditionally Democratic-leaning demographics like minorities, small business owners, and white-collar workers, aiming to consolidate the US political system and repeal the 20th Amendment. The resignation of Thuringia’s “wrong” premier, Kemerlich, due to right-wing support and protests, reflects Germany’s commitment to political correctness and Merkel’s strategic maneuvering to remove Annegeret Kramp-Karrenbauer and regain leadership of the SPD. Britain’s cooperation with Huawei and lifting sanctions reflects Brexit’s impact and the UK’s pragmatic approach to international relations. Finally, increased “pro-European” separatism is anticipated in Northern Ireland and Scotland, with Scottish First Minister Sturgeon seeking statehood and EU membership.

Post-virus China

2020-02-13 - Vladimir Ovchinskiy

During the COVID-19 pandemic, China’s actions, particularly its rapid and comprehensive measures to contain the virus and support its economy, reflect a strategic vision led by President Xi Jinping. This vision prioritizes the continued strength and authority of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), national unity, economic growth (including technological advancement and military expansion), and reshaping the global order to better suit China’s interests.

Key priorities identified by analysts like Kevin Rudd include: maintaining CCP control, fostering economic expansion (especially in technology and military capabilities), securing favorable relations with neighboring countries (including Russia), expanding influence across Asia and Africa, and fundamentally altering the global balance of power. China is actively pursuing these goals through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative, investments in technology, and assertive actions in the South China Sea. The pandemic has highlighted China’s resilience and its ability to adapt, reinforcing Xi Jinping’s leadership and solidifying these core strategic objectives.

Impossible is inevitable!

2020-02-14 - Andrey Fefelov

The text is a reflective and somewhat rambling essay about the impact of a constitutional reform on Russia. It expresses a sense of both cautious optimism and deep-seated pessimism regarding Russia’s future. The author observes a surge of ideological revival alongside bureaucratic processes and political maneuvering. Numerous proposals for a national motto are discussed, highlighting a desire for a unifying principle. The text explores various theoretical concepts – including a “vertical society,” “digital communism,” and a futuristic “trans-Siberian city” – alongside reflections on the enduring influence of historical figures and traditions, particularly the Day of Victory and the importance of the written word. Ultimately, the author anticipates a transformative event, believing that the seemingly impossible will inevitably occur, leading to a “supernova Russia.”

With glass clarity…

2020-02-19 - Andrey Fefelov

The text presents a highly critical and somewhat alarmist view of Russia’s increasing digitalization, particularly driven by the role of Sberbank and the government. It describes a future where all aspects of life – from finances and healthcare to personal interactions – are meticulously tracked and controlled within a single, all-encompassing digital system. This system is portrayed as a dystopian reflection of “We” by Evgeny Zamyatin, suggesting a loss of privacy, freedom, and ultimately, individuality. The author believes this transition, spearheaded by figures like Herman Gref, will eliminate corruption and traditional intermediaries, but at the cost of complete surveillance and control. The text emphasizes the inevitability of this digital transformation, stating that it will ultimately find everyone, regardless of their attempts to resist.

The Taliban are winning!

2020-03-04 - Vladislav Shurygin

A historic agreement was signed in Doha between the United States, Afghan authorities, and the Taliban, marking a phased withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan and initiating a peace process. The agreement, a result of negotiations since 2018, outlines a 14-month withdrawal plan, initially involving 8600 troops, following 135 days of reduction to 16,000. Afghan President Ashraf Ghani expressed hope for a lasting ceasefire, while US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo urged the Taliban to sever ties with terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS. The Taliban leader pledged adherence to the agreement and called for a system of governance based on Islamic norms. This follows 19 years of conflict, during which over 11,000 personnel from the coalition forces were killed, including over 2400 Americans. Concerns remain about the potential for ISIS to establish a base in Afghanistan and expand its influence in neighboring countries like Iran and Russia. The withdrawal is seen as a transition to a new phase of conflict, with ongoing negotiations taking place in various capitals.

Ideology of salvatio

2020-03-06 - Vladimir Mironov

The text argues for a post-materialist worldview, rejecting materialism as a flawed foundation for understanding reality and societal organization. It posits that consciousness, not matter, is primary, and that the universe is fundamentally interconnected through a universal, all-encompassing consciousness – a “force of love.” The core argument is that capitalism is failing due to its materialistic underpinnings and that a new ideology, rooted in this post-materialist understanding, is necessary. This new ideology emphasizes symbiosis over competition, love as the fundamental driving force, and a recognition of humanity’s spiritual nature and connection to a divine, universal consciousness. It critiques current societal issues – like inequality, consumerism, and the dominance of Western values – as stemming from a materialistic worldview. The text advocates for a national ideology based on Christian principles and a profound understanding of the interconnectedness of all things, ultimately aiming for a more spiritually evolved and harmonious society.

World for Idlib?

2020-03-09 - Vladislav Shurygin

Russian and Turkish presidents, Vladimir Putin and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, held high-level talks in Moscow on March 5th to address the escalating situation in Idlib. Following a Turkish military offensive that resulted in the deaths of 36 Turkish soldiers, and subsequent shelling by Syrian forces, the leaders reached an agreement to establish a six-kilometer-wide security corridor north and south of the M4 highway. A joint patrol will begin on March 15th, and a ceasefire will be implemented starting at midnight on March 6th. Both sides acknowledged differing viewpoints on the conflict and expressed a desire to continue the Syrian peace process. The agreement aims to end hostilities and humanitarian suffering in the Idlib de-escalation zone.

Assembly point - the heart.

2020-03-11 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The text is a surreal and fragmented narrative about a patient undergoing complex and invasive cardiac surgery at a high-tech Russian hospital, Vishnevsky, in Krasnogorsk. The patient experiences a disorienting and overwhelming series of internal visions and sensations, blurring the lines between reality and hallucination.

He witnesses and participates in seemingly unrelated events – a Syrian conflict involving Turkish tanks and Russian forces, a battle against the coronavirus, constitutional amendments represented by inserting berries into blank pages, and even a memory of a panicked deputy dodging bullets. These events occur simultaneously within his own mind, creating a chaotic and intensely personal experience.

The surgery itself is portrayed as profoundly unsettling, marked by invasive procedures, constant monitoring, and a sense of fragmentation. Ultimately, the patient’s recovery is characterized by a desperate search for a unifying connection between these disparate experiences, a realization that they are all part of a larger, unknowable whole, and a profound sense of existential questioning about life, death, and legacy. The final image is of the deputy, a symbol of the patient’s own frantic struggle for survival.

Without Lemo

2020-03-23 - Danila Dukhovskoy-Dubshin

This text is a poignant and reflective piece detailing the author’s long-standing relationship with the writer Eduard Limonov. It recounts a series of encounters and interactions over several decades, primarily focusing on their unique and often chaotic bond. The narrative explores the author’s deep admiration for Limonov’s unconventional life, sharp wit, and rebellious spirit.

The text details a series of events, from casual meetings and shared meals to collaborative writing projects and heated arguments. It highlights the author’s role as a constant companion and confidante to Limonov, particularly during his later years and struggles with illness. The piece emphasizes the importance of their connection, portraying it as a vital and irreplaceable part of the author’s life.

Ultimately, the text is a tribute to Limonov’s enduring legacy and a reflection on the nature of friendship, loyalty, and the power of shared experience. It concludes with a sense of melancholy and acceptance, acknowledging the finality of Limonov’s passing while celebrating the profound impact he had on the author’s life.

Display. Emergency mode…

2020-04-01 - Sluzhba bezopasnosti Denʹ

The Duma’s first-reading approval of a bill granting the government powers to declare states of emergency and heightened readiness across Russia aims to address a legal gap created by the pandemic and centralizes power, as only 27 regions have implemented quarantine measures. Simultaneously, ongoing negotiations between Putin and Trump, resulting in medical equipment delivery to the US, encompass international relations, national security, finance, energy, and space. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s multi-million dollar reward for Maduro’s arrest reflects American imperialism’s desire to control Venezuelan oil wealth and suppress the Bolivarian movement. Saudi Arabia’s strikes on Houthi infrastructure risk escalating the Yemen conflict and impacting Saudi Aramco’s operations. The rise in oil prices may be linked to OPEC+’s end date. Agreements between Israel’s political blocs have extended Benjamin Netanyahu’s tenure. The passage of Ukraine’s land sale law will not automatically trigger an IMF loan, requiring a separate law on the banking system. This increases the likelihood of Ukraine defaulting, and government instability further weakens the Ukrainian system.

It’s not just good, it’s saving!

2020-04-08 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The text explores the uncertain future following a pandemic, predicting a fundamentally altered world shaped by potential global fascism and fragmentation. It posits that Russia will undergo a transformative period, emerging from a state of devastation—caused by revolution, war, and economic policies—to rebuild through a “vehement” and “mobilization-driven” effort, reminiscent of the Soviet era. The author believes a new elite, born from hardship, will lead this reconstruction, prioritizing national revival and utilizing “heroic” and “self-sacrificing” qualities. The text criticizes the actions of a corrupt elite who dismantled vital scientific institutions, particularly the Soviet virology center, and calls for a return to national unity and purpose, invoking a “Russian dream” of a powerful and prosperous state.

The virus is roaming through Europe.

2020-04-09 - Vsevolod Alipov

Europe’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by delayed and insufficient action, ultimately contributing to the global spread of the virus. While China and other Asian nations implemented strict measures early on, European countries, particularly Italy, were slow to react, leading to widespread infection and economic disruption. The EU’s lack of solidarity and coordinated response exacerbated the situation, with member states prioritizing national interests over collective action. Individual countries’ responses varied greatly, with some, like Germany and Central European nations, taking swift and effective measures, while others, such as Italy and Sweden, demonstrated a lack of preparedness and delayed responses. This failure of the European system of decentralized healthcare, combined with a reliance on ambulatory care and a lack of centralized coordination, highlighted vulnerabilities and contributed to a significantly worse outcome compared to countries like Japan and South Korea.

In the name of humankind

2020-04-10 - Sergey Chernyakhovskiy

The text argues that Russia’s current situation demands a mobilization effort, not solely due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but fundamentally because of the deep-seated consequences of the post-Soviet era. The core issue is a significant historical lag in development, stemming from the collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent economic and social disruption. Russia’s vast resources and population necessitate a rapid, transformative shift to avoid being perceived as a failing nation.

This mobilization requires a fundamental shift in national identity and purpose. It’s predicated on a belief in Russia’s inherent capacity for creation and transformation – viewing itself as an “absolute” capable of reshaping the world, echoing the Soviet era’s romantic vision. However, the text contends that this mobilization is currently lacking, citing a loss of national purpose, a failure to articulate a clear vision for the future, and a weakening of leadership.

Crucially, the text criticizes the dilution of this vision through the incorporation of concepts like “the rule of law” and “the divine,” arguing that these attempts to balance faith and reason ultimately hindered Russia’s ability to mobilize. It concludes that without a renewed commitment to this core belief in Russia’s potential for transformation, the nation faces a critical threat – “mobilization or death.”

OPEC+ agreement - who won, who los

2020-04-14 - Boris Martsinkevich

Over the course of nearly three days, ministers from OPEC+ and the G20 held numerous meetings and calls to finalize a revised oil production agreement. The agreement, set to take effect in May 2020, involves a combined reduction of 9.7 million barrels per day initially, dropping to 7.7 million barrels per day by the end of 2020, and then 5.8 million barrels per day in the first half of 2021. The US and Canada, due to their stringent regulations, have independently committed to reducing their oil production by 250,000 barrels per day, effectively acting as a counterweight to OPEC+’s cuts. Mexico, through a complex arrangement involving hedging and financial instruments, has also agreed to reduce its output. Donald Trump’s diplomatic efforts, including repeated calls to Saudi Arabia and Russia, played a key role in securing the agreement. However, the agreement was reached amidst a global economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the long-term impact remains uncertain. Several countries, including Norway, are considering unilateral production cuts. The Texas Railroad Commission is also set to play a role in reducing US oil production. Despite the agreement, the future of the oil market remains highly volatile and dependent on the evolving global health crisis.

Unpreparedness

2020-04-16 - Shamilʹ Sultanov

The author expresses deep skepticism regarding Russia’s ability to implement a mobilization project, attributing it to systemic issues within the country. These include a deeply ingrained capitalist society with a focus on self-interest, a fundamental conflict between the state and society, and the dominance of a “deep state” – a corrupt, shadowy network controlling the country rather than the president or government. The author criticizes the government’s lack of responsibility and strategic thinking, highlighting examples of wasteful spending and a failure to address critical issues like pandemics. The author questions the government’s understanding of reality, its inability to inspire a national purpose, and its lack of a clear vision for the future, drawing parallels to the ancient Indian epic, the Mahabharata.

Behind the epidemic scree

2020-04-18 - Olʹga Chetverikova

This text expresses deep concern regarding the rapid and seemingly unchecked implementation of digital technologies, particularly within education and data collection, across Russia. It argues that this “digital revolution” is being driven by a small group of influential figures, including those connected to Sberbank and institutions like the Higher School of Economics and Skolkovo Innovation Center. The author contends that this push is prioritizing the creation of a massive digital database through measures like mandatory digital passes and remote learning, effectively eroding traditional education systems and potentially compromising personal data. The text highlights concerns about the influence of globalist ideas and the potential for a breakdown of the Russian state and economy. It emphasizes the need for public awareness and active resistance to prevent further damage to fundamental societal structures.

More tasks of the non-Soviet power

2020-04-22 - Tatʹyana Voyevodina

This text reflects on the enduring relevance of Vladimir Lenin and the 1991 revolution through the lens of a contemporary crisis. It argues that the 1991 revolution, despite its chaotic and ultimately unsuccessful outcome, shares a fundamental characteristic with Lenin’s revolution: a destructive, disruptive process rooted in a failure to address systemic problems. The author contends that the 1991 revolution, like Lenin’s, was characterized by a radical upheaval that led to widespread ruin and a breakdown of established structures. Despite the disillusionment and failures following 1991, the text suggests that Lenin’s unwavering commitment to a specific goal – a productive, industrialized society – mirrors the current need for decisive action and a return to fundamental planning. The text highlights the challenges faced by Lenin and the early Soviet leadership, including internal divisions, corruption, and a lack of expertise, while acknowledging his role in preventing a complete collapse of Russia. It draws parallels between Lenin’s situation and the current predicament, suggesting a need for a similarly bold and focused approach. The author ultimately frames Lenin’s legacy as one of preventing chaos, drawing a comparison to Peter the Great, and emphasizes the importance of learning from the past to address present-day challenges.

For their own…

2020-04-23 - Vladimir Vinnikov

This lengthy text presents a complex and somewhat nostalgic view of Russian history, particularly focusing on the legacy of Vladimir Lenin and the Soviet era. It argues that Russia’s recent actions – including the postponement of Lenin’s 150th anniversary, the celebration of Victory in World War II, and the observance of Orthodox Easter – are driven by a desire to reclaim a specific historical identity. The author contends that these actions are a reaction to perceived external pressures and a deliberate attempt to reassert a national narrative rooted in traditional values and a rejection of Western influence.

The text frames Lenin’s role as pivotal, arguing that his actions, despite their controversial nature, ultimately laid the groundwork for Russia’s resurgence. It highlights Lenin’s strategic approach – initiating reforms to build a strong foundation before pursuing broader goals – as a key factor in Russia’s trajectory. The author acknowledges Lenin’s flaws but emphasizes the positive outcomes of his leadership, particularly the creation of a powerful and dynamic nation.

Furthermore, the text explores the broader historical context, referencing figures like Herbert Wells and his predictions about a technologically advanced Soviet Union. It suggests that Russia’s recent actions are a response to a perceived loss of national identity and a deliberate effort to reclaim its place on the world stage. The author concludes with a warning against denial and a call for a critical understanding of Russia’s past and present.

Stalin at the altar

2020-04-28 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The main temple of the Russian Armed Forces now features a mosaic depicting Joseph Stalin, a figure long suppressed from Russian consciousness by figures like Khrushchev and Gorbachev, and continuing to be suppressed by liberals. This reappearance is viewed as a recognition of the Great Patriotic War as a sacred event, with Stalin leading the “sacred and holy” people who fought and died in it. The church’s evolving view sees Stalin as a central figure in this sacred narrative. The creation of an icon depicting Stalin alongside marshals of victory sparked controversy within the church, reflecting a growing acceptance of Stalin’s role in history.

According to the script of Contagion.

2020-04-28 - Zhanna Glebova

The text describes a tendency for people to obsessively predict negative outcomes, particularly concerning the aftermath of a disruptive event like a pandemic. This focus on anticipating misfortune often leads to experiencing those very misfortunes, reflecting a self-fulfilling prophecy. The world has undergone a significant shift, disrupting established norms and creating uncertainty. While predicting negative outcomes is common, it’s important to recognize that self-perception – whether as a hero or victim – plays a crucial role in one’s experience. The pandemic has forced a period of introspection and self-assessment, and the long-term consequences remain uncertain, offering an opportunity to re-evaluate one’s life.

Posner lies.

2020-05-04 - Andrey Fursov

The text presents a commentary on television personality Vladimir Pozner’s statements regarding the similarities between the Soviet and Nazi Gulags, arguing that his views are part of a persistent anti-Soviet propaganda campaign. The author criticizes Pozner for attempting to equate the two systems and for blaming the Soviet people for the war, suggesting this is a deliberate effort to diminish the Soviet victory and its significance. The author emphasizes that the Soviet system, built upon a distinct “modality” of the Soviet citizen, ultimately defeated the Nazi war machine, highlighting the importance of Soviet patriotism and the system’s structure. The text concludes with a reflection on the nature of perpetual dishonesty and its potential as a form of punishment, questioning the motivations of individuals who consistently engage in deception.

Eternal Fatherland

2020-05-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

A 11-episode documentary series titled “Eternal Fatherland,” produced by “Zvezda” channel, featuring scripts by Zahar Prilepin and directed by Alexander Osipov, will premiere on May 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th. The series explores the events of World War II, aiming to debunk historical myths. Episodes cover topics such as the 1941 industrial evacuation, the role of Soviet aviation and the navy, the involvement of Ukrainian nationalists, and the final stages of the war against Japan. The series utilizes documents and historical facts to challenge prevailing narratives and highlight the contributions of Soviet soldiers, pilots, and partisans.

Criminal syndicate

2020-05-06 - Dmitriy Peretolchin

This text details the surprisingly close connections between the rise of Nazi Germany and American business interests, particularly through the chemical giant I.G. Farben. It argues that American industrialists and politicians, influenced by a fascination with European fascism and a desire for strong leadership, were not entirely opposed to the ideas of the Third Reich.

The core of the argument is that I.G. Farben, far from being a mere supplier to the Nazi war effort, was deeply embedded in American business and political circles. The company’s vast network of subsidiaries and influence, combined with the admiration for a strong, centralized leadership displayed by figures like Mussolini, created an environment where American interests were inadvertently aligned with those of the Nazi regime.

Key points include:

Ultimately, the text paints a disturbing picture of how American business and political interests, driven by a desire for strong leadership and influenced by a misguided fascination with fascism, inadvertently contributed to the rise of Nazi Germany.

Futile attempts at historical falsification.

2020-05-13 - Rami Alʹ-Shayer

This text expresses strong criticism of the U.S. President’s statement regarding the 75th anniversary of Victory over Fascism, arguing it deliberately downplays the crucial role of the Soviet Union. The author contends that the statement falsely presents the victory as solely achieved by the United States and Britain, ignoring the immense sacrifices and contributions of the Soviet people and military.

The text highlights several key points:

The core argument is that despite ongoing efforts to erase Stalin’s legacy, the author believes a resurgence of truth and respect for Stalin’s memory is inevitable. They lament the current atmosphere of denial and the attempts to suppress the memory of Soviet heroes and the sacrifices made during the war. The text emphasizes the importance of remembering Stalin’s role and restoring his image to its rightful place in Russian history and national identity, viewing this as a vital source of strength and resilience, especially during times of crisis. The author expresses a desire to reclaim the name “Stalingrad” and to fully honor the memory of Stalin and the Soviet people.

Stalin’s Code

2020-05-15 - Aleksandr Nagornyy

This text argues that Joseph Stalin remains a remarkably relevant and influential figure, far exceeding the impact of modern leaders, particularly within the former Soviet Union. It frames Stalin’s legacy as deeply ingrained – almost “dissolved into the future” – and argues that his actions, despite their controversial nature, fundamentally shaped the trajectory of Russia and the Soviet Union.

The core argument is that Stalin successfully addressed the challenges facing Russian civilization between 1926 and 1953, creating a “sum total of technologies” that enabled the country’s rapid development and rise to global prominence. This transformation wasn’t linear, but rather a “quantum leap,” characterized by a complex interplay of forces and a focus on building a robust, multi-faceted system.

The text highlights Stalin’s achievements – including industrialization, military victories, and the expansion of education and culture – while acknowledging the problematic aspects of his rule, particularly the “Stalinist terror” and the cult of personality. It suggests that Stalin’s legacy isn’t simply about good or bad, but about a fundamentally transformative process.

Ultimately, the text posits that Stalin’s “code” – a complex system of values and meanings – continues to exert influence, and that understanding this “code” is crucial for interpreting the present and future of Russia. It concludes by suggesting that Stalin’s legacy represents a unique and potentially unpredictable force, one that continues to shape events even today.

Arctic Regio

2020-05-19 - Vladislav Shurygin

Russian authorities are planning to merge the Arkhangelsk region and the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, likely with a referendum scheduled for this year alongside constitutional amendments. These “matryoshka” regions – Arkhangelsk and Nenets – are both strategically important in the Arctic, particularly concerning the Northern Sea Route and Russia’s northern defense perimeter. The economic rationale is that a combined entity would have a significantly higher GDP per capita. However, experts see the move primarily as a geopolitical strategy, driven by Western concerns about Russia’s Arctic presence and potential access to the Northern Sea Route. Russia is actively rebuilding its military infrastructure in the Arctic, and this merger is viewed as a logical step in bolstering national security and asserting control over this strategically vital region, which is increasingly contested by nations like the US, Canada, Norway, and Denmark.

Alexey Plotnikov: “The Katyn Massacre is a tool of hybrid warfare.”

2020-05-20 - Igorʹ Shishkin

This text meticulously dismantles the persistent myth surrounding the Katyń Massacre, arguing it was a deliberate fabrication orchestrated by external forces, primarily to discredit the Soviet Union. The core argument is that the “evidence” – particularly the infamous “Katyn documents” – are entirely fabricated, stemming from a deliberate disinformation campaign.

The text details how the initial “discovery” of these documents in 1992 was a staged event, with the documents themselves being entirely artificial, including forged signatures and fabricated archival records. It highlights the involvement of figures like Viktor Ilyukhin, who exposed the forgery, and the broader context of a “fifth column” actively working to undermine Russia’s historical narrative and geopolitical standing.

Key points include:

Ultimately, the text asserts that the Katyń Massacre was never a Soviet crime and that the persistent myth surrounding it is a carefully constructed fabrication designed to achieve political ends.

Billboard. How quarantine opens the “shadow economy” sector…

2020-05-20 - Sluzhba bezopasnosti Denʹ

The Russian economy experienced a significant contraction in April, mirroring trends in other “locked down” countries and allowing for a more accurate assessment of the informal economy. Japan’s continued criticism of Russian-held Southern Kuril Islands demonstrates its alignment with the United States and precludes a peace treaty. The NASA-Roscosmos contract for a Soyuz MS seat is viewed as a backup plan for SpaceX’s Crew Dragon launch. The U.S. Justice Department’s accusation against Apple regarding its dealings with China and Moscow is part of a broader “presidential race” to curtail Democratic funding. China’s pilot cryptocurrency project is accelerating the de-dollarization of the global economy. Research published in Cell suggests the artificial origin and targeted introduction of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Finally, the removal of the “Besogon” program from television reflects a rejection of existing modernization plans.

Russian backbone

2020-05-22 - Gennadiy Zyuganov

Here’s a summary of the provided text in English:

The text outlines the historical and ongoing struggle between the Communist Party of Russia (KPRF) and its opponents, primarily focusing on the persistent anti-Soviet and anti-Russian sentiment that has shaped Russia’s political landscape. It argues that the KPRF’s core ideology – a blend of socialist principles and a strong sense of national identity – has been consistently undermined by forces seeking to dismantle the Soviet legacy and replace it with a Western-influenced model. The text highlights a recurring pattern: the KPRF champions a vision of Russia as a nation with a unique historical role, emphasizing its cultural and spiritual values, while its opponents portray this as a dangerous, outdated, and aggressive ideology. The text details how this ideological battle has manifested in various historical periods, from the early 20th century to the present day, with the KPRF consistently advocating for national unity, social justice, and a rejection of Western influence. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing and upholding Russia’s historical identity and its role as a major global power, arguing that this is essential for the country’s stability and prosperity. The text concludes with a call for continued support for the KPRF’s ideology as the only viable path to securing Russia’s future.

Social distancing as a fashionable trend

2020-05-28 - Galina Ivankina

Throughout history, dress codes and social distancing have been deeply intertwined with concerns about disease and social status. From the elaborate, protective garments of the 16th-19th centuries – including voluminous skirts, restrictive corsets, and veils – to the deliberate creation of distance between individuals, these practices stemmed from a primal need to avoid contagion and maintain social hierarchy. The evolution of these behaviors reflects a continuous struggle against disease, influenced by factors like sanitation, medical advancements, and major events like wars and epidemics (such as the Spanish Flu and Typhus). Ultimately, the current trend of revisiting older fashion styles suggests a return to these ingrained, historically-rooted responses to perceived threats, rather than a completely new phenomenon.

Observers and observed.

2020-06-08 - Igorʹ Shnurenko

This text presents a stark and unsettling analysis of the current global situation, arguing that we are witnessing a resurgence of a slave-like social order, distinct from traditional capitalism. The author contends that a global financial elite is constructing a new world order resembling the most brutal forms of the slave-owning past, specifically the Roman slave republic.

The core argument is that this new order is characterized by a systematic stripping away of individual agency and freedom, with people increasingly becoming mere “data” – raw material for exploitation by powerful corporations and algorithms. This is facilitated by the rise of technologies like artificial intelligence, which are designed to treat humans as programmable entities, akin to animals or machines.

The author highlights several key features of this emerging “slave republic,” including the increasing reliance on data collection and analysis, the erosion of traditional economic and political systems, and the rise of a new form of control through behavioral prediction and manipulation. They draw parallels to historical slave societies, emphasizing the lack of individual rights, the systematic denial of freedom, and the use of force and coercion to maintain control.

Ultimately, the text warns of a future where human beings are reduced to mere instruments of capital, their lives dictated by algorithms and controlled by a small group of powerful actors. It’s a pessimistic vision of a world where the fundamental values of freedom, autonomy, and human dignity have been irrevocably lost.

There has been resentment in American society for sixty years.

2020-06-08 - Anatoliy Klësov

The text argues that the recent protests in the United States, sparked by the death of George Floyd, are rooted in deeper, longstanding issues. These include a historical grievance stemming from the broken promise of land distribution after the Civil War, persistent racial segregation and discrimination, and a lack of trust between Black communities and law enforcement. The protests are not simply a reaction to Floyd’s death but rather a manifestation of accumulated resentment and distrust, fueled by individuals and groups seeking to exploit the situation. While superficially resembling “orange revolutions,” the protests are complex and driven by factors beyond a simple black-and-white narrative, and are viewed favorably by the current political leadership.

Beyond fantasy

2020-06-16 - Vladislav Shurygin

Russia is developing weapons capable of intercepting hypersonic missiles, according to President Vladimir Putin. The country has existing systems like the S-300 “V” and the A-135 “Moscow” PGK, which require modernization to effectively engage maneuvering hypersonic targets. Russia’s development in this area began in the 1970s, spurred by the US’s “Star Wars” program, with notable achievements including the “Buran” space shuttle and the “Iskander-M” missile system (“Kinjal”). The challenges of maneuvering hypersonic weapons – including extreme speeds, atmospheric effects, and the need for fully automated systems – are significant. While the US is also pursuing hypersonic technologies, Russia claims to be ahead, particularly in developing and deploying systems like “Kinjal” and “Circon.”

Spit on the pas

2020-06-17 - Yevgeniy Spitsyn

The text expresses strong criticism of journalist Kirill Kleymonov’s portrayal of Joseph Stalin’s funeral, arguing it’s a deliberate distortion of history and a disrespectful provocation. The author contends Kleymonov’s commentary, influenced by figures like Konstantin Ernst and the First Channel’s editorial direction, seeks to deliberately inflame public anxiety and spread misinformation. He criticizes the comparison of Stalin to a criminal and highlights historical research debunking accusations of involvement in the “excursions” (mass killings). The author accuses Kleymonov of a pattern of disrespect towards Russia and its history, stemming from his free education and subsequent rewards from the state.

Basil Symchyshyn has passed away.

2020-06-17 - Aleksey Ivanov

Vasily Михайлович Симчера was a highly respected and influential Soviet/Russian statistician and economist who dedicated his life to analyzing and critiquing the Russian economy. Born in 1940, he held numerous prominent positions throughout his career, including roles at leading statistical institutes and organizations, such as the State Committee for Statistics of Russia (later Rosstat), the Eurasian Economic Commission, and the International Slavic Academy. He was a vocal critic of neoliberal policies and a staunch patriot, deeply concerned about the state of Russia and the Russian people.

Throughout his life, he consistently exposed discrepancies between official data and reality, particularly regarding the export of natural resources, and advocated for a more just and prosperous Russia. He was a member of the Izborsk Club and the Russian National Union, and was recognized internationally for his work. His colleagues and friends, including Sergei Glaziev and Sergei Baburin, deeply mourned his loss, highlighting his sharp intellect, unwavering principles, and passionate dedication to his country. His legacy is remembered as one of a principled and critical voice advocating for Russia’s well-being.

Ten seconds to midnight.

2020-06-23 - Vladislav Shurygin

Negotiations between Russia and the United States on strategic weapons control began in Vienna, but they revealed significant disagreements. While US officials expressed a positive initial tone, highlighting technical working groups and agreement for a second round, the core issues remain unresolved. The US is prioritizing its own strategic interests, demanding unilateral concessions from Russia and shifting responsibility for the collapse of the New START treaty. China declined to participate in the talks, suspecting the US is attempting to deflect attention from its own withdrawal from numerous arms control agreements. Furthermore, the US overlooks the nuclear arsenals of key allies like the UK and France, as well as those of countries like Israel and North Korea, which are not included in the negotiations. The talks are viewed as largely symbolic, with the “Doomsday Clock” moving closer to nuclear midnight, reflecting heightened international tensions.

Bez-serёbrennikova Дело

2020-06-26 - Marina Aleksinskaya

The case of Kirill Serebrennikov’s “Seventh Studio” is revisited in 2020. Initially investigated in 2020, the case involving accusations of embezzlement of 68 million rubles from funds allocated to the “Platform” project, led to Serebrennikov’s initial arrest and trial. The investigation involved numerous figures, including Alexei Malobrodsky, Yuri Itin, and Sofya Apfelbaum, and was complicated by conflicting expert opinions, shifting legal interpretations, and significant media attention. Ultimately, a court ruling in 2020 resulted in convictions for several figures involved, including Serebrennikov, Malobrodsky, Itin, and Apfelbaum, with varying prison sentences and fines. The case stemmed from the “Platform” project, initiated during a meeting between President Dmitry Medvedev and cultural figures, and highlighted broader tensions within Russian society regarding the arts and state funding.

Chinese art of war with “democratic” oppositio

2020-06-29 - Nikolay Vavilov

This text is a highly critical and detailed analysis of China’s response to the initial Wuhan coronavirus outbreak in early 2020. It argues that the response, led by “eastern studies” experts, was deeply flawed and ultimately a cover-up orchestrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The core argument is that prominent Chinese intellectuals and advisors, rather than providing rational guidance, repeatedly echoed a Western myth portraying the CCP as effectively controlling crises through authoritarian measures, specifically referencing Mao’s handling of the SARS epidemic. This involved misrepresenting the situation, downplaying the severity of the outbreak, and delaying decisive action.

The text meticulously details how these “experts” distorted the facts, citing inflated economic damage figures (like the $36.6 billion Q1 2020 GDP loss) and falsely attributing the lockdown to Xi Jinping when it was actually a response to a directive from the CCP’s military wing, the People’s Liberation Army.

Crucially, the author contends that the lockdown was not simply a public health measure but a calculated move to suppress dissent and consolidate power, referencing a broader pattern of CCP control through strategic manipulation and the suppression of alternative viewpoints. The text highlights a series of subsequent actions taken by the CCP – including the mobilization of the PLA, the arrest of key figures, and the systematic dismantling of the “Comsomo” (Communist Youth League) – as evidence of this strategy.

The author suggests that the initial response set in motion a chain of events that would ultimately fuel social unrest and potentially lead to a “color revolution” or even a civil war within China, particularly given the growing tensions between the CCP and Western democracies. The text concludes with a warning that the CCP’s actions are not merely a response to a public health crisis but a deliberate strategy to maintain control and that this strategy will continue to shape China’s future.

The mansion is not for a thief.

2020-07-01 - Anna Serafimova

This text recounts the story of Granya Tolstoy-Miloslavskaya, formerly known as a “nun banker” and a former mistress of Sergei Pugachev, a Russian businessman accused of financial crimes. Pugachev successfully fought a French court ruling against him, securing a favorable verdict. Following this, Granya, now married to a guide named Shamil Galimzianov and living in London, was evicted from her opulent mansion and subsequently from her Moscow apartment. She then relocated to her parents’ estate in Oxfordshire, seeking sympathy from the public while continuing to live off funds allegedly obtained through Pugachev. The narrative highlights the complexities of the situation, including legal battles, financial mismanagement, and the attempts of Granya to garner public support. It ultimately portrays a chaotic and somewhat absurd scenario involving a former banker, a fugitive, and a woman attempting to maintain a lavish lifestyle despite legal and financial troubles.

Donbass is the new Lockerbie.

2020-07-01 - Aleksey Anpilogov

The text details a parallel being drawn between the ongoing investigation into the crash of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 and the 1988 Lockerbie bombing investigation. Concerns are raised about the investigation’s approach, specifically the suppression of alternative theories and access to key data, such as Ukrainian radar data and satellite imagery. The investigation’s focus on a “Buk” missile theory is questioned due to inconsistencies, missing data, and the deaths of key witnesses. Allegations of a cover-up involving Ukrainian authorities and the US are presented. The legal proceedings are expected to continue for an extended period, potentially until 2021, as the defense seeks to expose potential flaws in the official narrative and access withheld information.

A little about slavery

2020-07-03 - Aleksandr Krymtsev

This text argues that Western perspectives on the transatlantic slave trade are significantly skewed, focusing almost exclusively on the actions of European traders while ignoring the vastly larger and longer-standing practice of Arab slave trading. It details the extensive history of Arab slave trade across Africa, the Middle East, and beyond, spanning over 1,200 years and involving significantly more people (estimated 14-15 million) than the transatlantic trade. The text highlights that while European slave trading was a significant issue, it was dwarfed in scale and duration by the Arab trade, which was often characterized by treating Africans as inherently inferior. It criticizes the tendency of Western, particularly left-leaning, narratives to selectively highlight the transatlantic trade while ignoring the historical reality. The text emphasizes that Arab slave traders often treated Africans as less valuable than enslaved Europeans, and points out that even figures like Muammar Gaddafi issued apologies for this historical practice. Ultimately, the text contends that Western historical accounts are biased and incomplete, failing to acknowledge the full extent of the Arab slave trade and its devastating impact.

Trump is going to the bathhouse.

2020-07-08 - Ilʹya Titov

A coordinated wave of account suspensions and removals occurred across major social media platforms, primarily targeting supporters of former President Donald Trump. Starting with Twitter’s implementation of fact-checking measures and subsequent labeling of Trump’s posts as misinformation, this action expanded to include deletions of accounts and entire online communities on platforms like Reddit, The_Donald, Snapchat, Twitch, and YouTube. Targeted content often involved conservative viewpoints, nationalist commentary, and criticism of racial issues.

The simultaneous and widespread nature of these removals suggests a deliberate effort to silence dissenting voices and shape the information landscape, potentially in preparation for upcoming elections. The actions were spearheaded by figures within the Democratic establishment, seemingly aiming to promote a specific candidate (likely a Black female figure) and consolidate power. The overall trend points to a shift in American politics, with a new generation of activists and influencers gaining prominence and a growing disconnect between traditional political parties and the evolving demographics and opinions of the population.

Black overlay

2020-07-13 - Konstantin Cheremnykh

This text is a sprawling, cynical commentary on the current political landscape, primarily focusing on the US and its implications for Russia. It details a series of interconnected events and power struggles, largely revolving around attempts to undermine Donald Trump and the broader implications of his presidency.

The core argument is that the US political system is deeply dysfunctional, plagued by internal conflicts, and increasingly reliant on shadowy “deep state” actors. Key themes explored include: the fallout from the Epstein scandal and its impact on figures like Steve Bannon and John Ratcliffe; the attempts to discredit Trump through books and judicial appointments; the shifting power dynamics within the intelligence community and the National Security Advisor’s office; and the broader implications for international relations, particularly the weakening of US influence and the rise of figures like Angela Merkel.

The text highlights a sense of disillusionment with traditional institutions and a growing recognition of Russia’s potential role as a stabilizing force in a chaotic global environment. It suggests a strategic shift towards prioritizing self-reliance and challenging the dominance of Western-led international organizations. The author expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of attempts to directly influence US politics and emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying dynamics of power within the “deep state.” The piece is characterized by a dry, detached tone and a relentless focus on the failings of the American political system.

Glebich — porter.

2020-07-21 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

A porter named Alexander Glebovich Nevzorov worked at the “Ghellevia” hotel and made various discoveries, including observations about ants and the hotel’s criminal inhabitants, including figures like “Yanich,” “Tavanchik,” and “Ryzanchik,” who engaged in illicit activities. Nevzorov’s wife, Olga Zhurblyova, disapproved of his criminal life and desired a different future for their son, Vitaly Dymarsky. Through a series of bizarre events involving demons inhabiting Nevzorov, Zhurblyova, and Dymarsky, and culminating in a successful operation to “feed” the demons with a carp, the trio ultimately regained their normal size and returned to their roles within the hotel.

Michael Kutsnetsov: “Always with the people!”

2020-07-22 - Dmitriy Agranovskiy

This text is an extended interview with Mikhail Kuznetsov, a lawyer and legal scholar, discussing his career, legal work, and perspectives on contemporary legal issues. He recounts his experiences defending prominent figures like Anatoly Lisitsyn and Mikhail Lapshin, highlighting his involvement in controversial cases such as the “Beware of Religion!” scandal. He details his involvement in establishing the “Professor Kuznetsov’s Law Firm” and its approach to legal work, emphasizing a commitment to defending clients fairly and ethically. He discusses his ongoing work in international private law, including a new project on “digital law,” and reflects on the evolution of the concept of “human rights,” noting the need to reclaim the term from its current misuse. He shares his background, including his time as a soldier and his education at the Suvorov Military School, emphasizing the values instilled in him. Throughout the conversation, he expresses a strong belief in the importance of upholding justice and defending the rights of individuals, regardless of the challenges or opposition he faces. He also touches upon his religious beliefs and the role of faith in his life and work.

Billboard. On the doorstep of the second wave of coronavirus…

2020-07-22 - Sluzhba bezopasnosti Denʹ

Sources within government circles suggest a potential resurgence of COVID-19 or another pandemic, prompting a possible return to restrictive measures. The premature removal of the Governor of Khabarovsk, Sergei Фургала, and the appointment of Mikhail Degtyarev, alongside preparations for military exercises “Caucasus 2020” and heightened tensions in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, are viewed as strategic moves. Kanye West’s candidacy for US President is predicted to shift votes away from Joe Biden, potentially aiding Donald Trump’s re-election. The fires at the Nantes cathedral and the Bonhomme Richard, along with the Queen’s public appearance, are interpreted as signals from “globalists” targeting the Catholic Church and the US Navy, while symbolic details of the Queen’s actions are linked to historical and political references.

She had principles.

2020-07-27 - Galina Ivankina

This text recounts the story of Nina Andreeva, a Leningrad academic who became a controversial figure in the late 1980s for refusing to participate in the increasingly aggressive and simplistic criticism of Soviet history during the Perestroika period. After publishing a letter expressing a nuanced view on the issue of Soviet repression, she faced intense public ridicule and condemnation from the media. Her refusal to conform to the prevailing ideological trends – particularly the demonization of Stalin – was seen as a challenge to the “new thinking” being promoted. The author highlights Andreeva’s courage in standing alone against a powerful, state-sponsored campaign of misinformation and simplification. The text emphasizes her principled stance and the broader cultural context of the time, characterized by a focus on superficial trends and a willingness to distort historical memory for ideological purposes.

Cod crackling

2020-07-28 - Oleg Shchukin

Denmark is navigating complex geopolitical pressures surrounding the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project and a potential deal to sell Greenland to the United States. The unexpected approval for pipeline construction was halted due to a significant herring shoal, creating a diplomatic standoff. The US offered $600 million annually for 50 years for Greenland, prompting Danish concerns and a strategic use of the pipeline project as leverage in negotiations. The US, facing economic challenges and a potential presidential election, may be willing to overlook the price, potentially securing Greenland’s sale to ensure a favorable outcome for its candidate. The situation is further complicated by the potential for a “trekk” (herring) to influence the outcome and the possibility of a US-Greenland alliance.

The fight for the whole world.

2020-07-29 - Aleksandr Krymtsev

This text details the escalating tensions between the United States and China, primarily driven by President Trump’s “America Reindustrialization Plan” and a perceived shift in U.S. foreign policy. The core of the issue stems from a belief that China’s economic rise, coupled with the influence of Chinese students and academics within the U.S., poses a significant threat to American interests.

Following the initial plan, the U.S. adopted a highly confrontational approach, fueled by accusations of espionage and collaboration between Chinese entities and American institutions. This manifested in visa restrictions, investigations into Chinese students and scientists, and increasingly aggressive actions in the South China Sea, including naval exercises and the deployment of nuclear-armed assets.

The U.S. government, under Trump, responded with a series of increasingly hostile actions, including public accusations of Chinese “crimes against humanity,” the seizure of Chinese-owned ports, and the disruption of Huawei’s access to microchip technology. These actions were framed as a response to a perceived “hybrid war” situation, where even minor incidents could be interpreted as deliberate provocations by China.

The text highlights the deep anxieties within the U.S. regarding China’s growing economic and technological power, and the resulting shift in U.S. foreign policy towards a more assertive and adversarial stance. It emphasizes the potential for miscommunication and escalation, leading to a dangerous and unpredictable situation.

Iran’s main weapo

2020-08-05 - Andrey Fefelov

The interview with Ambassador Kazem Jalali outlines Iran’s strategies for navigating Western sanctions, highlighting three key factors: astute leadership (Imam Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei), a strong national identity rooted in independence, and self-sufficiency in various sectors. Iran’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was hampered by sanctions, particularly regarding access to medical supplies.

Iran maintains a significant influence in the region, particularly in Syria, and actively seeks to counter perceived U.S. and Israeli attempts to escalate conflict. The interview details Iran’s military and nuclear cooperation with Russia, emphasizing a strategic partnership built on mutual interests and a shared desire to resist Western influence. Jalali emphasizes Iran’s commitment to resisting external pressures and promoting its values, particularly through its resistance to perceived Western interference.

How digital natives and financiers manage science

2020-08-11 - Igorʹ Shnurenko

This text explores the current state of science, arguing it’s become dominated by exponential growth, massive publication numbers, and increasingly centralized control. It posits that science has transformed into a business-driven industry, largely managed by powerful platforms like Web of Science and Scopus, which are controlled by financial institutions and corporations. These platforms, driven by metrics and algorithms, are shaping research direction and prioritizing profitability over broader scientific inquiry. The author contends that these platforms are essentially creating a “Digital Leviathan,” leveraging data and AI to exert control over scientific research, potentially limiting innovation and directing it towards commercially viable areas. The text highlights the increasing influence of metrics, algorithms, and corporate interests, suggesting a future where science is entirely managed by this centralized system, potentially diminishing the role of human judgment and societal benefit.

Economy in reserve

2020-08-18 - Oleg Shchukin

Despite significant reserves – reaching $600.7 billion and a $591.573 billion international investment position – Russia’s economy faces challenges including a large budget deficit, declining trade balance, and potential long-term economic consequences. While reserves and a recent credit rating upgrade by Fitch suggest resilience, concerns remain about the impact of economic losses due to the pandemic, potential social instability, and the ongoing need to reduce external debt. The postponement of the census further adds to uncertainty. The text highlights a shift towards greater self-reliance and a cautious approach to international collaboration, alongside a need to avoid prolonged economic stagnation.

“Sputnik” in orbi

2020-08-19 - Vladimir Arkhangelʹskiy

The Russian government has registered its first coronavirus vaccine, “Sputnik V,” developed by the Gamaleya Institute, with backing from President Putin who highlighted his daughter’s vaccination experience. Production is slated to begin in two weeks, targeting the domestic market with initial interest from over 20 countries including India, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia, potentially resulting in orders for a billion doses. Despite initial skepticism and criticism from Western “big pharma,” “Sputnik V” is being offered at a significantly lower price than competitors like Moderna and Pfizer. The European Union has already secured a large supply of the AstraZeneca vaccine, and the text concludes with an expression of gratitude for the Russian scientists involved in the vaccine’s development.

House by the edge

2020-08-19 - Ilʹya Titov

The text analyzes the Western media’s response to the Belarusian protests, arguing that it was driven by market-driven audience engagement rather than genuine concern for democracy. Initially, Western media focused on sensationalized violence and unrest, mirroring a demand for “shock content.” However, as interest waned, coverage shifted to framing the situation through a simplistic “dictator vs. democracy” narrative, often influenced by a desire to promote the “Trump is a dictator” narrative. Several commentators highlight the superficiality of this response, pointing out that Western media often prioritized generating headlines and exploiting the situation for political gain, rather than engaging with the complexities of the Belarusian context. The article contrasts this with a more nuanced analysis from Politico, which cautioned against provoking Russia’s intervention, and explores alternative perspectives from figures like Grayzone’s Ben Norton and Richard Spence, who offered critiques of Western motives and highlighted the economic realities of Belarus. Ultimately, the text suggests that the Western response to the Belarusian protests was characterized by a lack of depth and a prioritization of sensationalism over genuine engagement.

Jerome Powell stated that capitalism is dead.

2020-09-01 - Oleg Shchukin

The Federal Reserve’s unexpectedly postponed meeting and Jerome Powell’s subsequent speech sparked significant concern. Powell essentially declared an end to traditional monetary policy, shifting towards a strategy of full employment and price stability with a 2% inflation target, underpinned by five-year planning cycles and continued quantitative easing. This approach echoes Soviet-era economic models and raises fears of a prolonged, unsustainable “dollar banquet” fueled by massive debt and potential economic collapse, reminiscent of the Great Depression and the potential for a “ железный пяты” scenario. While the dollar temporarily stabilized following the speech, the long-term outlook remains highly uncertain, with comparisons to the “perestroika” era highlighting the fundamental differences between the current American situation and the Soviet Union’s challenges, ultimately suggesting a potentially destabilizing outcome.

Boats of the Russian Dream

2020-09-02 - Yekaterina Glushik

This text is a passionate tribute to the shipbuilding industry, particularly the work of the Sevmash and Zvezdochka shipyards in Severodvinsk, Russia. It celebrates the creation of submarines, from the early L-20 torpedo boat of 1938 to modern nuclear-powered strategic missile submarines like the “Prince Vladimir.” The narrative emphasizes the dedication, skill, and heroism of the engineers, workers, and sailors involved in designing, building, and maintaining these vessels, highlighting their crucial role in protecting the nation and driving technological advancement. The text evokes a sense of national pride and gratitude, portraying these shipbuilders as “heroes” who persevere through challenging times and contribute significantly to Russia’s defense and industrial capacity. It concludes with a call to remember and appreciate these individuals and their achievements.

Endless quarantine

2020-09-03 - Vladimir Vinnikov

The text presents a skeptical view of the COVID-19 pandemic, arguing it may not be a naturally occurring event. It highlights conflicting opinions among officials and experts, noting that initial declarations of a pandemic seemed premature, coinciding with widespread detection of cases outside the initial Wuhan outbreak. The author suggests the pandemic’s characteristics – rapid mutation and atypical spread – point to deliberate manipulation, potentially involving advanced biotechnology and transnational organizations. They criticize the focus on blaming China and the economic damage caused by pandemic responses, predicting further “waves” and potentially catastrophic global economic consequences if a second wave occurs. The text raises concerns about the potential for misuse of biotechnology and the possibility of a future “viral” dystopia.

Third World War, First Eurasian: what will it turn into for the world Moscow-Beijing-Tehra

2020-09-08 - Nikolay Vavilov

This text outlines a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape dominated by a shifting power dynamic between China, Russia, and the United States, primarily focused on the Middle East and Central Asia. China’s growing influence through a massive 25-year economic and military partnership with Iran, coupled with investments and strategic port access, is viewed as a direct challenge to U.S. interests and a potential blockade of global energy routes. This expansion is fueling anxieties in Washington and Jerusalem, leading to a scramble to counter China’s influence. Russia, meanwhile, is positioning itself as a stabilizing force, seeking to leverage the tensions between China and the West to maintain its own strategic position and influence in the region. The text highlights a growing resistance among regional elites to China’s dominance, creating opportunities for Russia to play a mediating role. The situation is characterized by a complex web of alliances and counter-alliances, with the potential for escalating conflict as China’s influence continues to grow. Ultimately, the text suggests that the outcome of this struggle will determine the future of global energy markets and the balance of power in the 21st century.

Club policy

2020-09-09 - Sergey Chernyakhovskiy

This text analyzes the current state of political parties in Russia, arguing they have largely failed to function as effective political forces. It identifies several key issues: parties have fragmented the electorate, with voters increasingly gravitating towards niche interest groups rather than established political movements. There’s a lack of genuine engagement and support for parties, stemming from their perceived lack of power to influence policy – they can’t enact real change due to the presidential system and a reluctance to confront the government.

The text highlights a significant portion of the population (around 23%) who support the current political model, alongside smaller segments supporting Western, traditionalist, and Soviet-era ideologies. However, overall voter turnout remains low, suggesting a general apathy towards political participation.

Parties struggle to generate sustained support due to a combination of factors: a lack of clear ideological direction, a tendency for party members to prioritize personal interests over broader political goals, and a general distrust of political institutions. The text suggests that the existing party landscape resembles a collection of loosely connected interest groups rather than genuine political movements.

Ultimately, the text concludes that the current state of political parties in Russia is characterized by a disconnect between the electorate and the political system, with parties failing to effectively represent or mobilize public opinion. It emphasizes the need for parties to reconnect with the broader population and demonstrate a genuine commitment to addressing their concerns.

Happy Birthday, Chubachev!

2020-09-24 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

This text is a celebratory message to Eugene Vasilyevich on his 80th birthday. It highlights his rich and diverse life, including his origins as an Amur Cossack, his experiences during the expulsion of Russians from Chechnya, his accomplishments as a sambist, opera singer, and conservationist, and his impactful journalism in various publications like “Literary Gazette” and “Pravda.” The message emphasizes his contributions to defending Russia’s honor and his enduring popularity among readers, culminating in a wish for his continued health and a toast to his birthday.

Siberia, Victory, and Science

2020-09-24 - Igorʹ Shumeyko

The text recounts a conference held in Novosibirsk, Russia, focused on the intersection of science, war, and national identity. It details the recollections of several prominent scientists, primarily from the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, who played crucial roles during World War II. These scientists, including figures like Andrey Budker, Lev Chernov, and Nikolai Chinkin, were instrumental in developing technologies like anti-tank weapons, oil and gas exploration, and coal mining techniques. The conference highlighted the unique collaboration between science and the state during wartime, emphasizing the rapid advancements achieved through focused effort and a willingness to challenge established norms. Several speakers underscored the importance of freedom within a structured environment, citing the example of Andrey Budker’s innovative approach to wartime challenges and the collaborative spirit fostered by figures like Andrey Budker and Nikolai Chinkin. The narrative emphasizes the scientists’ dedication, their ability to quickly adapt and innovate under pressure, and the profound impact of their work on both the war effort and the subsequent development of Soviet science. The conference served as a reminder of this pivotal period and the enduring legacy of these individuals.

Second wave

2020-09-29 - Aleksey Anpilogov

The text discusses the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the surpassing of 1 million deaths globally and the unpreparedness of many nations, particularly the United States, to handle the second wave. It emphasizes the importance of proactive healthcare systems focused on preventative measures and national health, rather than relying on reactive, “medicine for the wealthy” approaches. The pandemic has exposed vulnerabilities in existing healthcare models and underscores the need for a reformed, robust healthcare system in Russia, moving away from a legacy system towards a preventative and nationally focused approach. The text frames the virus as a “viral information” entity, reflecting its reliance on RNA, and suggests a heightened role for doctors and scientists in the emerging new world order.

It cracked.

2020-09-29 - Ilʹya Titov

The recent conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh was a large-scale operation, meticulously planned and resembling the tactics used in Idlib, with significant Turkish involvement. Despite initial reports of a blitzkrieg, the operation failed to achieve a decisive victory, potentially due to differences in the combat readiness of the forces involved and the challenging terrain. The conflict has intensified the existing geopolitical tensions, particularly between Turkey and Russia, and has led to accusations and calls for intervention from various parties, including Russia, though the situation is complicated by the fact that Nagorno-Karabakh is not a member of the CSTO. The international response has been largely symbolic and ineffective. Both sides are now engaged in a protracted conflict, and Russia is attempting to subtly influence the narrative and regain influence in the region through propaganda.

Notes by Tikhanovskaya

2020-09-30 - Anna Serafimova

The text critiques Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, portraying her as profoundly misguided and strategically foolish. It argues she lacks genuine understanding of political realities, consistently employing performative gestures like speaking English and fabricating narratives of oppression to appeal to foreign powers. Her actions, including claiming vast sums of money and demanding sanctions, are seen as deliberately manipulative and lacking in substance. The text draws parallels to historical figures like Gogol, highlighting Tikhanovskaya’s self-delusion and tendency to exaggerate her importance, ultimately concluding she embodies a profound lack of political acumen.

Golem Civilizatio

2020-10-02 - Vitaliy Darenskiy

This text presents a critical analysis of transhumanism, arguing it’s a misguided response to secularized consciousness – a persistent desire for immortality that, lacking religious grounding, seeks artificial immortality through technology. The author views transhumanism as a “pseudoscience,” a distortion of religious ideas about the soul and transformation, specifically the notion of human potential extending indefinitely through technological means.

The core argument is that this pursuit is fundamentally flawed, leading to a dehumanized “post-human” state – a “golem-civilization” characterized by a loss of individual identity and a susceptibility to manipulation. The author contends that modern technology, driven by capitalist imperatives, is actively shaping a society where individuals are reduced to “bio-automatons,” lacking genuine purpose and susceptible to control.

The text warns against a future dominated by this “golem-civilization,” predicting it will be a catastrophic force leading humanity to the brink of apocalypse. It suggests that Russia, with its enduring cultural traditions and a “homo russicus” – a type of person resistant to this dehumanizing trend – holds the key to resisting this technological dominance. The author advocates for actively cultivating this traditional type of person within Russia’s social and political structures as a crucial defense against the destructive forces of the “golem-civilization.” Ultimately, the text frames the challenge not as simply opposing technology, but as safeguarding the core values and spiritual foundations that define human identity and purpose.

USA: elections are taking place

2020-10-05 - Vladimir Ovchinskiy

Recent analysis suggests that polls may not accurately predict election outcomes, citing past discrepancies like the 2016 election. Concerns about poll reliability are heightened by Donald Trump’s illness and related messaging, which may sway undecided voters. Research indicates that a significant portion of voters, particularly those hesitant to express their true preferences, may be swayed by Trump’s health and promises. Key factors contributing to the perceived lead for Clinton in 2016 were undecided voters who ultimately supported Trump in the final days of the race. Furthermore, a notable increase in support for political violence among both Democrats and Republicans is being observed, with many Americans believing it could be justified. Despite these concerns, Trump is seen as more consistent in his stance against political violence, and his messaging resonates with a segment of the population frustrated by recent unrest and crime.

Plot within the Soviet leadership?

2020-10-12 - Dionis Kaptarʹ

This text recounts the controversial story of Matthias Rust’s unauthorized flight into Moscow in 1987, framing it as a deliberate provocation orchestrated by Western intelligence agencies to destabilize the Soviet Union. Yuri KNUPOV details how a series of systemic failures within the Soviet military – specifically the dismantling of a unified air defense system and the resulting lack of coordination – created an opportunity for Rust’s flight. He argues that Western intelligence, including the CIA and German intelligence agencies, actively exploited these weaknesses, using Rust as a pawn in a broader strategy to undermine Gorbachev’s reforms and ultimately weaken the Soviet Union. KNUPOV highlights the involvement of figures like Andrei Andropov and the role of the General Staff, emphasizing that the event wasn’t simply a youthful act of defiance, but a carefully planned operation designed to expose vulnerabilities within the Soviet system. He points to the amnesties granted to Rust and the subsequent manipulation of the situation by Gorbachev to appease the West, suggesting a calculated move to further destabilize the country. Ultimately, KNUPOV presents the Rust flight as a pivotal moment in the collapse of the Soviet Union, fueled by Western interference and a series of strategic missteps within the Soviet military.

Chance for the Empire

2020-10-14 - Anton Gurʹyanov

Russia is entering a period of opportunity alongside potential instability, as the US loses its position as a global leader due to economic issues. Internal conflict in the US will limit support for European allies, leading to attempts like a Belarusian coup by Poland. Despite this, Russia’s popularity is rising globally, particularly in Europe, and it’s navigating a delicate balance against both the US and China. Russia faces challenges in developing “soft power” and lacks a compelling alternative civilizational project, though it has the potential to seize opportunities if it can successfully build this project and expand its influence in Eastern Europe, particularly Ukraine.

Games with the mind

2020-10-15 - Yelena Larina

The text argues that a “degenerative” and “destructive” dynamic is unfolding across economics, culture, and even daily life, driven by the combined forces of late capitalism and socialism. This convergence, observed globally – including in the US, China, the EU, and Russia – is characterized by a shift towards superficial assessments and a focus on external appearances rather than underlying substance. The author critiques the widespread, often uncritical, embrace of technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and transhumanism, portraying them as largely driven by fantasy and lacking a genuine understanding of their potential and limitations.

The core argument is that technological advancements, particularly in AI and augmented reality, are being treated superficially, leading to a misinterpretation of their capabilities and consequences. The author uses the analogy of a candy or sausage – in a “rising” phase, attention is focused on the core product, but in a “falling” phase, it’s solely about the packaging.

The text suggests a looming crisis of capitalism, predicting a need for significant re-evaluation and technological upgrades. It draws parallels to the Soviet era, highlighting the loss of knowledge and technological progress. The author anticipates a future shaped by “mixed reality” games and technologies, emphasizing the importance of critical engagement and a focus on substance over superficial trends. The piece ultimately calls for a return to fundamental understanding and a cautious approach to technological development, warning against the dangers of uncritical acceptance of emerging technologies.

Poet, journalist, fighter

2020-10-19 - Vladimir Vinnikov

This text is a detailed biographical sketch of journalist and poet, Евгений Neffedov. It chronicles his life from his birth in Krasny Lyman (now in Ukraine) in 1946, through his career as a reporter and editor, primarily for the newspaper “Zavtra” (Tomorrow), and his involvement in promoting humor and satire. The narrative highlights his deep connection to his hometown and the Donbas region, emphasizing his patriotic sentiments and unwavering loyalty to the Soviet Union and, later, to the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics.

The piece details Neffedov’s career progression, starting with his work in local newspapers and eventually leading to his role as the special correspondent for “Komsomolskaya Pravda” in the Donbas region. It emphasizes his significant contributions to the development of the “Russkiy Smekh” (Russian Laughter) festival, a project aimed at preserving and promoting humor and satire.

The text also explores Neffedov’s personal life, including his marriage to Ludmila Neffedova, his family ties, and his close relationships with colleagues and mentors like Arkady Volsky and Vladimir Bondarenko. It portrays him as a complex and often contradictory figure – a passionate patriot, a dedicated journalist, a committed poet, and a man deeply invested in the fate of his region.

The narrative concludes with a reflection on the posthumous recognition of Neffedov’s legacy and a call to action to publish a collection of his writings, highlighting his continued relevance and the importance of preserving his voice amidst ongoing geopolitical tensions.

Russia, Syria, Nagorno-Karabakh: blazing fires and the same “behind-the-scenes forces”

2020-10-20 - Rami Alʹ-Shayer

This text outlines a complex and pessimistic assessment of the current geopolitical situation, primarily focusing on Russia’s relationship with the West, particularly the United States. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

The core argument is that the State Council is a calculated response to the decline of the “globalized” order and a strategic repositioning of Russia. It’s presented as a move towards a more centralized, potentially authoritarian, system, drawing historical parallels to Ivan the Terrible’s oprichnina. The author suggests this transformation is driven by a recognition that the existing system was designed to benefit the West and that Russia needs to reclaim its sovereignty and strategic autonomy.

Key points include:

Ultimately, the text portrays the creation of the State Council as a bold, potentially risky, but strategically necessary step for Russia to regain control of its destiny in a world undergoing significant upheaval.

Where is the West leading?

2020-10-26 - Vladimir Vinnikov

This text analyzes the profound shifts occurring in the world following the 2020 Christmas year, driven largely by the COVID-19 pandemic. It argues that this event dramatically altered the global landscape, leading to economic collapse, trade disruptions, the near-destruction of industries like tourism and aviation, and a massive “digital revolution” forcing millions into remote work. The text questions whether the pandemic was simply a catalyst or a tool used to reshape the world order, spearheaded by figures like Henry Kissinger.

A key theme is Russia’s increasingly isolated position on the international stage, stemming from Western actions following the 2014 Crimean reunification. Despite ongoing sanctions and a diplomatic effort to restore pre-2014 relations, Western partners have consistently rejected these attempts, employing accusations and ultimatums. This has led Russia to reassess its foreign policy priorities, moving away from alignment with the “Washington consensus” and towards a more independent role.

The text suggests that Russia is now positioning itself as a global power, offering a “comprehensive security umbrella” to various nations, including those in the post-Soviet space. It anticipates continued resistance from the “Washington consensus” – represented by the United States and its allies – and predicts that Russia will continue to operate independently, regardless of who occupies the White House. The author concludes that the pandemic has fundamentally altered the balance of power, and Russia’s response is a calculated move to secure its future in a world increasingly shaped by disruption and uncertainty.

Irreversible journey beyond the horizo

2020-10-29 - Sergey Zhigalkin

Eugeniy Golyagin (1938-2010) is a profoundly difficult figure to discuss, particularly publicly, due to the “horrific whirlwind” he introduced into the world – a disruptive force that revealed unsettling yet captivating realities. This whirlwind created a persistent tension and opened doors to metaphysical anxieties, disrupting ordinary routines. Golyagin’s presence generated a unique atmosphere of unease, and his absence amplified this tension. Ultimately, for those who knew him, his departure didn’t fundamentally change things, but the lingering tension and open doors remained.

His legacy is small – primarily consisting of recordings and around thirty books, many of which he compiled or translated. However, these works are notoriously difficult to understand due to Golyagin’s abstract and unconventional thinking, making it challenging to draw meaningful conclusions or judge his significance.

Golyagin didn’t seek fame or influence; he actively avoided leaving a lasting mark. He pursued a path of immersion in esoteric realms, including mythology, alchemy, and the works of poets like Rabelais and Rimbaud. He travelled through imagined and real landscapes, often following the paths of writers and thinkers, seeking to experience these realities directly.

His approach involved a deliberate “sinking of the fire into water” – a process of dissolving the boundaries between the real and the imagined, allowing for a deeper engagement with metaphysical concepts. He believed that true understanding came not from observing the consequences of actions, but from experiencing the underlying forces that shaped reality, a perspective that ultimately transcends the limitations of human judgment and historical evaluation. His influence, though subtle, is felt in the persistence of unconventional thought and the continued exploration of the boundaries between perception and reality.

Why did the Reds lose.

2020-11-05 - Valeriy Shambarov

The text details the protracted and complex downfall of the White movement in Russia, primarily focusing on the final stages of the Civil War. It argues that the White forces, despite initial successes, were ultimately defeated not just by superior Red Army numbers, but due to a series of strategic and political missteps, exacerbated by external interference. The narrative highlights how Western powers, particularly Britain and France, actively undermined the White cause through manipulation, funding of rival factions, and ultimately, a failure to provide consistent support. The text emphasizes the crucial role of Mikhail Frunze and the Red Army’s superior leadership and organization in decisively defeating the White forces, particularly through the strategic use of the Syvash crossing and the encirclement of Vranгель’s army. It portrays the White movement as a product of internal divisions, a lack of genuine popular support, and the detrimental influence of foreign powers seeking to reshape Russia in their own image. The text concludes with a stark assessment of the White forces’ ultimate failure, attributing it to a combination of strategic errors, political instability, and the relentless pressure exerted by the Red Army.

Huge distance

2020-11-18 - Blog Izborskogo kluba

This text primarily critiques the current state of education in Russia, particularly focusing on the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent shift to distance learning. It argues that the widespread adoption of online education has exacerbated existing problems within the Russian education system, including excessive bureaucracy, an overwhelming workload for teachers, and a lack of investment in resources. The author highlights concerns about the quality of distance learning, citing difficulties for students and teachers, and the disruption of traditional learning environments. Furthermore, the text draws parallels with China’s experience during the pandemic, noting China’s successful implementation of distance learning and the resulting challenges for international students. It expresses concern about the long-term consequences of this shift, including potential declines in educational quality and the impact on students’ development. The text concludes with a call for a reevaluation of the current approach and a focus on restoring traditional, in-person learning environments.

Cry, Arkim!

2020-11-23 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

Gennady Borisovich Zdanchich, an archaeologist, discovered the archaeological site of Arkim in the Southern Ural Mountains, a place believed to be the cradle of the Aryans and a location prophesied in the Vedas and Avesta to be the origin of Indo-Germanic civilizations. Zdanchich stumbled upon Arkim accidentally while planning a water reservoir project, recognizing it as an ancient observatory and settlement. He faced skepticism and opposition but remained dedicated to his findings, envisioning Arkim as a place for international collaboration and spiritual understanding, a symbol of unity between diverse cultures. Zdanchich is considered a “genius loci,” deeply connected to the site, and his death is mourned by those who valued his work and the potential of Arkim as a center for global harmony.

Moldovan Saakashvili

2020-11-23 - Dmitriy Soin

This text outlines a strategic analysis of the political situation in Moldova, primarily focusing on the impending changes following the election of Maia Sandu. It predicts a concerted effort by Sandu, backed by Western powers and potentially Romania, to fundamentally alter the status quo in Moldova. This includes a forceful push to renegotiate the existing peace framework, aiming for a rapid withdrawal of Russian forces and a shift towards a pro-European Moldovan trajectory.

The analysis highlights a planned campaign to discredit and isolate former President Igor Dodon, potentially through legal action and public pressure. It anticipates a significant economic and demographic shift in the breakaway region of Transnistria, driven by Sandu’s policies and the potential for increased Romanian influence. The text emphasizes the precariousness of Transnistria’s future, dependent on maintaining a high standard of living and avoiding stagnation, and warns of a potential integration into Romania if the region collapses. It suggests a return to considering Transnistria as a “Russian regional showcase” as a potential strategy to maintain stability and influence. The overall tone is one of cautious anticipation, recognizing the potential for significant upheaval and the importance of proactive measures to safeguard both Moldova and Transnistria.

Monster of Educatio

2020-11-24 - Georgiy Malinetskiy

The text critiques the inefficiencies and bureaucratic overreach within the Russian education system, drawing parallels to the satirical play “The Inspector General” by Gogol. It highlights issues such as excessive bureaucracy, a large number of administrators, the occupation of school spaces by various departments and committees, and a disconnect between educational goals and administrative actions. The author contrasts this situation with successful educational systems in other countries like South Korea, which prioritize student performance and utilize innovative approaches. The text expresses frustration with the lack of accountability and the prioritization of administrative processes over genuine educational improvement. It suggests a need for a more streamlined and results-oriented approach, drawing a historical comparison to Lenin’s efforts to combat bureaucracy and emphasizing the importance of feedback and practical solutions.

Golden rooster

2020-11-26 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

Russia is surrounded by hostile forces and threats from multiple directions, including NATO expansion, conflicts in Ukraine, Belarus, the Caucasus, and Central Asia. Domestically, the country faces economic decline, corruption, mismanagement, and a failing economy. There is a sense of impending collapse and a need for a new national ideology focused on defense, revival, and a “Russian Dream” to overcome these challenges.

The Nightingale Sings

2020-11-27 - Irina Pichugina

Alexander Blok’s life and work are intricately tied to a sense of catastrophic vision and profound emotional turmoil, particularly evident in his iconic poem “The Twelve.” Blok is portrayed as a central figure embodying this “catastrophe,” mirroring the devastation felt by many in the face of societal upheaval. His early poetry, notably his “Twelve,” is characterized by a dark, almost apocalyptic tone, reflecting his anxieties about the burgeoning revolution and the loss of traditional values.

Blok’s relationship with his beloved, “The Beautiful Lady” (Lyubov Mendeleeva), is a recurring theme, representing both inspiration and a source of intense emotional conflict. His later works, such as “Skoptsy” (The Scythians) and his satirical plays, demonstrate a growing cynicism and disillusionment with the revolutionary fervor.

Throughout his life, Blok grappled with a complex and often contradictory worldview, oscillating between romantic idealism and a stark realism. His poetry is marked by a deep sensitivity to the suffering of the Russian people and a profound awareness of the spiritual crisis facing the nation.

His final years were marked by illness and despair, culminating in the creation of “The Twelve,” a poem that remains a controversial and intensely debated work, often interpreted as a prophetic warning about the dangers of revolutionary extremism. Blok’s life ultimately ended tragically, reflecting the broader sense of loss and disillusionment that characterized the early years of the Soviet regime.

“Барбаросса” по-японски

2020-12-10 - Anatoliy Koshkin

This text is a transcript of an interview with historian Anatoly Koshkin, focusing on the Soviet-Japanese relationship and the often-misunderstood history surrounding it. Koshkin argues that the Japanese perspective on this relationship is deeply ingrained and resistant to change, largely due to decades of propaganda portraying Russians as hostile figures. He highlights the crucial role Soviet forces played in winning the war against Japan, emphasizing that the US atomic bombings were not the sole factor, but rather a consequence of Japan’s aggressive actions and strategic miscalculations.

Koshkin details the complex negotiations leading to the 1941 Treaty of Neutrality, revealing that Japan initially offered to cede the Kuril Islands to Stalin in exchange for a non-aggression pact, a proposal that was ultimately rejected. He points out that the Japanese consistently framed the conflict as a struggle against a “barbaric” Soviet regime, fueled by a belief in their own racial superiority.

The interview explores the deeply ingrained skepticism and distrust that continues to shape the Japanese view of Russia, even today, despite the changing geopolitical landscape. Koshkin stresses that the Japanese narrative is not simply a historical record, but a persistent cultural and ideological force.

Master of Strategic Planning

2020-12-16 - Georgiy Malinetskiy

Este letter congratulates Sergey Borisovich on his anniversary, expressing admiration for his work across science, history, and futurism. The authors value his focus on strategic thinking, interdisciplinary approaches, and fostering critical minds. They highlight his contributions to fields like military strategy, science fiction, and promoting a forward-looking perspective for Russia. The letter emphasizes the importance of long-term planning, embracing technological advancements, and cultivating a generation capable of responsible leadership. It expresses optimism about Russia’s future and celebrates Sergey Borisovich’s unique blend of expertise and his commitment to shaping a brighter future for the country.

Obama’s secret army behind Biden.

2020-12-17 - Vladimir Ovchinskiy

This text argues that Barack Obama, with the support of figures like Valerie Jarrett and through his organization, OFA (Organizing for Action), has been actively working to undermine the Trump administration and promote a radical, anti-establishment agenda. The core argument is that Obama, influenced by the nihilistic philosophy of David Horowitz and particularly the writings of Luciferian radical, Frank Nitti, has orchestrated a deliberate campaign of disruption and resistance.

OFA, built upon Obama’s 2012 campaign infrastructure, has functioned as a network of activists and organizations designed to challenge the status quo and promote a revolutionary vision. The text details how OFA utilized tactics like organizing protests, disseminating misinformation, and targeting historical monuments – all driven by a rejection of traditional morality and a focus on constant conflict and change.

The author suggests that Obama’s actions were not simply political opposition, but a calculated effort to dismantle existing institutions and usher in a new era of radical transformation, fueled by a belief that stability and traditional values are inherently detrimental. The text highlights the influence of figures like George Soros and the potential for a deliberate, manipulative strategy aimed at destabilizing American society. It concludes with a warning about the potential for continued disruption and the dangers of a philosophy that prioritizes conflict over stability.

Billboard. Russia is abandoning “the separation of powers”…

2020-12-23 - Sluzhba bezopasnosti Denʹ

The formation of a new State Council, including parliamentary faction leaders, is seen as further strengthening the “presidential vertical” in Russia and abandoning the principle of separation of powers. This move, alongside factors like the UN resolution on Crimea, CAS rulings, negative media campaigns against Putin, and the ongoing rivalry with the West, is viewed as an attempt by Western “partners” to maintain influence in Russia. Russia is expected to reduce or halt gold exports, and is prepared to share data regarding the COVID-19 pandemic if necessary. A potential “political explosion” is occurring in the US, with efforts to destroy evidence related to the 2020 election. The planned closure of US consulates in Yekaterinburg and Vladivostok could lead to a reciprocal closure of Russian consulates in Houston and potentially New York, and new sanctions against Russian and Chinese tech companies will severely impact US aerospace projects.

One man in the field is a warrior.

2020-12-23 - Vladimir Krestovskiy

This text analyzes the contrasting approaches to interpreting political figures, specifically focusing on the distinction between “representational” and “epiphany” symbolism. The first, illustrative symbolism attempts to explain actions through direct analogies, often leading to oversimplified interpretations, as seen in attempts to understand Putin’s behavior through simplistic frameworks like “make Russia great again.” This approach, the text argues, misses the deeper, more complex reality.

The “epiphany” approach, conversely, views symbols as manifestations of a deeper reality, presenting them as events rather than explanations. This perspective, the author suggests, is more accurate in understanding Putin’s actions, particularly his deliberate use of ambiguity and contradictions.

The text critiques Western interpretations of Putin, arguing they are often shaped by ideological biases and a failure to grasp the nuances of his political strategy. It highlights Putin’s deliberate manipulation of perceptions, exemplified by his handling of the Naavalny investigation and his broader approach to engaging with the West.

Furthermore, the text emphasizes Putin’s self-awareness and calculated performance, portraying him as a shrewd political operator who understands the importance of maintaining a certain image, even if it involves appearing contradictory or evasive. The final portion of the text describes the press conference as a carefully orchestrated “bенефис” – a personal performance of his power, reinforcing the idea that he is not simply a puppet of ideology but a calculating and self-aware leader. The author concludes that Putin’s actions are driven by a desire to maintain his position and influence, rather than by any grand ideological vision.

Beware, immigrants!

2020-12-24 - Aleksandr Shirokorad

This text argues against attempts to reconcile with Russian émigrés, particularly focusing on the historical inaccuracies surrounding the narrative of Russian White Army and fascist movements abroad. It asserts that the popular image of a large, unified Russian émigré community, fueled by misinformation, is drastically overstated.

The author contends that only a tiny fraction – roughly 2% – of the total Russian emigration (around 8.5 million people who left between 1894 and 1923) were involved in White Army factions or anti-Soviet terrorist organizations like RVO and fascist parties. The vast majority of émigrés were simply seeking a better life, often becoming successful entrepreneurs and professionals in Europe and America.

The text specifically challenges the romanticized portrayal of White Army figures, highlighting the small numbers involved and their often misguided actions. It criticizes the perpetuation of myths surrounding Russian fascism, pointing out that these movements were short-lived and largely ineffective.

Ultimately, the author argues against glorifying or reconciling with these groups, emphasizing that they were primarily composed of individuals seeking escape from hardship and political turmoil, not representing a significant or unified Russian diaspora. The text stresses the importance of recognizing the historical reality of the emigration and rejecting the distorted narratives that have persisted for decades.

Holy and holy.

2020-12-31 - Dmitriy Kanakov

The text argues that the Soviet victory in World War II should be understood not just as a military triumph, but as a profound, almost religious, event rooted in a clash of cosmic forces – “sons of light” (the Red Army) versus “sons of darkness” (the Nazi forces). It frames the war as a “transcendent miracle,” facilitated by the revolutionary faith in a future of reason, progress, and human potential, symbolized by the figure of Vladimir Lenin and the Soviet state.

The text emphasizes a “phenomenological” analysis, drawing on concepts like “sacredness” and “truth” to interpret the war’s significance. It posits that the Soviet victory wasn’t solely due to superior weaponry or military strategy, but rather a spiritual force – a collective embodiment of revolutionary ideals – that overcame the forces of evil.

The victory is presented as a “cosmic” event, a “transcendental miracle” that shaped the subsequent development of humanity, particularly through the Soviet Union’s model of social organization and its commitment to advancing human potential. The “Бессмертный полк” (Immortal Regiment) is seen as a continuation of this legacy, a cyclical return to this foundational moment of spiritual transformation. Ultimately, the text suggests that understanding the Soviet victory requires recognizing it as a victory of faith, reason, and the pursuit of a better future – a victory still relevant today in the face of global challenges.