Summary of a sample of Zavtra.ru articles published in 2011

LLM-generated content, may include inaccuracies

This page includes LLM-generated summaries of articles published on Russian weekly newspaper Zavtra. They may be useful for a first overview of the contents published by Zavtra, but they have not been reviewed and they almost certainly include inaccuracies.

Clicking on the title of each article will bring you to the original publication on Zavtra’s official website.

This page includes an LLM-generated summary of a random sample of 100 articles out of a total of 1 194 articles published in 2011 (coverage: 8%). For more context, details on how this was implemented, and links to other years, see the index page.

Saved Faces

2011-01-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The exhibition “Saved and Restored Frescoes of the Sпасky Church in Morozov village near Veliky Ustug” showcases the results of long-term work by restorers and researchers from the Department of Monumental Painting of the State Restoration Institute. A chance discovery of a 1778 fresco fragment, attributed to artist Fedor Shein, led to the removal and restoration of several fragments from the crumbling walls of the Sпасky Church. The work involved a new mounting method developed with ЗАО “БЛОКФОРМ” and highlights the ongoing challenge of preserving Russian frescoes, which are steadily deteriorating. The exhibition aims to raise awareness about this issue and seek solutions for their preservation.

Yuri Rzhanov: “We’re just tolerated…”

2011-01-12 - Vladimir Vinnikov

The text details the concerns of Yuri Rzhanov, the owner of Rostselmash, regarding the state of the Russian agricultural machinery industry and the broader economy. He argues that the current system, driven by the “oil and gas needle” policy, actively hinders domestic production and innovation. Rostselmash, despite modernization and successful international testing (including in Canada with Mercedes engines), faces significant disadvantages due to government policies, including high taxes, a lack of investment incentives, and the preferential treatment of foreign competitors like Belarusian machinery through subsidized credit and tax breaks.

Rzhanov believes the key issue is a fundamental shift in government priorities – moving away from resource extraction towards supporting domestic industries. He proposes a revised tax system and a greater emphasis on fostering innovation. He is establishing a political party, “Party of Business,” to advocate for these changes, arguing that the current system is leading to a “brain drain” and a decline in the country’s productive capacity. He views the situation as analogous to a feudal system, where the state’s dominance over the Church mirrors a similar imbalance of power. He emphasizes the importance of a strong, independent Church to counterbalance the state’s influence and restore a more balanced and prosperous society.

Sport and politics

2011-01-12 - Andrey Plachendovskiy

This lengthy text argues that corruption and instability in Russia stem from a lack of a strong national ideology and a disconnect between the state and its people. The author, a former athlete, contends that Russia’s problems are rooted in a decline of traditional values and a rise of a “corrupt political elite” comprised of individuals lacking genuine national spirit.

The core argument is that Russia’s current issues – including political instability and social unrest – are fueled by a power struggle between a “healthy” segment of the population – primarily strong, disciplined individuals like athletes and military personnel – and a corrupt, self-serving political class. This elite, characterized by a focus on personal gain and a lack of genuine patriotism, actively seeks to manipulate public opinion and destabilize the country.

The author draws parallels to historical events, such as student protests and political coups, highlighting the role of strong, disciplined individuals in driving these upheavals. They believe that a return to traditional values, particularly those associated with the Imperial and Soviet eras, is essential for restoring stability and national unity. The text suggests that the state should prioritize and support individuals with strong moral character and a commitment to national strength, rather than relying on a corrupt political establishment. The author expresses concern about the influence of foreign capital and the erosion of Russian national identity.

stranger and stranger

2011-01-12 - Israelʹ Shamir

This text details a complex and contested investigation into the poisoning of former Russian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar in 2006. It centers around leaked US diplomatic cables (Wikileaks) and attempts to understand the circumstances surrounding his illness.

The core of the narrative revolves around conflicting accounts and interpretations of events. Initially, suspicion fell on Russian intelligence, fueled by statements from figures like Anatoly Chubais and later linked to the investigation of Alexander Litvinenko’s death. Chubais’s early insistence on an intentional poisoning, coupled with his attempts to pressure Gaidar, became a central point of contention.

The investigation was complicated by shifting narratives from Gaidar himself, initially suggesting a possible attack by Russian citizens, and eventually linking the poisoning to Alexander Litvinenko. Crucially, the text highlights the role of US intelligence, particularly through the cables of former CIA Director Henry Kissinger and the involvement of Russian intelligence officer Anatoly Safronkov.

The cables reveal a “friendly meeting” between Safronkov and Kissinger, where Safronkov admitted Russian intelligence was aware of and monitored the events surrounding Litvinenko’s death, despite British assurances of control. This information sparked debate and accusations of disinformation, with some interpreting it as a deliberate attempt to mislead.

The text explores the motivations behind the various actors involved, including Chubais’s desire for attention and influence, and the potential involvement of Israeli intelligence, based on parallels drawn to the assassination of Yasser Arafat. Ultimately, the document portrays a chaotic and contested investigation, characterized by conflicting interpretations of intelligence data and a struggle for control of the narrative. The investigation continues to be shaped by the ongoing analysis of these leaked cables.

Who “judges time”?

2011-01-12 - Igorʹ Ostretsov

This lengthy text presents a highly critical and conspiratorial analysis of 20th-century history, primarily focusing on the Soviet Union and its relationship with the West. It argues that the Soviet Union’s creation and eventual collapse were driven by a cyclical pattern of elite rise and fall, mirroring historical “tyrannies” and their attempts to dominate and destroy opposing forces.

The author contends that the Soviet Union’s primary purpose was to serve as a counterweight to Western liberalism, preventing a scenario where the West could have completely dominated the world. They frame historical events, such as the rise of Hitler and the creation of nuclear weapons, as part of this struggle.

The text heavily relies on a theological interpretation of history, drawing parallels between biblical narratives and 20th-century events. It views key figures like Lenin and Stalin as instrumental in fulfilling a “divine plan” to preserve humanity and its reason. The author criticizes contemporary political discourse, particularly the actions of Western leaders, as driven by short-sightedness and a lack of understanding of historical patterns.

Ultimately, the text suggests that the Soviet Union’s demise was inevitable, a necessary step in the ongoing cycle of historical “tyrannies” and a prelude to a future where humanity will finally embrace a “New Testament” understanding of God. It expresses deep skepticism towards modern political systems and a belief that history is governed by immutable, often dark, forces.

Behind the iron curtai

2011-01-26 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

A publicist and writer, Vladimir Smirnov, is appealing to Alexander Bastrykin, head of the Russian Investigative Committee, to investigate a fabricated criminal case against him. Smirnov was wrongly convicted of murder and claims the evidence, including manipulated forensic blood tests conducted by a specialist, was falsified by witnesses who falsely implicated him. He highlights the lack of investigation into the manipulated forensic evidence and the refusal to utilize polygraph examinations, despite the President’s advocacy for their use in criminal proceedings. He requests a formal investigation into the manipulated forensic evidence and a revision of the Russian Criminal Procedure Code to include mandatory polygraph testing.

Justice!

2011-01-26 - Sergey Zagatin

The text details the upcoming trial of Nikita Тихонов and Евгения Хасис, accused of murdering journalist Станислав Маркелов and journalist Anastasia Бабурова. The case is highly politicized, with accusations of bias and manipulation from the defense, led by lawyer Alexander Васильев, who argues there is a lack of concrete evidence. Васильев highlights the potential for the trial to be used as a political tool, pointing to the influence of extremist groups like “Black Hawks” and the “Russian Verdict” center. The trial involves accusations of biased media leaks, pressure on the jury, and the involvement of witnesses who implicated Тихонов due to their own connections to the investigation. Despite the presence of a firearm found at the scene, the defense maintains the couple’s innocence, arguing the evidence is circumstantial and manipulated. The case is expected to be a lengthy and complex process.

PYRAMID OF DARKNESS

2011-02-02 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text recounts several tragic and suspicious incidents in Russia, primarily focusing on the 2006 arson death of priest Andrey Nikolaev in Pryamukhino, Tver region, and the 2011 massacre in Kushchevo. Initially, the Pryamukhino case was treated as a martyrdom, fueled by a police general and politician connected to the area, who prematurely suggested a breakdown and self-inflicted arson by the priest. This narrative was pushed despite evidence suggesting a more sinister motive – a deliberate, pre-planned attack intended to conceal evidence of a previous arson. The Kushchevo massacre, occurring shortly after, was similarly covered up, with initial investigations hampered by the involvement of powerful figures who prioritized maintaining appearances and protecting their own interests. The text argues that these events represent layers of corruption and deliberate obfuscation, involving not just criminals and organized crime, but also corrupt officials, oligarchs, and politicians who actively conceal wrongdoing to protect their positions and wealth. It portrays a “pyramid of evil” deeply embedded within Russian society.

New look of old problems

2011-02-09 - Aleksey Gayday

This text analyzes the organizational structure of modern Russian military brigades, specifically focusing on the “new look” brigades created after the conflicts in Chechnya. It argues that these brigades, designed for modern, localized conflicts, are fundamentally flawed. The core criticism centers around the over-reliance on artillery and air defense systems, resulting in brigades with a disproportionately small number of infantry personnel (around 30% of the total force).

The text draws a comparison to the organizational structure of the US Army, highlighting the US’s preference for lighter, more mobile brigades with a greater emphasis on infantry capabilities. It points out that the Russian brigades, with their heavy artillery and air defense components, are overly complex, inefficient, and prone to unnecessary casualties.

The author contends that the experience gained in Chechnya, while valuable, has not been effectively translated into a modern brigade design. The current structure, it suggests, is a step backward, failing to adapt to contemporary warfare trends and potentially hindering the brigade’s effectiveness in future conflicts. The text concludes with a pessimistic outlook, questioning the prospects of the “new look” brigades and highlighting the need for a fundamental shift in design.

Mysteries of the Arab explosions…

2011-03-02 - Vladimir Ovchinskiy

This text is a detailed analysis of the Arab Spring revolutions, primarily focusing on Egypt, and exploring the potential implications for Russia. It argues that the revolutions were not simply spontaneous uprisings but were skillfully orchestrated, largely through the use of social media and leaked information (Wikileaks), with significant external support, particularly from the United States.

Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

In essence, the text presents a critical perspective on the Arab Spring, framing it as a deliberate intervention with potentially serious consequences for Russia.

Musi

2011-03-16 - Andrey Smirnov

This review examines the 1980s folk group “Яблоко” (Apple) and their recently released album “Кантри” (Country). Despite a 30-year gap, the album’s soft, ethno-vibrations remain interesting and avoid being pigeonholed. The group’s history reveals a complex blend of influences, incorporating rock elements, collaborations with prominent Russian artists (DDT, Nautilus Pompilius), and extensive festival participation, culminating in Marina Kapuro receiving the title of Honored Artist of Russia. The album itself features a mix of original compositions and interpretations of Russian and Belarusian folk songs, showcasing Kapuro’s diverse vocal abilities and the group’s unique approach to folk music, described as “unconventional” and driven by a genuine love for the genre.

It’s done!

2011-03-16 - Vladimir Vinnikov

This article presents a largely positive assessment of Alexei Navalny, highlighting his success in fundraising for his initiatives and his public image. The author notes Navalny’s impressive fundraising abilities (over five million rubles in a month) and his recognition by various media outlets, including being named “Person of the Year” and virtually serving as mayor of Moscow. The piece acknowledges criticisms, such as comparisons to Yeltsin and speculation about CIA involvement, but ultimately argues that even his detractors recognize the strength of his core ideology. The author criticizes Navalny for overlooking the impact of “market reforms” and “privatization” on over 100 million Russians, and for failing to address issues with Russian monopolies. The article concludes by suggesting that those who oppose Navalny’s system actually benefit from his efforts.

Managing hunger

2011-03-16 - Dmitriy Vladykin

The text outlines a historical analysis of global food security, beginning with the “Green Revolution” and subsequent developments. It argues that while initially intended to alleviate hunger, the “Green Revolution,” driven by Western corporations like Monsanto, created dependency, environmental damage, and ultimately, a system designed to maintain global food insecurity. The reliance on chemically intensive agriculture and genetically modified organisms has led to ecological problems, health issues, and a concentrated control of the food supply by multinational corporations, suggesting a deliberate strategy of “managing chaos” through the control of food resources.

Memory of a friend

2011-03-23 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Gennady Dobrov (1911-unknown) was a Russian artist who worked primarily in the critical realism genre, a style largely ignored during both the Soviet and post-Soviet eras. He traveled extensively, documenting marginalized groups and conflicts, including veterans of World War II, Chechen wars, and the Soviet-Afghan War. His work often challenged societal norms and focused on the suffering and resilience of individuals. He gained notoriety for his unflinching depictions of these situations, particularly his portraits of residents at the Valaam Sanatorium for war veterans and his depictions of the aftermath of the Chechen and Afghan wars. Despite facing criticism and misunderstanding from the artistic establishment, Dobrov remained dedicated to his art and his beliefs, continuing to create and contemplate until his death. He was considered a unique and insightful figure, a “philosopher” and “soul with compassion,” and a testament to the importance of artistic integrity and social awareness.

Student unres

2011-03-30 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text examines the public image and background of Anna Chapman, a figure who has garnered significant attention and positive regard in Russia despite a complex and controversial past. Chapman’s rise to prominence is presented as a result of skillful manipulation and leveraging of connections, particularly within Russian intelligence and the Russian elite. The article details her early life as the daughter of a KGB officer, her time as a student and subsequent marriage to a British national, and her involvement in a lifestyle involving figures like Boris Berezovsky and members of the British royal family. It highlights allegations of money laundering through various shell companies, her involvement in erotic photography, and her continued attempts to maintain favorable access to Russian political and economic circles. The author questions the public’s unquestioning admiration for Chapman, suggesting it’s a product of conformity and a willingness to overlook her questionable activities, ultimately arguing that this blind acceptance is a cause for concern.

“New nomads” are fighting against Russia.

2011-03-30 - Mikhail Delyagin

This text argues that the 2011 intervention in Libya, and more broadly, the actions of the United States and its allies, represent a fundamental shift in international relations – a move away from the established norms of international law and towards a system where powerful actors can unilaterally impose their will, regardless of consequences.

Michael Delyagin contends that this intervention is driven by a “global managing class” – a new, transnational elite focused on maximizing profit and control, rather than traditional national interests. This class, he argues, operates by destabilizing nations, exploiting resources, and manipulating global events to consolidate its power.

The intervention in Libya is presented as a prime example of this trend, fueled by a desire to eliminate a leader (Muammar Gaddafi) who was challenging this new global order and who had, in the past, recognized the legitimacy of Western powers. The intervention is characterized by a disregard for international law, a willingness to fabricate justifications for aggression, and a cynical manipulation of public opinion.

Delyagin suggests that this shift has created a dangerous situation for Russia, where the threat of intervention is heightened and the possibility of a “new Cold War” looms. He frames the situation as a struggle between a nation defending its interests and a global elite pursuing its own self-serving agenda, ultimately arguing that Russia must be prepared to defend itself against this “new kind of invasion.”

Madness “INSOra”

2011-03-30 - Sergey Chernyakhovskiy

This lengthy text is a scathing critique of a group of politically influential figures known as “Ingos” (Jurgen’s crew) and their proposed approach to “relaunching democracy” in Russia. The author argues that these individuals, attempting to impose a neo-liberal, 1990s-era vision, fundamentally misunderstand and disregard the will of the Russian people.

The core argument is that the “Ingos” are detached from reality, clinging to outdated ideas and failing to recognize the widespread dissatisfaction with the economic and political landscape. They propose a return to “free elections” and a market-driven economy, but the author contends this is based on a flawed understanding of Russian society and historical context.

Specifically, the text highlights several key criticisms:

Ultimately, the text portrays the “Ingos” as a group of out-of-touch intellectuals who are actively working against the interests of the Russian people and whose proposals are based on a dangerous and ultimately unsustainable vision.

Dream

2011-04-06 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text is a philosophical and somewhat surreal dialogue between a man named Alexei and the President of Russia. During a strange shift in the room’s lighting, they discuss the state of Russia, questioning concepts of power, responsibility, and morality. They analyze the decline of traditional values, the corruption within the country, and the distorted priorities of some individuals. The conversation progresses through a series of vivid images and recollections, including a classroom scene with students and a nostalgic glimpse of a Shanghai street. Ultimately, the exchange is a meditation on the need for self-awareness and a rejection of simplistic notions of justice and retribution, concluding with a request for the room to be cleaned.

Announcement “Day of Literature” No. 4

2011-04-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The April 2011 issue of “Den’ Literatury” (Day of Literature) newspaper features articles including an introduction by Alexandra Prohanova on the mission of the Russian book, a final version of a ranking of literary critics of the 20th century by Vladimir Bondarenko, an interview with Zakhar Prilepin, prose by Evgeny Radov, poetry by Vyacheslav Lozko, Yuri Loposov, Elena Soynina, and Ludmila Shamenkova, an article about Viktor Smirnov by Alexei Smirnov, public writing by Alexander Vladimirov and Evgeny Chebalin, and reviews of Mikhail Popov’s new novella and Oleg Osetinsk’s work. The issue also includes a chronicle of literary life. The newspaper is available through the “Газеты и Журналы России” catalog (index 26260) and can be purchased at various locations in Moscow, including the editorial offices of “Den’ Literatury” and “Zavtra,” as well as bookstores like СП России, Litinstitut, and ЦДЛ.

“Russkaya kniga” presents

2011-04-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a catalog and promotional material for “Russkaya Kniga” (The Russian Book), a publishing house. It advertises a wide range of books, DVDs, and CDs, primarily focusing on historical and political themes related to Joseph Stalin and Soviet history. The catalog features titles exploring Stalin’s leadership, the Great Patriotic War, accusations of conspiracy against him, and various interpretations of Soviet history. It highlights a diverse selection of viewpoints, including those critical of Stalin and those defending his legacy. The catalog emphasizes special offers, discounts for pensioners and veterans, and multiple ordering options – including mail order, courier delivery within Moscow, and online purchasing. It provides contact information for ordering and a physical store location.

The mission of the Russian book.

2011-04-13 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The text explores the decline of literature following the collapse of the Soviet Union, arguing that the Soviet system, with its centralized control and ideological framework, fundamentally shaped Russian literature. This “axis” of influence, encompassing various literary movements like “soilist” and “liberal democratic,” determined the landscape of Russian literature.

After the Soviet collapse, this axis vanished, leaving literature adrift in a “cultural vacuum.” The author contends that contemporary literature lacks the systemic coherence of the Soviet era, failing to filter through critical analysis and public consciousness.

The rise of large-scale publishing houses producing formulaic “bricks” and the emergence of literary prize clubs attempting to create new literary centers are seen as insufficient to restore a robust literary ecosystem. The author expresses a belief that meaningful, potentially transformative, ideas are still present within modern books, awaiting the conditions for their full development, possibly through art forms beyond literature. Ultimately, the text paints a picture of a literature struggling to find its footing in a post-Soviet world, searching for a new foundation and a unifying force.

Display board

2011-04-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Sources within Warsaw report that the bombings in the Minsk metro, mirroring the Moscow attacks, are a pressure tactic against Alexander Lukashenko, intended to provoke harsh measures against the “pro-democracy opposition” and subsequent defamation on the international stage. Belarusian security services are believed capable of identifying the perpetrators and organizers within two to three weeks.

A “Katyń hysteria” is rising in Poland, alongside Russian demands for multi-billion dollar compensation, voiced by officials from Tajikistan and Romania, highlighting a contradiction in the “national repentance” policy proposed by Fedotov, Karaganov, and others.

The difficult passage of the temporary US budget, involving a $37 billion reduction in spending and a need to raise the national debt above $14.294 trillion, suggests a “dollar dead end.” A secret conference, initiated by George Soros and Goldman Sachs, is reportedly considering a new global currency backed by gold, with a shift of the primary financial center from New York to Singapore, while London remains a “reserve” center for global money management, incorporating BRICS economies including China.

The 50th anniversary of the first human spaceflight highlights the stagnation of global civilization, with no comparable breakthroughs since the 1930s-60s, and the US failing to maintain its role as a global leader. The Fukushima nuclear plant situation, now at the highest danger level, is predicted to have radiation levels exceeding those of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings.

Muammar Gaddafi’s regaining control of Libya, including the “rebellious” Cyrenaica region, is causing concern among the “international coalition,” which is deploying mercenaries to overthrow him and control oil terminals.

The flight of former “Bank of Moscow” head Andrey Borodin, who sold his bank’s shares to VTB executives at a fraction of their value, renders the agreement between VTB and Rosneft “meaningless.”

Official income declarations from Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin – $3.378 million and $5.042 million respectively – portray them as typical members of the “upper middle class,” which is doubted by Frankfurt sources and may erode public trust.

Carry your cross

2011-04-13 - Andrey Smirnov

Viktor Smetannikov was a remarkable and complex figure – a former GRU officer, Orthodox priest, builder, and explorer. From 1998 until his death in 2010, he gained notoriety for his audacious attempts to plant Russian Orthodox crosses on the North and South Poles, actions he undertook with a military-like discipline and unwavering determination.

Initially a military man, Smetannikov transitioned into a deeply religious and practical role, restoring a dilapidated church and establishing numerous community initiatives – a choir, an icon-painting workshop, a school, and even a farm commune. He operated with a strong sense of duty and a hands-on approach, often employing unconventional methods and demonstrating a remarkable resilience in the face of setbacks, including financial difficulties, personal injuries, and the collapse of his ambitious projects.

His life was marked by a constant struggle to implement his vision of a revitalized Russia, blending military discipline with spiritual devotion and practical skills. Despite numerous challenges and ultimately a premature death, Smetannikov remained a symbol of unwavering faith, self-reliance, and a desire to rebuild Russia’s spiritual and cultural foundations. His polar expeditions, though controversial, became iconic representations of this spirit.

“New nomads” are fighting against Russia III

2011-04-20 - Aleksandr Nagornyy

This text is a transcript of a 2011 interview with Mikhail Deliyagin, a director at the Institute of Globalization Problems, discussing the current situation in Russia. Deliyagin argues that the visit by US Vice President Biden, intended to secure Russia’s agreement to a UN resolution regarding Libya, was actually a manipulation by the US to further destabilize Russia. He believes the Russian government, particularly under President Medvedev, was deliberately misled and humiliated, with Biden intentionally undermining Medvedev’s authority.

Deliyagin contends that the upcoming 2012 elections are inherently illegitimate due to the existing political system’s corruption and manipulation, arguing that the “United Russia” party is not representative of the Russian people. He advocates for a boycott of the elections and a focus on organizing and uniting healthy forces within Russian society.

Furthermore, he outlines a need for significant economic reforms, including guaranteeing a minimum standard of living, curbing corruption and monopolies, and implementing protectionist measures. He stresses the importance of a strategic shift towards tactical nuclear weapons as a safeguard against the perceived actions of the US and NATO. Ultimately, Deliyagin paints a bleak picture of Russia’s political landscape, characterized by manipulation, corruption, and a lack of genuine representation, urging a proactive response from the Russian people to avert further decline.

It’s done!

2011-04-20 - Fëdor Biryukov

The text explores the complex and often contradictory relationship with Vladimir Lenin’s legacy. It argues that Lenin has become a myth, built not on genuine understanding but on a towering “pyramid” of rumors, speculation, and ideological manipulation. Initially, Lenin was treated with a mixture of reverence and disdain by the Communist Party, who sought to control and sanitize his image. Later, counterculture figures and dissidents found value in Lenin as a figure of rebellion and critique, using him as a tool for subversive thought. The author suggests that attempts to understand Lenin’s significance require confronting the “questions” – the underlying desires and fears – that fuel the myth. Ultimately, Lenin remains a powerful, albeit distorted, symbol, shaped by the interpretations of those who engage with his legacy.

Without any additional comment or request, translate in English the following text: О величии забвения Without any additional comment or request, translate in English the following text: О величии забвения About the greatness of oblivion.

2011-04-27 - Andrey Smirnov

Georgy Osipov, in a lengthy interview, expresses a skeptical and somewhat cynical view of contemporary culture and the way people consume information. He critiques the tendency for people to rapidly absorb vast amounts of material without genuine understanding, comparing it to a flawed attempt at mastering multiple books or albums. He values a measured, deliberate approach to learning and experiencing art, emphasizing the importance of recognizing one’s own limitations and avoiding self-importance.

Osipov’s artistic philosophy centers around a preference for works that resist easy interpretation and are rooted in a deep understanding of history and culture. He admires artists who have struggled and suffered, believing that genuine artistic achievement is often linked to hardship and a rejection of superficial trends. He uses examples like Gogol’s Chartkov and critiques the way contemporary artists are often reduced to mere symbols or fashionable figures. He advocates for a cautious and discerning approach to art, warning against the dangers of excessive consumption and the distortion of cultural heritage. He values a measured approach to learning and experiencing art, warning against the dangers of excessive consumption and the distortion of cultural heritage.

Eston Standard

2011-04-27 - Dmitriy Linter

This text is a lengthy, impassioned account by Dmitry Lintzer, a member of the “Night Watch” activist group, detailing his experiences and observations regarding the situation in Tallinn, particularly concerning the Bronze Soldier monument and the broader relationship between Russia and Estonia. Lintzer expresses deep frustration with what he perceives as a deliberate attempt by the Estonian government to demonize Russia and its historical ties to the region, specifically through the framing of historical events like the Soviet occupation as inherently negative.

The core of Lintzer’s argument revolves around the perceived hypocrisy of the Estonian government’s actions. He highlights the government’s support for Waffen-SS veterans, its use of electronic voting systems riddled with potential for manipulation, and its overall efforts to create a narrative of antagonism towards Russia. He argues that the “de-Stalinization” movement, while ostensibly aimed at historical accuracy, is actually being used to justify continued hostility and to paint Russians as “occupiers” even when they were, in Lintzer’s view, fighting for liberation.

Lintzer emphasizes the personal impact of these actions, detailing his own imprisonment and the surveillance and harassment faced by himself and his associates. He outlines the formation of a new activist group, “Night Watch,” which is focused on building a grassroots movement, establishing legitimate leadership within the Russian community in Estonia, and advocating for a more positive and constructive relationship between the two countries. He stresses the importance of preserving Russian cultural and historical identity and argues for a broader vision of unity within the post-Soviet space. Ultimately, Lintzer presents a polemic against what he sees as a politically motivated campaign of disinformation and repression.

There once lived

2011-04-27 - Anna Serafimova

This text presents a satirical and absurdist commentary on a fictional country’s approach to a seemingly mundane problem – controlling flies. It uses the fly-catching dilemma to critique authoritarianism, propaganda, and the manipulation of public opinion. The narrative explores various proposed solutions – sticky tape, insecticide (dichlorvos), and even manual fly-catching – each accompanied by competing factions and vested interests. The story highlights the absurdity of prioritizing simplistic solutions over genuine progress, and the dangers of blindly following authority, even when presented with seemingly democratic processes. It satirizes the use of slogans, manipulated public opinion, and the prioritization of control over critical thinking. Ultimately, it’s a critique of a system where citizens are encouraged to chase distractions rather than address fundamental issues, symbolized by the futile pursuit of flies.

Russia is with you!

2011-04-27 - Vladimir Kvachkov

This open letter, written by Colonel Vladimir Kvakov in April 2011, advocates for a guerilla and sabotage campaign against the United States and its allies following the start of the Libyan intervention. Kvakov argues that the conflict mirrors the 1999 NATO intervention in Yugoslavia and calls for a similar strategy – utilizing the indigenous population of the United States (primarily Native Americans) to wage a national liberation struggle.

He proposes targeting military bases, infrastructure (including nuclear power plants), and disrupting the US economy through sabotage and disruption. Specifically, he suggests leveraging the Native American population to challenge US sovereignty and potentially secede from the Union. The letter frames this as a necessary response to perceived aggression and a defense of national sovereignty, highlighting the failure of the “melting pot” concept in the US and advocating for a return to traditional values of national defense and revolutionary action. He believes the US is a failing state and that a coordinated effort, utilizing the Native American population, could effectively dismantle it.

Tra

2011-05-04 - Sergey Kurginyan

This text presents a critical analysis of a growing trend within Russia – a program of “de-Stalinization” spearheaded by figures like Sergei Kurigan and S. Karaganov. It argues that this program, driven by a desire to confront the legacy of the Soviet Union, is fundamentally misguided and potentially destabilizing.

The core argument is that this de-Stalinization effort, supported by organizations like “AKSIO,” is based on a deeply flawed understanding of Russian society. The analysis highlights that the program is being promoted by individuals who, despite recognizing the negative aspects of the Soviet past, are actively contributing to a further polarization of society and a heightened sense of antagonism.

Key points include:

Ultimately, the text urges a halt to the de-Stalinization program, arguing that it is a misguided attempt to address the past that will only serve to further divide and destabilize Russian society.

Who is to blame?

2011-05-18 - Yekaterina Glushik

The article reviews the book “Who Destroyed the USSR?” by Alexander Sazonov, which argues that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a deliberate and meticulously planned process orchestrated by foreign politicians, intelligence agencies, and internal agents of influence within the USSR. The book relies on newly released archival documents, including transcripts of meetings and discussions, revealing a strategy of destabilization involving manipulating elections, creating economic hardship, and sowing discord. Key figures like Gorbachev, Reagan, and Yegorov are implicated, alongside internal actors like Gavril Popov and a figure identified as “Yeltsin,” showcasing a calculated effort to dismantle the Soviet system over approximately 50 years, with the final phase of destruction occurring in December 1991. The author highlights the importance of preserving these documents, arguing that they expose a deliberate and ruthless campaign to destroy the USSR, and that the book contributes to a greater understanding of this “tragedy.”

Apostrophe

2011-05-25 - Daniil Toropov

The text reviews the biography of Vladimir Purishkevich by Andrey Ivanov, titled “Vladimir Purishkevich – Biography of a Right-Wing Politician (1870–1920).” It details Purishkevich’s complex and often contradictory life, highlighting his brilliant education, organizational skills, oratorical talent, and literary pursuits, alongside his controversial political stances and involvement in significant historical events. The biography emphasizes Purishkevich’s ability to influence others, as evidenced by his interactions with figures like Maximilian Voloshin, Bunin, and Dzerzhinsky, and his prolific use of memorable phrases and sayings. The text notes Purishkevich’s shifting political allegiances and his role in key moments such as the attempted rescue of the Romanovs and the infamous Yusupov mansion incident. Ivanov’s work is presented as a comprehensive portrait not just of Purishkevich, but of the broader tragic and significant era he inhabited, and the book is recommended for both specialists and those interested in Russian history.

Dark forces

2011-05-25 - Vladimir Ovchinskiy

This article discusses a new controversy surrounding the September 11th attacks, specifically alleging Iranian involvement in planning and facilitating the attacks. Three former Iranian intelligence officials have testified that the Iranian government was involved in the attacks, providing details about training terrorists and offering material support to Al-Qaeda. This revelation poses a significant challenge to President Obama, potentially damaging his credibility after the successful “elimination” of Osama bin Laden.

The article argues that Obama is now being pressured to respond to this new information, potentially leading to military action against Iran. However, Iran is portrayed as a more formidable opponent than Iraq or Libya, and a conflict would be unpredictable and damaging.

Furthermore, the article suggests a conspiracy theory, claiming that “dark forces” are manipulating events, possibly linked to figures like Michael Ledeen, who were involved in the “Niger uranium” affair. It posits that Obama is being influenced by these forces, mirroring concerns raised by John F. Kennedy about secret societies. The author concludes that Obama’s efforts to resolve problems after 9/11 have been unsuccessful and that the situation is becoming increasingly volatile as the US presidential elections approach.

Russian Atlantis will resurface.

2011-06-01 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The text describes a growing cultural movement in rural Russia, driven by young intellectuals seeking to define a uniquely Russian identity rooted in local history, traditions, and spiritual values. These individuals are forming independent cultural centers, often centered around places like Svetloyar Lake near Nizhny Novgorod, which is viewed as a source of Russian spiritual resilience and a potential savior in times of national crisis. These groups draw inspiration from diverse sources – from Siberian folklore and industrial heritage to religious figures like Seraphim of Sarov and the legend of Kitezh. The author emphasizes the importance of these grassroots movements as a counterbalance to perceived societal chaos and a potential catalyst for a “Russian miracle” – a renewed spiritual strength capable of guiding Russia through difficult times. The text frames these developments as a vital, ongoing process of rediscovering and reaffirming Russia’s core identity.

House of contemp

2011-06-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text critiques the state of Russian healthcare, portraying it as deeply flawed and undergoing a troubling transformation. It describes a system characterized by corruption, managerial overreach, and a decline in the traditional values of medical service. The core issue is the shift from a system where doctors prioritized patient care to one dominated by bureaucratic managers and profit-driven practices, facilitated by a flawed insurance system (ETS).

The narrative highlights a generational change, with older, dedicated doctors gradually being replaced by younger professionals who prioritize paperwork and following managerial dictates over genuine patient care. There’s a pervasive sense of disillusionment and a loss of the doctor’s role as a healer, replaced by a focus on generating reports and navigating complex bureaucratic processes. The text expresses concern about the impact of these changes on the quality of care and the future of the profession, emphasizing the dwindling number of truly dedicated doctors and the increasing prevalence of cynicism and self-interest within the system. It concludes with a note of cautious optimism, asserting that despite the challenges, dedicated doctors still exist, representing a vital, though diminishing, force within the healthcare landscape.

Planned economy

2011-06-01 - Yuriy Boldyrev

Юрий Болдырев argues that public consciousness is not dominated by a catastrophic outlook, but rather by a misguided sense of complacency. He believes this stems from a focus on individual survival and a lack of collective will, exemplified by the “accumulative” pension system which encourages hoarding rather than shared prosperity. He criticizes the Western model, particularly the dominance of financial speculation and the exploitation of developing nations, arguing that it’s leading to a “war of attrition” rather than genuine progress. He sees a potential shift towards a more collaborative and socially-oriented model, but remains skeptical about whether this will truly materialize, suggesting the current trend is towards a cycle of competition and exploitation. Ultimately, he believes the core issue is the Western model’s prioritization of individual gain over collective well-being and its reliance on a perpetually unsustainable global system.

Why are we feeding the dollar?

2011-06-08 - Aleksandr Ayvazov

This text is a critical analysis of Russia’s economic situation and policies, primarily focusing on the challenges stemming from a reliance on a Western-style, neoliberal economic model. The author argues that Russia’s economic woes are rooted in a failure to understand and adapt to global economic cycles, particularly the “big cycles” of economic development identified by Kondratiev.

The core argument is that Russia’s economic problems are exacerbated by a dependence on the US dollar as a reserve currency and the resulting distortions caused by policies like artificially low oil prices and the manipulation of the ruble. The author criticizes the government’s support for the mortgage market and the expansion of the housing sector, arguing that this is a misallocation of resources and a perpetuation of a flawed system.

Furthermore, the text highlights the detrimental effects of excessive inequality, driven by a concentration of wealth and a lack of investment in the domestic economy. The author suggests that a shift towards state-led investment in sectors like agriculture and housing, combined with a more robust tax system targeting the wealthy, is necessary for sustainable economic development.

Finally, the text expresses a pessimistic outlook, predicting an even deeper global economic crisis in the coming years and warning that Russia’s current economic model is fundamentally unsustainable. It concludes with a call for a radical change in economic thinking and policy.

“Need to toughen up.”

2011-06-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This speech, delivered on May 24, 2011, to graduating students in Pskov and the Pskov region, emphasizes the importance of resilience and a strong spirit. The speaker, a Metropolitan, urges young people to value their lives, be wary of destructive influences, and arm themselves with patience, faith, and responsibility. Drawing parallels to the victory over fascism, he highlights the constant struggle for a meaningful life, advocating for a life of purpose, love for family and country, and a commitment to truth and goodness. The speech concludes with a blessing for health, salvation, and long life, and a reaffirmation of faith.

First pla

2011-06-08 - Boris Liznëv

This text recounts a surreal and somewhat disappointing experience during a trip to Kyiv for a documentary film festival. The narrator is unexpectedly given the room previously occupied by Nikita Mikhalkov, a luxurious suite within a VIP hotel overlooking the Dnipro River and adorned with celebrity photographs and opulent furnishings. Despite the initial extravagant welcome and over-the-top service, the situation quickly changes when the narrator learns he’ll be moved to accommodate actress Svetlana Mogilevskaya. The experience culminates in a cramped and uncomfortable room at a pilgrim’s hotel near the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, highlighting a stark contrast to the initial lavish promises.

Apostrophe

2011-06-15 - Vladimir Vinnikov

This lengthy review of Zahar Prilepin’s “Black Monkey” analyzes the novel as a complex, multi-layered work. The reviewer identifies three key strata: a reimagining of Tolkien-esque “hobbit” narratives, a politically charged commentary centered on the character of Velimir Sharov (a figure resembling Putin), and a profound exploration of the disillusionment and moral decay experienced by a generation shaped by the Soviet collapse and subsequent reforms. The novel is described as a “SOS-realism” or “catastrophic realism” reflecting a widespread sense of defeat and moral ambiguity. Prilepin’s work is characterized by its fragmented, uneven structure, likened to a “broken road,” and suggests the author is operating within a state of profound uncertainty, potentially navigating between commercial literature, social protest, or a more genuinely literary space. The reviewer emphasizes the difficulty of achieving this level of nuanced observation, comparing it to the work of Viktor Pelevin, and concludes that Prilepin’s journey into this “point of bifurcation” remains unpredictable.

Planned economy

2011-06-15 - Yuriy Boldyrev

Here’s a summary of the provided text:

The text is a transcript of an interview between economist Yuri Boldyrev and journalist Ekaterina Glushik. Boldyrev reflects on his political journey, starting with his disillusionment with the Soviet system and his role in founding “Yabloko.” He critiques the current state of the Russian economy, arguing for a shift away from a purely market-driven approach and advocating for a more self-sufficient and strategically focused model. He expresses skepticism about the prevailing trends, particularly the concentration of wealth and power, and highlights the need for a fundamental change in Russia’s approach to economic development, emphasizing a return to core values and a rejection of Western-imposed models. He also touches on the challenges of navigating the current geopolitical landscape and the need for Russia to prioritize its own interests.

Apostrophe

2011-06-22 - Oleg Kilʹdyushov

George Ritzer’s book, “McDonaldization,” examines the ongoing influence of Max Weber’s theory of rationalization in contemporary society, particularly through the lens of the fast-food industry. The book explores how the principles of efficiency, calculability, predictability, and strict control, exemplified by “McDonald’s,” have become pervasive in various aspects of modern life, including consumer culture and entertainment. Ritzer draws on historical figures like Weber, Taylor, and Ford to illustrate the roots of this process. The book aims to raise awareness of the potential negative consequences of “McDonaldization,” highlighting its dehumanizing effects and advocating for a more humane approach to this increasingly dominant mode of organization. Ritzer’s work seeks to shift public consciousness and encourage a critical engagement with the forces shaping contemporary society.

Palaces and crows

2011-06-22 - Marina Aleksinskaya

This text is a sprawling, somewhat chaotic reflection on the state of the Bolshoi Theatre and broader cultural and political issues in Russia in 2011. It begins by juxtaposing the legacy of Soviet-era missile production with the current situation, using the example of a woman’s “blessing” from a veteran Soviet officer to illustrate the perceived distortions of truth. The author then shifts to a detailed account of a June 3rd performance of “Swan Lake” at the Bolshoi, highlighting the ongoing efforts to modernize the theatre and the persistent rumors surrounding director Anatoly Iksanov’s dismissal.

The core of the piece is a relentless investigation into corruption and mismanagement within the Bolshoi, fueled by anonymous accusations and leaked information. The author details a complex web of figures – including Iksanov, Minister of Culture Mikhail Shvydkoy, and newly appointed figures – all implicated in alleged financial irregularities and a lack of transparency. The text is saturated with accusations of bribery, inflated budgets, and a deliberate obfuscation of the truth. It uses the performance of “Swan Lake” as a backdrop to expose a deeper crisis of trust and accountability within the theatre and the broader cultural landscape. The author concludes by emphasizing the ongoing struggle for “truth” within the Bolshoi, suggesting a persistent and potentially dangerous battle for control and influence.

Display board

2011-06-22 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text analyzes various political and economic developments in Russia, Belarus, Greece, and Libya, alongside the Fukushima nuclear crisis. Key themes include the 2012 Russian presidential election dynamics, with Medvedev reportedly attempting to undermine Putin’s chances and support Sergey Sobyanin. The text highlights concerns about Russia’s technological stagnation and the potential collapse of the Belarusian-Russian Union. It details financial pressure on Belarus, the ongoing Greek debt crisis linked to territorial concessions, the stalled NATO intervention in Libya, and the escalating risks surrounding the Fukushima nuclear plant. Finally, it notes the difficulties Obama faces in securing continued funding for the Libyan operation.

Forty-first…

2011-06-22 - Vladimir Vinnikov

This text argues that the Soviet Union’s early defeats in World War II were not solely due to German aggression, but rather a complex web of internal errors and external manipulations. It posits that a “plan Dalle” – allegedly outlined in a novel and later attributed to a Soviet-US exchange – aimed to destabilize the USSR by exploiting internal divisions and fostering a potential “Russian” resistance movement.

The author contends that factors such as over-reliance on rapid economic growth, a cultural rift caused by the revolution, and the influence of figures like Mikhail Tukhachevsky contributed to the initial setbacks. The text highlights the role of figures like Vladimir Vinnikov and Anatoly Ivanov in shaping this narrative.

It suggests that the United States, particularly through the “plan Dalle,” actively sought to undermine the Soviet Union, and that this influence continues to resonate in subsequent events, including the rise of figures like Nikita Khrushchev and ultimately, the post-Soviet era and the current Russian government. The author emphasizes a cyclical pattern, suggesting that the “1941” situation – characterized by internal errors and external pressures – continues to shape Russia’s trajectory. The text concludes by pointing to the ongoing attempts to rewrite history and equate the Russian tricolor with the Nazi swastika, framing the entire narrative as a continuation of a deliberate strategy.

Russian steel

2011-06-22 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The text is a detailed and somewhat romanticized account of a visit to a modern steel pipe factory in Vyksa, Russia. It focuses on the owner, Anatoly Sedoy, a Russian capitalist who has revitalized the factory by importing Western technology, employing international workers, and aligning his business with Russia’s national interests – specifically, its security and prosperity. The author is captivated by the factory’s operation, describing it as a “civilization of fire and steel,” a “divine beauty and unwavering faith,” and a symbol of Russia’s potential for a new, powerful future. Sedoy’s approach is presented as a rare and admirable example of a modern Russian entrepreneur prioritizing national interests alongside personal gain. The factory itself is portrayed as a vibrant, thriving center of innovation and a testament to Russia’s ability to compete with Western industrial powers.

Zoya’s notes

2011-06-29 - Vladimir Bondarenko

This text is a review of Sergei Shargunov’s book, “Book Without Photographs,” published in 2011. The reviewer sees the book as a candid and somewhat self-aware account of Shargunov’s experiences navigating the political landscape of post-Soviet Russia. He portrays Shargunov as a young, ambitious writer who initially gained attention for his outsider perspective, being viewed as a “nobody” by the political elite despite his literary success. The book chronicles Shargunov’s travels, including trips to the Caucasus and Georgia, as attempts to prove his worth and significance.

The reviewer emphasizes Shargunov’s honesty and willingness to confront his own position within this system. He highlights the book’s relevance as a reflection of a generation disillusioned with post-Soviet politics and the desire for change. Shargunov’s experiences, including his upbringing in an anti-communist religious family, are presented as crucial to understanding his perspective.

The review praises Shargunov’s growing skill as a writer, noting his evolution beyond purely photographic journalism. It also acknowledges his youth and vulnerability, suggesting that he must remain grounded and focused on his craft. Ultimately, the reviewer sees the book as a significant work, foreshadowing potential future social and political shifts in Russia, and a reflection of a generation seeking to define its place in history.

Extended hand of the marke

2011-06-29 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text outlines the challenges faced by small-scale traders, particularly those operating on open markets in Russia, and advocates for greater protection and representation for these traders. It describes a situation where many traders, often former workers or intellectuals, operate out of necessity rather than passion, frequently encountering issues like extortion, pressure from administrators, and difficulties in securing fair prices due to high rental fees and a lack of organized support. The author, Leonid Rozvozhaev, highlights the chaotic conditions on markets like the Cherkizovsky market, where issues such as illegal immigration, smuggling, and a breakdown in security led to widespread disruption and hardship for traders and shoppers alike. He argues that the current system, driven by a desire to redevelop market land into expensive real estate, is exploiting these traders. Rozvozhaev proposes the creation of a centralized, cooperative wholesale trading center, managed by a council of renters, as a solution to these problems, emphasizing the need for greater self-governance and protection for these vital economic actors. He stresses the importance of recognizing the collective nature of these traders and their ability to organize and advocate for their rights.

About “Jewish century”

2011-07-06 - Igorʹ Shafarevich

This text is a continuation of a historical analysis, primarily focusing on the complex and often contradictory relationship between Jewish intellectuals and the Soviet regime, particularly during the period of Stalin’s rule and the Great Purge. The author, likely a historian, dissects the perceptions and realities surrounding Jewish representation within the Soviet government and security apparatus.

Initially, the text examines Yuri Slezkine’s work, which highlights the significant role Jews played in the Bolshevik revolution and the subsequent manipulation of this fact to fuel anti-revolutionary sentiment. It critiques the argument that Jews were primarily motivated by personal grievances or a desire for revenge, suggesting a deeper, more unsettling factor – a willingness to participate in the regime’s violence.

The author then introduces the writings of Anatoly Shulgin, who controversially argued that Jews, particularly in the 1930s, adopted a form of “ethnic guilt” and responsibility, anticipating a moral reckoning that never fully materialized. This position was widely supported by other Jewish intellectuals, leading to a paradoxical situation where Jews were both pillars of the regime and victims of its excesses.

The analysis emphasizes the disproportionate number of Jewish individuals within the NKVD (the Soviet secret police) and the Gulag system, a fact that fueled suspicion and accusations of anti-Jewish bias. The author points out the irony of this situation, where Jews were instrumental in perpetrating the very violence they were later accused of being victims of.

Finally, the text explores the perspectives of returning émigré intellectuals, like the Ulanovs, who struggled to reconcile their past support for the regime with the horrors of the Great Purge. The author concludes by reiterating the central paradox of the situation: that Jews, despite their prominent role in the Soviet system, were ultimately caught in a web of suspicion and violence, a situation that highlights the dangers of ideological manipulation and the complexities of historical memory. The text suggests a continuing narrative will be explored, focusing on the most sensitive aspects of this relationship.

Display board

2011-07-06 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text compiles a series of intelligence reports and analyses, primarily focused on geopolitical risks and strategic assessments. Key themes include: concerns about a manipulated Russian political landscape and upcoming presidential elections, a perceived green light for NATO’s missile defense system expansion, shifts in Russian energy policy (particularly Gazprom’s leadership changes reflecting a neo-liberal ideology), escalating tensions with Ukraine, potential US economic instability (including a dollar decline), the stalled Libyan conflict and the potential for further escalation, and Turkey’s growing role as a destabilizing force in the Middle East, specifically through support for opposition movements in Libya and Syria. The reports suggest a complex web of strategic maneuvering by various actors, with significant implications for Russia’s security and economic interests.

To hell and back

2011-07-13 - Anastasiya Belokurova

This text is a largely critical and somewhat cynical review of the 33rd Moscow International Film Festival. It details numerous organizational failings, including malfunctioning computers, chaotic ticket lines, and a generally unpleasant experience for critics. The review highlights a sense of frustration with the festival’s perceived lack of attention to detail and the often-negative attitudes of some of its organizers, particularly towards critics.

It expresses amusement at the perceived absurdity of the festival’s problems, framing them as opportunities for commentary. The review focuses on the films themselves, noting a trend towards violent and often bleak narratives, including a particularly unsettling film about female genital mutilation.

Awards are presented with a sardonic tone, with a young British director receiving a prize for a film about a Nazi hunter, and Helen Mirren receiving a special award for her connection to Russian acting traditions. The review concludes with a feeling of weary resignation, suggesting that despite the challenges, the festival ultimately delivered a worthwhile experience.

There once lived

2011-07-13 - Anna Serafimova

A woman on a subway expresses frustration with the lack of discipline she observes in children and adults, particularly criticizing the perceived lack of responsibility among teachers and the demands of parents. She argues that teachers shouldn’t be burdened with the role of disciplinarians, as they are not obligated to do so, and that parents’ expectations are often overly focused on capitalist values. The conversation devolves into a debate about individual responsibility and the unwillingness of people to take action, even when they desire a better society. Ultimately, the woman resists taking any personal responsibility, relying on others to fix the problems she identifies.

Apostrophe

2011-07-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a darkly humorous and philosophical novella by V.V. End, exploring themes of resistance, control, and the enduring human spirit. It recounts a seemingly absurd and surreal narrative centered around a man who encounters a mysterious figure named Istem, a former member of a Zaporizhian Jewish khanate. The story unfolds through a series of bizarre events, including a thwarted attempt to model the collapse of the Soviet Union, a tragic military incident involving a BTR, and a confrontation with a KGB investigator. Throughout, the narrative suggests a struggle against a suffocating, totalitarian system that seeks to erase individual thought and memory. The central metaphor is that of a “crumbling” system, symbolized by the destroyed “bridge to space,” and the protagonist’s attempts to escape its influence. Ultimately, the story emphasizes the importance of maintaining one’s inner self and resisting attempts to conform, suggesting that even in the face of overwhelming power, the human capacity for love and defiance can prevail.

Behind an iron curtai

2011-07-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text describes the ongoing plight of approximately 2,000 Russian nationalist prisoners, a number increasing daily. These individuals, including journalists and ordinary citizens, have been sentenced for expressing nationalist views or for fabricated charges. Many have endured torture and coerced confessions. The text urges readers to provide support through writing letters of encouragement, sending material aid (via specified bank accounts and PayPal), and attending fundraising events and an action near the Dorogomilovsky Court on July 24th. Donations will receive a commemorative gift.

Norwegian Butcher

2011-07-27 - Nikolay Konʹkov

This text analyzes the 2011 Norway attack, framing it as a potential warning for current Russian leadership. It argues that the attack was not solely the work of a lone, mentally unstable individual, but rather a calculated operation orchestrated by external forces, specifically the United States, seeking to maintain control over its allies.

The author posits that the attack was designed to destabilize Russia, given its economic strength (particularly its energy resources and nuclear capabilities) and its growing independence from US influence, exemplified by its continued participation in the Libyan conflict. The text suggests that the US utilizes manipulative tactics, including psychological operations (referenced through the Timothy Leiri experiments), to influence vulnerable populations and maintain control.

It highlights the significant internal instability within Russia – high levels of social inequality, terrorism, and regional conflict – as a key vulnerability. The author concludes that the attack serves as a warning, suggesting that the current Russian leadership faces immense pressure from external forces and internal dissent, potentially leading to a situation where it is caught between external pressure and internal unrest.

Battle for History

2011-08-03 - Vladimir Karpets

The text explores the evolving geopolitical significance of the Arctic, framing it as a “battle for the continent” driven by historical narratives and ideological clashes. It argues that the Arctic’s strategic importance stems from a “hyperborean theory,” positing a return to a primordial homeland for ancient peoples – specifically, the Arian route through Russia, India, and Antarctica. This theory fuels a conflict between Russia and the “New Atlantis” (the West), with the melting Arctic ice accelerating this struggle. The text highlights historical expeditions and research, including Soviet and Russian efforts, as evidence supporting this narrative. It suggests a broader ideological conflict, linking the Arctic’s importance to a “transcendental geopolitics” centered on the Arian East, contrasting it with the Western-dominated “Atlantis.” The melting ice is seen as a catalyst for a return to this ancient route, potentially reshaping global power dynamics and challenging Western influence.

It’s done!

2011-08-03 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a scathing critique of Moscow’s new mayor, Sergei Sobyanin, and his administration’s policies. The author argues that Sobyanin’s actions, particularly the “tile craze” – the widespread replacement of asphalt with cheap concrete tiles in the city center – are a superficial and ultimately damaging distraction from addressing Moscow’s serious systemic problems. The author accuses Sobyanin of engaging in populist gestures, focusing on minor issues like parking fines and immigration registration, while ignoring the deeper issues of urban decay and infrastructure problems. There’s suspicion surrounding Sobyanin’s wife’s involvement in the tile industry, and concerns about the potential damage to historical foundations and the creation of a dangerous, slippery surface. The overall tone is one of cynicism and frustration, suggesting that Sobyanin’s efforts are a futile attempt to mask a broken system and that the situation is likely to worsen.

There once lived

2011-08-17 - Anna Serafimova

The text is a rambling, stream-of-consciousness monologue about hearing voices and their implications. The narrator expresses skepticism about the voices, initially dismissing them as potentially dangerous and unsettling. They then engage in a lengthy, critical examination of societal issues – democracy, corruption, economic growth, and technological advancement – through the lens of these voices. The narrator uses these voices to critique the superficiality of modern life, highlighting the gap between lofty ideals and actual outcomes. They express frustration with the lack of genuine progress and the manipulation of language and rhetoric. Ultimately, the narrator concludes that the voices are more interested in sounding authoritative than in reflecting truth or understanding, and they urge listeners not to succumb to their pronouncements.

Golden cup… Abundant cup…

2011-08-17 - Timur Zulʹfikarov

This text is a lengthy, intensely personal and somewhat surreal reflection on a life spent observing and documenting the world, particularly through the lens of a long-time acquaintance, Timur Zubifkar. It’s a deeply nostalgic and melancholic piece, filled with vivid imagery and a preoccupation with beauty, truth, and the elusive nature of love and artistic creation.

Timur Zubifkar is portrayed as a profoundly wise and observant figure – a “muallim” (teacher), “domullo” (wise man), and “ustod” (master) – deeply connected to both Russian and Persian cultures. He’s celebrated for his poetic and epic works, written in Russian, which are characterized by a “vers libre” style and a fascination with themes of love, death, and the human condition.

The narrator, an unnamed observer, recounts a meeting with Timur on the Greek island of Cyprus, where he’s contemplating death. This encounter triggers a flood of memories and reflections on Timur’s life and work, and on the narrator’s own life. The text is saturated with sensual imagery – particularly of the female form – and a yearning for connection and understanding.

Ultimately, the text is a meditation on the fleeting nature of beauty, the importance of artistic expression, and the enduring power of memory. It’s a passionate, almost obsessive, tribute to a singular, enigmatic figure, and a poignant exploration of the human desire for meaning and connection in a world often characterized by chaos and loss. The narrator’s final act – immersing himself in the sea with Timur’s beloved – symbolizes a merging of souls and a final, blissful surrender to the inevitable.

It’s done!

2011-08-17 - Vladimir Ovchinskiy

The text criticizes Western liberal responses to the events in Libya and Egypt, arguing that they initially supported violent uprisings while labeling legitimate authorities as tyrannical. It highlights how Western countries, particularly the UK and the US, subsequently imposed restrictive measures like curfews and surveillance on their own populations following similar unrest. The author suggests that this behavior is driven by a hypocritical support for chaos and a willingness to use repressive tactics when faced with dissent, predicting that liberal leaders in Russia would similarly demand harsh measures and potentially establish repressive regimes if they gained power.

Russian vagabond Emelini

2011-08-24 - Aleksey Tatarinov

Всеволод Емелин’s poetry is characterized by a cynical and ironic engagement with contemporary Russian society and culture. He portrays himself as a “vagrant” – a figure detached from mainstream values and disillusioned with the promises of modernization. His work often takes the form of dark humor and satire, skewering figures of authority, popular culture, and the broader social landscape.

Emeilin’s style is marked by a fragmented, conversational tone, frequently employing a stream-of-consciousness approach. He frequently uses a “voice” that is both self-deprecating and aggressively critical, often adopting the persona of a disillusioned observer – a “fool” or “idiot” – who is acutely aware of the absurdities of the world around him.

A key element of his work is his exploration of addiction, particularly alcoholism, as a means of both escape and creative fuel. He frequently depicts himself as a figure struggling with dependency, using it as a lens through which to examine broader themes of social decay and personal failure.

His poetry is deeply rooted in a tradition of Russian “vanguard” literature, particularly the work of figures like Alexander Blok and Andrei Bely, but he adapts these traditions to the specific context of post-Soviet Russia. He embraces a nihilistic worldview, questioning the meaning of existence and the possibility of genuine progress.

Ultimately, Emeilin’s poetry is a defiant and unsettling reflection on the state of Russia in the 21st century – a country grappling with its past and uncertain about its future.

Demand for pogroms

2011-09-07 - Miroslav Mitrofanov

The text analyzes a political situation in Latvia, driven by widespread disillusionment and a rising demand for retribution. Twenty years after independence, Latvia faces economic hardship stemming from flawed liberal policies and a reliance on foreign loans. This has fueled resentment towards both the former “oligarchic” politicians and the Russian minority. A far-right party, “Vсё для Латвии,” is capitalizing on this sentiment, explicitly calling for a “demand for pogrom” – organizing online campaigns to destroy Russian schools and garner support for violence against Russians. This demand for revenge, fueled by a sense of hopelessness and a rejection of compromise, represents a significant shift in Latvian politics, prioritizing immediate, destructive action over reasoned political solutions.

Communism and Reformatio

2011-09-07 - Aleksandr Molotkov

This text analyzes the Russian Revolution and the Soviet experiment through the lens of a “religious reformation,” arguing that it was a uniquely Christian attempt to restructure society. It posits that the Soviet Union, despite its atheistic ideology, was fundamentally shaped by a radical Christian ethical impulse – a “Christian social socialism.”

The core argument is that the Soviet project, born from a profound religious reinterpretation of Christian principles, represented a historically significant attempt to realize Christian social ideals. This reformation, distinct from Western European Protestantism, produced a “Soviet man” guided by social justice, equality, and brotherhood, reflecting core Orthodox values.

However, the text critiques the failure of the Soviet project because it lacked a truly integrated understanding of this religious foundation. The purely materialist interpretation of communism ultimately undermined its spiritual depth, leading to ideological stagnation.

The author advocates for a renewed “strategic consensus” – a synthesis of Orthodox spirituality and communist social ideals – as the key to Russia’s future. It suggests that recognizing the fundamentally Christian nature of the Soviet experiment, and actively pursuing its spiritual and social goals, is essential for Russia’s continued development and identity. The text concludes with a call for a new, “quantum” approach to Orthodox-Communist thought, emphasizing a balance between rational social organization and spiritual strength, as the only path to a successful future for Russia.

The moon is attacking…

2011-09-07 - Anastasiya Belokurova

This article reviews the film “Apollo 18,” a mockumentary presented as a rediscovered archival film. It details the film’s origins, including its creation by a Russian production team with the involvement of established Hollywood figures like Timur Bekmambetov and NASA consultants. The core concept is a chilling story of an Apollo 18 mission that uncovers a terrifying secret: Soviet cosmonauts were also on the moon, and they discovered evidence of a sinister, potentially Nazi-linked, presence. The film utilizes a realistic, almost documentary-style approach, employing techniques like scratched film stock and 16mm footage to enhance the illusion of authenticity. The reviewer highlights the film’s inspiration from 1970s sci-fi horror and draws parallels to earlier Soviet films like “Kozorog-1,” which popularized the “lunar conspiracy” theory. The article playfully notes the potential for future films exploring darker, more conspiratorial themes related to the number 18 and its possible connection to Nazi activity.

Renaissance of realism

2011-09-07 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The exhibition “Renaissance of Realism” by the Union of Russian Artists opened in Gomel in 2011 as part of the “Cultural Capitals of the Commonwealth” program. Established in 2008, it’s a successor to the original organization active from 1903-1923, featuring artists like Vasnetsov, Vrubel, and Суриков. The exhibition, with works largely unseen before, focused on Russian history, culture, and traditions, particularly landscapes representing various regions of Russia. The Union of Russian Artists was invited to represent Russia officially in Gomel and is slated to remain in Belarus until 2012, with plans for a future joint exhibition with Belarusian artists in Minsk.

Strategy 666

2011-09-14 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The text critiques the current leadership in Russia, arguing they lack the historical drive, vision, and genuine concern for the Russian people that characterized past rulers. It suggests the current regime is focused on accumulating wealth and power, mimicking imperial ambitions without the substance to back them up. The author contrasts this with the historical efforts of Russian leaders to expand the nation, build a strong military, and foster a rich culture. The text expresses disillusionment with the current state of Russia, highlighting corruption, economic stagnation, and a decline in national identity, symbolized by events like the Yak-42 plane crash and the influence of figures like Prokhorov and Okhlobystin. It concludes with a pessimistic outlook, predicting a future dominated by superficiality and a further erosion of Russia’s national spirit.

Don’t let Ivan be president…

2011-09-21 - Georgiy Sudovtsev

The text critiques Ivan Okhlobystin’s political aspirations, arguing he is a skilled but ultimately unreliable actor, constantly adopting different roles without genuine conviction. Okhlobystin’s “Doctrine-77” and political ideas are dismissed as performative, stemming from a desire to play a role rather than hold genuine beliefs. The author uses the example of Okhlobystin’s role in the film “Supermanager” – a parody that failed to resonate with its target audience – to illustrate this point. The film, a “fanfic” of sorts, highlights Okhlobystin’s tendency to engage in superficial role-playing. Ultimately, the text concludes that Okhlobystin is not suited for leadership because more competent and authentic figures already occupy that role.

There once lived

2011-09-21 - Anna Serafimova

A Russian Duma deputy, speaking in 2011, expresses extreme satisfaction with his position, describing it as the “best job in the world.” He emphasizes the benefits of being a Duma member – high income, lavish perks, political influence, and untouchability. He details how the role allows for significant personal enrichment, including exploiting business connections, securing lucrative positions for family members, and accumulating wealth. The deputy criticizes the Communist Party for lacking similar advantages and highlights the prevalence of wealthy Duma members, particularly within “United Russia,” citing numerous examples of deputies with substantial personal fortunes. He questions the purpose of elections if the primary outcome is the enrichment of those in power, rather than improving the lives of ordinary citizens.

Born to give birth

2011-09-21 - Anastasiya Belokurova

The text is a scathing review of the film “Beregmenny” (The Pregnant Man), a Russian comedy. It criticizes the film as a profoundly stupid and shallow work, comparing it unfavorably to the Hollywood film “Junior” and highlighting the overall decline in quality of Russian cinema. The reviewer laments the industry’s reliance on clichés and plagiarism, particularly referencing the success of films like “Junior” and the persistent trend of producing formulaic romantic comedies. The film’s plot, involving a man inexplicably becoming pregnant, is deemed absurd and ridiculous, with the reviewer emphasizing the film’s lack of intelligence and artistic merit. The film’s box office success is noted with disdain, suggesting that audiences are content with such low-quality entertainment. Finally, the review anticipates a sequel based on “The Little Prince” starring Mikhail Galustyan, further reinforcing the author’s concerns about the state of Russian cinema.

First pla

2011-09-21 - Boris Liznëv

The text recounts a poignant memory of the author’s school’s final day, a graduation evening filled with a surprising and deeply affecting moment. The author remembers his classmate, Sasha Parfenov, and their shared love for the song “Last Fight” (“Последний бой”) from the film “Defenders.” Parfenov’s intense connection to the song, often sung quietly to himself, became a focal point of the evening. On the last day of school, Parfenov spontaneously led the entire school, including students, teachers, and even the school’s rock band, in singing “Last Fight.” This unified act, triggered by Parfenov’s initiative, was a powerful and emotional experience, representing a connection to history, national identity, and a shared cultural heritage. The author emphasizes that this moment, and the song itself, served as a reminder of what truly matters – their Russian identity and the importance of remembering their roots, a sentiment that remains relevant today.

There is still Prokhara…

2011-09-21 - Nikolay Konʹkov

This text is a scathing analysis of the political career of Mikhail Prokhorov, a Russian oligarch who briefly led the “Right Cause” party. It argues that Prokhorov’s rise and fall were a predictable consequence of Russia’s political system, highlighting a deep-seated corruption and manipulation between the Kremlin and business elites. The piece details Prokhorov’s initial, overly optimistic support from President Medvedev, followed by a calculated “push” out of politics. It criticizes Prokhorov’s naive approach to politics, believing he could simply apply a Western business model to Russian realities, ultimately leading to his swift and humiliating defeat. The author emphasizes the cyclical nature of this pattern, portraying Prokhorov as a pawn in a larger game of political maneuvering, where oligarchs are supported, used, and discarded based on their perceived utility to the ruling elite. The text underscores the fundamental disconnect between the promises of “political reform” and the continued dominance of entrenched interests, suggesting that Prokhorov’s fate is merely a reflection of a deeply flawed system. It concludes with a cynical observation about the ongoing relationship between power and wealth in Russia, predicting a continuation of this pattern.

Apostrophe

2011-09-28 - Georgiy Sudovtsev

The book, “Phenomenon of Sobyanin,” by Alexei Kungurov, is a critical examination of Moscow’s current mayor, Sergei Sobyanin. Kungurov portrays Sobyanin as a technically skilled, almost robotic figure who excels at executing orders from both the Kremlin and oligarchs. He describes Sobyanin as a cynical, uncultured, and self-serving individual, primarily functioning as a facilitator of interests within the corrupt Russian power structure. Kungurov argues that Sobyanin’s rise to power is due to his ability to effectively manage and implement the agendas of powerful groups, rather than possessing any genuine political vision or leadership qualities. The book suggests that Russia’s current leadership is engaged in a process of dismantling the country’s former imperial ambitions, and Sobyanin is a key figure in this process, prioritizing efficiency and control over any broader societal goals.

This is not my time.

2011-09-28 - Vladimir Bondarenko

This interview between Vladimir Bondarenko and Nikolai Doshenko explores Doshenko’s long hiatus from writing and his feelings about the contemporary literary landscape. Doshenko expresses frustration with the perceived superficiality and competitiveness of “the real literary process,” preferring to cultivate a smaller, more personally rewarding circle. He attributes his fifteen-year absence to a shift in his life – moving into public affairs and journalism – rather than a lack of desire to write. Doshenko reveals a complex history of relationships with literary journals like “Our Contemporary” and “Literary Gazette,” marked by both successes and conflicts, often stemming from his outspokenness and refusal to conform to prevailing opinions. Despite these challenges, he maintains a philosophical acceptance of his position, valuing genuine connection over widespread recognition and emphasizing that his personal contentment outweighs the desire to be part of a dominant literary trend.

Display board

2011-09-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text details several interconnected geopolitical and economic developments. It highlights a perceived lack of unity within the Russian government following the controversial election of Valentina Matviienko as Speaker of the Federation Council, alongside significant internal conflict. Simultaneously, the “G20” and “BRICS” summits failed to establish a unified agenda, suggesting a prioritization of national interests over coordinated global action to combat the economic crisis. Critiques of the European Union’s response to the crisis from US President Obama proved ineffective, mirroring the severity of American economic challenges. Anti-globalist demonstrations, while unsuccessful in their immediate goals, served as a training exercise for law enforcement. The assassination of Burhanuddin Rabbani indicated Taliban intentions to consolidate power in Afghanistan, and Chinese investment in Iceland was revealed to be motivated by strategic naval access. Finally, the construction of a gas pipeline through North Korea was predicted to be a step towards a Sino-Korean alliance, challenging US influence and reshaping regional geopolitics.

American breakthrough

2011-10-05 - Valeriy Medvedev

This article, written in 2011, presents a somewhat pessimistic but ultimately hopeful view of America’s future and the trajectory of global civilization. The author, a Soviet-era programming expert, argues that despite concerns about America’s declining industrial base and economic challenges, the United States is poised to become the dominant force in the future due to a massive influx of global talent and a unique, unparalleled technological “puzzle” being assembled.

He believes America’s innovation, particularly in robotics and automation, will fundamentally reshape industries and society, leading to increased efficiency and productivity. The author anticipates a gradual decline of nation-states as interconnectedness and technological advancements, exemplified by the internet, erode traditional boundaries.

He acknowledges a potential conflict between America’s leadership role and the rise of other powers, but ultimately expresses confidence in humanity’s ability to navigate these changes, driven by technological progress and a collective pursuit of knowledge. The article concludes with a call for open discussion and a recognition of the complex, evolving nature of the future.

Megamashina

2011-10-19 - Aleksandr Maslov

The text discusses the potential implications of Ukrainian President Yanukovych’s upcoming visit to Brussels versus a trip to Cuba and Brazil. It suggests that a visit to Brussels is unlikely due to the European Union’s concerns regarding the handling of the “Tymoshenko case” and a lack of a decisive response from Yanukovych. The EU’s increasingly critical tone, stemming from Yanukovych’s declared commitment to a “European vector,” raises the possibility of Ukraine pivoting towards Russia and the Eurasian Union, potentially abandoning agreements with the EU, including the Association Agreement and the Free Trade Zone. The situation is viewed as creating conditions for Ukraine to rejoin Russia, with various obstacles and challenges anticipated.

Choice for Yanukovych

2011-10-19 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text analyzes the complex and fraught situation surrounding Viktor Yanukovych’s presidency in Ukraine, primarily through a religious and historical lens. It argues that Yanukovych’s actions, particularly his engagement with Constantinople Patriarchate Bartholomew and his attempts to align with “European integration,” represent a betrayal of his spiritual and historical roots as a devout follower of the Moscow Patriarchate and the teachings of St. Zosima (Symeon). The author contends that Yanukovych is being manipulated by “temptors” (influential advisors like Herman and Manfor) who prioritize personal gain and Western alignment over the preservation of Ukrainian Orthodox unity and tradition.

The core argument is that Yanukovych’s decisions, including welcoming Bartholomew to Ukraine and attempting to resolve the Orthodox schism through a pan-Orthodox synod, are fundamentally at odds with the “Zosima Testament,” which calls for unwavering loyalty to the Moscow Patriarchate and the preservation of traditional Orthodox values. The author views recent events, such as the destruction of a tent church erected by exiled schismatics and the disruption of Yanukovych’s pastoral visit to the Chernivtsi region, as ominous signs of this betrayal.

Ultimately, the text suggests that Yanukovych’s only path to redemption and success lies in fully embracing the teachings of St. Zosima and reaffirming his commitment to the historical and spiritual foundations of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, recognizing the Moscow Patriarchate as his true spiritual leader. The author expresses concern that if Yanukovych continues down his current path, he will face not only political ruin but also divine judgment.

Why did Gaddafi die?

2011-10-26 - Maksim Shevchenko

The author argues that Muammar Gaddafi’s death was not a heroic last stand, but a calculated assassination orchestrated by Western leaders, particularly Sarkozy and the European financial elite. He believes Gaddafi’s attempts to align himself with Western powers, accepting their money and adopting a performative, “exotic leader” persona, ultimately made him a target. The author suggests that Western leaders, facing an economic crisis, saw Gaddafi’s wealth as a solution and eliminated him to recoup those investments. He expresses deep resentment towards the families of Western leaders, particularly Sarkozy and Carla Bruni, and accuses them of responsibility for the immense suffering inflicted upon the Libyan people during the conflict. The author concludes that the war was a calculated financial maneuver that benefited Western powers at the expense of Libya.

Euroblee

2011-11-02 - Aleksey Gordeyev

The article analyzes the European Union’s decision to bail out Greece, highlighting it as a significant, potentially destabilizing event for the global financial system. The bailout, coupled with interventions aimed at addressing debt crises in Italy and other nations, primarily burdens Germany and reflects deep divisions within the EU. Concerns are raised about the potential for a “second wave” of global financial crisis due to excessive liquidity and the EU’s inability to address underlying economic problems. The article predicts a decline in demand for Russian commodities as the EU economy weakens, potentially impacting the value of the ruble. It suggests that Russia faces challenging times ahead, potentially leading to a reassessment of economic policies and a shift away from “Washington Consensus” approaches.

Protect the sovereignty…

2011-11-02 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Kim Jong-un emphasized the protection of North Korea’s sovereignty, attributing the nuclear issue to U.S. actions and hostility. He highlighted the importance of continued Korean-Russian friendship and cooperation, particularly regarding economic projects like gas pipelines and railway connections. He reiterated North Korea’s commitment to denuclearization, advocating for six-party talks and a shift in U.S. policy. Regarding relations with Japan, he demanded acknowledgment and redress for past wrongs. He expressed gratitude for Russian support and wished Russia success in building a strong state.

Apostrophe

2011-11-02 - Vladimir Vinnikov

This text reviews Dmitry Lobanov’s book, “Seven Samurai of the USSR,” which examines the perspectives of the seven deputies who voted against the Belovezh Accords in 1991, effectively dissolving the Soviet Union. The book presents a collection of interviews with these individuals, offering diverse and often contradictory explanations for the USSR’s collapse.

The deputies themselves provide varied accounts, ranging from blaming external interference (particularly by the United States) and economic factors (like lagging technology and falling oil prices) to internal issues such as a lack of inherited wealth among the elite and a flawed political system.

Lobanov doesn’t aim for a specific ideological argument, instead presenting these testimonies as a fragmented, albeit insightful, look at the events surrounding the dissolution of the USSR. The book highlights the disillusionment of those who believed the Soviet elite deserved privileged, inherited assets, a belief ultimately absent from the system. The author suggests that understanding these perspectives is crucial for Russia’s future, as these individuals represent a lingering “embodied dream” of the Soviet establishment.

Year without Govoru

2011-11-02 - Aleksandr Dugin

This text is a series of reflections and recollections surrounding the life and passing of Yevgeny Golovin, a unique and enigmatic figure. The author, a close acquaintance of Golovin, explores the profound impact Golovin had on him, describing him as a man deeply rooted in ancient traditions, mythology, and a skeptical view of modern society.

Golovin was characterized by his unconventional approach to knowledge, blending European and Eastern traditions, and a distrust of established narratives. He possessed a sharp, ironic intellect and a fascination with the hidden dimensions of reality, often expressed through his poetry, articles, and conversations. The author recounts several key encounters and observations about Golovin, including his skepticism regarding modern Europe, his belief in the enduring power of ancient myths, and his desire for a “free” journey, both physical and spiritual.

The text highlights Golovin’s resistance to conventional thinking and his insistence on a personal, intuitive understanding of the world. It emphasizes his ability to provoke thought and challenge assumptions, and the lasting impact of his unique perspective. The author concludes by expressing a wish for Golovin’s peaceful departure, acknowledging him as a singular and unforgettable figure.

Kurginyan and Chubais: who is “bigger”?

2011-11-02 - Aleksandr Nagornyy

This text details a televised debate between Sergei Kurganin and Anatoly Chubais, focusing on their contrasting views of Russia’s post-Soviet economic and political trajectory. Kurganin argues that Chubais and figures like Goldman Sachs were responsible for disastrous reforms, including privatization, the destruction of state control, and the creation of a “dependent, semi-colonial” capitalist system. Chubais and his team countered with the argument that they inherited a collapsing state and were forced to implement necessary, albeit difficult, changes.

The debate highlighted a strategic manipulation of public opinion, with Chubais’ team employing a “vote-buying” strategy to secure victory, despite Kurganin’s ultimately more insightful and critical analysis. The text emphasizes that Kurganin’s victory represents a broader rejection of the Kremlin’s policies and a call for continued resistance. Ultimately, the author concludes that Kurganin and the Russian people are the true winners, not Chubais and his associates.

Quiet house

2011-11-09 - Anastasiya Belokurova

“The Quiet House” is a Russian crime epic directed by Oleg Pogodin, released in 2011. The film centers on the Shamonov family, a clan of Cossacks in the Don steppes, marked by generations of violence and oppression. The story follows Viktor, the estranged son returning after 25 years, who is a criminal figure seeking refuge. The film explores themes of family legacy, brutality, and the suppression of emotions. It’s notable for its ambitious scope, influenced by American filmmakers like Sam Peckinpah and William Faulkner, and for being a rare Russian film that doesn’t rely on Soviet cinematic tropes. The film is praised for its strong performances, complex narrative, and its innovative approach to Russian cinema, which has been compared to Quentin Tarantino’s work. Despite a challenging ending and a shortened runtime, the film is considered a significant achievement and a potential catalyst for change in the Russian film industry.

It’s done!

2011-11-09 - Roman Nesterenko

“Молодая Россия” staged a controversial event in Kaliningrad to commemorate the victims of political repression, featuring an “improvised Gulag” and informational stands. The event was marred by the display of photographs unrelated to the Gulag, including images of victims of the Armenian genocide, Nazi atrocities, and Soviet-era military prisoners, sourced from a website promoting anti-Russian sentiment. Organizers, specifically the “Young Guard” of United Russia, attempted to downplay the errors, claiming they were simply “minor misunderstandings” and that their students were merely using freely available images. Despite the significant controversy and the denial of apologies from the leadership, no official response was issued.

Display board

2011-11-16 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The article details a complex web of geopolitical events and interpretations surrounding key international relationships in November 2011. It highlights the perceived diplomatic victory for China at the ASEM summit due to secured trade terms with the US, alongside a largely unproductive meeting between Medvedev and Obama. The “Afghan Scandal” involving Russia and Tajikistan is presented as driven by Chinese interests to weaken Russian influence in Central Asia, while Kazakhstan’s parliament dissolution was seen as a strategic move by Nazarbaev to thwart Putin’s Eurasian Union plans. Internal Russian affairs are covered, including the controversial renaming of the police force and the return of Yuri Luzkov, linked to power shifts ahead of Putin’s presidential term. The article also discusses speculation surrounding Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s “Nelson Mandela” preparation, the perceived US-coordinated downgrade of France’s credit rating, and the interpretation of the IAEA report on Iran’s nuclear program, suggesting a coordinated effort to suppress the full truth about the Fukushima disaster and Israeli involvement.

Announcement “Day of Literature” No. 11

2011-11-23 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The November 2011 issue #47 (940) of “День Литературы” newspaper features articles including an interview with Gennady Lukinykh on the “Gelmanization” phenomenon, prose by Viktor Sazykin, Roman Senchin, and Konstantin Smorodin, poetry by several authors, and articles on the works of Sergei Semenov and other writers. It also includes reviews of new books by Larisa Solovyova and Vladimir Chugunov, as well as a chronicle of literary life. The newspaper is available at post offices and bookstores across Russia.

Unrecognized Russia…

2011-11-23 - Georgiy Sudovtsev

The text contrasts the restoration of cultural landmarks – the Bolshoi Theatre’s revival and the re-evaluation of Antonio Salieri’s work – with Russia’s perceived “unrecognized” status and the influence of “Western forces.” It argues that the Bolshoi’s premiere of “Ruslan and Lyudmila” was deliberately staged to symbolize Europe’s “recognition” versus Russia’s “unrecognition,” mirroring the 2004 restoration of Salieri, which was previously suppressed due to suspicions of involvement in Mozart’s death. The author suggests that Russian state officials’ applause at the Bolshoi’s premiere was a reflection of their own inadequacy, highlighting a deliberate effort to align Russia with Europe’s acknowledged cultural achievements while rejecting Russia’s own “Russian spirit.”

Battle for Moscow

2011-11-23 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text details the Battle of Moscow during the winter of 1941-1942, a pivotal moment in World War II. It highlights the immense pressure exerted by the German and Axis forces attempting to capture Moscow, a strategic target crucial to Hitler’s “blitzkrieg” plans. The Soviet defense, fueled by the mobilization of the entire Soviet population and spearheaded by figures like G.K. Zhukov, proved remarkably resilient, despite facing overwhelming odds and near-constant bombardment. The battle was characterized by intense fighting, immense casualties on both sides, and a near-total commitment of Soviet resources. The eventual Soviet counter-offensive, beginning December 4th, marked a turning point, contributing to the formation of the Allied anti-German coalition and ultimately shaping the course of the war. The battle’s scale and impact are compared to other significant conflicts, including Stalingrad, and emphasizes its importance in determining the future of humanity by rejecting ideologies of superiority.

The artist Vasily Dranishnikov from the Ural region – 75 years old.

2011-11-23 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Vasily Dranishnikov, a Ural artist, established a strong artistic community amidst the turbulent 1990s, creating a system of creative support and collaboration. Despite his individualistic nature, he took on the responsibility of leading the section of panel graphics, organizing exhibitions and finding income opportunities for artists. His artwork focuses on landscapes of the Ural region, portraying individuals as harmonious parts of a larger scene, often using silver-like paper and a single lead pencil. He is celebrated for his unique artistic style and his dedication to fostering a creative community.

Ball lightning

2011-11-23 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text is a dialogue between a writer, Mikhail Rusanov, and a shadowy figure, Lipkin, discussing the historical relationship between Mikhail Lomonosov and Friedrich Miller. Lipkin, a mysterious and somewhat unsettling character, argues that Lomonosov was fundamentally a patriot, fiercely defending Russia’s image, while Miller, a German professor, was a detached, almost cynical, observer, prioritizing objective historical study over national loyalty. The core of their disagreement revolves around Miller’s famous quote – “a historian must seem without a fatherland, without faith, without a sovereign.” Lipkin uses specific historical events, such as the 1748 search of Miller’s apartment by Lomonosov and Trediakovsky, as evidence of Miller’s perceived disloyalty. He emphasizes the contrasting personalities and motivations of the two figures, suggesting that Lomonosov’s actions stemmed from a deep love for Russia, while Miller’s were driven by a purely academic, almost cold, perspective. The conversation culminates in Lipkin’s assertion that this fundamental difference is the root of the conflict between the two men.

For the Fatherland with Stalin!

2011-11-23 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Alexander Kharkichov discusses his songwriting journey, beginning in 1991 following the collapse of the Soviet Union. He describes a surge of patriotic songs fueled by grief over the “ruin” of Russia and considers himself the originator of this genre. Initially, his songs were raw and confrontational, evolving over time to include more lyrical and patriotic themes, particularly those focused on Stalin. He recounts a significant early connection with journalist and activist, Vladimir Nevzorov, which led to his music being featured on Nevzorov’s radio program “600 seconds.” Despite later disagreements with Nevzorov, Kharkichov is grateful for the initial exposure. He details the process of creating and distributing his music, including collaborations with Tatiana Denisenko and Sergey Serkov, and the eventual release of 42 studio albums through the “Delokrat” label. He expresses frustration over limited financial resources and a lack of widespread recognition for his work, contrasting it with the popularity of commercially successful but shallow pop music. He highlights his belief in Stalin’s greatness and the importance of remembering his legacy, culminating in the recurring slogan “For the Motherland with Stalin!”

EGE and others

2011-12-14 - Andrey Fursov

This text critiques the educational “reform” currently underway in Russia, arguing it’s a destructive process rather than a genuine improvement. The author identifies several key issues: the imposition of the ЕГЭ and Bologna System, which are seen as fundamentally flawed and detrimental to the quality of education. These systems are blamed for lowering standards, increasing bureaucracy, and fostering a culture of formalism over substance.

Specifically, the text argues that the reforms have led to a decline in educational standards, a rise in corruption, and a widening social gap due to unequal access to information and quality education. The introduction of the Bologna System, in particular, is criticized for transforming universities into institutions dominated by administrators and “innovation” consultants, rather than academics.

Furthermore, the author contends that the reforms are driven by external forces – the World Bank and Western “informational” structures – seeking to manipulate Russia through its education system. The overall effect is a degradation of professional standards, a weakening of the national intellectual base, and a reinforcement of social inequalities. The author concludes that the pursuit of these reforms actively undermines Russia’s modernization efforts and threatens its future.

RUSSIA-3

2011-12-14 - Aleksandr Dugin

This text presents a complex and somewhat cynical analysis of the political landscape in Russia, dividing it into three distinct “Russias”: Russia-1 (Putin’s “vertical power” with a mix of conservative and economic ideologies), Russia-2 (“Orange Russia”), and the potential for a third, unifying “Russia-3.”

Russia-1 is characterized as a tightly controlled system dominated by figures like Medvedev and focused on maintaining stability and a conservative national identity. Russia-2, emerging from the 2004 events, is portrayed as a more liberal and anti-establishment force, largely driven by figures like those involved in the Maidan protests and fueled by a desire to challenge Russia-1.

The author argues that neither of these “Russias” represents a viable long-term solution. They are both ultimately unsustainable and driven by short-term interests. The text posits that a “Russia-3” – a strong, sovereign state based on a genuine national identity and social justice – is the only true path forward. This Russia-3 is presented as a potential unifying force, a project that needs to be actively pursued to prevent the disintegration of the country.

The analysis is highly critical of both Russia-1 and Russia-2, depicting them as flawed and ultimately destructive forces. It suggests a need for a new, independent vision – Russia-3 – to guide the country’s future. The text emphasizes the importance of recognizing this potential and actively working towards its realization.

Premonition of civil war

2011-12-14 - Vsevolod Yemelin

The text depicts a chaotic and surreal vision of an impending civil war in Russia, characterized by confusion, drunkenness, and a sense of impending doom. It portrays a futile defense against an unknown enemy, symbolized by the “Panfilovites,” who are depicted as exhausted and ineffective. The scene is filled with imagery of decay, violence, and a loss of national identity, suggesting a country spiraling out of control. The narrator expresses a cynical acceptance of this situation, driven by a desire to repeat the experience despite its negative consequences.

Revenge Stories

2011-12-14 - Israelʹ Shamir

Despite debates surrounding election fraud, the communist party achieved a significant victory in Russia’s all-encompassing, democratic vote, surpassing the expectations of many. This success, achieved amidst media restrictions, reflects a growing disillusionment with capitalism and a resurgence of communist ideas, particularly in Russia where memories of a “good old time” persist. Analysts, including a US Ambassador’s leaked 2006 report, recognized the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPR) as a viable force fueled by nostalgia and a desire for radical change. The party’s populist platform, advocating for nationalization and state intervention, gained traction during a period of economic crisis. Despite media suppression and limited access to the public, the CPR’s popularity grew, and its leaders called for a fundamental shift in Russia’s political and economic landscape, warning that President Putin risked being swept away by popular discontent if he failed to adapt.

FIRST PLAN

2011-12-14 - Boris Liznëv

The text expresses a deeply ambivalent and critical view of Saint Petersburg. The author’s long-standing connection to the city, stemming from his time at Lenfilm, is intertwined with a profound sense of disillusionment. He views Petersburg as a fundamentally “western” city, born of betrayal – specifically, the February Revolution and the rejection of Russia’s traditional values and the Tsar. This betrayal, he argues, is a continuing “sin” that permeates the city’s history, exemplified by the renaming of Leningrad after the war and the glorification of contemporary “destructive” figures like Anatoly Sobchak and Zbigniew Brzezinski.

The author sees Petersburg as a city frozen in time, resistant to genuine Russian identity and focused on a superficial, “cultural capital” status. He believes the city’s elite are driven by Western, “pseudo-European” goals, and that its preservation is a consequence of this historical betrayal. The author concludes with a sense of uncertainty about Petersburg’s future, questioning whether it will ever truly return to being a Russian city and whether the historical stagnation will ever be broken.

Forward, Transfigurationists!

2011-12-21 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The text expresses deep disappointment and skepticism regarding Vladimir Putin’s answers to questions posed during a meeting. The author contrasts Putin’s responses with a vision of a strong, transformative leader – a “savior” figure akin to Peter the Great, capable of uniting the Russian people and guiding the country through a period of profound change.

The author argues that Putin’s answers were evasive, lacking a clear vision for Russia’s future and failing to address critical issues such as corruption, the decline of the military, and the country’s economic woes. He perceives three distinct groups of Russians present at the meeting – a volatile, nationalistic “Manekha,” a youthful, “orange revolution”-inspired crowd, and a devout, faith-based population seeking a miraculous savior.

Ultimately, the author finds Putin’s responses unconvincing and lacking the necessary authority or understanding to lead Russia effectively. He suggests Putin is more of a “technical” or “managerial” figure, ill-suited to the complex challenges facing the nation and failing to connect with the diverse aspirations of the Russian people.

Overcoming

2011-12-28 - Gennadiy Zhivotov

The text discusses the relatively unknown artist Viktor Bychkov, prompting the author to write about him after noticing his work at an exhibition. It highlights a shift in the Russian art scene, particularly in the 1990s, where artists returning to rural areas, like Bychkov, were producing works reflecting a new, somewhat melancholic, view of the Russian countryside. The author contrasts Bychkov’s work with that of earlier artists like Plastov and Popkov, emphasizing Bychkov’s sense of empathy and a feeling of “revival” within the rural landscape. The piece also touches on the broader cultural changes – the rise of the “total consumer” and the focus on nostalgic, personal experiences – and expresses a desire for Bychkov to continue his artistic work, particularly in restoring churches, reflecting his long career and the importance of an artist with a deep connection to their roots.

Musi

2011-12-28 - Andrey Smirnov

The review discusses the album “Вечный огонь” by “Ленинград,” noting its release as a somewhat belated and unconventional project. Despite containing familiar elements of “Ленинград’s” style – including elements of Soviet-era music, irony, and provocative lyrics – the album feels dated and lacks the impact of previous works like “Хна.” The reviewer highlights the album’s attempts to satirize various aspects of Russian society, including the government, youth culture, and even rock music, but ultimately finds it lacking in genuine engagement. The album’s themes, such as a critique of consumerism and a nostalgic look at the “zeroes” era, resonate weakly with a core audience, particularly those familiar with the band’s earlier, more biting work. The reviewer contrasts the album’s reception with the enthusiastic response of a younger, “middle-class” audience, noting a disconnect between the band’s established fanbase and a broader appeal. The album’s title and imagery evoke both remembrance and damnation, but ultimately feels like a diluted version of “Ленинград’s” signature style.