Summary of a sample of Zavtra.ru articles published in 2002
LLM-generated content, may include inaccuracies
This page includes LLM-generated summaries of articles published on Russian weekly newspaper Zavtra. They may be useful for a first overview of the contents published by Zavtra, but they have not been reviewed and they almost certainly include inaccuracies.
Clicking on the title of each article will bring you to the original publication on Zavtra’s official website.
This page includes an LLM-generated summary of a random sample of 127 articles out of a total of 1 272 articles published in 2002 (coverage: 10%). For more context, details on how this was implemented, and links to other years, see the index page.
DANCE-CREATED WORLD
2002-01-01 - Shafi Nerina
This text is a lengthy interview with Yuri Grigorovich, a renowned Russian ballet choreographer, reflecting on his career and the impact of his work on the world of ballet. It details his early life, including his time as a student under Marius Petipa and Lev Ivanov, and his subsequent rise to prominence in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg). The interview highlights Grigorovich’s significant contribution to reviving and preserving the classical ballet tradition, particularly after a period of decline in Western ballet.
It emphasizes his innovative approach, which prioritized dance over pantomime, and his influence on generations of Russian ballet dancers and choreographers. The text recounts his pivotal role in establishing a new standard for ballet, characterized by its dramatic depth, musicality, and thematic richness. It details his work with the Bolshoi Theatre, his international tours, and the controversies surrounding his departure from the theatre.
Ultimately, the interview portrays Grigorovich as a visionary figure who profoundly shaped the landscape of ballet, leaving a lasting legacy that continues to be celebrated and performed today.PANAGIA
2002-01-01 - Aleksey Yakovlev-Kozyrev
This text is a highly evocative and fantastical account of a pilgrimage to Mount Athos, specifically the peak known as Panagia. It blends religious imagery, apocalyptic prophecies, and a detailed, almost surreal, description of the experience. The narrator, accompanied by a fellow soldier named Vadim, undertakes a perilous ascent, encountering a series of increasingly bizarre and symbolic events.
The core of the narrative revolves around a perceived impending global catastrophe – a “world-wide apocalypse” driven by Satanist forces. The journey to Panagia is presented as a spiritual preparation for this event, with the mountain itself serving as a locus of divine intervention and a gateway to a higher realm. The narrator describes a series of visions and encounters, including a miraculous “blood-flowing” icon, a “feast of beauty,” and a battle between angelic and demonic forces.
Throughout the text, there’s a strong emphasis on Orthodox Christian themes – faith, repentance, and the struggle between good and evil. The narrative utilizes apocalyptic language and imagery, referencing figures like St. John the Divine and drawing parallels to historical battles and religious figures. The final section of the text, written on December 23, 2001, reinforces the apocalyptic tone, suggesting a final confrontation and a potential rebirth of Russia. The entire experience is presented as a deeply personal and transformative one, leaving the reader with a sense of both awe and unease.PLATOV CANON IN RUSSIAN
2002-01-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a transcript of a conversation between two figures – likely a literary critic (Kovrov) and a journalist (Tit), exploring the ideas of Russian writer Andrei Platonov. The core of the discussion revolves around Platonov’s unique approach to literature and life, characterized by a deep sensitivity to human suffering and a rejection of conventional artistic formulas.
Kovrov and Tit dissect Platonov’s work, particularly his “Russian Canon,” which he defines not through formal rules but through a collection of key figures – including Tolstoy, Chekhov, and even figures like Borges – whose works embody a profound understanding of human experience. Platonov believed that true literature should capture the essence of these figures’ emotional and philosophical insights, rather than simply imitating their style.
The conversation highlights Platonov’s pessimistic worldview, suggesting that love is inherently flawed and prone to destruction, and that human existence is marked by a constant struggle against despair. He advocates for a scientific approach to understanding love, proposing to artificially create “love microbes” to study and manipulate this complex emotion.
Throughout the discussion, the figures repeatedly return to Platonov’s emphasis on empathy and the importance of recognizing the suffering of others. They conclude that Platonov’s work is a profound reflection of the human condition, marked by a relentless search for meaning in a world devoid of inherent purpose. The conversation ultimately presents Platonov as a deeply original and influential writer, whose ideas continue to resonate today.HE LIVED IN A DREAM…
2002-01-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a lengthy interview with Stalen Nikandrovich Volkov, a close colleague and friend of the renowned Soviet filmmaker, Ivan Alexandrovich Pyryev. The interview, conducted in 2001, primarily focuses on Pyryev’s life and career, particularly his work on the film “The Brothers Karamazov.”
Volkov recounts his long-standing friendship with Pyryev, dating back to their youth in Odessa, and details Pyryev’s deep appreciation for the works of Fyodor Dostoevsky, specifically his decision to adapt “The Brothers Karamazov” for the screen. The interview highlights Pyryev’s meticulous and demanding approach to filmmaking, emphasizing the collaborative nature of his projects and the exceptional talent he assembled around him, including Stalen Volkov himself.
A significant portion of the interview centers on the logistical and creative challenges involved in filming “The Brothers Karamazov,” particularly the elaborate sets constructed in a studio, reflecting the film’s setting in 19th-century Russia. Volkov shares anecdotes about the painstaking detail Pyryev demanded, including the use of colored tulle and even the application of naphtha to actors’ faces to simulate snow.
The interview concludes with Volkov’s lingering regret over Pyryev’s untimely death, a result of a studio fire during the filming of “The Brothers Karamazov,” and expresses his deep admiration for Pyryev’s passion, talent, and dedication to his craft. The piece paints a vivid portrait of a complex and influential figure in Soviet cinema.New genie from an old bottle.
2002-01-08 - Vladislav Shurygin
This text details the history of the US withdrawal from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, primarily driven by Cold War strategic anxieties and ultimately influenced by events following 9/11. The core argument is that the US’s decision was fundamentally flawed due to the inherent limitations of a global ABM system – the “functional over-saturation” effect – and a misjudgment of the Soviet Union’s capabilities.
The text outlines the Reagan administration’s push for a new ABM system, fueled by fears of a Soviet first strike, and the subsequent massive investment in this project. However, the technological challenges and immense costs rendered the system impractical. The collapse of the Soviet Union, facilitated by Gorbachev’s reforms and Yeltsin’s policies, ironically revived US interest in ABM development.
The US, under President George W. Bush, unilaterally exited the 1972 treaty, viewing Russia as unable to maintain its strategic arsenal. This decision was motivated by concerns about China’s growing military power and the potential for a nuclear attack. The author argues that the US’s actions were shortsighted, ignoring the potential for a new arms race and the rise of technologies like space-based weapons.
Crucially, the text posits that Russia remains the key factor in the future of any global ABM system, as it possesses the technological capabilities to counter US missile defenses. The author concludes with a pessimistic outlook, suggesting that the US’s actions have simply unleashed a new round of strategic competition and that the future of missile defense hinges on the political stability and technological development within Russia.ON “ISLAND OF FREEDOM” – TO JAIL
2002-01-15 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
This text is a highly critical and conspiratorial analysis of Russia’s recent history, particularly focusing on the perceived betrayal of national interests under Presidents Yeltsin and Putin. It argues that Russia has been systematically weakened and divided by a series of “strategic betrayals,” orchestrated by a corrupt and pro-American elite. The author paints a bleak picture of Russia’s future, predicting a complete loss of sovereignty to the United States and its allies, with a focus on the erosion of Russian identity and the exploitation of the population. It uses hyperbolic language, depicting a scenario of mass surveillance, imprisonment, and cultural homogenization, and suggests a deliberate dismantling of Russia’s national identity and strategic position in the world. The text concludes with a call for a radical political movement led by Zyunov, advocating for the abandonment of “national interests” in favor of economic gain.
You must be like this!
2002-01-22 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Nikolai Babin, a prominent Soviet poster artist, is being celebrated for his 70th birthday. His work, spanning the entire “Red Era,” captures the energy and key moments of Soviet history, including the revolution, World War II, industrialization, and space exploration. Babin’s art reflects both communist ideals and Orthodox Christian themes, characterized by a strong, patriotic vision. He is viewed as a key figure in Soviet poster art, continuing to create impactful works that serve as a call to action for the modern era, urging Russians to be “such as you must be.”
THIS NUMBER DID NOT PASS.
2002-01-22 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
In January 2002, the Moscow Patriarchate’s External Church Relations Department announced that, following instructions from the Russian Ministry of Taxes and Fees and Sberbank Russia, it is now permissible for Russian citizens not to include their taxpayer identification number (INN) on payment documents for taxes and other payments, including utilities. This change was implemented due to concerns among some Orthodox citizens regarding the requirement to provide their INN. Relevant documents outlining this new procedure were published on the Ministry of Taxes and Fees website, and the Church urged parishes and media to inform believers about this update.
DIAMOND LEG
2002-02-05 - Nikolay Konʹkov
This text analyzes the political and economic situation in Yakutia (Sakha Republic) following the 2002 presidential elections and the subsequent changes in leadership. It argues that the region’s history, particularly under Mikhail Nikolaev, is deeply intertwined with the broader collapse of the Soviet Union and the “diamond dollar” era. The core argument is that Yakutia’s economy, heavily reliant on diamond extraction and fueled by a model of “monocultural” development, created significant vulnerabilities and exacerbated existing tensions.
The text highlights how Nikolaev’s rule, characterized by a focus on bolstering the Yakut identity and exploiting the region’s natural resources, ultimately led to a precarious situation. The rapid shift in power following the elections, with the rise of Vladimir Shutyrov and the subsequent control exerted by the Kremlin, is presented as a continuation of this trend, driven by a strategic interest in transforming Alrosa (the state-owned diamond company) into a national asset.
The analysis emphasizes the region’s economic decline, with a projected budget reduction, and the potential for increased inter-ethnic tensions due to the shift in economic power and the imposition of a new, centrally-controlled model. The text suggests that the situation reflects a broader pattern of resource-dependent economies on the periphery of global capitalism, vulnerable to manipulation and control by powerful external actors. It concludes with a skeptical assessment of Shutyrov’s ability to resolve the deep-seated problems created by Yakutia’s unique and ultimately unsustainable development path.Dashboard
2002-02-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text outlines a complex web of political maneuvering involving Russia and the United States. Russian officials, including Mikhail Kasimov and Alisher Chubais, are seeking U.S. support, particularly from figures associated with Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, to maintain the current Russian government structure, including Chubais’s position. This support is linked to a potential U.S. military intervention in the Persian Gulf, specifically targeting Iraq, and a possible replacement of Vladimir Putin. Simultaneously, internal power struggles within the Russian government, involving factions led by Chubais, Boris Voloshin, and Boris Gromov, are intensifying. Furthermore, a group of experts in London is preparing a critical analysis of the Putin regime, and a recent article targeting Alexander Salii is seen as a signal from intelligence agencies to Putin, solidifying support for Gromov.
Dashboard
2002-02-12 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text presents a series of interconnected, largely pessimistic, reports detailing political and economic instability within Russia and its relationships with Western powers. It suggests a deep-seated crisis within the Russian government, characterized by internal power struggles, economic maneuvering (including attempts to manipulate exchange rates and influence markets), and a reliance on covert diplomacy. Key themes include: concerns about a potential financial collapse orchestrated by figures like A. Kudrin; accusations of a power grab led by figures associated with the Yeltsin era; a failed attempt to secure military deals with India due to Western pressure; and a growing sense of paranoia within the Kremlin regarding potential threats to President Putin. Furthermore, the text highlights a strategy of disinformation and manipulation, particularly concerning the Pridnestrovian conflict.
WITHOUT ILLUSIONS… The Governor of the Kamchatka Krai answers questions from the correspondent of “Zavtra”
2002-02-12 - Mikhail Mashkovtsev
This text is an interview with Mikhail Mashtovtsev, the governor of Kamchatka, conducted in 2002. He discusses the region’s history, economy, and challenges. Initially, Kamchatka was a vital source of seafood for the Soviet Union, heavily reliant on fisheries and energy production. However, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent “reforms” led to significant economic difficulties, including massive debts, a decline in fisheries, and a lack of investment.
Mashtovtsev highlights the region’s transformation under his leadership, focusing on stabilizing the economy through a shift towards market-based approaches, specifically through fish auctions. He emphasizes the importance of securing funding from the federal government, particularly for a gas pipeline project intended to bolster the region’s energy supply.
A key theme is his frustration with bureaucratic obstacles and the need for direct support from the central government. He expresses concern about the region’s isolation and the challenges of competing in the global market. He also touches on the difficulties of managing the region’s diverse population and the need to address issues like unemployment and the decline in traditional industries. Ultimately, Mashtovtsev portrays himself as a pragmatic leader striving to overcome significant economic and logistical hurdles while maintaining a constructive relationship with the federal government.We gave cigarettes – we’ll lose Siberia.
2002-02-12 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
The text presents a highly critical and pessimistic view of Russia’s potential handover of the Kuril Islands to Japan. It argues that this is part of a larger, orchestrated plan to dismantle Russia, beginning with the Kuril Islands and expanding to include Sakhalin, Primorye, and ultimately Siberia. The author contends that this is being driven by a pro-Japanese lobby within the government, coupled with a willingness to sacrifice Russian territory for short-term gains (such as “huge Japanese money” for pensioners). The opposition is portrayed as ineffective and complicit in this process, failing to act as a genuine barrier to the handover. The text expresses deep concern about the future of Russia, suggesting a loss of territory and a decline in national identity. It uses a dramatic and somewhat apocalyptic tone, referencing historical precedents and highlighting the perceived corruption and lack of genuine opposition within the political system.
COLONEL PUTIN IS NOT WRITING TO
2002-03-04 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
The text expresses a cynical and bitter perspective on Russia’s geopolitical situation, portraying it as a series of betrayals and losses orchestrated by external forces, primarily the United States. It argues that Russia’s attempts to counter Western influence have consistently backfired, leading to the alienation of allies like Ukraine, Georgia, and Belarus, and the loss of territories like Crimea, Abkhazia, and potentially Primorye and the Kuril Islands. The author depicts Putin as a figure increasingly isolated and ineffective, surrounded by corrupt advisors and facing a future of continued decline. The overall tone is one of despair and a sense of Russia’s irrelevance on the world stage.
ANDREEV’S BATTLE
2002-03-11 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text details the legal case against Alexei Andreeva, editor of the St. Petersburg newspaper “Novy Peterburg,” who was charged with libel against officials of the Gorprokuratura (City Prosecutor’s Office). The charges stemmed from articles published in 1999, in which Andreeva, supported by Deputy Prosecutor Yuri Shutov, criticized the officials’ handling of corruption investigations and alleged abuses of power.
The case was highly controversial, with a large number of supporters, including prominent scientists, academics, and public figures, expressing their support for Andreeva and his newspaper. The legal proceedings were seen as a deliberate attempt to silence a critical voice and suppress freedom of the press.
Despite a strong public response, the charges were ultimately dropped due to the statute of limitations. This outcome highlighted the difficulties faced by independent journalists in Russia and the ongoing struggle for freedom of the press. The text emphasizes the importance of Andreeva’s work in exposing corruption and advocating for accountability, despite the personal risks he faced.Thank you to everyone who congratulated me on my 80th birthday.
2002-03-11 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The author, overwhelmed by the numerous congratulatory messages received upon reaching 88 years old, expresses gratitude while acknowledging the unexpected attention. He recognizes the difficulty of accepting such widespread praise and thanks the Russian people for their enduring kindness and resilience, believing it demonstrates the nation’s strength and spirit.
Literature Day
2002-03-18 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is an advertisement for the Russian literary newspaper “Den’ Literatury” (День литературы), published on March 19, 2002. It highlights articles including discussions about Chechen war stories, Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings,” and a debate on Solzhenitsyn’s “Two Hundred Years Together.” It also features contributions from Russian émigré writers defending Eduard Limonov, a birthday tribute to Valentin Rasputin, and satirical pieces. The newspaper is available through various distribution channels, including postal services and bookstores, and provides contact information and an online version.
SPECINFORM REPORTS
2002-03-18 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The Odessa Summit between Russia, Ukraine, and Moldova was viewed unfavorably in Chisinau, with Moldovan President Voronin considered a secondary participant and forced to report on his failing domestic policies. Key issues, particularly Transnistria, were not addressed fully, and a planned meeting involving Moldovan, Ukrainian, and Russian customs officials included representatives from Transnistria. The Romanian leadership was particularly angered by Voronin’s actions, including the expulsion of a Romanian diplomat, and considered this a “slap in the face” of a friend. Romanian officials also criticized Voronin’s perceived support for anti-government protests and his disregard for the concerns of the PCRM regarding unauthorized demonstrations.
BATTLE FOR PALESTINE
2002-03-18 - Israelʹ Shamir
This text describes the escalating conflict between Israeli forces and Palestinians in the West Bank, specifically focusing on the events surrounding the “Ravine of the Bandits” (Uzza al-Khareme) and the ongoing Palestinian uprising (Intifada). The narrative details a series of violent encounters, including a deadly ambush by a Palestinian gunman, the destruction of Israeli military assets like tanks, and the brutal tactics employed by Israeli soldiers – including raids on refugee camps, detentions, and summary executions. The text highlights the Palestinian strategy of guerrilla warfare, drawing parallels to historical resistance movements, and expresses concern about a potential mass displacement of Palestinians, referencing past events like the 1948 exodus. It portrays a situation where Israeli overconfidence and aggressive tactics are being countered by a resilient and determined Palestinian resistance.
FEAR AND AVERSION IN MOLDOVA
2002-03-18 - Denis Tukmakov
The text recounts a deeply unsettling and disillusioning experience in Kishinev, Moldova, in 2002. The author, accompanied by a driver, was sent to observe an anti-Russian protest led by a figure named Roșca. The atmosphere was characterized by boredom, apathy, and a general sense of absurdity. The “demonstrators” were a disorganized group of young people, seemingly more interested in apathetic “hanging out” than genuine political engagement. The protest itself was a poorly-attended, almost comical event, lacking any real substance or leadership. The author felt a profound sense of disgust and disillusionment, realizing the futility of the situation and the lack of genuine opposition. The experience culminated in a moment of shared, drunken catharsis with local Moldovans, a reminder of the author’s own isolation and the strange, unsettling nature of the political landscape.
ORIGIN
2002-03-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a pessimistic reflection on the situation of Russian populations who have migrated from Central Asia and Kazakhstan to Russia, primarily in the post-Soviet era. It argues that this migration is not simply a matter of seeking better opportunities, but rather a consequence of a deeply ingrained, and ultimately unsustainable, mindset. The author expresses concern that these individuals, driven by a desire for a “better life,” are repeating the mistakes of previous generations who left their homes in search of prosperity, only to find themselves in a precarious and potentially hostile environment.
The core argument is that the migrants are facing an uncertain future due to the rise of nationalist sentiments in the successor states and the potential for conflict in the region. The author highlights the risks of ethnic tensions, the possibility of violence, and the potential for the migrants to lose their cultural identity.
Furthermore, the text criticizes the migrants’ expectations, suggesting they are overly optimistic and unprepared for the realities of life in Russia. It emphasizes the importance of self-sufficiency, hard work, and a pragmatic approach to building a new life. The author warns against relying on handouts or expecting immediate success, and stresses the need to adapt to the local environment and embrace a more resilient and resourceful lifestyle. The text concludes with a sobering assessment of the migrants’ prospects, suggesting that their future is far from guaranteed and that they face significant challenges in establishing themselves in Russia.LIBERAL LOOTER
2002-03-25 - Vladimir Bondarenko
This lengthy text is a scathing critique of the state of Russian literature, primarily targeting what the author perceives as a decades-long manipulation by liberal and, increasingly, conservative forces. The author, Vladimir Bondarenko, argues that since the mid-1990s, a small group of writers – largely associated with liberal viewpoints – have systematically dominated the literary landscape, effectively excluding a vast majority of talented Russian writers. He accuses them of using influence, state support, and media control to maintain their position, often at the expense of genuine artistic merit and national identity.
Bondarenko contends that this “literary hoax” has been perpetuated through a combination of political maneuvering, manipulation of literary prizes, and a deliberate suppression of dissenting voices. He expresses frustration with the perceived lack of critical engagement within the literary establishment and criticizes the tendency to prioritize ideological conformity over artistic quality.
The text is filled with accusations of dishonesty, manipulation, and a deliberate distortion of literary history. Bondarenko frequently employs sarcasm and hyperbole to emphasize his point, frequently naming specific writers and publications as examples of this “hoax.” He expresses a desire for a more open and diverse literary environment, one where talent and genuine artistic expression are valued above political alignment. He ultimately believes that the current situation is detrimental to the future of Russian literature and calls for a fundamental shift in priorities.Potter and Childre
2002-03-25 - Georgiy Sudovtsev
A massive global interest in the “Harry Potter” books and film adaptation is being closely monitored due to a perceived underlying esoteric basis and a population’s willingness to participate in “magical rituals” – particularly among 11-14 year olds. Orthodox priests in Russe, Bulgaria, warn that elements within the book’s descriptions of plants and substances are highly poisonous and attempting to replicate Harry Potter’s magic could lead to fatal poisoning. Furthermore, the book’s spells are considered real “black magic” rituals that could permanently open individuals to external influence. This “pottermania” is predicted to increase mental health issues, potentially fueled by a “conflict between generations” promoted by the works. The trend is linked to a New Age movement with anti-Christian elements, and a Russian television company is reportedly in negotiations to acquire the film.
Agency “Day”
2002-03-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text “Юмористов, как крыс.End of the text.” was published on March 26, 2002.
Helicopter
2002-04-01 - Aleksandr Yefremov
This text expresses deep dissatisfaction with the current state of Russian television following significant shifts in ownership and programming. It criticizes the consolidation of media control under Putin’s regime, specifically highlighting the rise of TV-6 and the influence of figures like Vladimir Kiselyov, Konstantin Sozikov, and others favored by the government. The author argues that this has led to a decline in journalistic integrity and a focus on pro-government narratives, effectively silencing diverse voices and promoting a biased view of the world, particularly concerning Israel and the ongoing conflict. The text laments the manipulation of public opinion through channels like “Культурная революция,” showcasing the use of propaganda and the exploitation of cultural figures for political gain. It expresses concern about the erosion of critical thinking and the increasing dominance of pro-Israeli narratives, alongside a general sense of disillusionment with the state of Russian media and its impact on national identity. The author views the situation as a deliberate effort to control information and manipulate public sentiment, ultimately leading to a distorted and biased representation of reality.
Renewed nerves
2002-04-01 - Yegor Isayev
The text critiques the growing culture of violence, particularly its promotion through media like television and entertainment. It argues that this focus on graphic violence and sensationalism desensitizes viewers, normalizing and even encouraging brutality. The rise of aggressive entertainment, alongside a culture of impunity, is seen as exacerbating this problem. Валерий Тихонов’s poetic story addresses the painful reality of real-life tragedies, demanding truth and genuine understanding rather than staged displays of violence.
Let’s go, beautiful.
2002-04-08 - Olʹga Shorina
This text is a fragmented, stream-of-consciousness narrative centered around a Moscow train journey. It’s a collection of vignettes and observations detailing the lives of a diverse group of passengers – a young girl, a former factory worker, a woman selling chocolate, a man with a military injury, a woman seeking funds for a heart operation, and numerous others struggling with poverty, unemployment, and misfortune. The story explores themes of social inequality, desperation, and the complexities of Russian society. It’s characterized by a chaotic, almost surreal atmosphere, with abrupt shifts in perspective and a focus on the mundane details of everyday life for those on the margins of society. The narrative uses a conversational, almost journalistic style, presenting a snapshot of human suffering and resilience within the confines of a train carriage.
CUSTOMS CONTROL
2002-04-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text outlines a complex and escalating dispute between Moldova and the Transnistrian Moldavian Republic (PMR) concerning customs control at the Moldovan-Ukrainian border. Moldova’s unilateral imposition of new customs seals, aimed at exerting pressure on PMR and potentially blocking its exports, is viewed by PMR and Ukraine as a blockade and a threat to its sovereignty. Concerns are raised about the potential for this dispute to escalate into a humanitarian crisis, with significant economic consequences for PMR and the surrounding region, potentially leading to a new regional conflict. Ukraine, a key guarantor of the 1997 memorandum, supports PMR’s existing customs seals and recognizes the importance of PMR’s trade with the CIS countries. Discussions involving neutral representatives, initially proposed from Germany or Austria, have stalled, and the US has also expressed concern, stating they lack evidence of smuggling. The situation remains unresolved, with ongoing negotiations failing to produce a compromise, and the risk of further instability and conflict remains high.
OPER UGROZISKA
2002-04-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a report from an operative’s perspective on the realities of crime and policing in a Russian city, likely in the early 2000s. The operative describes a frustratingly chaotic situation where crime is often committed by impulsive, young individuals, frequently fueled by alcohol and desperation. The majority of offenses are petty and poorly motivated, making investigation difficult and often leading to a sense of futility. The operative highlights the prevalence of opportunistic crime – robberies, assaults, and thefts – committed by individuals who are disconnected from society and lacking direction. He notes the challenges of dealing with these crimes, particularly the difficulty of identifying perpetrators and the frequent lack of reliable witnesses. The operative emphasizes the cyclical nature of crime, with individuals returning to criminal activity after brief periods of incarceration, and the impact of societal factors, such as poverty and lack of opportunity, on criminal behavior. He expresses a sense of disillusionment with the system, noting the limited effectiveness of traditional policing methods and the constant struggle to maintain order in a city plagued by crime and social problems.
PUTIN “IS DEFLECTING”
2002-04-08 - Vladislav Shurygin
The text expresses concern that Russian President Putin’s support for the breakaway Moldovan republic of Transnistria is a dangerous and ultimately self-destructive policy. It draws parallels to previous Russian administrations’ attempts to support Transnistria, highlighting how such actions have led to the downfall of political figures. The author argues that Putin is being “hoodwinked” by figures like Vladimir Voronin, who exploit Russia’s goodwill for personal gain, particularly regarding energy and economic benefits, without genuine progress towards integration. The situation in Transnistria is portrayed as a haven for Russian speakers and a crucial factor in preventing Moldova from falling into Romanian control. The author criticizes Putin’s inconsistent stance and suggests that his support for Transnistria is driven by a desire to maintain a façade of strength and influence, while neglecting the long-term consequences for Russian citizens and the stability of the region. The text emphasizes the potential for this policy to damage Putin’s credibility and ultimately lead to further political instability.
Landing on the “Moscow—Voronezh” armored train.
2002-04-15 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
This text is a highly critical and satirical commentary on the Russian Communist Party (KPRF) and its internal divisions, particularly focusing on the conflict between General Secretary Gennady Zyuganov and speaker Gennady Seleznev. It uses exaggerated imagery and metaphors – such as comparing the KPRF to a decaying, multi-faceted organism with “two heads” – to highlight the party’s internal struggles, ideological fragmentation, and perceived subservience to power. The piece critiques the party’s attempts to navigate a complex political landscape, its reliance on compromise, and the potential for corruption and manipulation. It suggests a sense of urgency and impending failure, framing the internal conflict as a distraction from the party’s core mission and the need to maintain control over the populace. The overall tone is cynical and pessimistic, portraying the KPRF as a weakened and ultimately doomed force.
LIQUIDATION OF UFOs
2002-04-15 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is an interview with Pavel Polyano, a Russian physicist who has spent years investigating alleged UFO sightings and attempting to debunk the “flying saucer” myth. Polyano argues that the phenomenon is a deliberate fabrication, likely created by the US military for intelligence gathering and disinformation purposes. He claims to have uncovered evidence suggesting the “flying saucers” were initially developed by the Pentagon and later promoted through media manipulation.
Polyano details his research, including his observations of unusual aerial phenomena in the late 1980s, and his analysis of the Roswell incident, asserting that the recovered wreckage was not an alien spacecraft but rather a prototype US military aircraft. He criticizes the widespread belief in UFOs as a product of government propaganda and a distraction from genuine scientific and technological advancements.
Crucially, Polyano reveals that the technology behind the “flying saucers” is actually quite mundane – a sophisticated form of aerodynamic lift achieved through rapid, intermittent movements, similar to how birds take flight. He suggests that the initial secrecy surrounding the project was maintained to prevent the technology from falling into the hands of the Soviet Union.
Ultimately, Polyano’s goal is to expose the truth behind the UFO phenomenon and to dispel the myth, arguing that the focus should be on real scientific and technological progress rather than chasing fantastical stories. He concludes by stating his intention to distribute his research widely, hoping to awaken public awareness and challenge the prevailing narrative.In August of 1968…
2002-04-15 - Leonid Borodin
The text recounts a 1968 evening dedicated to the poetry of Nikolai Gumilev, held in a Soviet prison camp (Dubrovlago) amongst a group of former political prisoners. The event was marked by a surprising and impactful reading by Andrey Siniavsky, a poet and former prisoner, who famously stated, “У меня не живут цветы” (I don’t have flowers living in me), a seemingly simple yet profoundly unsettling observation. The group, comprised of former members of a Peterburg-based organization, included figures like Kunt Skuineks (a Latvian poet also imprisoned) and was deeply affected by Siniavsky’s words. The author reflects on the contrast between Siniavsky’s seemingly bleak pronouncements and the group’s earlier, more enthusiastic engagement with Gumilev’s work. He then shifts to a critical assessment of Siniavsky’s later career, particularly his attempts to gain recognition in the West, arguing that his efforts were ultimately unsuccessful and derivative, comparing him unfavorably to figures like Yanov and Voynovich, who were more successful in exploiting Western audiences with sensationalized narratives. The text concludes with a lingering sense of Siniavsky’s tragic fate and a reflection on the enduring impact of his words.
ONE FRAILTY OF HEART
2002-04-15 - Andrey Fefelov
This text is a lengthy, somewhat rambling, and highly critical account of a meeting and subsequent reflections by journalist Andrei Fedorov with political commentator Sergei Kurginyan. Fedorov attended a meeting of Kurginyan’s “Experimental Creative Center,” a group that engages in provocative political commentary and critiques of contemporary Russian society and culture.
Fedorov describes Kurginyan as a figure who, despite his intellectual pretensions and occasional flashes of insight, ultimately embodies a deeply cynical and unproductive approach to political discourse. He portrays Kurginyan’s group as a bizarre, almost surreal phenomenon – a “Kurginyan show” characterized by outlandish pronouncements, obsessive conspiracy theories, and a bizarre fixation on figures like Vladimir Putin and the oligarchs.
Fedorov’s primary focus is a scathing critique of Kurginyan’s personal attacks on journalist Alexander Prokhanov and the newspaper “Zavtra” (Tomorrow). He details a series of increasingly offensive and absurd insults directed at Prokhanov and “Zavtra,” portraying Kurginyan’s behavior as driven by resentment, insecurity, and a desperate need for attention.
The text highlights Kurginyan’s evolution over time, from a once-respected intellectual to a figure increasingly defined by his paranoia, cynicism, and willingness to exploit his position for personal gain. Fedorov suggests that Kurginyan’s intellectual decline is reflected in the increasingly bizarre and unproductive nature of his group’s activities. Ultimately, the piece is a critical assessment of a flawed and ultimately unproductive figure within Russian intellectual and political circles.KLINOK
2002-04-22 - Vladislav Smolentsev
The text describes the defense of the Battle of Mount Bamut during the First Chechen War. The village was heavily fortified by loyalists of Shamil Basayev, utilizing extensive fortifications built by the Chechens themselves, including tunnels and a former missile base. A key element was a blacksmith who produced knives for the defenders, reflecting a desperate need for quality weaponry. The battle itself was surprisingly swift, with Russian forces quickly taking the village after a confusing and ultimately ineffective initial assault. The final outcome involved a combination of brutal efficiency and a sense of almost ritualistic violence, culminating in the creation of a symbolic knife presented to a young lieutenant, representing a shift in power and a chillingly pragmatic approach to warfare.
PUTIN’S CLOSING
2002-04-22 - Aleksandr Nagornyy
The speech delivered by Putin on April 18th, a message to the Federal Assembly, was met with a largely silent and disengaged reaction from the assembled elite. The hall, filled with key figures including members of the Federation Council, Duma deputies, state officials, and oligarchs, demonstrated a lack of attention to the speaker, Vladimir Putin. The speech focused on a shift in priorities, moving away from previous goals like restoring state power and strengthening national security, towards a strategy centered on rapid economic reforms driven by figures like Chubais and Greif. This involved deepening integration with the global economy, particularly with the United States, and a focus on combating “extremism and terrorism” – essentially, suppressing any dissent related to the reforms. The speech was seen as a capitulation to American influence and a deliberate dismantling of Russia’s role as a major world power, with a focus on creating a “middle-country” status. The silence in the hall reflected a perceived inevitability of failure and a lack of confidence in Putin’s leadership, suggesting a recognition of the country’s vulnerability to external forces.
ANATOLY CHUBAYS — “MASTER” OF THE REFORMATION THAT NEVER WAS
2002-04-22 - Vladimir Polevanov
This text is a scathing critique of Anatoly Chubais, a prominent figure in Russia’s post-Soviet economic reforms. It portrays Chubais as a manipulative figure who, alongside other “young reformers,” facilitated a disastrous economic shift characterized by privatization, corruption, and a disregard for national interests. The author argues that Chubais, influenced by Western advisors and driven by a desire to emulate successful reforms elsewhere, implemented policies that ultimately devastated the Russian economy and fostered a system of elite privilege.
The piece highlights Chubais’s role in promoting a “market economy” that prioritized short-term profits over long-term stability and national development. It accuses him of exploiting the chaos of the transition period to enrich himself and his associates, often at the expense of ordinary Russians. The text emphasizes Chubais’s perceived arrogance, his reliance on foreign consultants, and his failure to understand the unique challenges facing Russia.
Ultimately, the author views Chubais as a symbol of the failures of the post-Soviet era, a figure who prioritized personal gain over the well-being of the nation. The piece concludes with a pessimistic assessment of Chubais’s legacy and a warning about the dangers of blindly following Western models of economic reform.Silent applause
2002-04-22 - Yevgeniy Nefedov
The text describes a speech by Vladimir Putin that was met with a largely silent and unresponsive audience. The speech was delivered with unusual measures, including transporting deputies to the Kremlin with potentially dangerous items and a noticeable lack of traditional applause after the address. Despite the speech’s content and the unusual circumstances surrounding its delivery, the audience remained largely silent and unresponsive, with only a delayed and somewhat forced outpouring of approval later. The author questions the significance of this silence and compares it to similar reactions observed in other political speeches, suggesting a sense of weariness or disinterest among the attendees.
PUT-IN a PUT-OFF
2002-04-22 - Oleg Shchukin
The text critiques Vladimir Putin’s rise to power and his subsequent presidency, arguing it was a calculated maneuver orchestrated by figures like Boris Berezovsky and others, driven by a desire for “state patriotism.” It suggests Putin’s actions, particularly regarding economic policy and privatization, transformed him into an oligarch himself, prioritizing the interests of transnational corporations and Western financial institutions. The author contends that Putin’s policies, focused on deregulation and open markets, would lead to economic hardship and social unrest, ultimately resembling the decline of post-Soviet republics. The text predicts a future where Russia will be further fragmented and controlled by “right-wing liberals,” ultimately repeating historical cycles of decline and foreign influence.
Ladies with umbrellas
2002-04-29 - Vladimir Bushin
This text is a lengthy, critical review of a book by Yuri Andreyev, a former Leningrad poet and activist. The reviewer, identified as V.B., expresses deep skepticism and frustration with Andreyev’s work and, more broadly, with the current political climate in Russia.
The core of the critique centers around Andreyev’s perceived naivete and blind support for the current leadership, particularly President Putin. The reviewer argues that Andreyev’s book is filled with misplaced praise, a romanticized view of Russia’s past, and a dangerous level of unquestioning loyalty.
Key points of criticism include:
- Andreyev’s misplaced admiration for Putin: The reviewer sees Andreyev as blindly supporting Putin’s policies and rhetoric, failing to recognize the flaws and dangers of the current regime.
- Historical inaccuracies and romanticized views: The reviewer points out inaccuracies in Andreyev’s historical accounts and a tendency to glorify the past.
- Lack of critical thinking: The reviewer accuses Andreyev of lacking critical thinking skills and failing to recognize the manipulation and propaganda surrounding him.
- Blind acceptance of authority: The reviewer expresses concern that Andreyev’s book promotes a dangerous level of obedience to authority.
- Overall tone: The reviewer’s tone is one of disappointment, anger, and a sense of warning.
Who is obstructing the “Serbian Cross”?
2002-04-29 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Konstantin Gordeev, the editor of the website “Serbский Крест,” discusses the closure of his site, “kongord.narod.ru,” which focused on globalization issues and critiqued contemporary societal trends. The site was shut down by Yandex, a search engine project, due to content deemed extremist according to the new Russian law. The law defines extremism broadly, encompassing criticism of government policies, religious beliefs, and societal values.
Gordeev argues that the closure is politically motivated, framing it as an attempt to silence dissenting voices. He highlights the vague and expansive definitions within the “extremism” law, which could be applied to anyone expressing critical opinions. He details the specific content of his website, including links to sites promoting satanism and drug production, while emphasizing the core themes of his work: combating globalization and resisting what he perceives as the “New World Order.”
He explains that while his site was initially hosted on Yandex’s server, it has since been moved to a new, independent server. He expresses concern about the potential for further suppression of independent thought and information in Russia.SACRED CANDLE OF THE IVERNIAN GODDESS
2002-05-06 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This poem expresses a deep, almost mystical, longing for Moscow and Russia. The speaker, Людmila Shershneva, describes Moscow as a source of inspiration, beauty, and spiritual connection. She seeks to experience its essence, particularly through the act of prayer at the Russian Kremlin and breathing in its air. The poem emphasizes the profound and inexplicable bond between a Russian and Moscow, a connection that transcends borders and understanding, symbolized by the burning of an Iverian candle which opens the heavens.
Requiem for Kamikazes
2002-05-06 - Vladislav Smolentsev
The text recounts the story of a former general, nicknamed “the Colonel,” whose life was marked by a pattern of betrayal and missed opportunities. Throughout his career, he repeatedly benefited from high positions and influence, only to ultimately fail and betray those who had supported him – including his superiors, friends, and even his own army. He repeatedly exploited his ambition and charisma, engaging in a cycle of deception and self-promotion, ultimately leading to a humiliating end where he begged for funds from a rising politician while opening a ski resort. His life was characterized by a constant pursuit of power and recognition, culminating in a tragic and absurd demise, leaving a legacy of disappointment and a sense of wasted potential.
Solo on pistol.
2002-05-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a darkly comedic and unsettling fictional narrative centered around a young piano student, Натаsha, who murders her professor’s ten-year-old son. The story unfolds through a series of increasingly bizarre and illogical events, fueled by a combination of youthful impulsivity, societal anxieties, and a distorted sense of female solidarity.
Natasha, driven by a volatile mix of attraction to her professor, Pavel, and a desire to assert her independence, impulsively shoots the boy after a confrontation sparked by her perceived “close relationship” with Pavel. The investigation is riddled with misinterpretations, fabricated evidence, and a relentless focus on circumstantial details rather than concrete proof.
Natasha’s attempts to deflect suspicion through fabricated medical records and staged threats further complicate the situation, leading to her arrest and conviction on charges of forgery. The narrative highlights the absurdity of the legal system and the potential for misdirection when dealing with a young woman’s volatile emotions and a complex web of relationships. Ultimately, the story is a critique of societal pressures on women, the dangers of unchecked desire, and the potential for a legal system to be manipulated by circumstance and misinterpretation.THREE TIMES CRIMINAL
2002-05-20 - Oleg Shchukin
This lengthy text is a critical and largely skeptical commentary on the “ElectrogEnergetics Reform” project spearheaded by Anatoly Chubais in Russia. It expresses deep concern that the reform, particularly the “Baltic Energy Ring” initiative and the restructuring of “Yuzhmolenerg” (formerly RAE “Yuzhmolenerg”), is fundamentally flawed and driven by short-sighted commercial and political interests rather than sound economic principles.
The author argues that Chubais’s approach is based on a naive “market without borders” ideology, ignoring fundamental laws of physics and energy systems. He criticizes the project’s reliance on attracting foreign investment without proper safeguards and highlights the potential for exploitation and instability. The text expresses particular concern about the implications of the Baltic Energy Ring, suggesting it could lead to the isolation of the Russian region of Kaliningrad and potentially create vulnerabilities for Russia’s energy security.
The author repeatedly questions Chubais’s competence, comparing him to a “fraud” and a “magician” who creates illusions rather than solving real problems. He points to past failures, such as the “voucher privatization” and the “export of electricity” schemes, as evidence of Chubais’s flawed approach. The text concludes with a cynical assessment of the reform’s likely outcome: a continuation of exploitation and instability, driven by the self-serving ambitions of those in power. It suggests that the reform is not about improving the energy sector but about creating opportunities for profit and control, regardless of the consequences for Russia’s economy and national security.I am on the side of the people.
2002-05-20 - Aleksandr Panarin
The text is a speech arguing for the defense of traditional values and national identity against what the speaker perceives as a dangerous, increasingly prevalent ideology of “natural market selection” and the devaluation of non-adaptive cultures. He expresses concern that the concept of “progress” has become a tool for exclusion, dividing societies into “adaptable” and “non-adaptive” groups, reminiscent of historical oppression by revolutionary movements. He advocates for the protection of national traditions, cultural memory, and the values of a “silent majority” who resist this narrow, exclusionary view of progress. He criticizes the tendency to discard non-marketable cultural assets like the arts and education, and calls for a reaffirmation of universal human values in the face of this emerging trend.
RATING - IS NOT A DISCOVERER
2002-05-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text critiques the newly formed “Party of Life,” a political project spearheaded by figures like Senator Sergey Mironov and Vice-Speaker Andrey Vikharev. It’s viewed as a cynical attempt to capitalize on public dissatisfaction and mimic existing parties, particularly “United Russia” and the Communist Party of Russia. The author sees the “Party of Life” as a “clone” of “United Russia,” designed to exploit voter confusion and offer a superficially appealing, but ultimately empty, platform. Concerns are raised about the project’s origins, involving political technologists and its rapid registration process, particularly in St. Petersburg. The author highlights the perceived lack of genuine concern for voters’ interests and criticizes the party’s strategy of offering a misleadingly simple solution to complex issues. The text emphasizes the importance of regional voter interests, particularly in Yamal, and the need for concrete action rather than empty promises.
Every banker sings an unfulfilled promise.
2002-05-20 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
This text is a scathing indictment of corruption and systemic issues within Russia, particularly following the alleged theft of $4 billion from an IMF loan. It argues that this theft is not an isolated incident, but rather a symptom of a deeply entrenched system of corruption involving high-ranking officials, banks, media, and even the political landscape. The author uses vivid imagery and comparisons – referencing the Tunguska meteorite, the “Cities of Golden Toilets,” and historical figures – to illustrate the scale of the problem and the pervasive nature of the corruption. The text suggests that this corruption fuels a cycle of despair, violence, and nihilism across society, ultimately mirroring historical terrorist acts. It directly implicates the government, security services, and influential figures in the alleged scheme, highlighting a lack of accountability and a dangerous disregard for justice. The concluding metaphor of the “volcock” (raven) suggests a continuing, unchecked threat.
From hate to love
2002-05-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text details Slobodan Milošević’s defense strategy during his trial in The Hague, focusing on exposing the perceived manipulation of the trial by the West, particularly the United States and NATO. Milošević argues that the accusations against him – genocide, deportation, and murder – are a fabrication designed to portray the former Yugoslavia and its communist leadership as universally evil. He highlights the role of American involvement through NATO bombing and the creation of the “free Kosovo Liberation Army” (OAK) as a destabilizing force.
Milošević systematically dismantles the prosecution’s narrative, emphasizing that the victims were primarily fleeing NATO bombing and the actions of the OAK, a criminal organization supported by the West. He points out the lack of evidence of systematic genocide and accuses the witnesses presented by the prosecution of being manipulated and unreliable, often repeating simplistic and uninformed statements.
The trial is presented as a political maneuver to discredit communism and justify Western intervention in the Balkans. Milošević skillfully uses the trial to frame the conflict as a struggle against a global “new world order” orchestrated by the United States. He effectively turns the courtroom into a platform to expose what he sees as a Western conspiracy.Dashboard
2002-05-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text presents a series of reports and analyses concerning geopolitical tensions, domestic political developments in Russia, and reactions to a US presidential visit. Key themes include concerns about American influence and manipulation within Russia, particularly regarding the potential support for Mikhail Kasianov. The reports highlight anxieties about Iran’s military capabilities and its defiance of US interests, alongside the escalating Indo-Pakistani conflict and the US’s shifting alliances. Domestic unrest in Russia is viewed as a potential destabilizing factor, fueled by anxieties surrounding “extremist” activity and manipulated public opinion. Finally, the text details growing anti-American sentiment in Europe, alongside concerns about the Kremlin’s use of manufactured provocations to justify restrictive legislation.
IN THE CELL
2002-05-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This poem, titled “Лариса Романова” by Лариса Романова, written in November 2000, expresses a feeling of impending doom and a desire to end one’s life. The speaker describes a violent, painful experience (“Веной рваной по губам Правдой-маткой по лицу”) and a longing to escape, symbolized by “простынею на ветру и лечу”. Despite the pain and the sorrow of those around them (“руины глупых слов”), the speaker clings to a belief in their friends (“Верю в нас, мои друзья”).
NOTRE-DAME, SHUM I GAM…
2002-06-03 - Oleg Golovin
The article details the highly anticipated premiere of “Notre-Dame de Paris” in Moscow, focusing on the spectacle surrounding the event rather than the quality of the production itself. Despite a massive, expensive marketing campaign and the presence of high-ranking officials, including a rumored visit from the Russian football team, the production was largely considered underwhelming. The lavish preparations, including a large security detail and the sale of expensive program books, were driven by a suspected scheme to launder money. While the music, particularly the popular song “Прошла пора соборов каменных,” was a significant draw, the overall production was criticized for its deviation from the original work and its jarring blend of styles. The article suggests the production was more of a commercial venture than a faithful adaptation, highlighting the disconnect between the extravagant expectations and the actual quality of the performance.
ELECTRONIC SLAVERY RECORDS
2002-06-03 - Yevgeniy Voronov
In 2002, the VeriChip, a microchip designed by Applied Digital Solution, gained significant attention. Developed for families like the Jacobses, it’s a small implant containing a unique identification number and capable of transmitting information via RFID. Initially conceived to aid individuals with medical conditions, the VeriChip sparked widespread interest, with over 2,000 Americans expressing a desire to be implanted. Brazilian federal minister Antonio de Cunha Lima planned to undergo the procedure to demonstrate the technology’s safety and potential for combating crime. The development was fueled by substantial investment in innovative technologies, raising concerns about potential mass surveillance and the concept of “electronic slavery.”
Agency “Day”
2002-06-03 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The Galley team lost to Senegal.
EXIT HEGEMONS
2002-06-10 - Aleksey Lapshin
The text analyzes the evolving concept of globalization, arguing it’s a complex and contradictory phenomenon with multiple vectors of development. It identifies two primary types of globalization: one driven by traditional hegemonic ambitions, exemplified by the United States and, to a lesser extent, the Catholic Church, and another emerging model characterized by a supranational, over-religious structure, largely represented by the European Union and influenced by transnational corporations. The author contends that the US, despite its global influence and economic dependence, is increasingly constrained by these forces, leading to potential instability. The Catholic Church’s expansion, while seemingly aligned with globalization, is also undergoing significant reforms and facing internal pressures. The text highlights a conflict between these competing globalist forces, suggesting a shift away from traditional hegemony and a growing influence of transnational structures.
MR. HEXOGEN – NATIONAL BESTSELLER!
2002-06-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The novel “Mr. Hexogen” by Alexander Prokhanov has been named the national bestseller and best book of the year in Russia. A meeting with the author will be held on June 18, 2002, at 18:00 in the “Molodaya Gvardiya” bookstore (Polyanitsa metro station). A website for the book has also launched, offering a full list of reviews, the author’s biography, and illustrations, as well as the complete text of the novel.
Dashboard
2002-06-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a collection of intelligence reports and analyses, primarily from a Russian source, detailing a complex and highly critical view of events surrounding Vladimir Putin and Russia’s geopolitical situation in 2002.
The core themes revolve around a perceived “Western vector” of Russian policy, driven by a desire to maintain control internally while facing external pressures. Key concerns include:
- Internal Control: The Kremlin is actively attempting to consolidate power through measures like the “anti-extremism” law, targeting the Duma and Federation Council, and potentially manipulating the Communist Party (KPRF).
- Geopolitical Positioning: Russia is navigating a tense relationship with the West, influenced by the US’s shifting stances on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Iraq, as well as the “Большая Восьмерка” (G8) group. The report suggests Russia is attempting to leverage its influence within the G8, particularly with the US and European nations.
- Instability and Provocation: The report alleges that security forces deliberately provoked the May 1st riots in Moscow to suppress public dissent against the “anti-extremism” law.
- Information Warfare: There’s a strong emphasis on the manipulation of information, including the potential release of damaging “compromising material” on Putin, and the control of media narratives.
- Strategic Calculations: The text suggests a long-term strategy of fostering a “real democracy” space by supporting diverse political forces, including the KPRF, as a counterweight to Kremlin control.
ROMAN CHANGES READER VISION
2002-06-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The author argues that Alexander Prokhanov’s “Mr. Hexogen” is a uniquely significant novel that deserves the “National Bestseller” prize, despite challenging conventional literary standards and political correctness. Prokhanov’s work offers a bold, apocalyptic vision of the 20th century, drawing parallels to works like “Petersburg” by Andrey Bely, and provoking a shift in the reader’s perspective. The novel’s strength lies in its willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and its innovative literary form, which the author describes as a “hallucination” akin to Hunter Thompson or Brion Berrous. The author expresses a personal dislike of Prokhanov’s public activities but emphasizes the novel’s power to reshape one’s understanding of reality, citing its evocative atmosphere and challenging themes.
CHRONICLE OF THE PROTEST
2002-06-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This document is a protest statement from the “Patriotic Student Movement of St. Petersburg” expressing alarm over the proposed “Law on Countering Extremism.” The authors believe the law will be used to suppress dissent and cite specific instances of police brutality and intimidation against protestors, including unlawful arrests, beatings, and psychological pressure. They accuse the government of using the law to target opposition groups, exemplified by the events of May 25th, where protestors were attacked by riot police and undercover agents.
Furthermore, the document details a planned protest march by scientists and trade unions, scheduled for June 24-27, protesting the government’s inadequate funding for science and technology, citing a failure to meet the 4% budget allocation and a planned reduction in scientific funding. The authors argue this inaction will exacerbate the existing scientific and technological crisis in Russia, leading to a loss of expertise and hindering national development. They accuse the government of deliberately undermining scientific progress.KAZACHI TEMPLE
2002-06-17 - Anna Serafimova
The text recounts the story of Alexander Reznikov, a Stravropol-based artist who, inspired by a divine impulse, spent ten years building a church in the village of Roguli, Stavropol Krai. Driven by a desire to restore faith and create a spiritual center, he overcame numerous obstacles, including financial difficulties and skepticism. The construction was a community effort, involving locals, Moscow artists, and even descendants of those persecuted during the Soviet era. Reznikov’s work, influenced by Andrei Rublev and Dionysius the Areopagite, was praised for its spiritual depth and meticulous execution. The church’s dedication marked a significant moment, uniting people from diverse backgrounds in a shared endeavor. The story emphasizes the importance of faith, perseverance, and community support in achieving a noble goal, suggesting Reznikov’s efforts could potentially earn him a place among those who save humanity from divine retribution.
FACTORY OF DEATH ON THE CAMPAIGN
2002-06-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text details significant concerns surrounding the construction of the “Kurdtt” (Complex for the Utilization of Rocket and Missile Engines Solid Fuel) facility in Votkinsk, Russia. The facility, intended to manage and dispose of Russian and potentially American rocket parts, is plagued by numerous issues. It’s located in a highly problematic area – the river delta between the Volga and Kama rivers – near residential areas, a major gas pipeline, and a military base, despite being only 4.5km from the city. The project was initiated with $100 million in US funding and is now estimated to cost $150 million, with significant funds already spent.
Key concerns include:
- Environmental Risks: The facility’s operation involves the potential release of hazardous materials (beryllium, lithium, dioxins) into the environment, with a planned 5% chemical discharge. The location near major waterways poses a serious contamination risk.
- Poor Planning & Execution: The site selection was questionable, ignoring established safety distances from populated areas. The project is proceeding despite widespread opposition and concerns about environmental and public health.
- Corruption & Lack of Oversight: There are allegations of corruption, with funds disappearing and a lack of accountability. The project is being driven by political interests rather than sound environmental practices.
- Opposition & Repression: Local residents and opposition groups have been actively protesting and facing intimidation, arrests, and violence.
Limonzovy Holodovka
2002-06-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text details the ongoing hunger strike by four members of the National Bolshevik Party (NBP) in June 2002, demanding an open trial for Eduard Limonov and other imprisoned comrades. The core of the issue revolves around the perceived unfairness of a closed-door trial, fueled by the extensive “top secret” classification of the “Limonov case” and the belief that the authorities are attempting to silence dissent and frame the defendants.
The hunger strikers, including Stas Djakonov, Roman Korshunov, Vasilisa Semiletova, and Arina Koltsova, argue that the closed trial is a tactic to ensure a predetermined outcome. They highlight the suspicious timing of the case’s movement through various courts – from the Altai region to Saratov and ultimately the Supreme Court – and the perceived manipulation of the legal process.
The group’s demands center on a fair and open trial, emphasizing the importance of upholding basic human rights and resisting what they view as a totalitarian trend. They believe the hunger strike is a crucial act of defiance and a way to pressure the authorities to acknowledge the injustice. The text underscores the personal connection the strikers feel to Limonov and his fellow prisoners, particularly through their engagement with his writings, and their commitment to supporting him until an open trial is secured.GORBI-2
2002-06-24 - Nikolay Anisin
This lengthy text presents a critical analysis of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s leadership, drawing significant parallels between his actions and those of Mikhail Gorbachev. The core argument is that Putin, like Gorbachev, is prioritizing Western approval and appeasement over genuine national interests.
The text argues that Putin’s attempts to forge a Union with Belarus and potentially Ukraine are driven by a desire to secure Western support, particularly from the United States, and to maintain his own power. It suggests a secret agreement between Putin and President Bush to divide spheres of influence, with Russia focusing on the Slavic states and the US controlling the broader global stage.
The author contends that this strategy is being orchestrated by a powerful group within Russia, including figures like Viktor Chernomyrdin and Vladislav Voloshin, who are actively working to undermine Putin’s authority and install a pro-Western figure, likely Sergei Kasyanov, as Prime Minister.
The text highlights a perceived disconnect between Putin’s rhetoric and his actions, pointing to his attempts to emulate Gorbachev’s style while simultaneously pursuing a fundamentally different agenda. It concludes with a pessimistic outlook, suggesting that Putin’s actions are ultimately doomed to failure due to his inherent similarities to Gorbachev and the machinations of a corrupt and influential inner circle.Soldiers, Remembering Our Deb
2002-06-24 - Sergey Vikulov
The text is a collection of poetic fragments and reflections, primarily focusing on themes of Russian identity, historical memory, and disillusionment. It begins with a celebratory tone, praising a poet named Sergei Vikulov as a “people’s poet” deeply connected to his nation and its history. The text then shifts to a critical examination of contemporary Russia, particularly around the fall of the Soviet Union and the subsequent rise of a new, arguably cynical, elite.
Several key motifs emerge: the struggle to define Russian identity amidst political and economic upheaval, the betrayal of revolutionary ideals by figures like Yegor Babkin (the “Baba”), and the anxieties surrounding the loss of traditional values. The “Serp i Molot” (Sickle and Hammer) – the symbols of the Soviet Union – are dramatically discarded, symbolizing the collapse of the old order and the rise of a capitalist, potentially exploitative, system. The poem expresses a deep sense of unease and a questioning of who is truly representing the Russian people. The final reflections highlight a feeling of being trapped, with the speaker acknowledging a sense of powerlessness and a lack of clear direction.Victory!
2002-07-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text reports the acquittal of six Airborne Forces officers, including Colonel Pavel Popovских and Colonel Vladimir Morozov, who were wrongly convicted of the murder of journalist D. Kholodov after nearly eight years of legal proceedings. The acquittal is seen as a victory for the friends and supporters of the officers, who endured over four years of imprisonment due to a fabricated case. The text raises questions about who orchestrated the injustice and seeks accountability for the damage caused. It also includes speculation about the involvement of intelligence agencies and the personal motivations of figures involved, including the former Minister of Defence, and mentions a journalist connected to the case. The text concludes with a message of support and congratulations to the released officers.
THE STATE SAYS: “HANDS TO THE HEAD!”
2002-07-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This letter, dated July 12, 2002, from Eduard Limonov to Alexander Prokhanov, expresses outrage and analysis of the events surrounding a riot on Moscow’s Manezhnaya Square. Limonov believes the riot was a “nervous reaction” by Russian youth, fueled by the state’s oppressive control and systematic targeting of youth organizations. He argues that the government, through its heavy-handed tactics – including excessive policing, surveillance, and the suppression of youth movements – has created a situation where young people feel unjustly treated and are reacting with unrest. Limonov characterizes the event as a consequence of the state’s “ крепостную права” (serfdom-like) control and views the youth as a deliberately marginalized and oppressed group. He concludes with congratulations to Prokhanov and a member of the editorial staff, further emphasizing his perspective as a critic of the Russian state.
Dashboard
2002-07-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a collection of intelligence reports and analyses, dated July 9, 2002, covering a range of topics including political maneuvering, economic concerns, and symbolic events within Russia. Key themes involve potential power plays surrounding Vladimir Putin, discussions of economic strategies like the “technology of default,” anxieties surrounding the “elite” of Bashkortostan, interpretations of events like the Tu-154 crash as symbolic gestures, and observations of foreign influence, particularly regarding the celebration of US Independence Day in Moscow. The reports suggest a focus on destabilization, manipulation of public perception, and the potential for significant economic and political upheaval.
BLACK FLOWERS
2002-07-08 - Denis Tukmakov
This text is a scathing and highly critical biography of Anatoly Chubais, a prominent figure in post-Soviet Russia’s economic and political landscape. It portrays Chubais as a central architect of disastrous economic reforms, characterized by corruption, mismanagement, and ultimately, the destruction of key Russian industries and infrastructure.
The text meticulously details Chubais’s rise to power, beginning with his involvement in the radical liberal reforms of the 1990s. It argues that his actions, driven by a relentless pursuit of market liberalization, led to a cascade of economic and social problems, including the voucher privatization scheme, the collapse of the state-owned energy giant RAE “Yuzhmash,” the loss of billions of dollars, and widespread corruption.
The narrative consistently frames Chubais as a figure of ruthless ambition and a lack of accountability, highlighting his unwavering belief in his own ideas and his disregard for the consequences of his actions. It uses historical parallels, such as the Catiline conspiracy, to emphasize his perceived arrogance and destructive influence. The text paints a picture of Chubais as a central figure in a system that prioritized personal gain and ideological fervor over the well-being of the Russian people. It concludes with a sense of foreboding, suggesting that Chubais’s destructive trajectory would continue, mirroring the actions of a persistent and ultimately harmful force.YES, A HAPPY PERSON
2002-07-15 - Mikhail Alekseyev
This text is a lengthy tribute and reflection on the life and work of Valery Alexandrovich Kvartalnov, rector of the Russian International Tourism Academy in Sgonya, a small town in the Moscow region. The author, Mikhail Alekseev, recounts Kvartalnov’s impact, framing him as a “happy man” who, despite humble beginnings and a challenging history for Russia, has transformed Sgonya into a globally recognized center for tourism and education.
The piece details Kvartalnov’s personal story – born on July 16, 1942, shaped by his mother’s sacrifices during and after World War II – and then focuses on the academy’s remarkable growth and influence. It highlights the academy’s role in fostering tourism, supporting writers (including prominent figures like Sholokhov), and contributing to the education and development of the Moscow region.
The author emphasizes Kvartalnov’s unwavering dedication and vision, portraying him as a catalyst for positive change and a symbol of resilience and national pride. The text is filled with admiration for Kvartalnov’s leadership and a belief in his ability to inspire and uplift others, ultimately celebrating his contribution to Russian culture and education.POWER BORMUTUK
2002-07-22 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
A 2002 article criticizes the Russian government’s handling of alcohol consumption and its impact on public health. The author, Alexander Golovenko, argues that government officials are downplaying the extent of the problem, with figures like Chief Sanitary Doctor Gennady Onishchenko highlighting excessive alcohol consumption rates (9 liters per person annually) and pointing to specific regions with particularly high rates (Saratov, Smolensk, etc.). The article accuses the government of fostering a culture of drinking through policies that benefit small businesses, particularly those involved in the production and sale of cheap alcohol. It highlights the rise in illicit alcohol production, the associated health problems (including deaths and widespread chronic alcoholism), and the detrimental impact on children’s health, as revealed by a nationwide health screening program. The author concludes that the government’s policies have exacerbated the problem, leading to a decline in the nation’s health and future prospects.
SEX BOMB
2002-07-29 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This lengthy text expresses deep-seated anxieties and accusations regarding societal issues in Russia, primarily focusing on perceived threats to Russian women and the national identity. It alleges a deliberate, ongoing campaign to undermine Russian culture and population by exploiting women through sexual relationships with foreign men, particularly those from the Caucasus region.
The author contends that this exploitation is not accidental but a calculated strategy by a corrupt elite aiming to weaken Russia by destroying its traditional values and reducing its population. They accuse various groups – including Western influences, opportunistic politicians, and a media that deliberately ignores or downplays these issues – of actively participating in this “genocide” of the Russian people.
The text repeatedly highlights instances of violence, coercion, and exploitation, often involving Russian women and girls, and frames these events as evidence of a broader, systematic attack. It expresses frustration with the lack of action from authorities and a media that perpetuates a distorted narrative. The author calls for a collective response from Russians to defend their women and their national identity, viewing the situation as a battle for the soul of Russia. The text is filled with accusations of manipulation, deceit, and a deliberate attempt to erase Russian culture and values.STRAW CUTTING
2002-07-29 - Aleksandr Lyskov
This text is a nostalgic and somewhat melancholic reflection on rural Russia, particularly focusing on the changing landscape of farming and the enduring spirit of the peasantry. It’s a story told through a series of encounters and observations, primarily centered around the experiences of several key characters – including a writer named Alexander Lyskov, a former collective farm director named Alexei Matrenin, and a young farmer named Sergei.
The narrative explores the tension between traditional rural values and the forces of modernization, symbolized by the proliferation of gas stations and the encroachment of urban influences on the countryside. It highlights the cyclical nature of rural life, with recurring themes of generational change, lost opportunities, and the enduring connection between people and the land.
A significant portion of the story revolves around the changing role of the collective farm director, Matrenin, and his attempts to adapt to the new realities of rural life. The author contrasts Matrenin’s pragmatic approach with the idealistic vision of the writer, Lyskov, and the younger farmer, Sergei.
Ultimately, the text is a meditation on memory, identity, and the preservation of a vanishing way of life, suggesting a bittersweet acceptance of the past while acknowledging the inevitable march of progress. It’s a portrait of a Russia grappling with its heritage and its future.GUIDE
2002-07-29 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
“Zvoikovy Bar’yer” is a unique music store in Moscow, offering a vast collection of vinyl records spanning all genres of music from classical to modern. The store regularly receives new shipments, including original English records like Beatles, Rolling Stones, and Pink Floyd, alongside CDs, cassettes, and music literature, such as the ReSearch counterculture publication. It’s located near the metro and open daily from 11:00 to 20:00.
DWINA in the Source
2002-08-05 - Aleksandr Lyskov
The text is a glowing review of the revived literary journal “Dvina,” based in Arkhangelsk, Russia. Launched after over 40 years of absence, the journal is praised for its high quality, both in content and design. It’s seen as a vital return for northern writers who previously had to send manuscripts to Petrograd’s “Sever” journal, which was struggling financially. The editor, Mikhail Popov, is particularly lauded for his discerning taste and commitment to preserving the spiritual and cultural heritage of the region. The journal’s “westward” leaning, contrasting with the “poetical” tendencies of Volgograd, is seen as a strength, allowing for translations of Norwegian poetry and explorations of the natural landscape. The author emphasizes the journal’s importance as a cultural institution, supported by the community, and highlights the role of its editor, Inel Yashina, in maintaining its integrity. The journal’s creation is attributed to the support of local authorities, including the governor, who sees it as a vital force in preserving Russian culture.
Longing for terror
2002-08-05 - Vladimir Osipov
This text is a scathing critique of the 2002 law against “extremism” in Russia, arguing it’s a tool for suppressing dissent and consolidating authoritarian power. The author contends the law isn’t genuinely aimed at combating genuine extremism, but rather at silencing critics of the government, particularly those expressing economic grievances or questioning the established order.
The core argument is that the law is a disguised attempt to control public discourse and punish those who challenge the ruling elite’s policies, particularly the shock therapy economic reforms and the privatization process. It’s framed as a shift from a “liberal-communist” system to one that restricts freedoms and punishes criticism of the regime.
The author highlights the hypocrisy of the law, noting that the government itself is responsible for corruption, economic mismanagement, and violence, yet it uses the “extremism” label to silence opposition. They point to historical events like the Belovezhskaya Pusha coup and the privatization of state assets as examples of actions deserving of condemnation, yet these are ignored in favor of targeting ordinary citizens and critics.
Ultimately, the text portrays the law as a step towards a totalitarian state, designed to control the population and suppress any challenge to the ruling power. It’s a warning about the dangers of unchecked government power and the erosion of democratic freedoms.Confusio
2002-08-19 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This review critiques V. Moss’s book, “Confusion in V. Moss. The Orthodox Church at a Crossroads,” a translation of his work examining the Orthodox Church, particularly focusing on Greece and Romania. The reviewer finds the book interesting but ultimately flawed due to several issues: the author’s obvious political and religious biases, particularly anti-Soviet sentiment, internal contradictions, and a selective presentation of history.
Specifically, the reviewer argues that the sections on Greece and Romania are engaging due to the use of previously unavailable documents, while the Russian sections are less compelling and informative. The author’s interpretation of events, such as the perceived “failure” of Tsar Nicholas II’s renunciation and the role of World War I in Russia’s decline, is heavily skewed by his English perspective.
The reviewer also criticizes the book for ignoring key historical periods and figures relevant to Russian Orthodox history, including the First Fall of Constantinople, the Time of Troubles, and the writings of P. Mogila. Despite containing some interesting details and previously unknown facts, the reviewer concludes that the book is overly biased and lacks a truly objective and scientific approach.Crocodiles cry too.
2002-08-26 - Nikolay Konʹkov
This text is a cynical and critical analysis of historical events, primarily focusing on the collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent rise of global capitalism. It uses extended analogies – particularly the comparison of humans to crocodiles – to illustrate the cyclical nature of power, adaptation, and ultimately, destruction.
The core argument is that the downfall of the USSR wasn’t a singular event but a predictable consequence of a flawed adaptation to a changing global landscape. The Soviet system, driven by a misguided attempt to build a “consumer society,” failed to evolve sufficiently, becoming a “mammoth” – a valuable resource eventually exhausted. The rise of “shark capitalism” in the West, similarly, is portrayed as a predatory force, exploiting vulnerabilities and ultimately consuming everything in its path.
The author critiques the Western narrative of the Soviet collapse as a triumph of “liberalism,” arguing that the “values” of the West were ultimately hollow and self-serving. The text suggests a deterministic view of history, where systems inevitably rise and fall based on their ability to adapt, and that the West’s current dominance is merely a temporary phase. It concludes with a bleak outlook, predicting a future of escalating conflict and ultimately, the demise of Western power, mirroring the fate of the Soviet Union.SOVIET — MEANS EXCELLENT
2002-08-26 - Denis Tukmakov
The text is a satirical reflection on the resurgence of nostalgia for the Soviet Union in post-Soviet Russia. It argues that, after years of criticism and denigration, the Soviet Union is now viewed favorably by a significant portion of the population, primarily due to dissatisfaction with contemporary Russia’s economic and social conditions. The author suggests this nostalgia stems from a desire for a perceived sense of strength, purpose, and national pride, contrasting it with the perceived weakness and mediocrity of modern Russia. The text uses vivid imagery and hyperbolic language to highlight this trend, portraying it as a reaction against perceived liberal failings and a yearning for a simpler, more powerful national identity, often fueled by frustration with current circumstances.
The Secret of Lawlessness
2002-08-26 - Vladislav Shurygin
The text explores the unanswered questions surrounding the 1991 August Coup (GKHCP) and its true nature. It questions the official narrative, suggesting it wasn’t a failed romantic attempt to save Russia, but a calculated plan for power transfer. The author investigates suspicious events surrounding the coup, including suicides of party officials, the actions of the KGB and “Alfa” group, and the involvement of foreign powers. The text highlights the silence of those involved, particularly former “Gechenepists,” and their subsequent quiet lives after the events. It raises numerous “why” questions about the coup’s participants and their actions, ultimately calling for a search for the truth behind the demise of the USSR.
The gentlemen are leaving…
2002-08-26 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The story depicts a frantic, staged preparation for a visit by President Putin to the town of Borodino, commemorating the Battle of Borodino. The scene highlights the excessive and superficial efforts of railway workers and local residents to create a polished, almost absurd, impression of the town. This elaborate display, reminiscent of Soviet-era propaganda and designed solely to please the president, overshadows genuine concerns about issues like the Chechen conflict and industrial decline. The situation is characterized by a blend of opportunism, self-serving behavior, and a manufactured sense of national pride, ultimately presenting a distorted and artificial version of Russia.
UNIVERSITY
2002-09-02 - Denis Tukmakov
The text describes a chaotic and unsettling “Day of the City” celebration in Moscow in 2002, portraying it as a heavily controlled, almost dystopian event. The city was effectively sealed off with roadblocks, police, and armed guards, creating a feeling of surveillance and restriction. The atmosphere was tense, fueled by economic hardship, social unrest, and a sense of impending doom, with rumors of planned attacks and provocations circulating. Despite attempts to create a festive atmosphere with concerts and staged performances, a violent confrontation erupted at Moscow State University between different youth groups, resulting in a fatality. The author argues that the event was a manifestation of pent-up frustration and anger, highlighting the disconnect between the planned celebration and the underlying social and economic realities of the time. The text suggests that the controlled, artificial celebration was ultimately unsuccessful and underscored the deep-seated problems within Russian society.
COMMANDER OF NAVAL INFANTRY
2002-09-02 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Evgeny Kochshkov, a retired Major General of the Naval Infantry, reflects on his service, particularly his involvement in the Chechen conflict. He highlights his command of a naval infantry brigade during a difficult period for the Russian army. He emphasizes the immense responsibility and pressure of leading soldiers, particularly the importance of earning their trust through consistent action and unwavering dedication.
Kochshkov details several key experiences, including his involvement in street-to-street combat in Grozny, the emotional impact of casualties, and the crucial role of support from other military units, especially artillery and airborne troops. He expresses frustration with political interference and inconsistent orders, which he believes contributed to unnecessary losses.
He credits the strong camaraderie and mutual support within his brigade as vital to their survival and success, noting the bravery and selflessness of individuals like Sergeant Zuykov and many other officers and soldiers. He particularly emphasizes the importance of recognizing and appreciating the contributions of support personnel, such as political officers and communications specialists. Kochshkov’s account is marked by a deep sense of respect for his fallen comrades and a poignant reflection on the human cost of war.Question in the Lobby Anatoly CHUBAISU
2002-09-09 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Anatoly Chubais, as head of RAO “Yuzhashorsk” (translated as “EES Russia”), argues that autumn cold and summer heat are now considered natural disasters in modern Russia. Despite this, the company has prepared for the autumn-winter season, with coal reserves exceeding 18.3 million tons (99.7% of the planned amount) and oil reserves exceeding 2.8 million tons (4% above plan). He emphasizes a system where the company is paid and receives payment in full, and highlights the absence of fuel shortages. However, he notes discrepancies, citing examples where oil reserves in certain facilities are significantly below planned levels, despite the impending navigation closure.
The pink stockings of the German woman were stained.
2002-09-09 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a scathing, accusatory letter from an unnamed source (likely a Kremlin figure) to Boris Nemtsov, published in “Zavtra” and “Sovetskaya Rossiya” on September 10, 2002. The letter alleges Nemtsov is a traitor actively working against the Russian-Belarusian Union. It accuses him of conspiring with figures like Belarusian double “Lebedko” and Kremlin operative Surkov to destabilize Belarus, particularly through economic pressure and undermining Lukashenko. The author claims Nemtsov’s actions are part of a broader scheme to dismantle the union, fueled by figures like Rostislav Zakharov and Vladislav Gurkov, and that Nemtsov’s statements about Putin being a combination of SPS and Prokhanov were deliberately provocative. The letter concludes with a declaration of gratitude from Belarusian and Russian citizens for the publication of the information and a subsequent denial from President Putin, framing the situation as purely political.
Ordinary massacre
2002-09-09 - Vladislav Shurygin
This text is a scathing critique of Defence Minister Ivanov’s actions, portraying him as a destructive figure who deliberately dismantled the Russian Army’s air force and targeted experienced, capable officers. The core argument is that Ivanov’s decisions were driven by personal animosity towards the Chief of the General Staff, Anatoly Kvashnin, rather than sound military judgment.
The article details how Ivanov, a former KGB officer, systematically dismantled the Army Aviation, a vital component of Russian military capabilities. He blamed lower-ranking officers for a helicopter crash, using this as a pretext to eliminate experienced commanders and consolidate power within the Ministry of Defence. The author highlights the irony of Ivanov’s actions, given the increasing importance of helicopter aviation in modern warfare, contrasting it with the declining state of the Russian military – aging equipment, low morale, and a loss of expertise.
The piece emphasizes the incompetence and destructive nature of Ivanov’s leadership, portraying him as a figure who prioritized personal ambition over the well-being and effectiveness of the armed forces. It concludes with a pessimistic outlook, suggesting that Ivanov’s actions will continue to damage the Russian military and potentially cost lives.FOREIGN POWER
2002-09-09 - Mikhail Pyatayev
This text is a bitter, cynical commentary on a visit by President Putin to the city of Novokuznetsk, Russia. The author expresses deep resentment towards the current leadership and a perceived disconnect between the government and the realities of life for ordinary citizens, particularly in the region.
The visit is portrayed as a staged, superficial event designed to project an image of engagement without addressing the city’s deep-seated problems – poverty, unemployment, neglected infrastructure, and a general sense of abandonment. The author highlights numerous instances of this, including the manipulation of public spaces (the “Ozerny” recreational facility), the exploitation of residents for security, and the erasure of historical and cultural symbols (the lines from a poem by Vladimir Mayakovsky).
The core of the text is a lament for the lost spirit of the city, a place once vibrant and hopeful, now marred by corruption, inequality, and the indifference of those in power. The author uses vivid imagery and personal anecdotes to convey a sense of disillusionment and despair, accusing the current leadership of prioritizing appearances over genuine concern for the well-being of its people. The repeated phrase “Я знаю, город будет…” (I know, the city will be…) is used ironically, representing a forgotten promise and a lost dream. Ultimately, the text is a powerful critique of political manipulation and a poignant reflection on the human cost of economic and political change.Everything is ahead.
2002-09-16 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a post-election analysis following a campaign in Krasnoyarsk, led by Sergei Glaziev and Alexander Nagorniy. Glaziev argues that the Patriotic Bloc’s victory in Krasnoyarsk, despite not achieving a decisive win, was significant due to securing approximately 50% of the vote – a target for the coalition of the National Patriotic Party and the Communist Party of Russia. He attributes this success to a well-received program focused on rapid economic growth, utilizing the region’s resources and aiming to halt capital flight, increase industrial competitiveness, and improve living standards.
Glaziev criticizes the election process, alleging widespread manipulation, including inflated spending by local officials, unrestricted campaign advertising, and a flawed vote counting system that defied statistical probability. He believes the key factor in the Bloc’s success was the clarity of their message and the ability to connect with voters concerned about the influence of oligarchs and the perceived mismanagement of the economy.
He anticipates potential economic challenges stemming from a drop in oil prices, predicting a possible fall to $7-8, which would negatively impact Russia’s budget. However, he remains optimistic about the Bloc’s program, believing it can drive economic growth regardless of external fluctuations. He emphasizes the importance of continuing to educate the public about the program’s goals and the need to combat misinformation. Glaziev stresses the importance of the coalition’s unity – combining conservative and socialist elements – to achieve a strong and sustainable national economy.Question to Alexey TKACHEV
2002-09-16 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Governor Alexander Tkachev argues that his membership in the CPRF does not impede his relationships with the presidential administration and government, stating his constituents dictate his policies. The editorial counters, asserting that regional development hinges on public trust in government, exemplified by the economic achievements of the Krasnodar region under Tkachev’s leadership, despite challenging circumstances.
This was with me…
2002-09-16 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text recounts a harrowing and fabricated story about a man brutally beaten, falsely accused of terrorism, and ultimately framed for falling off a bridge and disappearing. The man, a construction worker from a rural area, was subjected to unwarranted aggression by corrupt police officers who attempted to steal his money and fabricated evidence to justify their actions. He endured physical assault, false accusations, and a calculated scheme to erase his presence from the town, culminating in his being dumped in a river.
Helicopter
2002-09-23 - Aleksandr Yefremov
This text is a scathing critique of Russian state-controlled media, particularly NTV, and its coverage of the conflict in Georgia and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The author argues that the media is deliberately ignoring crucial aspects, such as the potential consequences of sanctions against Georgia and the dangers of Israel’s actions. They highlight the media’s focus on portraying a favorable image of the Shevardnadze regime and the Israeli government, while failing to acknowledge the broader geopolitical implications. The author accuses the media of manipulating public opinion through selective reporting and framing, particularly regarding the Communist Party of Russia’s (KПРФ) initiative for a referendum. They point out a shift in public opinion, attributed to NTV’s coverage, and criticize the use of deceptive tactics, like manipulating statistics, to discredit the referendum. The overall tone is one of cynicism and outrage at the perceived manipulation of the media landscape by state actors.
Smoke of the Fatherland
2002-09-30 - Oleg Shchukin
This text is a scathing critique of the current approach to climate change, arguing it’s fundamentally flawed and potentially catastrophic. It details a scenario of escalating environmental disaster, primarily driven by the rapid deforestation of Russia, particularly in the Moscow region. The deforestation is exacerbating extreme weather events – including damaging frosts and the recent devastating peat bog fires – and contributing to a global climate crisis.
The core argument is that the dominant “sustainable development” (KUUR) framework, promoted by developed nations, is ineffective and, in fact, harmful. It focuses on simply reducing carbon emissions without addressing the crucial role of natural carbon sinks like forests. The author contends that Russia, with its vast forested areas, is a vital “negative feedback” mechanism in stabilizing the climate, but current policies are actively undermining this capability by exporting timber.
The text criticizes the “invisible hand of the market” as incapable of self-regulation and argues that current economic policies, particularly in Russia, are actively contributing to humanity’s demise. It proposes a radically different approach: prioritizing the preservation and expansion of natural carbon sinks, specifically emphasizing Russia’s forests, as a key strategy for mitigating climate change. The author concludes with a stark warning that the current trajectory is a dangerous and ultimately self-destructive one.FIFTH WAY
2002-09-30 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text outlines the complex situation of the Russian minority in Latvia, examining four potential paths for their future. The author, Вячеслав Altukhov, heads the Russian Community of Latvia (ROL) and expresses concern about the lack of support and opportunities for the Russian population.
He identifies four primary paths: assimilation (already occurring, with some Russian-speaking Latvians holding ministerial positions), rejection of current realities and nostalgia for the Soviet Union, emigration to Russia or Western countries, and integration as a bilingual nation – a model similar to Canada.
The author criticizes the lack of unity among Russian organizations in Latvia and calls for Russians to unite, elect their own representatives, and address internal conflicts. He argues that the Russian community needs to actively participate in Latvian society and demand equal rights. He expresses skepticism about Russia’s continued support and highlights the challenges of maintaining cultural identity in a rapidly changing Latvia. The text emphasizes the need for self-determination and strategic action by the Russian community to secure their future within the country.Strange units
2002-10-07 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text details a complex and somewhat bizarre historical narrative centered around the writings and beliefs of Pierre Drie La Rochelle, a French journalist and observer from the 1940s. La Rochelle’s writings reveal a deeply ambivalent and often contradictory perspective, oscillating between fervent support for Soviet communism and a surprisingly nostalgic embrace of aspects of fascism.
Throughout the 20th century, La Rochelle’s views were echoed by figures like Konstantin Rodzayev, a leader of the “Union of Russian Fascists,” who envisioned a unified “red-brown” movement. The narrative highlights a recurring “strange unity” observed in Italy, particularly in 2001, involving figures from across the political spectrum – including neo-fascists, homosexual activists, Catholic integralists, and representatives of various nationalist and anti-globalist movements.
The text suggests a persistent, albeit often overlooked, connection between these disparate groups, fueled by a shared distrust of Western liberalism and a fascination with alternative geopolitical visions, notably the concept of a “euro-sovietic empire.” This connection is further illustrated by the posthumous recognition of La Rochelle’s ideas in Russia, reflecting a historical tendency to find common ground between seemingly opposing ideologies. The narrative concludes with a suggestion that this “strange unity” continues to resonate in contemporary movements, particularly within anti-globalist and nationalist circles, and that the historical roots of these movements can be traced back to the complex and often contradictory perspectives of figures like La Rochelle.SIZE OF LEADERS
2002-10-14 - Ernest Sultanov
This text explores the recurring theme of “leader size” – the mismatch between leadership capabilities and the complexity of historical situations – across several pivotal moments in history. It argues that a key factor in failures, such as the rise of fascism under Hitler and the eventual collapse of traditional left and right-wing movements, is the oversimplification of geopolitical challenges.
The analysis draws parallels between the failures of the German leadership in the 20th century, particularly under Bismarck and Hitler, and the later trends of “pink liberalism” within the Soviet Communist Party and the adoption of conservative ideologies by Italian neo-fascists. It highlights how leaders, like Napoleon and Hitler, attempted to impose rigid, simplistic solutions on complex situations, ultimately leading to disastrous outcomes.
The text suggests that a capacity for strategic foresight and adaptability – akin to Bismarck’s approach – is crucial for navigating uncertainty. It posits that future geopolitical shifts may lead to new alliances and leadership figures who can anticipate and respond effectively to unforeseen challenges, contrasting with the tendency to rely on outdated models and simplistic solutions. The author references historical figures like Bismarck and Stalin as examples of leaders who possessed this crucial ability.HERMETIC TYRANNY
2002-10-14 - Vladimir Lichutin
This text is a cynical and critical reflection on contemporary Russia, particularly focusing on the state of culture and society under a “hermetic” system of power. It argues that this system, reminiscent of the absolute monarchs of the past, is characterized by secrecy, exclusion, and a disregard for genuine public opinion.
The author critiques the current political landscape, portraying it as a closed circle of elites who prioritize their own interests and maintain control through manipulation and suppression of dissent. They highlight the lack of accountability, the prevalence of corruption, and the stifling of creativity and independent thought.
The text draws parallels to historical periods of autocracy, emphasizing the dangers of unchecked power and the importance of a free and open society. It expresses frustration with the superficiality and cynicism of contemporary culture, arguing that it is dominated by a “hermetic” mentality that prioritizes appearances over substance.
Ultimately, the piece is a lament for the loss of genuine values and a warning against the dangers of a system that prioritizes control over freedom. It suggests that the current state of Russia is characterized by a deep sense of alienation and a lack of hope for the future.PROJECT “BABYLONIAN TOWERS”
2002-10-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text presents a conspiracy theory surrounding the events of 9/11 and the subsequent invasion of Iraq, arguing that these events were orchestrated by powerful, “utopian” figures within the US government, primarily dating back to the 1990s. The core argument is that the “New Strategy for National Security,” developed by figures like Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis Libby, and Eric Edelman, aimed to establish a single superpower and reshape the global order.
The text details a long-term plan originating in 1990, fueled by a desire to create a “new world order” based on US financial and military dominance. It claims that the 9/11 attacks were deliberately engineered to justify this agenda, and that the invasion of Iraq was a key step in achieving this goal, intended to benefit Israel and solidify US control.
The text draws upon a series of historical references, including the biblical story of the Tower of Babel, to support its claims. It suggests that figures like Henry Kissinger have long recognized this strategy and that the current situation is a continuation of this plan. The text posits that the US government, driven by a “utopian” vision, is willing to sacrifice anything – including lives and international law – to achieve its goals. It ultimately frames the events of 9/11 and the Iraq War as a deliberate manipulation designed to establish a new world order dominated by the United States.Agency “Day”
2002-10-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a news clipping from “Agentstvo Dnya” (Agency of the Day) dated October 22, 2002, concerning “Diamond bracelets of Nasur – Nasur prisoners.”
LIE AND POLICY
2002-10-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a transcript of a lengthy discussion between Gennady Zyuganov and Valentin Chikin, focusing on the political landscape in Russia following a controversial interview with Boris Berezovsky. The core themes revolve around the perceived manipulation of public opinion by the ruling elite, the emergence of Berezovsky as a significant, albeit disruptive, political force, and the need for the Left Opposition to strategically adapt and consolidate its position.
Here’s a summary of the key points:
- Berezovsky’s Influence: The conversation centers around the impact of Berezovsky’s interview, which has triggered a significant reaction from the authorities and fueled public debate. The speakers acknowledge Berezovsky’s role in exposing corruption and challenging the established order.
- Government Manipulation: The speakers express concern about the government’s attempts to discredit the Left Opposition and divert attention from legitimate grievances. They highlight the use of tactics like staged protests and misinformation campaigns.
- Strategic Adaptation: The discussion emphasizes the need for the Left Opposition to learn from the Berezovsky situation, strengthen its organization, and develop a clear strategy for engaging with the public.
- Consolidation of the Left Opposition: The speakers stress the importance of uniting diverse elements within the Left Opposition, including intellectuals, activists, and workers, to create a powerful and cohesive force.
- Focus on National Interests: The core argument is that the Left Opposition must prioritize the interests of the Russian people and the country’s future, rather than being swayed by short-term political calculations.
- Call to Action: The text concludes with a call for vigilance, strategic adaptation, and a renewed commitment to the goals of national unity, social justice, and democratic reform.
Question to Alexey Gurov
2002-10-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Following the terrorist attack on Ulitsa Melnikova, it became clear that terrorists could move freely through Moscow in vehicles, armed and camouflaged, without fear. The terrorists likely arrived as spectators at the “Nord-Ost” club, and the explosives were stored at the “Central Station” club, owned by Chechens. The attack was a well-planned provocation, and acquiring weapons and explosives in Moscow was readily available. The editor suggests the Minister of Internal Affairs, Gryzlov, should be questioned regarding this issue, but he was unavailable at the time of the tragedy.
According to the state support scheme
2002-10-28 - Andrey Fefelov
This text is a scathing critique of the Russian government’s response to the 1995 hostage crisis in Moscow, specifically focusing on the chaotic and ultimately unsuccessful attempts at negotiation and eventual military intervention. The author expresses deep disillusionment with the political elite, portraying them as incompetent, self-serving, and lacking any genuine concern for the well-being of the Russian people. The text highlights the absurdity of the situation, detailing bizarre pronouncements from celebrities and “experts,” and the apparent lack of strategic thinking. It argues that the government’s actions were driven by a desire for revenge and a fear of further national humiliation, mirroring past failures. The author predicts a catastrophic outcome for Russia, foreshadowing a continued cycle of instability and violence. The piece is filled with a sense of impending doom and despair, culminating in the depiction of a failed state and a missed opportunity for decisive action.
Punishing Dream
2002-10-28 - Vladislav Shurygin
This text is a highly critical and conspiratorial account of the 2002 Moscow theater siege. It argues that the event was not a simple terrorist attack, but rather a deliberate provocation orchestrated to undermine President Putin and destabilize Russia. The author contends that Western media and political figures actively sought to humiliate Russia, manipulating the situation to portray Putin as weak and ineffective.
The narrative focuses on the actions of Russian special forces and military personnel, portraying them as the true heroes who successfully thwarted the attack and saved the country. It criticizes the actions of government officials, analysts, and intellectuals, accusing them of incompetence and manipulation. The text emphasizes the brutality of the operation, particularly the swift and decisive elimination of the hostage-takers, and frames the event as a battle for Russia’s future. It suggests a deep-seated conspiracy involving Western forces aiming to weaken Russia, and highlights the unwavering loyalty and courage of the Russian military as the only genuine protectors of the nation.Apostrophe. Paul Virilio.
2002-11-04 - Oksana Timofeyeva
Pol Virilio’s “Informational Bomb” is a scathing, uncompromising critique of contemporary society, arguing that the relentless bombardment of information through media is leading humanity towards a bleak and inevitable end. Virilio contends that modern life, dominated by visual media and instant information, is shrinking the world, reducing human experience to a shallow, illusory existence. He sees this as a descent into infantile behavior, mirroring a “lemming” instinct, and a loss of responsibility. The book’s forceful, almost apocalyptic tone, coupled with its perceived lack of nuance or a specific solution, ultimately leaves the reader feeling apathetic and overwhelmed, suggesting it’s simply another unproductive attempt at philosophical commentary from French intellectuals.
Following Gorky
2002-11-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text details a complex and somewhat murky history involving Soviet-era arms deals to Africa, primarily with Angola, and the subsequent exploitation of these deals by individuals like Arkady Gaidamak and Viktor Malkin. Initially, the Soviet Union provided significant aid and weaponry to African nations, driven by geopolitical interests and a desire to expand its influence. Following the collapse of the USSR, Gaidamak and Malkin capitalized on this legacy, engaging in a series of transactions involving Angolan debt and the sale of Soviet military equipment. They established a network of contacts, including within the Paris Club of creditors, and ultimately facilitated the purchase of weapons by the Angolan government.
This operation involved a complex web of payments, including the issuance of promissory notes and the manipulation of debt obligations. The duo’s activities led to accusations of illegal arms dealing and involvement with organizations like Al-Qaeda, though evidence remains circumstantial.
More recently, Gaidamak and his partner Vladimir Ananich have expanded their operations into the media sector, launching a Russian-language television channel, “Russkiy Mir,” aimed at international audiences. This represents a new phase in their business ventures, leveraging their established connections and expertise in international trade and finance. The text highlights the ongoing involvement of figures like Viktor But, who was previously involved in the Russian stock exchange, and suggests a broader, potentially global, media strategy. The narrative emphasizes the opportunistic nature of their activities and their ability to adapt and exploit new opportunities, demonstrating a persistent and evolving business model.In each other’s interests
2002-11-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is an interview with Dr. Abdullah bin Abdul-Moheisin at-Turki, the Secretary-General of the World Muslim League, conducted in 2002. At-Turki discusses his background, including his extensive education and various leadership roles within Islamic organizations, including the World Muslim Council, the Association of Islamic Universities, and the World Assembly of Muslim Youth. He emphasizes a commitment to peace, justice, and combating terrorism, advocating for collaboration between all religions.
The interview focuses on the strained relationship between the US and the Islamic world, particularly regarding the Iraq War and the Palestinian issue. At-Turki expresses concerns about US foreign policy and highlights the historical relationship between Saudi Arabia and the Soviet Union, noting the disruption of diplomatic ties due to Soviet ideological pressures. He details the eventual restoration of relations in 1990, attributing it to mutual interests and a desire for improved communication.
Key points include his belief in the importance of open dialogue and cooperation, his assessment of the current US-Islamic world dynamic, and a reflection on the historical context of Saudi-Soviet relations. The interview concludes with a discussion of the ongoing relationship between Saudi Arabia and Russia, emphasizing the potential for strengthened ties.WE DEMAND A RESIGNATION!
2002-11-11 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The Petrovsky Academy of Sciences and Arts demands the resignation of Russian Culture Minister Mikhail Shvydkay due to his alleged insult to the Russian people and the perceived destruction of Russian cultural foundations. The Academy claims Shvydkay’s statement equating “Russian fascism” with German fascism is a deliberate attack on the Russian people and a denial of their sacrifices during World War II. They argue that Shvydkay’s actions reflect a desire to evade responsibility for the decline of the Russian population and represent a threat to Russian culture and national identity.
Dashboard
2002-11-11 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text outlines a complex web of political and economic developments across multiple countries. In Russia, Anatoly Chubois is consolidating power following Vladimir Putin’s absence, attempting to discredit the Communist Party and manage “siloviki” activity. Simultaneously, the US presidential election has eased tensions with Congress, while the UN Security Council’s resolution on Iraq has delayed potential military action. This delay, coupled with the Federal Reserve’s interest rate cuts, is contributing to a financial crisis. China is pursuing an ambitious economic growth program, and Gazprom is attempting to gain control over the “Slavneft” company, potentially influenced by interests within the Russian government. Finally, there are indications of a significant gay lobby operating within the close circle of Boris Gryzlov, and a financial group led by Potanin and Bendukidze is seeking control over Russian nuclear exports.
Russia, Hende Hosh!
2002-11-11 - Vladislav Smolentsev
This text alleges a secret agreement between the United States and Russia following the September 11th attacks. It claims that Russia, under Putin, secretly facilitated the movement of weapons and military equipment to Afghanistan via Russian territory, while also allowing the extensive operations of the FBI within Russia. Furthermore, it asserts that a classified memorandum was signed between Bush and Putin, effectively ceding the US control over the post-Soviet space in exchange for US financial support for nuclear disarmament and a complete disregard for Russian sovereignty. The document grants the US unrestricted access to Russian military assets, including nuclear facilities, and designates Russia as a subordinate state aligned with the US agenda.
Apostrophe
2002-11-11 - Sergey Yashin
The text is a review of “Subcomandante Marcos. Another Revolution. Zapatistas vs. the New World Order,” a Russian translation of a book by Mexican indigenous leader Subcomandante Marcos. The book recounts Marcos’s experiences, including his friendship with figures like Oliver Stone and Gabriel Garcia Marquez, and his involvement with the Zapatista Army of National Liberation. It highlights the stark socioeconomic conditions in Chiapas, Mexico, where 90% of the population lives in poverty and many children lack education. Marcos’s revolutionary ideas, shaped by indigenous mythology and a rejection of globalization, are presented as a “real revolution” against the forces of “globalization” and “the new world order.” The reviewer notes the book’s blend of romantic literature and political utopianism, and suggests a parallel between the Zapatistas’ struggle and the potential for a “national, Orthodox socialism” in Russia.
Russian “ZONE”
2002-11-18 - Vladislav Shurygin
This text is a scathing critique of President Putin’s handling of the Kaliningrad issue and Russia’s relationship with the Baltic states. It argues that the situation is essentially a “visa regime” disguised as a diplomatic victory. The author contends that Putin is being manipulated by Western powers who are unwilling to grant Russia equal status as a partner, and that the Kremlin’s PR efforts are disingenuous and designed to maintain a facade of strength. The text highlights the historical context of Russia’s past mistakes in relinquishing control over the Baltic states and accuses Putin of perpetuating a colonial-like relationship, with Russia essentially confined to a “reservation” called “Erephia.” It expresses frustration with the lack of genuine progress and the reliance on propaganda to mask the reality of Russia’s diminished geopolitical influence.
NATO: TAKING PRAGUE
2002-11-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text describes the 2002 NATO summit in Prague as a pivotal moment solidifying the alliance’s shift towards a more assertive, pro-American, and anti-Russian posture. It argues that the summit marked the end of illusions about Russia’s influence and the beginning of a new era where NATO actively seeks to expand its control over the post-Soviet space. The summit was characterized by the increasing military presence of NATO in Eastern Europe, particularly in the Baltic states, and the alliance’s attempts to integrate former Soviet republics. The text highlights the symbolic importance of the summit, the diminishing role of European powers in shaping NATO’s direction, and the growing influence of the United States. It portrays a shift in Russia’s geopolitical position, returning to a 17th-century-like confrontation with the West, and a growing sense of disillusionment within Russia regarding its own leadership.
Winner of Fire
2002-11-25 - Vladimir Bondarenko
This text is a lengthy, reflective essay by Stanislav Konyayev (Stasya Konyayev) about his life and work, primarily focusing on his poetic journey and evolving worldview. It’s a deeply personal and often contradictory account, marked by a strong sense of Russian national identity and a willingness to confront difficult truths.
Konyayev describes his life and poetry as a constant, winding path – sometimes a well-trodden road, other times a solitary, challenging trek through diverse landscapes, both physical and intellectual. He emphasizes the importance of following one’s own internal compass, resisting external pressures and trends, particularly within the literary scene. He recounts a pivotal moment in his career when he rejected the popular “good with fists” stance, initially promoted by Vadim Kozhinov, viewing it as a constraint on his artistic freedom. He acknowledges the influence of Kozhinov, recognizing him as a significant figure in shaping his poetic direction, but ultimately prioritizes his own deeply rooted, almost primal, connection to Russia.
The essay explores Konyayev’s evolving relationship with Russia, moving from a more localized, regional identity to a broader, almost imperial, perspective. He grapples with the complexities of being a Russian poet in a changing world, confronting themes of national identity, historical memory, and the burdens of leadership. He frequently expresses a sense of disillusionment and weariness, acknowledging the pain and suffering inherent in Russia’s past and present.
A central theme is the tension between his personal convictions and the expectations placed upon him by others, particularly within the literary establishment. He repeatedly asserts his independence and willingness to challenge conventional wisdom, even when it means going against popular opinion. He highlights the importance of courage, resilience, and a willingness to stand up for one’s beliefs, even in the face of adversity.
The text culminates in a reflection on the nature of heroism and sacrifice, suggesting that true heroism lies not in grand gestures but in quiet acts of defiance and unwavering commitment to one’s values. He concludes with a sense of having “won” – having endured the “fire” – and a renewed determination to continue fighting for what he believes in, ultimately embodying the spirit of “good with fists.” The essay is a testament to a life lived passionately and authentically, marked by a profound love for Russia and a relentless pursuit of truth.Rentable meadow
2002-11-25 - Aleksandr Lyskov
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko represents a rebellious and contradictory type, a key element of his strength and uniqueness in Europe. His defiance, seeking “storms” and political advantages, contrasts with the perceived conformity of figures like those in Prague. Lukashenko’s assertiveness, fueled by Russian gas supplies and his own anger, strengthens his position. The growing tensions, including the support of Portugal and potential recognition of breakaway regions like Chechnya and Abkhazia, are intended to provoke a reaction from Russia and the West. Lukashenko’s actions, including planned military maneuvers near Poland, are viewed with respect by globalist forces, widening the rift between Russia and Belarus and creating instability in European politics.
REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONALS
2002-11-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is an analysis of the 2002 gubernatorial election in Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia, focusing on the surprising victory of Alexander Khloponin. It critiques the previous governors, particularly Professor Zubov and General Lebed, who were widely seen as incompetent and wasteful. The article highlights the key factors that led to Khloponin’s success: his background as a successful businessman (previously heading Norilsk Nickel), his pragmatic approach to governance, and his ability to quickly address the region’s economic problems.
Khloponin’s strategy involved aligning himself with the needs of major industrial groups while simultaneously addressing the region’s financial difficulties. He implemented measures like raising energy tariffs for large businesses to benefit the population and securing increased revenue from Norilsk Nickel. He also fostered a collaborative relationship with the regional legislature, emphasizing a focus on practical solutions and a rejection of ideological divisions. The article suggests that voters were essentially choosing a skilled manager – someone who could effectively run the region’s economy – rather than a governor based on political affiliation. The comparison to previous governors, particularly those with backgrounds in party leadership, underscores the shift towards valuing managerial competence. Ultimately, the article argues that Khloponin’s victory represented a return to a more traditional, results-oriented approach to governance, suggesting that the best governors are those who can successfully manage production.About the Union of Communists and Liberals
2002-11-25 - Boris Berezovskiy
This 2002 article, written by Boris Berezovsky and published in “Независимая газета,” analyzes the Russian political landscape leading up to the 2003 parliamentary elections. The core argument is that the only viable opposition force is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KПРФ), and that achieving either the “minimum” goal of securing over 150 seats in the Duma or the “maximum” goal of winning a majority (226 seats) is dependent on a coalition led by КПРФ.
Berezovsky argues that despite support from segments of the liberal opposition, particularly after the collapse of “Liberal Russia,” the КПРФ remains the key player due to its significant public support and the perceived infiltration of pro-Kremlin forces within its ranks. He stresses the importance of the КПРФ’s ability to forge alliances, specifically with liberals, to overcome the potential barrier of 150 seats.
The article highlights the differing ideological positions between the Communists and Liberals, acknowledging areas of potential agreement, such as constitutional reform and foreign policy, while recognizing that disagreements will inevitably exist regarding economic issues. Ultimately, Berezovsky frames the potential alliance as a necessary, albeit complex, strategy to counter the perceived authoritarian tendencies of the Putin regime and to mobilize a broad “patriotic” opposition.Brezhnev
2002-11-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a recollection and analysis of Leonid Brezhnev’s leadership, primarily focusing on the period surrounding his 20th death anniversary in 2002. It details a conversation between Valery Boldin and Viktor Golikov, both former high-ranking figures within the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. The core of the discussion centers on the perceived flaws and contradictions of Brezhnev’s rule, particularly the “stagnation” era and the disconnect between the idealized image of the Soviet Union and the reality of its economic and social challenges.
The conversation highlights Brezhnev’s complex legacy, acknowledging his successes in maintaining stability and achieving military parity with the United States, while simultaneously criticizing his perceived complacency, lavish gifts, and the influence of sycophants. A significant portion of the text explores the personal life of Brezhnev, detailing his relationships and the influence of his wife, Victoria, and the problematic behavior of his daughter, Galina.
The speakers express concern about the resurgence of Brezhnev-era nostalgia and the perceived lack of critical engagement with the past. They emphasize the importance of strong, decisive leadership within the Communist Party and warn against the dangers of complacency and the influence of individuals like Brezhnev who prioritized personal comfort and loyalty over the needs of the nation. The conversation concludes with a reflection on the need to learn from the past, while acknowledging the complexities and contradictions of Soviet history.HORIZONTAL
2002-12-02 - Nikolay Anisin
This text is a lengthy analysis and optimistic report on the development of the “Agrocomplex” in the village of Vyselki, Krasnodar Krai, Russia, and the subsequent rise of the “Patriotic Movement ‘Fatherland’,” led by Nikolai Kondratenko and spearheaded by Alexander Tkachov. It details the origins of the Agrocomplex as a response to economic hardship and the influence of Western economic models, particularly the shift from a system of survival to one of prosperity.
The core narrative focuses on how a young entrepreneur, Alexander Tkachov, transformed a collection of struggling agricultural enterprises into a highly efficient and profitable integrated agricultural system. This was achieved through a radical restructuring, consolidating resources, implementing market-based principles, and fostering a culture of innovation and productivity.
The text highlights the key factors contributing to the Agrocomplex’s success: a pragmatic approach, a focus on efficiency, and a willingness to learn from Western economic models. It emphasizes the importance of strong leadership and a commitment to continuous improvement.
Crucially, the piece argues that the Agrocomplex’s success demonstrates a viable path for Russia’s economic development, suggesting that individuals with practical business experience and a strategic vision are better equipped to guide the country’s economic future than those solely focused on political maneuvering.
Finally, the text concludes with a hopeful note, asserting that the Agrocomplex’s model – a combination of patriotism and pragmatic business acumen – represents a promising approach for Russia’s economic development and that the victory of the “Patriotic Movement ‘Fatherland’” in the Krasnodar Krai legislative elections signals a positive shift in the country’s political landscape.Cretinism, debility, idiocy…
2002-12-02 - Vladimir Bushin
This text is a scathing critique of contemporary Russian political leadership, arguing that their actions and statements reveal a profound lack of understanding, strategic thinking, and genuine concern for Russia’s interests. It uses historical examples and rhetorical questions to highlight what the author perceives as a pattern of deception, self-deception, and ultimately, incompetence. The core argument is that the current leadership is characterized by a “cretinism,” “debiolism,” and “idiolism” – a combination of intellectual deficiency, poor judgment, and a willingness to accept misleading assurances from foreign powers like the United States.
The text employs sarcasm and irony to expose the perceived absurdity of the leadership’s justifications and pronouncements, particularly regarding NATO expansion and Russia’s relationship with the West. It repeatedly questions the motivations and credibility of key figures, suggesting they are driven by a desire to maintain power rather than by a genuine commitment to national security or international cooperation. The author uses historical comparisons – referencing Stalin’s careful observation and strategic thinking – to contrast sharply with the perceived failings of the current leadership, suggesting a decline in Russia’s intellectual and political capacity. Ultimately, the text is a lament for a lost sense of national pride, strategic foresight, and responsible governance.Underground wind
2002-12-02 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a highly critical and conspiratorial analysis of the US-Russia Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) and the broader relationship between the two countries from 2002. It argues that the treaty was not a genuine effort at arms reduction but rather a carefully orchestrated scheme by the United States to weaken Russia’s military capabilities and exert greater global influence.
The core argument is that the US, through a network of “non-governmental” research centers and by manipulating Russian experts and officials, systematically undermined Russia’s strategic nuclear deterrent. The text details how the US exploited Russia’s post-Cold War vulnerability, using misleading language in the treaty itself, and failing to establish effective verification mechanisms. It claims that the US deliberately created a situation where Russia was forced to dismantle its strategic weapons under conditions that ultimately benefited the US.
Specifically, the text highlights:
- Misleading Treaty Language: The text points out discrepancies and ambiguities in the START I treaty, suggesting they were intentionally designed to disadvantage Russia.
- Non-Governmental Influence: It emphasizes the role of US-based research centers and “non-governmental” experts in shaping Russian policy and influencing the treaty negotiations.
- Lack of Verification: The text criticizes the inadequate verification mechanisms in the treaty, allowing the US to effectively monitor and potentially manipulate Russia’s compliance.
- Conspiracy: The overall tone suggests a deliberate conspiracy by the US to exploit Russia’s weakness and achieve strategic dominance.
UNFORGOTTEN CHECHNYA
2002-12-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text, dated December 17, 2002, is a bleak assessment of the Chechen conflict, painted by a journalist who previously reported from Afghanistan. The author expresses a profound sense of hopelessness regarding the situation, describing it as a “proklyтое место” (cursed place). He argues that the war is entering a perpetual state, with no prospect of peace and a deeply entrenched, almost suicidal, cycle of violence.
The journalist’s observations highlight a complete breakdown of communication and trust between Russians and Chechens. He believes the conflict is primarily a civil war amongst the Chechens themselves, fueled by clan rivalries and a deep-seated resentment of Russian influence. Chechens view the conflict as a righteous struggle against an oppressive foreign power, while Russian officials maintain a naive belief that the Chechens will eventually accept Russian dominance.
The author emphasizes the lack of any realistic solutions, noting that neither side is willing to compromise. He describes a situation where both Russians and Chechens are motivated by self-interest – Russians seeking to maintain control and Chechens hoping for a future where Russia pays them compensation. The journalist’s previous experience in Afghanistan informs his pessimistic outlook, stating that he has never witnessed such a bleak and intractable situation. He concludes that the conflict is a tragic, unending cycle with no foreseeable end.Appeal to the city council
2002-12-17 - Viktor Toporov
This text is a commentary on the “National Bestseller” prize and the controversy surrounding its 2002 award to author Alexander Prokhanov. The author, Viktor Toporov, argues that much of the criticism leveled against Prokhanov is driven by ideological bias and a desire to discredit the prize. He dismisses accusations of political manipulation and critiques the tendency of some literary critics to unfairly compare Prokhanov to past writers. Toporov emphasizes that the prize is simply a recognition of the best work presented, and that the selection process is transparent and designed to avoid bias. He details the composition of the prize’s judging committee, highlighting its focus on youth and its efforts to exclude those who have demonstrated a lack of professionalism. The text concludes with a warning against resorting to personal attacks and a reiteration that the prize is fundamentally about recognizing quality literature, regardless of political considerations.
FAIRYTALES FOR OYL-LUKO-LUKO
2002-12-17 - Aleksandr Gordeyev
This text details a growing alignment between Russian oil giants, particularly Lukoil under the leadership of Vagif Alekperov, and the United States, driven by economic pressures and geopolitical considerations. Lukoil’s decision to sever a contract with Iraqi oil firm Saddam Hussein’s government, prompted by sanctions and a perceived lack of trust, was largely orchestrated by US influence, facilitated by figures like Arkady Chuibchev. Alekperov’s proposal to shift Russian oil exports to the US, including the construction of a massive terminal in Murmansk and new pipelines, is presented as a strategically motivated move to secure a “backup airfield” for Lukoil executives and their families, given recent security concerns. The project is viewed as economically unsound, particularly if oil prices decline, and is ultimately seen as a result of a shift in priorities towards Western interests rather than genuine economic benefit for Russia. The text suggests a pattern of Russian oligarchs seeking refuge and business opportunities within the US, potentially at the expense of domestic needs and with the support of US intelligence and economic actors.
AREA OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE
2002-12-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a detailed, almost epic, recounting of Viktor Volkov’s tenure as the head of the Chernsky District, a region in the Tula Oblast of Russia. It’s a story of a man deeply connected to his region’s history and identity, particularly its ties to the writer Ivan Turgenev and the area’s traditional Russian heritage. Volkov’s leadership is characterized by a relentless focus on revitalizing the district, often through unconventional and sometimes controversial methods.
Initially, he spearheaded a “Turgenev Summer” festival, leveraging Turgenev’s connection to the region to boost its profile. He then systematically addressed the district’s decline, implementing a series of ambitious projects including restoring historical sites, supporting local culture, and boosting the local economy. This involved a hands-on approach, often personally overseeing projects like rebuilding churches, organizing agricultural initiatives, and managing the district’s finances with a meticulous, almost obsessive, attention to detail – including tracking every brick, ton of grain, and even the number of people attending events.
Volkov’s leadership style is portrayed as strong-willed, bordering on autocratic, driven by a deep sense of regional pride and a desire to preserve its unique identity. He fostered a loyal team, often recruiting individuals with a passion for the district’s history and culture. His methods were frequently disruptive, involving clashes with Moscow officials and generating considerable local legend. The text highlights his ability to mobilize the local population, utilizing their skills and resources to achieve his goals, and his willingness to challenge established norms. Ultimately, Volkov’s story is one of a dedicated, if somewhat eccentric, leader who fought tirelessly to preserve and revitalize his region, leaving behind a legacy of ambitious projects and enduring local legend.Dashboard
2002-12-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text, originating from a 2002 Russian news source (“День”), presents a series of interconnected narratives suggesting a deliberate manipulation of Russian politics and a strategic realignment of global power dynamics. It alleges that the Russian government is creating conflict within the КПРФ-НПСР alliance to undermine the current liberal-monetarist course, achieved through manipulating economic tariffs and leveraging Gazprom’s financial support for upcoming elections. Simultaneously, the text details a “global truce” between the Republican and Democratic administrations, facilitated by financial influence from corporations like Goldman Sachs, who are supporting the Bush administration’s military actions in Iraq and potentially seeking to expand influence in Kazakhstan through figures like Aga Khan IV. The text also suggests a planned escalation of military action in the Persian Gulf, potentially culminating in a US victory by Christmas, and a coordinated effort to influence political outcomes in Russia and Kazakhstan.
On the anniversary of Eduard Volodin’s death.
2002-12-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This poem, written on December 24, 2002 by Leonid Shumsky, is a lament for the deceased Eduard Volodin. The speaker expresses deep sorrow and regret, describing Volodin’s memory as “black clouds” and a source of painful “thorn-like” anguish. He wishes Volodin could be free, soaring like white birds or reflecting in serene waters, filled with joyful songs. The speaker acknowledges his own earthly sadness and admits to a transgression, but insists he did not kill, lie, or betray Volodin, stating he loved him.
I’m tired of their movies!
2002-12-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
On December 24, 2002, a group of individuals, identifying as “national-bolsheviks,” staged a protest against what they perceived as harmful American cultural influence, specifically Hollywood films. They targeted the “Pushkinsky” cinema during a James Bond premiere, attempting to disrupt the screening with leaflets and slogans. The protest involved physical confrontation with security personnel (“pokemon”) and resulted in several individuals being detained and fined for administrative offenses. The group expressed frustration with the perceived dominance of American culture and advocated for the promotion of Russian cinema.
Behold the glory.
2002-12-31 - Georgiy Sudovtsev
This text expresses deep skepticism and concern regarding the actions and motivations of both the Russian Orthodox Church and the Vatican, framing the exchange of a Christmas message between Patriarch Alexey II and Pope John Paul II as a strategic move rather than a genuine gesture of reconciliation. The author argues that both institutions are being manipulated by forces seeking to undermine religious freedom and establish a global “New World Order” characterized by control through technology, financial systems, and ultimately, a loss of individual liberty.
The core argument is that the “peaceful” exchange is a calculated tactic, driven by a desire to bring the Orthodox Church under state control through financial and technological means, mirroring concerns about the erosion of religious autonomy and the rise of a totalitarian system. The author highlights anxieties about the increasing influence of global elites, the manipulation of religious institutions, and the potential for a “concentration camp” scenario where individual freedoms are curtailed through technological surveillance and financial control. The text concludes with a warning to remain vigilant against these perceived threats, suggesting a long and difficult period of “suffering” for the Orthodox Church.FIRE COMPANY
2002-12-31 - Anna Serafimova
The text describes a disillusioned observer’s experience living in a Berlin apartment complex. The narrator details the ineffective presence of a private security guard named “Alligator,” who largely ignores disruptive behavior in the courtyard, including drunken revelry, illegal activities like smuggling, and the general lack of order. The security guard prioritizes avoiding confrontation and deferring to his superior, demonstrating a lack of responsibility and a cynical view of his role. The narrator questions the purpose and value of private security firms and their presence in daily life, highlighting the feeling of being exploited and the lack of accountability. The overall tone is one of frustration and bewilderment at the seemingly pointless expenditure of resources and the disconnect between the security force and the community it’s supposed to protect.