Summary of a sample of Zavtra.ru articles published in 2000

LLM summary

LLM-generated content, may include inaccuracies

This page includes LLM-generated summaries of articles published on Russian weekly newspaper Zavtra. They may be useful for a first overview of the contents published by Zavtra, but they have not been reviewed and they almost certainly include inaccuracies.

Clicking on the title of each article will bring you to the original publication on Zavtra’s official website.

This page includes an LLM-generated summary of a random sample of 131 articles out of a total of 1 319 articles published in 2000 (coverage: 10%). For more context, details on how this was implemented, and links to other years, see the index page.

STATE OFFICIALS

2000-01-03 - Nikolay Anisin

This text presents a historical analysis of Russia’s political landscape, arguing that a strong, centralized political subject is crucial for national development. It traces a cyclical pattern: periods of prosperity and capable leadership are followed by decline due to weak leadership and a failure to address fundamental issues.

The author contends that Russia’s problems stem from a lack of a cohesive, effective political entity capable of establishing stable rules and driving economic and social progress. Throughout history, attempts to create such a subject – exemplified by figures like Nicholas II and, ultimately, Stalin – have been fraught with challenges.

The text highlights key moments: the perceived potential of the Tsarist era, the failures of the early Soviet period, and the eventual rise of Stalin, who, despite his flaws, successfully forged a powerful political subject through sheer force of will and nationalistic fervor.

The author suggests that the current political situation in Russia mirrors this historical pattern, with a fragmented and unstable system struggling to address critical issues. However, they express cautious optimism, noting the emergence of a more assertive and capable military force and the potential for a renewed sense of national purpose, particularly if a strong, centralized leadership can be established. The text ultimately argues that a robust political subject, rooted in national identity and driven by a clear vision, is essential for Russia’s future.

BIG PROJECT

2000-01-03 - Aleksandr Lyskov

This text outlines a grand, ambitious project for Russia’s future, dubbed the “Second Union.” It envisions a radically transformed society built upon a core belief in humanity’s potential and a deep connection to nature, drawing heavily on Russia’s historical “hand-crafted” societal model. The project centers around a technologically advanced, globally-oriented Russia, fundamentally different from the Soviet era.

Key elements include a shift away from traditional nation-states towards a decentralized, “Diaspora-based” system, with a strong emphasis on scientific and technological advancement. Education would prioritize skills and knowledge acquisition, preparing individuals for a rapidly evolving world. The Second Union would be characterized by a globally-minded approach, fostering connections and collaborations across borders, particularly with populations sharing the Russian language and values.

Crucially, the project rejects traditional political structures like parliaments and republics, instead advocating for a highly organized, scientifically-driven system overseen by a “Construction Bureau of Public Device” (КБОУ), staffed by experts in fields like genetics, mathematics, and cultural studies. This bureau would guide the development of the nation, prioritizing human potential and a harmonious relationship with nature. The text suggests a future where Russia becomes a global leader, driven by a unique blend of technological innovation and a profound respect for humanity.

DUMSKOE BROZHENIE

2000-01-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text analyzes the anticipated composition and dynamics of the third convocation of the State Duma of Russia, predicting a highly unstable and fragmented political landscape. It argues that the Duma will be significantly more complex and multi-faceted than its predecessors, characterized by numerous competing factions and a lack of clear majority control.

The core prediction is that the Duma will be dominated by compromise and negotiation, with no single faction holding a dominant position. The “control package” – the coalition of right-wing parties – is unlikely to consolidate, and the Speaker’s role will be one of constant mediation.

Several key points are highlighted:

Ultimately, the text paints a picture of a Duma characterized by uncertainty, competition, and a reliance on delicate negotiations, rather than a stable, governing majority.

At the end of the past year, the V All-Russian People’s Cathedral took place in Moscow…

2000-01-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The V All-Russian People’s Cathedral took place in Moscow at the end of 2000, focusing on the theme “Russia on the Eve of the 2000th Anniversary of Christianity.” The event addressed faith, the people, and power. Key figures including Patriarch Alexey II, prominent politicians, religious leaders, academics, and cultural figures participated. Speakers emphasized the potential of the Church and Russian Orthodoxy to unite the nation during a time of global turmoil and focus on Russia’s salvation. Delegates from 20 Russian regions, as well as Orthodox communities in neighboring countries, attended.

Probuksówka

2000-01-10 - Vladislav Shurygin

This text is a scathing critique of the Russian government’s handling of the Chechen conflict, particularly its information warfare strategy. It argues that the Kremlin’s approach is chaotic, poorly coordinated, and ultimately failing to garner public support for the war.

The core argument is that the Ministry of Defence and figures like General Udugov are losing the “information war” to Chechen propaganda. There’s a lack of a clear strategy, with a reliance on outdated, ineffective methods. The author highlights a disconnect between the public perception of the war and the government’s messaging, fueled by a lack of transparency and a confusing series of events.

Key concerns raised include:

The text expresses deep concern about the potential for this lack of strategic direction to negatively impact the war’s outcome and the political standing of President Putin. It paints a picture of a government struggling to control the narrative and manage public opinion.

BORIS YELTSIN DID NOT RESIGN

2000-01-10 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

This text is a satirical and surreal narrative recounting the chaotic and absurd farewell of Boris Yeltsin and the subsequent arrival of Vladimir Putin. It’s presented as a series of reports from various international news outlets – “Financial Times,” “Daily News,” “Herald Tribune,” “Jerusalem Post,” “Mond,” and “Logovaz”) – alongside observations from NASA scientists regarding a strange atmospheric anomaly over Russia. The story depicts Yeltsin’s departure filled with bizarre gifts, including a secret chest of buttons and keys, and a final, almost comical, decision to reinstate himself through a fabricated decree. The narrative continues with a series of increasingly outlandish events, such as a NASA scientist’s concern about a dangerous atmospheric aerosol and a reporter’s discovery of a private correspondence between Putin and singer Zykina. The overall tone is one of dark humor and exaggeration, highlighting the instability and uncertainty surrounding the transition of power in Russia.

Guess the future.

2000-01-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a collection of essays and reflections on the state of Russian literature and culture, particularly in the context of the post-Soviet era and the challenges facing Russia today. Several key themes emerge. Firstly, there’s a critique of the “good man” archetype prevalent in Soviet literature, deemed inadequate and even detrimental in the face of the national crisis. The authors argue for a new, active, and historically-aware hero – one capable of responding to the demands of the present. Secondly, the text emphasizes the importance of literature as a tool for shaping national identity and understanding the soul of the Russian people. Several writers advocate for a return to realism, enriched by contemporary knowledge, to analyze the experiences of Russians during this turbulent period. There’s a desire to identify a new “hero” figure, capable of guiding the nation forward. The authors express concern about the influence of Western culture, particularly American culture, and the need for Russia to forge its own path. Finally, there’s a belief that literature holds a crucial role in preserving and transmitting cultural values, and in providing a framework for understanding the nation’s past and future.

From the Patriotic Information Burea

2000-01-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text describes Vladimir Goorukhov as a politically opportunistic and theatrical figure, primarily motivated by personal enjoyment and a love of attention rather than genuine political conviction. He is portrayed as a manipulative and inconsistent individual who shifts his political allegiances and criticisms based on his current situation and desires. Goorukhov is depicted as a self-serving “political dilettante” who enjoys the trappings of power and uses dramatic gestures and personal attacks to gain attention. He is characterized as a “nervous woman” who engages in elaborate performances and is ultimately a figure of little substance in the political landscape.

Agency “Day”

2000-01-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The article, published by “Agentstvo Dnya” on January 25, 2000, discusses several rumors: “Yastrzhembsky is the ‘Trojan Horse’,” “a ‘Committee for the Affairs of Failures’ is being created under Yavlinsky,” and a film directed by Govorukhina titled “The Thought We Lost.”

From eternity

2000-01-24 - Aleksey Yakovlev-Kozyrev

This text is a reflective piece describing a visit to Mount Athos, a unique Orthodox monastic state in Western Europe. It details a specific evening experience – a solitary moment of prayer and contemplation amidst the serene beauty of the landscape, focusing on the feeling of timelessness and spiritual connection. The author describes the atmosphere of the monastic community, emphasizing their dedication to traditional Orthodox practices and their resistance to modern influences. The piece highlights the profound sense of peace and spiritual awakening experienced through prayer and communion with nature, portraying Mount Athos as a place where the boundaries of time and space dissolve, offering a glimpse of eternal reality. It concludes with a sense of anticipation for further explorations and a continued journey of spiritual discovery within the unique environment of the Holy Mountain.

Literature Day

2000-01-31 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The January 2000 issue of “Den’ Literatury” newspaper featured articles on the exit secretariat of the Union of Russian Writers in Volgograd, excerpts from works including “Europe from Kitezh to Alaska” by Sergei Kornev and Vadim Shepya, an article about Vasily Terkin by Evgeniy Nefedov, and writings by Peter Krasnov. It also included poetry by Tatiana Glushkova, Svetlana Syrnevoy, Anatoly Evseenko, and Gleb Gorbovsky, alongside articles by Viktor Shirokov about Oscar Wilde, and reviews by Nikolai Pereyaslov and Ilya Kirillov. The issue was illustrated with photographs by Heidi Hallindjer, and the newspaper was available for purchase through “Zavtra” distributors and the editorial office.

“Roasted Chicken”

2000-01-31 - Sergey Kara-Murza

This lengthy review of Alexander Parshev’s “Why Russia is Not America” expresses overwhelming enthusiasm for the book. The reviewer, a “burned rooster” (a reference to the book’s title), praises Parshev’s work as a significant and overdue contribution to Russian society’s understanding of its predicament. He believes Parshev is the first author in a long time to speak to the Russian public in a language they can genuinely comprehend, moving away from outdated, ideologically-driven discourse.

Parshev’s strength lies in his directness and rejection of overly complex arguments. The reviewer highlights Parshev’s focus on a fundamental, geographically-determined challenge to Russia’s development – the high costs associated with its vast territory and climate. He sees this as a crucial, objective truth, rather than a product of ideological bias.

The reviewer acknowledges some potential shortcomings, particularly Parshev’s somewhat reductive emphasis on geography and his underestimation of the influence of culture. However, he largely dismisses these as minor adjustments made by Parshev to maintain the book’s central focus.

Ultimately, the reviewer advocates for widespread dissemination of the book and its continued publication, viewing it as a vital tool for stimulating critical thought and debate within Russian society. He sees Parshev’s work as a necessary “experiment” and a crucial step towards addressing Russia’s challenges.

announcements

2000-01-31 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The Agency for Patriotic Information (API) is seeking collaboration from patriots to provide information about events, protests, and cultural initiatives across Russia and abroad. API offers information, analysis, and commentary, distributing this content to approximately 200 print publications. They also announce events, including a political advertisement pricing for “Zavtra” newspaper and a creative evening honoring Valentin Sorokin. Finally, they promote a new intellectual center, Arktogeia, offering books, lectures, and materials by figures like Aleksandr Dugin.

Donations to General Kulikov

2000-02-14 - Vladislav Shurygin

The text critiques the former Minister of Internal Affairs, General Nikolai Kulikov, portraying him as a manipulative figure who embodies a fabricated “patriotic consciousness” created and exploited by the Yeltsin regime. It argues that Kulikov’s public image – particularly his recent appearance on “Glas Naroda” – is a carefully constructed facade, masking his role as a careerist who blindly followed orders and participated in the disastrous Chechen wars. The author accuses Kulikov of distorting history, offering misleading narratives about his actions, and ultimately betraying the memory of fallen soldiers. It suggests that Kulikov represents a corrupt and morally bankrupt segment of the former elite, now reduced to a parody of military leadership, and contrasts him with a new generation of Russians who are independent, responsible, and not subservient to power.

They were shivering…

2000-02-21 - Boris Khorev

This text is a scathing critique of economic policies in Russia, particularly following the 1990s reforms. It argues that Russia’s economic problems stem from a fundamental incompatibility with the global “free market” due to its unique geographical and climatic challenges. The author contends that attempts to align with Western economic models have been disastrous, leading to a decline in living standards and a dependence on external forces.

Key arguments include:

Essentially, the text presents a pessimistic view of Russia’s economic future unless a radical shift in policy occurs, prioritizing national resilience and acknowledging inherent limitations.

LET’S GO FOR THE VICTORY! Ivan Makushok)

2000-02-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text is an interview with Ivan Makushok, head of the Agency for Patriotic Information (API), discussing API’s activities and strategy during the 2000 Russian presidential election. API’s purpose is to provide operational information and analysis, primarily to regional publications, and to counter what they perceive as government censorship and influence. They are actively engaging with the internet, conducting polls, and facilitating communication between users and Gennady Zyuganov. API is creating materials for Zyuganov’s campaign, including video footage and photographic materials. Their strategy involves highlighting Zyuganov’s established political standing and contrasting him with perceived figures of instability within the current government, aiming to persuade voters that it’s time for a change. They are deliberately creating a perception of instability within the Putin camp, and are focused on utilizing new communication channels to reach a broad audience.

DEATH AND SPECULATORS

2000-02-28 - Vladimir Bushin

This text is a scathing, almost obsessive, critique of Anatoly Sobchak’s death and the surrounding circumstances, delivered in a rambling, polemic style. It argues that Sobchak’s death was not a natural one, but rather a politically motivated assassination orchestrated by a network of figures including Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin, and various journalists and political commentators. The author contends that Sobchak was a deeply flawed and self-serving figure who cultivated a false image of European sophistication and used this to manipulate others.

The piece relentlessly attacks Sobchak’s character, portraying him as arrogant, manipulative, and ultimately responsible for his own demise due to his reckless behavior and disregard for his health. It highlights a series of events surrounding Sobchak’s death – including his three heart attacks, his attempts to revive his political career, and the media frenzy that followed – as evidence of a deliberate plot.

The author uses a sarcastic and often repetitive tone, frequently invoking historical parallels (particularly referencing Lenin’s critique of liberal intellectuals) to underscore their argument. They repeatedly question the motives of those involved, suggesting a cynical manipulation of public opinion and a calculated effort to discredit Sobchak. The text is filled with accusations of “political assassination,” “manipulation,” and “false narratives,” ultimately concluding that Sobchak’s death was a consequence of his own actions and the machinations of those seeking to exploit his demise for political gain. It’s a highly critical and somewhat paranoid reflection on the events surrounding Sobchak’s death, framed as a warning against the dangers of political manipulation and the exploitation of public tragedy.

Dictatorship of lawlessness

2000-02-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text details the tumultuous career and increasingly problematic actions of Pavel Gurkalov, a former director of the Orsk-Khalilovsky Metallurgical Combine (OХМК). Gurkalov’s attempts to manipulate ownership and control through questionable financial maneuvers, including issuing shares and attempting to transfer control of the factory to his daughter’s foreign firm, repeatedly failed. He subsequently attempted a political career, ultimately leading to failure and involvement with dubious commercial structures, including “Stiltex,” where he orchestrated violence and intimidation against individuals associated with the factory and its former management. The text highlights a pattern of abuse, threats, and illegal actions, culminating in his role as a campaign manager for Vladimir Putin. The situation raises concerns about the potential consequences of allowing individuals with such a history and propensity for corruption to hold positions of power.

THIS IS THE RUSSIAN WORD – VICTORY!

2000-02-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a fragmented, almost stream-of-consciousness account of a soldier’s experiences during the final stages of the conflict in Grozny. It’s a deeply unsettling and impressionistic portrayal of the war, focusing on the psychological impact of witnessing death and destruction, and the strange, almost surreal atmosphere of the besieged city.

The narrative shifts between observations of the battlefield – including encounters with a bizarre “wolf hunt” and the unsettling sight of a frozen, blood-soaked river – and reflections on the soldiers’ experiences, particularly the aging and eventual departure of a veteran commander, Prokhachev. There’s a recurring theme of the soldiers’ resilience and loyalty, juxtaposed with the grim reality of their situation and the psychological toll of war. The text highlights the disorientation and surreal quality of the conflict, with descriptions of a “wolf hunt,” a frozen river, and the strange, almost dreamlike atmosphere of Grozny. It ends with a poignant reflection on the enduring loyalty of the soldiers, particularly the veteran Prokhachev, suggesting that the war’s impact extends far beyond the battlefield.

announcemen

2000-03-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

A patriotic arts evening, “For Victory!”, is taking place on March 6, 2000, at 6:00 PM in the Large Hall of the Writer’s House. The event features performances by several authors including Vladimir Litutin, Nikolai Gubenko, Alexander Prokhanov, and Eugene Nefedov, alongside Soviet songs like “Larks Migrate.” Poets Yuri Kuznetsov, Yegor Isaev, Igor Lapin, and Marina Strukova are also participating, along with figures like Gennady Zuyganov. Alexander Prokhanov is hosting, and a book sale with signed copies will be held in the foyer. Admission is by invitation.

Literature Day

2000-03-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The March 2000 issue of “Den’ Literatury” (Day of Literature) focuses primarily on the 100th anniversary of writer Vladimir Lilichin, with articles by Valentin Rasputin, Alexander Mikhailov, and Anatoly Afanasyev. It includes an interview with Vladimir Bondarenko covering topics such as Putin’s presidency and the Pen Club. The issue also features new prose by Lilichin (“Miledi Rotman”), commentary on the crisis in new literature and cinema, new poetry by Sergei Alihanov and Gennady Ivanov, an article on the literary circles of the liberal elite, reviews of journals and books, notes from Mikhail Alekseev, and parodies by Evgeny Nefedov. The publication also provides information on subscription options and contact details for distribution and support.

Russian Descendants Sisters

2000-03-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a series of interviews conducted by journalist Евгений Храмцов with women involved in the 247th Stavropol Cossack Ranger Division’s operation in Chechnya during March 2000. The interviews highlight the diverse roles these women played, ranging from medical personnel (Captain Elena Banshikova and Sergeant-Telegraphist Olga Dedeyko) to logistical support and even frontline combat support.

The core theme is the unexpected strength, resilience, and humanity displayed by these women amidst the brutal realities of war. They demonstrate unwavering dedication to their duties, often exceeding expectations and displaying remarkable courage and compassion. Several women, including medics and a photojournalist, express a profound sense of duty and a desire to help those in need, regardless of their nationality or background.

The interviews reveal a surprisingly egalitarian and supportive environment within the unit, with a focus on mutual respect and a shared commitment to their mission. The women’s perspectives challenge traditional notions of femininity in wartime, portraying them as capable, resourceful, and deeply committed individuals. The piece emphasizes their unwavering spirit and the enduring human connection they maintained despite the extreme circumstances.

Maslenitsa

2000-03-05 - Vladimir Golyshev

This text describes the ancient Russian tradition of Maslenitsa, a 10-day period preceding Lent. It details the various customs and rituals associated with Maslenitsa, which evolved over centuries. Initially, it began with a royal procession and “Judgment Day” spectacle, followed by a chaotic “rolling flood” across the land. The central figure was a drunken old man on a sleigh, representing Maslenitsa herself, accompanied by a bear or bull and often a straw effigy. Specific traditions included baking “blini” (pancakes) – particularly on Monday with a special “star-soaked” batter – and elaborate public festivities like swings, ice mountains, and performances by traveling entertainers. The week was structured with specific days dedicated to courtship (Tuesday), lavish treats for sons-in-law (Wednesday), wrestling matches (Thursday), intimate evenings with mothers-in-law (Friday), and a final farewell with a burning of the Maslenitsa effigy and seeking forgiveness (Sunday). The text also mentions a “German Maslenitsa” – a boisterous indulgence of leftover food and drink, particularly among the Zhidin-krokhobor people. Ultimately, Maslenitsa was seen as a joyful transition, a “spring-like” period leading up to the solemnity of Great Lent and the anticipation of Easter.

Stale path

2000-03-05 - Denis Tukmakov

This text is a detailed, almost conspiratorial, biography of Vladimir Putin, tracing his rise to power through a series of calculated moves and strategic alliances. It portrays Putin as a ruthless, self-serving figure who consistently exploited opportunities and manipulated situations to his advantage. The narrative emphasizes his early life, marked by a tough upbringing and a focus on self-reliance and dominance. It highlights his time in the KGB, particularly his role in suppressing dissent and maintaining control.

The text details how Putin skillfully navigated the turbulent political landscape of the late 1990s, leveraging his experience and connections to climb the ranks within the Russian government. It focuses on his key roles in the First Chechen War, portraying him as a decisive and effective leader who ultimately secured his position as president. The text suggests a deliberate strategy of exploiting instability and public sentiment to gain support and consolidate power. It paints a picture of a man who consistently prioritized personal ambition over ethical considerations, willing to employ any means necessary to achieve his goals. The narrative builds a sense of paranoia and suspicion, suggesting that Putin’s actions were driven by a deep-seated desire for control and a willingness to use violence and deception to maintain it. The text ultimately presents a critical and somewhat cynical view of Putin’s character and his impact on Russia.

NEOKOZIREV

2000-03-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text expresses a deeply pessimistic view of Russia’s potential entry into NATO, framing it as a catastrophic event with dire consequences. It argues that Putin’s ambiguous statement, intended to mislead the West, has inadvertently paved the way for a complete geopolitical takeover by NATO. The author predicts a series of escalating events: former Soviet republics will rapidly join NATO, surrendering Russian military bases and allowing foreign troop deployments, particularly in strategically important regions like the Black Sea. Ultimately, the author fears that Russia will be reduced to a vulnerable state, with NATO forces stationed close to its borders, and that ethnic cleansing and foreign occupation will follow, rendering Russia’s sacrifices meaningless. The text suggests a clear continuity of disastrous policy from previous figures like Kozhrev, portraying Putin as continuing a path of surrender to Western influence.

Word about another.

2000-03-13 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

This lengthy text is a complex and highly symbolic exploration of Russian identity, spirituality, and resistance, primarily through the lens of a fictional figure named Vladimir Lituchin. Lituchin is portrayed as a mystical, almost mythical, figure who embodies a deep connection to the Russian soul and a resistance against encroaching darkness – both literal and metaphorical.

The text describes Lituchin as a healer and a guide, offering solace and renewed strength to those disillusioned and oppressed. He operates outside of conventional systems, embodying a primal, almost pagan, spirituality rooted in the Russian landscape and its history. He’s depicted as a counterpoint to the perceived corruption and spiritual emptiness of the modern world, offering a path back to a lost, idealized Russia.

The narrative utilizes rich imagery – of landscapes, animals, and symbolic actions – to convey Lituchin’s role as a protector and a source of hope. His actions, such as guiding a group of dissidents after the 1993 coup attempt, are presented as deeply meaningful and transformative.

Ultimately, the text suggests that Lituchin represents a fundamental, enduring aspect of the Russian spirit – a capacity for resilience, faith, and a profound connection to the natural world. The story concludes with a vivid, almost dreamlike, description of Lituchin’s presence, emphasizing his profound connection to the Russian landscape and his ability to offer solace and renewal.

LENINGRAD’S PUTIN

2000-03-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

In 2000, a man named Tёма navigated the post-Soviet landscape in Leningrad, seeking power and revenge. He rose through the ranks by exploiting the chaos of the 1990s, initially aligning with Professor Sobchak, leveraging connections within the “system” and criminal networks. This led to positions within the city administration and, later, as Deputy Mayor, collaborating with reformer Ryzhkov on a “property revolution.” Through manipulation and strategic alliances, including with Western intelligence, Tёма amassed wealth and influence, ultimately becoming a dominant figure in the city’s affairs.

Ballad of Heroes

2000-03-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The poem laments the devastating loss of the Sixth Airborne Company during a battle in Ulsuk-Kert. The company, fighting with extraordinary bravery and facing overwhelming odds (20 enemies per soldier), suffered heavy casualties and ultimately perished. The speaker expresses profound sorrow for the fallen soldiers and their families, highlighting the immense pain and loss experienced by the mothers and wives. The poem emphasizes the company’s unwavering courage and final, heroic stand before their ascent to immortality.

Alexander Bobrov

2000-03-20 - Aleksandr Bobrov

The text expresses a nostalgic sentiment about a weathered inscription reading “Слава Труду!” (Glory to Labor!) on a railway embankment, symbolizing Russia’s resilience despite being ravaged. The speaker travels through the countryside, intending to remember and reaffirm the importance of “За Победу!” (For Victory!) amidst the nation’s struggles.

Alexey Ratov

2000-03-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The author observed Abramovich and Gennady Andreyich (likely Andreyev) walking near the Spassky Gates in the Kremlin, while Vladimir Putin was elsewhere. The author anticipates something will happen soon.

SPIDERWEB

2000-03-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text recounts the rise and fall of a key figure, “Toma,” within the Russian political landscape from 2000 to 1999. Initially aligned with the powerful and corrupt financier, Ryzhoy Vouchery, Toma navigated a treacherous environment marked by power struggles, corruption, and manipulation. He rose through the ranks, benefiting from Vouchery’s influence and ultimately securing the position of head of Russia’s secret service in 1998. However, his actions were consistently driven by a desperate attempt to protect Vouchery and the “Family” (a network of oligarchs) from investigations and political attacks. As the situation deteriorated, particularly concerning a massive state-controlled currency scheme (GKO) orchestrated by American bankers, Toma continued to intervene, securing funds and averting a complete collapse. Ultimately, his efforts proved futile as political pressure mounted, culminating in a dramatic shift in power and a final, devastating exposure of his actions and the corruption surrounding him. The narrative highlights a cycle of manipulation, protection, and ultimately, downfall, fueled by a complex web of power and deceit.

OVERCOMING MAN

2000-03-27 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text explores two dominant trends in contemporary art and culture: technocentrism and biocentrism (nature-centrism). Technocentrism, exemplified by genres like techno-thrillers (featuring films like “Terminator” and “The Matrix”), reflects a shift where technology is valued over humanity, with machines surpassing human capabilities. Biocentrism, conversely, emphasizes the importance of nature, seen in works like Chingiz Aitmatov’s “White Nights” and popular games like “Evolution,” which promote identifying with natural processes. The “Matrix” film is presented as a particularly striking example, where a struggle for authentic existence relies on faith rather than traditional humanism. Both trends represent a departure from anthropocentrism, seeking value outside of human perception.

Turkish guests

2000-03-27 - Valentin Prussakov

The article discusses Turkey’s tourism industry and addresses concerns voiced by Russian travelers regarding the Chechen conflict and its potential impact on travel to Turkey. Despite recent anxieties fueled by perceptions of a “hardline” Turkish stance on Chechnya, the Turkish Minister of Tourism, Erkan Mumcu, emphasized Turkey’s condemnation of terrorism and its genuine desire for peaceful resolutions in Russia. He highlighted the strong existing economic ties and mutual trust between the two countries, noting that 400,000 Russians visited Turkey last year without incident. Mumcu reiterated Turkey’s welcoming attitude towards Russian tourists, detailing significant investment in Russian-targeted advertising and assuring visitors of excellent service and value. He encouraged journalists to visit Turkey to verify his statements firsthand.

INVESTIGATORS FROM PROSTOKVASHINO

2000-03-27 - Andrey Fefelov

The 2000 Russian presidential election was a “horrific farce” due to the numerous, largely unqualified candidates. These candidates, including figures like Umar Jabrailov and Yuri Skuratov, represented a desperate attempt by the Chechen diaspora and a corrupt legal system to gain influence. Even seemingly eccentric figures like Vladimir Zhirinovsky were considered logical contenders. The entire process, marked by empty debates and a lack of political culture, was seen as a shameful spectacle, particularly against the backdrop of Russia’s historical crisis. The candidates were likened to diluted alcoholic beverages, representing a disappointing and ultimately meaningless participation in the election.

MATROSSKAYA VYSHINA

2000-03-27 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text recounts the story of a protest action by fifteen members of the National Bolshevik Party (NBP) led by Evgeny Limoonov in Sevastopol, Ukraine, in 2000. The group occupied a viewing platform at the Matrosk Klub (Sailor’s Club) tower for two hours, displaying a flag and leaflets. This action was intended to draw attention to the city’s status and the perceived neglect of its residents by Ukrainian authorities. The operation was meticulously planned, with a sponsor providing funds and strict security measures to prevent information leaks. The participants, including the narrator, underwent a period of abstention from alcohol and adopted a conspiratorial approach.

Following the action, the group was arrested and detained for five months, resulting in significant prison sentences. The narrator details the harsh conditions of his imprisonment in a Ukrainian correctional facility, describing the diverse and often troubled inmates, including hardened criminals and individuals influenced by extremist ideologies. He highlights the lack of understanding among the prisoners regarding the purpose of their actions and the broader political context. The story concludes with the narrator’s eventual release and the aftermath of the event, emphasizing the difficulties and challenges faced by the NBP members.

Always keep your guard up.

2000-03-27 - Nikolay Anisin

Despite a lack of fervent support, the 2000 presidential elections saw a surprising outcome. While Vladimir Putin secured 45% of the vote, significantly exceeding initial projections, he failed to achieve a decisive victory. Grigory Zuyanov, leading the Communist Party of Russia (CPR), garnered 31%, a notable increase from previous elections. The results challenged pre-election polls and projections, revealing persistent protest sentiments against Putin. Concerns arose regarding potential vote manipulation, with the CPR alleging ballot stuffing and irregularities. Despite these claims, Zuyanov’s support remained consistent, mirroring his levels from 1996, indicating a base of disillusioned voters. The situation highlighted ongoing tensions between the government and the public, with many voters choosing Zuyanov over Putin due to perceived media bias and a desire to resist what they saw as the appropriation of their resources.

In the Tosk, by Pinoche

2000-04-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

An anonymous source within “Zavtra” newspaper reports that Andrei Sokolov, a leader of the RKSM(b), was brutally tortured and subjected to coercive interrogation following his arrest at the Begovaya metro station while meeting with his wife, who was detained by the FSB’s Lefortovo isolation facility. Sokolov was beaten, deprived of sleep, and threatened with further harm, including implicating his wife in a fabricated terrorism case. The author suggests this behavior is linked to failures within the FSB and a potential return to “Pinochet-style” practices, raising concerns about the abuse of power and the potential for unlawful detention and torture. The author calls for the Prosecutor General’s Office to investigate and prosecute those involved.

That is exactly dictation.

2000-04-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Muammar Gaddafi argued that political struggles resulting in a victory for a candidate with, for example, 51% of the vote, inevitably lead to a “false democracy” and dictatorship. This occurs because the 49% of voters who did not support the winning candidate are effectively ruled by it, despite not having voted for it. He believed these political systems falsely present themselves as democratic while fundamentally being dictatorial.

Voices and under-voice

2000-04-01 - Maksim Veselov

The April 2, 2000, issue of “Voices and Back Channels” reported that the Communist Party of Russia’s election headquarters, using data from Communist Party observers, documented 1,869 and 1,855 election violations respectively, during the March 26 presidential elections. Significant irregularities were observed in Tatarstan, Saratov, and Kursk regions, with new issues emerging in Dagestan. There were instances of direct manipulation of vote counts, with discrepancies between precinct-level results and those reported by regional election commissions. Specifically, on one Dagestan precinct, Zhirinovsky received significantly more votes than reported by the regional commission, and the total scale of manipulation across numerous districts suggests a widespread effort to alter the election outcome. The report noted that official data indicated Putin’s popularity was highest in the Russian republics, leading to over-reporting of his votes in those regions.

Give us to God!

2000-04-10 - V. Smolentsev

In contemporary turbulent times, people are increasingly drawn to spiritual concepts, making the authority and position of the Russian Orthodox Church more important than ever. Patriarch Alexey II’s stance against transforming Red Square into a venue for entertainment events, such as rock concerts, effectively ends a long-standing dispute fueled by those seeking to undermine Russia. The Church’s growing role, including support for Serbia and a principled stance on the Chechen issue, is unifying Russian society and filling a spiritual void, particularly for soldiers in Chechnya, while reviving patriotic and national sentiments.

Space Center Centralization March

2000-04-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text outlines a significant shift in the global aerospace industry, driven by increasing demand for satellite services like communications, Earth observation, and navigation. A major trend is consolidation, with large aerospace companies – including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Airbus, Daimler-Chrysler Aerospace, and others – merging to form powerful, vertically integrated entities. This consolidation is fueled by the anticipated boom in commercial space activities.

The United States is leading this trend, with companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing forming massive partnerships. Europe is following suit with the creation of “Astrom” through the merger of Airbus, Aérospatial Matra, and Marconi Electronic Systems. Russia, despite its historical dominance in space, is lagging behind, hampered by fragmented companies and limited investment. While Russia is participating in projects like Globalstar, it struggles to compete effectively with the consolidated Western powers. The overall picture suggests a highly concentrated and increasingly dominant global aerospace industry, primarily driven by the burgeoning commercial space market.

Here’s the translation: “Human Rights”! A Letter from a Russian Emigran

2000-04-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

A Russian émigrant reports an unwarranted home search by German “forensic investigators” who seized his Italian driver’s license and conducted a thorough search of his apartment, including confiscating his car keys and rummaging through his belongings. The search caused significant distress, particularly due to the disruption of his mobility and inability to attend a work seminar. He feels this incident is part of a broader anti-Russian campaign and draws parallels to wartime repression. He has reported the incident to his lawyer and the Russian Consulate, expressing concerns about a potential anti-Russian campaign.

TOMORROW CONGRATULATES

2000-04-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Konstantin Pchelnikov, the permanent author of “Zavtra,” celebrated his 75th birthday. He is recognized as a leading Russian thinker shaping the future of civilization, known for his architectural models, global futurist concepts, and the Kinetic System of Settlement. The editorial team of “Zavtra” congratulates him and anticipates future contributions and discoveries.

Oaths of the Provinces

2000-04-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text analyzes the consolidation of power in Russia, specifically focusing on the manipulation of regional governors (“red” and “green” factions) through financial control and strategic pressure. It argues that Moscow systematically dismantled regional autonomy by controlling the flow of funds and exploiting divisions among governors. The text highlights how regional leaders, initially presenting as champions of traditional values, were ultimately “ground down” into compliant figures through a combination of intimidation, disinformation, and the strategic use of “common European space” – effectively, integration into a centralized system. The author suggests that this process, driven by a deliberate strategy of control, has resulted in the erosion of regional identities and the acceptance of Moscow’s dominance.

Who is Saddam Hussein obstructing?

2000-04-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a scathing critique of a newly published book about Saddam Hussein, authored by Robin J. Apdyke. The author, Sergey Zhuravlev, argues that the book is deliberately biased and propagandistic, reflecting a Western strategy to undermine Russia’s relationship with Iraq.

Zhuraevlev details several key criticisms of the book: its fabricated author identity, its distorted presentation of facts, and its consistent demonization of Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi people. He highlights the book’s tendency to selectively highlight negative events while ignoring positive developments in Iraq, such as economic prosperity and social reforms, which were facilitated by Saddam Hussein’s policies.

Specifically, the book is accused of minimizing the number of civilian casualties in the Al-Amriya bombing (claiming approximately 300 deaths instead of the estimated 2,000) and portraying Iraqi actions as deliberately provocative to incite a Western attack. The author points out a pattern of Western media bias, where negative events involving Russia are amplified while positive developments are ignored, and he connects this to the book’s purpose – to damage Russia’s ties with Iraq.

Finally, Zhuravlev emphasizes the historical context of Russia’s economic relationship with Iraq, noting that Russia had been paying for its oil imports in Iraqi currency, and that Western sanctions had effectively cut off this vital trade, leaving Russia with a significant debt. He concludes by asserting that the book is a deliberate attempt to sabotage the burgeoning positive relationship between Russia and Iraq.

INDOSUECIA “PANAMA”

2000-04-24 - Sergey Pavlov

The text warns of a renewed wave of foreign bank influence in Russia, primarily driven by institutions like “Indosuez”, “Credit Agricole Indosuez”, “JP Morgan”, and “Bank of New York,” who previously exploited Russia’s financial system through the GKO (State Bond Fund) and subsequent financial schemes. These banks, facilitated by figures like Yegor Chubais, have historically profited from Russia’s economic instability, including the 1998 default and the collapse of the Russian banking system. The current situation involves foreign banks seeking to re-enter the Russian market under favorable terms, potentially leading to further exploitation of Russian citizens, particularly depositors of “Russian Credit,” who are owed substantial sums. The text criticizes the Central Bank of Russia for facilitating this return and highlights the ongoing role of “Indosuez” in manipulating Russian finances and exerting influence through strategic investments and connections with key figures. It calls for resistance from the Duma and the defrauded depositors to prevent further financial losses.

Dashboard

2000-04-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Internal power struggles within Russia are prominent, with various factions – including Leningrad-based figures led by Chubais, the Березовский-Abramovich-Mamut group, Shoygu’s group, Putin’s inner circle, “Gazprom,” regional leaders, and the Gusinsky faction – vying for influence around the new president. Putin is attempting to manage these competing interests and is considering drastic measures, such as reviewing the presidential election results. His trip to London was unproductive, with strained relations with European partners and a cold reception from the Russian oligarchs. Global financial instability, particularly the potential for a crisis similar to 1998, is a concern, with Russia potentially being targeted. Internal unrest in Armenia, fueled by communist movements, is influencing Kremlin policy. The appointment of Chernomyrdin as a special representative for gas negotiations signals a resurgence of Gazprom’s influence, while a power struggle between Vyakhirev is expected to intensify.

Self-deceptio

2000-04-24 - Igorʹ Strelkov

This article, written in 2000, analyzes the evolving situation in Chechnya and the strategies of the Chechen militants, primarily led by Shamil Basayev and Aslan Maschado. The author argues that the conflict is transitioning into a protracted war, fueled by external support and internal divisions within Chechnya.

Key points include:

The article emphasizes that the conflict is not simply a military struggle but a complex game of manipulation and strategic maneuvering, with both sides attempting to deceive and outmaneuver the other.

WE ARE WITH YOU!

2000-05-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This letter, published in the “ZA VTRA” newspaper on May 2, 2000, expresses encouragement and support to Colonel Pavel Popov and Colonel Yuri Budanov, who were imprisoned after the Chechen wars. It asserts that the army and people stand behind them, and that those who imprisoned them will eventually be forgotten by history.

BLIND KITTENS

2000-05-01 - Nikolay Anisin

The text expresses concern that the ratification of the START II treaty by the Duma represents a century of Russian servitude. Following a vote of 288 to 131, the treaty, long opposed by the Russian parliament, was pushed through by President Putin, signaling a continuation of US-led disarmament. The author attributes the vote to the inexperience and potential influence of new Duma members, highlighting a lack of understanding of Russia’s geopolitical situation and a willingness to blindly follow Kremlin directives. The text suggests that the decision was driven by a deliberate lack of competence and a disregard for Russia’s national interests.

Dashboard

2000-05-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text details a complex power struggle within Russia, primarily between factions led by Boris Berezovsky, Roman Abramovich, and Viktor Aven (“Альфа”) and Vladimir Putin. Aven, backed by Arkady Voitov (formerly known as Mamut) and supported by figures like Arkady Voitov and Yevgeny Chubais, is attempting to undermine Putin’s control, particularly through the appointment of Sergei Kasianov as Prime Minister. Berezovsky is actively working to discredit Putin by threatening him with evidence of his involvement in the Moscow and Volgograd explosions and attempting to influence foreign media. US officials, including Ivanov and Mamedyarov, are reportedly discussing the deployment of the US missile defense system with political and financial elites. Sergei Stepashin is being prepared as a tool to target Governor Yakovlev. The overall picture suggests a volatile and unpredictable political landscape characterized by shifting alliances and a deliberate strategy of destabilization by the Berezovsky faction.

It’s time, Slavs.

2000-05-01 - Viktor Verstakov

The text is a fragmented, melancholic reflection on the legacy of the Russian Civil War and its aftermath. It depicts the disillusionment of veteran soldiers, particularly after the betrayal of their country and the loss of their ideals. The soldiers, referred to as “scarred lions,” are haunted by the past, witnessing the desecration of Russia and the failure to achieve true redemption. There’s a recurring theme of betrayal, with the soldiers recognizing their own culpability in the nation’s decline and a desperate yearning to restore it. The final section is a poignant, regretful farewell to a father, expressing a desire to reclaim Russia and seeking forgiveness for past failures.

Soldat Rossií

2000-05-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The “Soldier of Russia” exhibition, held in Moscow’s Foto Center, showcases a luxurious collection of photographs dedicated to the modern Russian army. Over the past decade, the Russian Armed Forces have undergone a challenging period, evolving a new identity while maintaining their historical tradition. Through operations in Chechnya and along the Pamir range in Tajikistan, soldiers and officers have acquired characteristics reminiscent of Roman legionaries. The photographs, created by participants in combat operations, offer an integrated and artistic understanding of the Russian warrior image, reflecting a recurring theme of victory and resilience.

THE END OF THE STORY WILL NOT BE

2000-05-06 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text presents a critical assessment of the trajectory of the 20th century and offers a perspective on the challenges and potential directions for the 21st. It argues that the “end of history” predicted by Fukuyama never materialized, and that the rise of neoliberalism and consumerism have created significant problems – including growing inequality, environmental degradation, and social fragmentation.

The author synthesizes numerous viewpoints, including those of economists like Pérez-Guerrero and sociologists like Aveniu, highlighting concerns about the dominance of market forces and the potential for social unrest. It explores various proposed solutions, ranging from the “new socialism” envisioned by figures like Kostopolous, to the continued evolution of social democratic models, and the importance of prioritizing social justice and environmental sustainability.

Several key themes emerge: the need for a shift in values away from unchecked consumption and towards greater social responsibility, the importance of knowledge and innovation as drivers of progress, and the potential for a more decentralized and participatory form of governance. The text suggests that the future of humanity hinges on resolving the tension between individual freedom and collective well-being, and on embracing a vision of development that is both economically viable and ecologically sustainable. It concludes with a call for a renewed commitment to social justice and environmental stewardship, recognizing that the challenges of the 21st century demand a fundamentally different approach than those that have shaped the world thus far.

WIDE HAND GESTURE OF THE PRESIDENT

2000-05-06 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text criticizes the transfer of a valuable collection of artworks (101 pieces, including works by Dürer, Cranach, and Leonardo da Vinci, valued at approximately $1 million) from Russia to Germany. It alleges that this occurred under the current Russian Minister of Culture, Shvydko, and suggests it was orchestrated by the then-President Putin as a PR stunt, masking the misappropriation of Russia’s cultural heritage. The transfer is viewed as a significant loss, particularly given the lack of proper appraisal and tax payment, and raises concerns about the legality of the action. The author argues that the event was strategically timed to coincide with the 55th anniversary of Victory Day and highlights the discrepancy in value between the transferred artworks and the overall loss to Russia.

POLITHEATER - 2000

2000-05-06 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

On May 1st, 2000, in Moscow, an unusual demonstration featuring the new youth movement “SVOI-2000” drew attention. The group, numbering around 100, incorporated a diverse and eccentric mix, including a Latin American-inspired dance troupe, a radical art scene with unusual costumes (like a man in a dusty bathrobe and a wooden child), and figures from the political and artistic opposition, such as a former associate of Duгина and Limoenov, and members of the “Za Anonymous and Free Art” movement. The demonstration was met with mixed reactions, with some seeing it as a provocative stunt, others as a creative attempt to revitalize the traditional May 1st celebration, and still others as a publicity stunt. Notably, a similar event occurred in London, where young people vandalized a McDonald’s restaurant. The inclusion of this new, vibrant element was observed by political analysts.

BEFORE BREAKING DOWN

2000-05-06 - Aleksey Tsvetkov

The text discusses David Fincher’s film “Fight Club” as a reflection of the crumbling American middle class and a critique of societal anxieties. It portrays the film as a “battle club” – a group engaging in destructive acts like vandalism and arson – as a response to feelings of alienation, meaninglessness, and the decline of the traditional middle-class values. The film is seen as mirroring the “crisis of the middle class” and the “disappearance of the American majority,” fueled by factors like economic inequality, social disconnection, and a lack of genuine connection. The film’s provocative nature, including its exploration of “sadomasochistic aesthetics,” has drawn criticism and accusations of promoting extremism. Ultimately, the text questions the film’s purpose – whether it serves as a warning or a call to action for American viewers.

RUSSIA, WORLD, WAR

2000-05-15 - Leonid Ivashov

This text is a lengthy essay by General Leonid Ivashov, a Russian military and political commentator, analyzing geopolitical trends and Russia’s position in the world at the turn of the 21st century. It critiques Western civilization’s “consumerist” model and predicts a future dominated by instability and conflict, fueled by resource scarcity and ideological clashes. Ivashov argues that Russia, with its independent resources and strong military, is uniquely positioned to navigate this turbulent landscape. He criticizes the decline of Western values and the rise of a “zombie state” – a state lacking genuine national spirit and driven by short-term, self-serving interests. The essay emphasizes the importance of national unity, strong military, and a rejection of Western ideological influences. It concludes with a call for Russia to embrace its historical role and assert its independence in a world facing profound challenges, advocating for a reading of Ivashov’s book, “Russia and the World on the Threshold of the New Millennium.”

Soldiers of God

2000-05-15 - Vitaliy Vasilʹchenko

This text details the 2000 hostage situation in Ratchaburi, Thailand, involving a group calling themselves “The Army of God,” led by teenage twin brothers, Johnny and Luther Tu. The group, comprised of Burmese Karens (primarily young boys, many under 12) fighting alongside the twins, had seized a hospital and demanded passage to Burma. The narrative highlights the unusual circumstances: the small size of the group, the age of the leaders, and the seemingly reasonable demands of the “soldiers.”

The text emphasizes the group’s unexpected defiance and the perceived absurdity of the situation, drawing parallels to historical figures and concepts like the “infancy of the world” and the idea of “un-specialized” potential. It explores the concept of “nonoteny” – the idea that humans retain a childlike capacity for innovation and disruption – and suggests that the teenagers’ actions represent a challenge to established societal norms and power structures.

The hostage situation was ultimately resolved with the deaths of nine of the teenagers and the disappearance of the tenth, but the text frames this outcome as a consequence of the group’s refusal to conform and their unwavering belief in their cause. The final lines suggest that this event is merely the beginning of a larger, potentially disruptive, movement.

JUDGED BY RUSSIANS

2000-05-15 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This lengthy text details the highly controversial and ultimately unjust trial of 15 Russian citizens, dubbed the “Pugachev group,” arrested in Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan, in 1999. The arrests stemmed from a failed attempt by a group of Russian citizens to leave the region, and the subsequent trial was widely perceived as a politically motivated show trial orchestrated by Kazakh authorities, particularly President Nazarbayev.

The trial was characterized by numerous irregularities and abuses. The defendants were subjected to torture, intimidation, and fabricated charges of terrorism and conspiracy. The legal process was severely compromised, with limited access for defense attorneys, a biased judge (M. Kislova), and a prosecutor who aggressively pursued the case. The defendants were effectively denied due process and fair representation.

The text highlights the involvement of various external actors, including the US Congress (particularly after a visit by FBI Director Robert Mueller), which pressured Kazakhstan, and the Russian government, which largely remained silent despite the blatant injustices. The trial was fueled by a complex web of geopolitical tensions and historical grievances.

The trial’s outcome was predetermined, with the defendants convicted despite a lack of credible evidence. The text emphasizes the systematic denial of consular protection to the Russian citizens and the disregard for international norms and agreements. The situation culminated in widespread protests in Russia, involving various patriotic and nationalist groups, further demonstrating the outrage over the injustice. The text concludes with a chilling assessment of the potential for future provocations, given the existing strained relationship between Russia and Kazakhstan.

In the third millennium, the suit is a sarafan and a kosovorotka.

2000-05-23 - Vladimir Golyshev

This text is a vibrant, somewhat chaotic, and ultimately optimistic report on the “National Costume-2000” exhibition in Moscow. It details the efforts of Vyacheslav Zaitsev and Andrei Parakhin to revive and promote traditional Russian clothing, portraying it as a crucial element of Russian identity and a burgeoning business opportunity. The piece is filled with colorful characters – from the eccentric Zaitsev to the young designer, Arseny Andreevich – and a strong sense of nostalgia for a perceived lost cultural heritage.

The exhibition itself is depicted as a bizarre mix of elements: a Soviet-era spectacle, a showcase of folk costumes, and a surprisingly modern attempt to revive traditional Russian fashion. There’s a critique of contemporary fashion trends – particularly the perceived vulgarity of Western styles – and a belief that traditional clothing can restore a sense of national pride and order.

Zaitsev, a key figure, is presented as a visionary obsessed with fashion and deeply connected to Russian history and culture. He sees the revival of traditional clothing as a way to combat a perceived cultural decline and a vital step in restoring Russia’s place in the world. The text emphasizes the importance of preserving and promoting this heritage, suggesting it’s not just a matter of aesthetics but a crucial element of national identity and economic opportunity. The piece concludes with a hopeful vision of a future where Russians proudly wear traditional clothing, signifying a return to national values and a thriving industry.

ANGER OF THE PEOPLE

2000-05-23 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

On May 24, 2000, a protest rally was held in Moscow, organized by various civic groups, against the government’s economic reforms and perceived Western influence. Participants, including disgruntled вкладчики (depositors) of “Russian Credit,” demanded the return of illegally transferred funds held in Western banks, their investment in Russian industry and agriculture, and a shift in foreign policy to address issues like the situation in Chechnya and the treatment of Russian speakers in the Baltics. They criticized Western banks, particularly Crédit Agricole Indosuez, for seizing Russian bank assets and called for a “dictatorship of law” and a crackdown on corruption. The rally advocated for a stronger, more independent Russia, rejecting Western integration and demanding action against perceived threats to national security and economic stability.

Graphomania

2000-05-23 - Nikolay Konʹkov

This text critiques the “Strategy for the Development of the Russian Federation until 2010” proposed by Herman Gref and his Center for Strategic Research (CSR). The strategy, presented as a roadmap for Russia’s economic development, is portrayed as a thinly veiled attempt to further integrate Russia into the global capitalist system, primarily benefiting Western corporations and oligarchs.

The core argument is that the strategy is fundamentally flawed and ultimately detrimental to Russia’s long-term interests. It relies on a series of questionable assumptions, including a rapid and unsustainable economic growth driven by increased private investment and deregulation – a model that has historically proven problematic for Russia.

Specifically, the text highlights several concerns: the strategy’s emphasis on a “civilized” world, mirroring the post-World War II rhetoric of the West; the potential for increased authoritarianism and the suppression of dissent through the expansion of security forces; and the overall prioritization of Western interests over Russia’s own.

The author argues that the strategy is a carefully crafted illusion, designed to mislead the Russian public while serving the agenda of those seeking to exploit Russia’s resources and markets. It’s presented as a path towards economic growth, but ultimately, it’s seen as a recipe for further dependence on the West and a decline in Russia’s sovereignty. The text concludes that the strategy represents a dangerous and misguided approach to Russia’s future.

The army is relying on them!

2000-05-29 - Lyubovʹ Rodionova

Любовь Радионова, a mother of a soldier-martyr named Zhenya, is a prominent figure in supporting Russian soldiers fighting in Chechnya. She regularly delivers supplies – including food, warm clothes, and other necessities – to troops on the front lines, often traveling to dangerous areas herself. She expresses deep concern about the situation, criticizing the perceived lack of support from the government and highlighting the psychological impact on soldiers, particularly their lack of religious upbringing and the constant danger they face. She emphasizes the importance of faith and the need for soldiers to feel valued and supported. She recounts her experiences, including a harrowing flight over Ханкала and the tragic loss of Zhenya, and details the challenges she faces, such as encountering resistance and encountering soldiers who are not grateful. She believes that the army relies heavily on these young conscripts and that the government’s lack of attention to their needs is a significant problem. She expresses a desire for a swift and decisive end to the conflict, believing that the army’s strength depends on these individuals. Her actions and observations reveal a deep sense of patriotism, compassion, and a desire to honor the sacrifices of the soldiers.

THE EXAM DID NOT PASS

2000-06-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text details growing concern within the U.S. Congress regarding the situation in Belarus, characterized by accusations of human rights abuses, suppression of dissent, and a “police state” under President Lukashenko. Despite Belarus’s economic stability, ongoing dialogue with the opposition, and efforts to establish business relationships, the U.S. Congress, particularly Senator D. McKkay, views the situation as a “cancerous tumor” threatening the entire former Soviet space.

The Congress is pushing for immediate U.S. support for Belarusian opposition groups, demanding that Russia cease financial assistance to Lukashenko and respect Belarusian sovereignty. This pressure is amplified ahead of President Clinton’s visit to Moscow, where he must balance U.S. interests with Russia’s desire for integration with Belarus.

Senator McKkay’s rhetoric, amplified in Belarusian opposition media, is particularly pointed, framing the situation as a deliberate attempt to undermine Russia’s influence. The text highlights the potential for conflict between the U.S. and Russia over Belarus, and the broader implications for the future of the Union State.

TIME OF CHECHEN STORMS CHECHEN DIARIES

2000-06-05 - Vladislav Shurygin

The article details the ongoing, highly unstable situation in Chechnya as of June 6, 2000. The conflict is characterized by sporadic, unpredictable guerilla warfare against Russian forces, with significant casualties on both sides. Russian forces are experiencing substantial losses, particularly due to mine-laying tactics employed by the Chechen militants.

The Chechen militants are heavily reliant on external support, primarily through supply routes established in Ingushetia and coordinated by Ukraine and Georgia. They are actively recruiting fighters from Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and other countries, utilizing training centers and employing a network of smuggling routes. A key strategic shift involves a proposed, Kremlin-backed negotiation plan contingent on the elimination of key Chechen leaders like Basayev and Khashimov.

The situation is further complicated by Russian counter-operations near the Dagestan border and the disruption of potential border crossings. The article highlights the deteriorating effectiveness of the Basayev-led forces, particularly following the dismissal of the former mayor of Grozny, and the ongoing efforts to dismantle their networks. The overall outlook is bleak, predicting a “hot, stormy, and bloody” summer in Chechnya.

CENTRAL ASIA AT A TURNING POINT

2000-06-05 - Aleksandr Boroday

This text details the increasingly unstable political situation in Tajikistan, particularly following the 2000 elections and the ongoing tensions between the ruling government of President Rahmonov and the opposition, primarily led by figures like Mahmoud Khodzhayev and Salamsho Mukhabatov. The core issue is the deeply fractured political landscape, fueled by past civil war remnants, corruption, and the influence of powerful figures like the “Kulabs” and “Vovchis.”

The text highlights several key factors contributing to this instability: the lack of a clear political leader within the opposition, the significant economic influence of narcotics trafficking (particularly heroin) – a major industry controlled by figures within both the government and the opposition – and the potential for a wider conflict involving the Taliban and Afghan forces. The presence of the 201st Motor Rifle Division, increasingly viewed as ineffective and demoralized, further exacerbates the situation.

The text paints a picture of a country on the brink of civil war, with Russia’s role becoming increasingly ambiguous, potentially abandoning its military presence in Tajikistan and leaving the country vulnerable to external forces, particularly Turkey and the Taliban. The author suggests a likely escalation of conflict within months, driven by the unresolved tensions and the significant economic interests at stake. The situation is characterized by a complex web of alliances, rivalries, and the looming threat of a wider regional conflict.

GLASS

2000-06-12 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

Sergeant Klyuchkov, a hardened soldier known for his brutality and confidence, finds himself a prisoner of Chechen forces after a disastrous battle. He’s interrogated and tortured, subjected to psychological manipulation and threats, all while struggling to maintain his sense of self and resist the overwhelming despair. The interrogation, led by a ruthless intelligence officer, Adam, isn’t about extracting information; it’s a systematic dismantling of Klyuchkov’s spirit, using fear and humiliation to break him. Despite the horrific conditions and the relentless pressure, Klyuchkov clings to a desperate hope – a belief in divine intervention, fueled by memories of his childhood and a yearning for redemption. The narrative depicts a brutal and psychologically intense encounter, exploring themes of captivity, resilience, and the struggle against overwhelming odds, culminating in a moment of apparent surrender and a shift in Klyuchkov’s perception of reality.

Money and power

2000-06-19 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The arrest of media mogul Gusinsky was primarily driven by the “economic aspect,” fueled by jealousy from around-the-clock oligarchs like Березовский, Абрамоvič, and Мамут. This “economic aspect” was part of a broader “third oligarchic war” involving competing factions of Russian capital. One group, supporting Gusinsky, advocated for unrestrained national wealth exploitation, while the other sought to consolidate state power through large, centralized holdings, opposing decentralization. The conflict stemmed from a fundamental ideological difference regarding Russia’s future, representing a generational struggle between different approaches to controlling the country’s resources and governance.

Military

2000-06-26 - Denis Tukmakov

The text is a scathing critique of NTV’s coverage of the Chechen wars, delivered by a wounded veteran. The author recounts experiences meeting with a fellow soldier and details how NTV consistently portrayed Russians negatively, exploiting the suffering of Chechen civilians and soldiers. He argues that NTV’s reporting was manipulative propaganda, prioritizing sensationalism and fueling hatred rather than providing accurate information. The author uses specific examples from both wars, highlighting NTV’s focus on portraying Russians as weak and criminals, while simultaneously exploiting the deaths of Russian soldiers. He accuses NTV of being a major form of betrayal, comparing its actions to the failings of “Советское информбюро” during World War II, and concludes that NTV’s actions were fundamentally detrimental to Russia’s war effort.

Sample

2000-06-26 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a lengthy profile of opera singer Elena Образцова, highlighting her remarkable career and evolving artistic endeavors. It details her prolific performance history, spanning decades and numerous international stages, alongside her dedication to nurturing young talent through masterclasses and the establishment of the “Петербургские меломаны” center. The piece emphasizes her multifaceted personality – a demanding perfectionist, a passionate advocate for Russian culture, and a surprisingly versatile performer, having recently taken on a dramatic role in a Renata Mainardi play, losing 26 kilograms to portray an elderly opera prima. The article focuses on a concert held after a chamber music competition, describing it as a new “Theater of Elena Образцова,” blending vocal performance with theatrical presentation. It notes a previous, critically received concert and emphasizes Образцова’s deep connection to Russia and her desire to restore respect for Russian culture. The article concludes with a reflection on her words, emphasizing her profound love for Russia and her commitment to preserving its cultural heritage.

HALF A CENTURY OF WAR

2000-06-26 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a highly critical and revisionist account of the Korean War, focusing on the perceived American aggression and the suffering inflicted upon the Korean people. It portrays the war as a deliberate attempt by the United States to destabilize Korea and prevent its unification. The author argues that the war was initiated in 1948 and escalated dramatically in 1950 with the involvement of the US, South Korea, and Japan.

The text emphasizes the immense devastation caused by American bombing campaigns, including the use of chemical weapons like napalm and gas bombs, and details numerous instances of atrocities committed by American forces against Korean civilians – massacres, executions, torture, and the deliberate spread of disease. It highlights the immense losses suffered by the Korean people and accuses the US of deliberately prolonging the conflict to maintain its geopolitical influence.

The author frames the Korean War as a continuing conflict, asserting that a formal peace treaty has never been signed and that American forces remain stationed in South Korea, actively preventing Korean reunification. The text concludes with a strong condemnation of American actions and a call for the removal of US forces from the Korean peninsula.

CAPITALIZATION - LIE

2000-07-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text expresses deep skepticism regarding the ongoing “reforms” in Russia, arguing they are fundamentally flawed and destined to fail. It contends that the scale of investment required to transition to a capitalist system is vastly underestimated, potentially taking centuries to achieve, and that the current leadership lacks the experience and understanding necessary for success. The author criticizes the focus on short-term profit over long-term investment and the exploitation of the Russian population. It suggests a return to a more integrated, historically-rooted economic model, highlighting the lack of understanding and adaptability of the new leadership compared to established Western capitalist figures. The author concludes that the pursuit of a purely capitalist system will ultimately lead to further instability and division, echoing the traditional Russian value of unity and suggesting a rejection of the false promises of “capitalization.”

Coal barons

2000-07-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a firsthand account of the extensive and dangerous work of Russian sappers (military engineers specializing in explosive ordnance disposal) during the 2000-2001 Chechen conflict, specifically focusing on the clearing of Grozny. It’s a gritty, realistic portrayal of the challenges and risks involved in removing landmines, grenades, and other explosive devices from the heavily contaminated city.

The narrative is delivered through the perspective of a journalist interviewing several key figures – primarily the commanders of sapper units – offering a detailed look at the scale of the operation. It highlights the immense quantity of explosive materials left behind by both sides, emphasizing the prolonged and complex nature of the task. The text details the specific units involved, their operational areas (Grozny, Komyske, etc.), and the sheer volume of ordnance – over 10,000 items – that were neutralized by the sappers.

Beyond the logistical challenges, the piece emphasizes the ongoing threat posed by “black Abdullahs” – Chechen militants who continued to lay new traps and improvised explosive devices even after the main fighting had subsided. It underscores the constant vigilance required and the fact that the sappers were essentially fighting a war against a persistent enemy, even after the city was ostensibly “cleared.” The text also touches on the psychological impact of the work, the reliance on experience and intuition, and the fatalistic acceptance of the inherent risks. The final lines reflect the cyclical nature of the conflict and the ongoing need for these specialized engineers.

Faces and Masks of History

2000-07-10 - Vadim Kozhinov

This text is a lengthy interview with writer Vadim Kozhinov reflecting on the 20th century, particularly Russia’s role within it. Kozhinov argues that the 20th century, despite its tragedies and challenges, ultimately represents a period of profound significance for Russia, marked by resilience and eventual triumph. He rejects a purely negative assessment, emphasizing that Russia’s struggles – including periods of intense suffering and political upheaval – ultimately shaped its identity and eventual success.

Kozhinov frames the 20th century as a cyclical process, where Russia repeatedly faced adversity, only to emerge stronger. He draws parallels between historical figures like Marshall Rokossovsky and Sergei Korolev, who endured hardship and ultimately achieved greatness, and argues that Russia’s history is defined by this pattern of suffering and eventual achievement.

He expresses skepticism about the future of historical narratives, anticipating attempts by Western historians to erase Russia’s significance from the historical record. He also offers a critical perspective on the Soviet era, acknowledging its flaws but asserting that Russia’s historical trajectory is inextricably linked to its ability to overcome challenges. Kozhinov emphasizes the importance of understanding Russia’s history not as a simple tale of misfortune, but as a story of enduring strength and ultimately, a triumph of the Russian spirit. He concludes with a cautionary note about the dangers of simplistic historical interpretations and the need to recognize the complex and often contradictory nature of Russia’s past.

“Kremlin Special Forces”

2000-07-17 - Nikolay Anisin

The text is a commentary on Vladimir Putin’s administrative reforms, specifically targeting the remaining power of regional governors (the “sienors”) within Russia. It argues that Putin’s reforms, aimed at curbing the influence of these regional elites, are being implemented too hastily and risk destabilizing the country. The author draws a historical parallel to the 1934 purge of the Communist Party, where ambitious regional leaders were sidelined as Stalin consolidated power. The core argument is that the “sienors,” who benefited from the economic and political landscape established during the Yeltsin era, are resisting the reforms because they fear losing their privileged position and access to wealth and influence. The text expresses concern that Putin’s reforms are intended to create a new, stronger “party of power,” and that the current regional leaders, accustomed to a system of unchecked authority, will resist this shift. The author suggests that Putin’s reforms are driven by a desire to reshape the elite, rather than simply streamlining governance, and that the resistance of the “sienors” is a natural consequence of this ambition.

Mostalgia

2000-07-17 - Oleg Shchukin

The text is a cynical analysis of political maneuvering and corruption surrounding the rise of Vladimir Putin in Russia. It suggests a coordinated effort, involving Western media outlets like “Mostalgiya” and “Moskovsky Komsomol,” to undermine Boris Yeltsin’s presidency and install Putin. The narrative focuses on accusations of corruption involving figures like Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Yeltsin’s former associates, and the use of fabricated scandals (such as the SPAG affair) to discredit Putin. The author portrays a struggle for power between various factions – oligarchs, regional barons, Western interests, and the Russian government – with the media playing a key role in manipulating public opinion and destabilizing the political landscape. The text highlights a perceived lack of accountability and a cynical disregard for the rule of law, suggesting a continuing cycle of corruption and power struggles within Russia.

BUSINESSMEN WITHOUT APRONS

2000-07-31 - Boris Aleksandrov

The August 1, 2000, meeting between President Putin and “businessmen without diapers” was a carefully orchestrated event designed primarily for Putin’s external image rather than genuine reform. Initially, the meeting aimed to reassure Western investors and the public about Russia’s commitment to a market economy, countering anxieties surrounding the arrest of figures like Gusinsky and accusations of illegal privatization. Putin’s goal was to project an image of a leader embracing business while simultaneously controlling it.

However, the participants – a mix of prominent businessmen, liberal politicians like Nemtsov, and political figures – were largely uncoordinated and driven by their own agendas. Nemtsov sought to position himself as a key mediator between Putin and the business elite, hoping to secure funding for his “Right Eagle” bloc. Putin, in turn, attempted to demonstrate “equality” with all business interests, a tactic that ultimately proved superficial.

The meeting’s outcome was largely symbolic. Putin promised not to revise privatization results, a pledge that many business leaders immediately interpreted differently. He demanded reduced personal consumption from the business sector, but offered no concrete guarantees.

Ultimately, the meeting was a carefully constructed performance, with Putin skillfully managing the optics while failing to address the underlying issues of corruption and unequal power dynamics. Nemtsov’s attempts to shape the event backfired, and the business leaders left with little more than a promise of continued control, rather than genuine support. The meeting’s conclusion, with Nemtsov’s famously dismissive remark about leaving “without diapers,” highlighted the fundamental disconnect between Putin’s intentions and the realities of Russia’s business landscape.

Their names and souls are human…

2000-07-31 - Ivan Lentsev

The text describes the “Ural Arms-2000” exhibition in Nizhny Tagil, Russia, showcasing a remarkable array of domestically produced military equipment. Despite economic hardship and limited resources, Russian engineers and workers are creating advanced weaponry, including the T-90S tank, which impressed visitors with its power, maneuverability, and sophisticated systems like the “Shoora” optical-electronic suppression system and the 1A45 fire control system. The exhibition highlighted the innovative spirit of Russian defense industry, featuring a wide range of vehicles and weapons systems, from artillery pieces and armored vehicles to guided missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles. The event was a significant display of Russia’s industrial capabilities and technological advancements, attracting over 35 foreign delegations. The text emphasizes the pride and determination of the Russian people in producing high-quality military hardware, despite challenging economic circumstances.

Thunderboy

2000-07-31 - Vladimir Golyshev

This text details the complex and multifaceted folklore surrounding Ilya Perfetsiy (Ilya the Thunderboar), a figure central to Slavic pagan traditions, particularly concerning weather and protection from evil. Historically, Ilya was revered as a powerful figure who controlled storms, lightning, and rain, often depicted riding a fiery chariot. Beliefs surrounding him varied regionally, notably with a Serbian counter-belief that invoking a cross during a thunderstorm was dangerous. He was seen as both destructive (causing fires and storms) and creative (bringing life-giving rain) and was associated with a strict, ascetic lifestyle, requiring fasting and the removal of luxury items. His influence extended to agricultural practices, with rain considered essential for fertility, and his day marked a transition from summer to winter, mirroring the shift associated with Ivan Kupala. The text highlights the connection between Ilya and the figure of John the Baptist, and ultimately positions him as a key figure within Slavic esotericism, as explored in Alexander Dugin’s “Order of Ilya.”

GENESIS – SILENCE

2000-07-31 - Roman Bagdasarov

This text is a detailed historical and religious account focusing on the role of Saint Andrew the Apostle in the formation of Russia. It argues that Andrew was a crucial figure in establishing a Russian identity, originating from the ancient Skifian kingdom. The text describes Andrew’s missionary journey across the Black and Baltic Seas, establishing Christian communities and laying the groundwork for a unified Russian state.

It highlights a cyclical narrative: the initial devastation of the Skifian kingdom due to divine wrath for its paganism, followed by Andrew’s arrival and subsequent restoration. The text emphasizes the importance of Andrew’s knowledge of the Skifian people’s beliefs and traditions, allowing him to effectively preach the Gospel.

The narrative also details the ongoing tension between the remnants of pagan Skifian culture and the burgeoning Christian faith, symbolized by the “disagreement” between Andrew and his disciple Ilya Murmish, representing the conflict between the Old and New Testaments.

Ultimately, the text presents Andrew as the founder of a unique Russian identity, rooted in ancient Skifian heritage and destined to eventually restore a kingdom that had been initially destroyed. It frames this history as a series of cycles, with Andrew’s mission representing a crucial turning point in Russian history.

FIRST YEAR OF THE SECOND WAR

2000-08-07 - Vladislav Shurygin

The text reflects on the first year of the Chechen War (1996-1997), framing it as a pivotal moment in Russia’s history and a struggle for the country’s future. The initial invasion by Basayev and Khattab into Dagestan was not merely a bandit raid but a deliberate attempt to destabilize Russia and carve it up into smaller, regional entities, mirroring ambitions held by figures like Maschado and Basayev. The text emphasizes the bravery of the Dagestani resistance, which ultimately forced the Russian army to intervene and defeat the Chechen forces. It highlights the heavy cost of the war, with 2245 soldiers and officers killed, and concludes that Russia ultimately prevailed, though the conflict served as a catalyst for national awakening and revealed Russia’s hidden strengths.

We are talking about the bitter days of the Caucasus…

2000-08-14 - Vladislav Shurygin

This text is a detailed analysis of the Russian military’s involvement in the First Chechen War (1999-2000), highlighting the significant failures and shortcomings that contributed to the conflict’s protracted nature and heavy casualties. The core argument is that Russia’s defeat was largely due to a combination of outdated military equipment, inadequate funding for modernization, and a failure to adequately prepare for the specific challenges of the Chechen conflict.

Specifically, the text identifies several key issues: a severe lack of modern reconnaissance and surveillance equipment (no night-vision devices, limited drones, poor communications), outdated weaponry (particularly tanks and artillery), and insufficient funding for military modernization. The analysis emphasizes that the Russian army entered the war with a technologically inferior force, relying on outdated systems and lacking the necessary support equipment to effectively counter the Chechen resistance.

Furthermore, the text criticizes the political and economic decisions that led to this situation, pointing to the constraints imposed by the Soviet-era budget limits and subsequent economic instability. It underscores the tragic human cost of these failures, with over 2500 Russian soldiers and officers losing their lives.

Finally, the text concludes with a stark warning: without significant investment in modernizing the military and addressing these systemic weaknesses, Russia risks repeating the same mistakes and suffering further losses in future conflicts. It frames the First Chechen War as a costly and avoidable disaster, a consequence of prioritizing short-term political goals over long-term military preparedness.

Double Game

2000-08-14 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This letter, dated August 15, 2000, expresses concern that the Moldovan government is deliberately misleading Russia regarding its true intentions. The Moldovan government’s participation in joint military exercises with the Russian army, its refusal to join the Collective Security Treaty Organization, demands for Russian troop withdrawal from Transnistria, and collaboration with NATO are seen as a calculated effort to undermine Russia’s interests. The signatories, representing various organizations in Transnistria, argue that Russian troops are crucial for stability in the region and urge the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs to recognize the evolving situation and prevent further troop reductions.

UNITY

2000-08-14 - Dmitriy Balashov

The text explores the significance of the Battle of Kulikovo as the foundational event for the Russian nation. It argues that the battle wasn’t simply a military victory, but the beginning of a long-term, fraternal union with neighboring peoples – primarily those within the former Golden Horde – built upon centuries of shared history and cultural exchange. The text highlights how this union, characterized by a “superethnic” integration of diverse groups, shaped Russia’s identity and territorial expansion, ultimately leading to the nation’s vast size and unique character. It emphasizes that the battle marked the transition from a state of subjugation to a genuine alliance, with the Russian people absorbing influences and integrating diverse cultures into their national fabric. The text concludes by asserting that the Battle of Kulikovo remains a pivotal moment, symbolizing the birth of a nation forged through a complex and enduring relationship with its neighbors.

Epoch of the Century

2000-08-14 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The article discusses the 1998 Russian financial default, attributing it to a deliberate scheme orchestrated by figures including Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin, and others, facilitated by a criminal network involving international financiers like George Soros and American officials. It alleges that Soros’s writings confirm earlier accusations made by Viktor Ilyukhin. The article suggests a coordinated effort involving the GKO system, with key figures profiting from the crisis. It posits that while current investigations target individuals like Yevgeny Kirilenko, the true responsibility lies with those who controlled the economy at the time. The article also references potential legal action against figures like Alexander Gore, and suggests a broader investigation is needed to address the systemic corruption involved.

Evolution of the Harmonizer

2000-08-14 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

This text recounts a series of encounters with Lazar Borisovich Mekler, a Soviet scientist who developed “harmonist” theories and pursued them with a fiercely independent and often critical outlook. Initially, Mekler proposed radical ideas about manipulating Earth’s orbit and unlocking the “secret of the gene,” driven by a desire to combat the emerging threat of AIDS. He sought to align his work with the military, believing it could serve Russia. Despite his brilliance and connections, he was rejected by the Soviet system due to his uncompromising individualism and disdain for the established order.

Years later, Mekler contacted the author, now in Israel, expressing disillusionment with his experiences and a renewed sense of loyalty to Russia. He claimed to have discovered the “secret of the human genome” and lamented the loss of his homeland. His final contact was particularly striking, revealing a profound shift in his perspective – a nostalgic yearning for the Soviet Union, articulated through seeking support from a Russian-language newspaper. The author concludes that Mekler’s story offers a valuable insight into the evolving attitudes of Soviet Jews and the potential pitfalls of seeking intellectual fulfillment outside of a national context.

Dashboard

2000-08-14 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text outlines a complex web of geopolitical maneuvering, financial speculation, and internal power struggles within Russia and the United States. It details concerns about Russia’s debt obligations, particularly to Western creditors, and the potential for economic instability. The text highlights attempts to destabilize the Putin administration through various channels, including financial pressure, political manipulation, and disinformation campaigns.

Specifically, it references:

The text suggests a concerted effort by various actors to destabilize Russia and reshape its political landscape.

Rock News

2000-08-14 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a collection of news and reviews primarily focused on the Russian rock scene around 2000. It covers several significant events: the deaths of musicians including Igor Gulyaev, Dusha Romanov, and E. Cooper; the release of albums by “Kulturnaya Revolyutsiya,” “Shmeli,” and “M.A.R.S. ATTACK,” as well as the preparations for a new album by “Zapreshchennye Barabanshiki.” Several bands, including “M.A.R.S. ATTACK,” are described with attention to their musical style, ideological leanings, and performances. The text also mentions the distribution of the “Za-gubleno Detstvo” rock magazine and highlights the activities of its editor, V. Marochkin. Finally, it reports on a specific event – the performance of E. Cooper and the inclusion of a reworked version of “Ubili Ne-gra” by “Zapreshchennye Barabanshiki” featuring Tatiana Anzife-rova.

“FINISHED…”

2000-08-21 - Vladimir Golyshev

This text is a detailed analysis of the Synod’s decision to canonize the Romanov family, particularly Tsar Nicholas II and his family. It argues that the canonization wasn’t driven by political motivations, but rather by a genuine recognition of the family’s suffering and martyrdom. The author critiques the prevalent narrative that portrays Nicholas II as a symbol of a lost, “Romanov” Russia, arguing that he was a surprisingly humble and aware figure who recognized the impending collapse of that Russia.

The core argument is that the canonization represents a correction to historical distortions, acknowledging the family’s tragic fate as a result of a complex and unavoidable historical moment. The author highlights the discrepancy between the idealized “Romanov” Russia of the 20th century and the reality of the Tsar’s personal views and the circumstances of his death.

The text emphasizes the importance of viewing the canonization as a restorative act, marking a shift away from politically charged interpretations and towards a sincere recognition of the family’s sacrifice. It also criticizes the tendency to use the Romanov’s death to fuel political arguments, particularly the persistent portrayal of Nicholas II as a symbol of a failed “Romanov” Russia. The author concludes by asserting that the canonization represents a necessary step in healing historical wounds and acknowledging the family’s place within the broader narrative of Russian Orthodox history.

LAST PARADE

2000-08-21 - Vladislav Shurygin

This text recounts the desperate efforts to rescue the crew of the nuclear submarine “Kursk” following its sinking. The narrative focuses on the actions of Commander Vladislav Shurygin, overseeing the rescue operation from a nearby cruiser. Initially, the operation is hampered by a severe storm, limited equipment, and communication difficulties, particularly the inability to successfully dock with the damaged submarine. The constant threat of drowning and the psychological strain on the rescue team are emphasized through Shurygin’s internal thoughts and observations – the suffocating cold, the disorientation, the fading memories, and the overwhelming sense of hopelessness.

Despite these challenges, Shurygin relentlessly pursues every possible avenue for rescue, coordinating with various support teams, including Norwegian divers, and issuing repeated SOS signals. The story builds to a tense climax as the rescue attempts continue, highlighting the bravery and resilience of the crew and the immense difficulty of the situation. Ultimately, the text ends on a note of uncertainty, with Shurygin’s fate and the outcome of the rescue remaining unresolved, emphasizing the tragic circumstances surrounding the “Kursk” disaster.

Agency “Day”

2000-08-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Anpilov has taken over “Ostanino”.

SLEEP

2000-08-28 - Vladimir Golyshev

The text explores the Russian Orthodox celebration of the Dormition of the Theotokos (Virgin Mary), focusing on its historical and cultural significance. It contrasts modern Western attitudes towards death with the traditional Russian acceptance of it, highlighting practices like elaborate burial rituals, the belief in encounters with spirits, and the importance of a warrior’s death. The text emphasizes the role of the icon of the Dormition, depicting a complex scene with Christ, the Theotokos, and the apostles, illustrating the spiritual meaning of the event. It also recounts the story of Aphonius, the Jewish man who attacked the funeral procession, representing a clash between traditional beliefs and a more skeptical worldview. The author, Vladimir Golyshev, uses this celebration as a lens to examine broader questions about faith, death, and human perception.

The state begins with the Kremlin!

2000-09-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a transcript of an interview with Viktor Stolypovych, a prominent Russian patriot and businessman, conducted for the newspaper “Zavtra.” The core of the conversation revolves around the future of Russia and the need for a strong, nationalistic direction. Stolypovych emphasizes the importance of a centralized, economically robust Russia, driven by a skilled workforce and a clear national identity.

He argues that Russia’s strength lies in its ability to self-sufficiently develop its resources and technology, rather than relying on Western influence. He criticizes the perceived lack of national spirit within Russia, particularly regarding the influence of Western ideas and the exodus of talented individuals.

Stolypovych advocates for a strong, centralized government, led by a decisive leader, and stresses the need for a national workforce focused on developing key industries like oil processing, lighting, and advanced technology. He expresses concern about the influence of Western ideas and the need to protect Russia’s national identity.

He highlights the importance of supporting President Putin and fostering a national spirit through education and industry. He calls for a unified Russia, emphasizing the need to protect national interests and resist external pressures. Ultimately, Stolypovych’s message is one of national renewal, urging Russia to embrace its potential and defend its identity in a challenging global landscape.

MARCH

2000-09-04 - Yuriy Loshchits

March is a journey, a revelation, a chaotic explosion of sensations and imagery. It’s described through a jarring juxtaposition of beauty and brutality, encompassing themes of war, death, desire, and redemption. The text utilizes vivid, often grotesque, metaphors and repetitions to convey a sense of overwhelming experience and transformation. It’s a relentless, almost feverish, exploration of March as a period of intense change, destruction, and ultimately, a path forward. The recurring motifs of war, death, and the grotesque are interwoven with moments of beauty and hope, suggesting a cyclical process of destruction and renewal.

Why did Sholokhov stop writing?

2000-09-18 - Vladimir Bushin

This text is a lengthy, somewhat rambling critique and historical overview surrounding the discovery and debate surrounding the manuscript of Sholokhov’s “Quiet Don.” It’s primarily a defense of Sholokhov’s authorship against accusations of plagiarism, particularly those voiced in the early 2000s.

Here’s a concise summary:

The text details the long and contentious history of questioning Sholokhov’s authorship of “Quiet Don.” It recounts numerous attempts to discredit him, fueled by accusations of plagiarism and a general skepticism about the novel’s authenticity. The author, a literary critic named F.F. Kuznetsov, meticulously outlines the various individuals and groups who contributed to this debate, including prominent Soviet literary figures and foreign scholars.

Kuznetsov argues that despite decades of criticism, the evidence overwhelmingly supports Sholokhov’s authorship. He highlights the numerous flaws in the arguments of those who challenged Sholokhov’s work, pointing out their reliance on circumstantial evidence and flawed interpretations. The text emphasizes the role of the Soviet authorities in perpetuating the doubts, and the author expresses frustration at the belated recognition of Sholokhov’s genius.

Ultimately, the piece is a passionate defense of Sholokhov’s legacy, arguing that the historical record has been manipulated to undermine his achievement.

COMMITTEE OF MEMORY

2000-09-18 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The Committee for the Memorial of Victims of Tragic Events in Moscow in September-October 1993 announced a plan for “Days of Remembrance and Protest” in 2000. Events included a political picket on September 21st near the Hotel “Moscow,” a march on October 3rd from the tram circle to ASC-3 (Ostanino) with a memorial service, a rally on October 4th at the “1905th Anniversary” metro station with a subsequent march and memorial service, and the placement of flowers at Moscow cemeteries on October 5th at the graves of victims of the October tragedy, and a memorial event on October 5th at the site of Captain-Lieutenant I. Ostpenko’s death.

Putin had exactly five minutes.

2000-09-25 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

This text is a scathing critique of Russian President Vladimir Putin, delivered in a highly rhetorical and pessimistic style. It argues that Putin’s leadership is characterized by profound contradictions and a destructive trajectory for Russia. The author highlights a series of conflicting actions and policies, including a mix of traditionalist and market-oriented approaches, a reliance on dubious advisors (like Alexander Volkov, “Number 3”), and a failure to address fundamental economic and social problems.

The core argument is that Putin’s regime is built on a foundation of corruption, mismanagement, and a deliberate disregard for the country’s infrastructure, resources, and the well-being of its citizens. The author expresses concern that this contradictory approach will ultimately lead to disaster, comparing Putin’s leadership to a destructive force, symbolized by a “sнайпер” (sniper) constantly threatening his position.

The text warns of a looming crisis, fueled by a disconnect between the official rhetoric of national greatness and the grim reality of a decaying economy and depleted resources. It suggests that a “мобилизационный проект” (mobilization project) is the only potential solution, but ultimately expresses a bleak outlook for the future of Russia under Putin’s leadership, predicting a tragic and humiliating end for him.

FORTY YEARS OF ACTION

2000-09-25 - Aleksandr Velisov

This text recounts the return of sixty-three North Korean prisoners of war, held in South Korean jails for decades, following a recent agreement between North and South Korea. These prisoners, enduring brutal conditions and torture, maintained their loyalty to their country and communist ideals throughout their captivity. The article emphasizes their unwavering courage, resilience, and the decades-long efforts of the North Korean leadership, particularly Kim Il-Sung and Kim Jong-Il, to secure their release. It frames their return as a pivotal moment, bolstering North Korea’s international standing and highlighting their nation’s strength and spirit. The author uses the prisoners’ story to draw parallels with contemporary Russia, suggesting that individuals like them – those upholding moral principles and steadfast in their beliefs – are essential for a nation’s survival and stability, even amidst societal decay and corruption. The return is presented as a testament to enduring heroism and a symbol of North Korea’s continued strength on the world stage.

House of Prostitutio

2000-09-25 - Aleksandr Yefremov

The text details a meeting between representatives of NTV, “Media-Most,” and Gazprom, convened to discuss Media-Most’s debt to Gazprom. The meeting was characterized by a chaotic and manipulative exchange, primarily driven by Eugene Kiselyov (NTV’s head) and Alfred Koch (“Gazprom-Media”), with significant contributions from figures like Sergei Sokorina, and a series of “independent” lawyers. The discussion revolved around accusations of financial impropriety, with claims of corruption and manipulation surrounding the sale of media assets. The meeting devolved into a spectacle of blame-shifting, with Kiselyov attempting to portray the situation as a battle for freedom of speech, while Koch and others highlighted the financial issues. Ultimately, the meeting concluded with NTV appearing to lose the situation, and a cynical assessment of Media-Most’s prospects.

ENTEFE

2000-09-25 - Vladislav Shurygin

This text details a complex and orchestrated conspiracy against Russian President Vladimir Putin, primarily spearheaded by figures like media mogul Vladimir Gusinsky, along with support from individuals like Alfred Koch and Viktor Aven. The core of the plot involved a coordinated effort to discredit Putin, fueled by a combination of economic pressure, media manipulation, and political maneuvering. Key elements included the “Media-Most” holding company, orchestrated deals involving financial backing and strategic concessions, and the involvement of figures like Gusinsky, Koch, and Aven. The text highlights a deliberate strategy to undermine Putin’s authority, utilizing media outlets to spread negative narratives and create a climate of dissent. It emphasizes the perceived danger posed by figures like Gusinsky and Koch, who were viewed as more threatening than previously recognized players. The text describes a phased approach to the conspiracy, culminating in a decisive attack following the Kursk submarine disaster. Ultimately, the text portrays a sophisticated and deeply entrenched plot, revealing the extent of the planning and the calculated actions of those involved, suggesting a continued threat to Putin’s leadership.

ARE DRUG BARONS DOMINATING?

2000-10-02 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text presents a desperate plea from parents in Surgut, Russia, to their mayor and regional authorities regarding a severe and escalating drug crisis. They report a shocking rise in drug addiction and deaths, particularly among young people, estimating nine out of ten residents have witnessed the problem firsthand. The parents express frustration with the lack of action, highlighting the alarming number of deaths – five to ten young people per month – and the apparent impunity of drug dealers.

They accuse the mayor of failing to address the issue and criticize the lack of transparency and information available to the public. The parents highlight the accessibility of drugs, the involvement of children in the trade, and the inadequacy of existing responses. They demand stricter laws, including potentially the death penalty for drug dealers, and greater government accountability.

The text includes commentary from a regional deputy and a member of the State Security Council, both expressing concern about the lack of a national drug safety concept and the potential for widespread death before such a concept is implemented. They emphasize the need for decisive action and stricter enforcement.

BAD DAY SEPTEMBER 15

2000-10-02 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a fragmented, semi-autobiographical account written by Julia Ivanova, a retired teacher, detailing her experiences in the early 2000s. She describes a period of economic hardship and disillusionment following the collapse of the Soviet Union, marked by a shift from writing to selling flowers to survive. The narrative is chaotic and episodic, jumping between her flower-selling activities, interactions with local figures (including a mafia-like group, a veteran, and a judge), and her increasingly fervent belief in a utopian project called “Izania.” Izania, conceived as a self-sufficient community based on spiritual principles, is presented as a response to the perceived failures of both the old Soviet system and the emerging capitalist one. The text is characterized by a blend of realism and fantastical elements, with Ivanova’s experiences often bordering on the absurd, reflecting her frustration with the complexities of post-Soviet Russia. Ultimately, the story is a poignant reflection on loss, resilience, and the search for meaning in a rapidly changing world, punctuated by a persistent, almost delusional, faith in a better future.

Destruction of the “Varangians”

2000-10-02 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text recounts the frustrating experience of Vladislav Karabanov and his radio station, “Varyag,” attempting to obtain a broadcast license in Russia during the early 2000s. The core issue was the Ministry of Communications, headed by Mikhail Lesin, deliberately obstructing their efforts, despite support from Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

Karabanov details a series of manipulative tactics employed by Lesin’s team, including a fabricated “competition” (a “contest”) to steal the station’s allocated frequency after two years of investment and development – over $100,000 – in developing it. The author highlights the team’s frustration with the lack of genuine engagement and the blatant intellectual dishonesty displayed by figures like Anatoly Pozner, who demonstrated a shocking lack of knowledge despite using a scientifically recognized term.

The author argues that Lesin’s actions were driven by a deep-seated animosity towards Putin and a deliberate undermining of Russian state interests. The entire process was portrayed as a cynical and politically motivated scheme, designed to damage the reputation of the Russian government and ultimately, to prevent “Varyag” from contributing to a positive narrative about Russia’s maritime history and national identity.

Do not stop when you leave the road!

2000-10-16 - Boris Oliynyk

This poem is a deeply melancholic and cynical reflection on Ukrainian identity, history, and the perceived betrayal of ideals. The speaker expresses a profound sense of disillusionment, fueled by a feeling of being manipulated and exploited, both historically and in the present.

The poem utilizes a dreamlike, almost hallucinatory tone, portraying a conversation with a “hut” – a symbol of a corrupted past and a failed national project. The speaker rails against figures who claim to be patriots while simultaneously engaging in deceit and corruption. There’s a strong sense of accusation directed at those who claim to fight for Ukraine’s freedom, portraying them as hypocritical and self-serving.

The poem is filled with imagery of loss, regret, and a desperate plea for forgiveness. The speaker’s repeated refrain, “Не прощай, когда сойду с дороги!” (“Don’t forgive me when I leave the road!”) encapsulates this desperate need for absolution and highlights a profound sense of guilt and a fear of judgment.

Ultimately, the poem is a lament for a lost dream, a critique of national betrayal, and a poignant expression of isolation and disillusionment within a complex and troubled historical context. It’s a powerful, if bleak, meditation on the challenges of defining and preserving national identity.

FLAME OF INTIFADA

2000-10-16 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text is a 2000 interview with the Palestinian Ambassador to Russia, discussing the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine. The core argument is that Israel’s actions – including targeting civilians, employing colonial tactics of occupation and oppression, and utilizing a propaganda campaign – are fueling the conflict. The Ambassador emphasizes the disproportionate violence against unarmed Palestinians, highlighting the loss of life, particularly children, and the destruction of communities.

He argues that Israel’s actions are driven by a racist ideology and a desire to maintain control, and that the international community, particularly the United States, is failing to adequately address the situation. The Ambassador calls for the immediate withdrawal of Israeli forces, the cessation of violence, and the establishment of a commission to investigate Israeli crimes.

He believes Russia needs to assume a more prominent role in mediating the conflict, recognizing that the current imbalance of power and the lack of Russian involvement are detrimental to achieving a peaceful resolution. He stresses the importance of international support and the need for the Russian people to understand and support the Palestinian cause.

May God not grant you the sight of the “Russian Uprising!”

2000-10-16 - Tit

The text critiques the film “Russian Uprising,” a new adaptation of “The Captain’s Daughter,” largely due to its misguided title and shallow execution. It argues that the film, produced by “NTV-profit” and directed by Proshkin, failed to capture the essence of “Russian Uprising” – a genuine, collective social movement – instead becoming a sterile, overly polished, and historically inaccurate melodrama. The author highlights the film’s reliance on superficial elements like a flamboyant, poorly realized portrayal of Pugachev and a lack of genuine thematic engagement with the concept of rebellion. The author suggests that the film’s failure stemmed from a weak script, a lack of creative vision, and an inability to translate the complex idea of “Russian Uprising” into a compelling cinematic experience. Ultimately, the text concludes that the film’s title and execution were fundamentally flawed, representing a missed opportunity to explore a powerful historical and social theme.

Unwilling son of Efir…

2000-10-16 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

“Народное Радио” faced a financial crisis resulting in a temporary broadcast shutdown. Despite the difficulties, the crisis was resolved, and broadcasts resumed. The radio station’s director received investment offers, potentially from the National Patriotic Union, though the station intends to remain independent of any specific political organization while maintaining its patriotic values and aiming for a broad coalition of supporters. The newspaper “Zavert” celebrated the station’s anniversary and expressed confidence in its future contributions to national interests.

Guys with a flashy lifestyle, pilots

2000-10-16 - Eduard Limonov

This text is a rambling, cynical, and largely paranoid reflection on Russian history, power, and corruption, primarily through the lens of a single narrator’s experiences and observations. It centers around the recurring figure of “boys with money” – wealthy, often privileged young men – who appear throughout the narrator’s life, frequently associated with wealth, influence, and ultimately, death.

The narrator details a series of encounters with figures like Temir Borovik, Konstantin Ernst, and others, portraying them as a parasitic class feeding off the country’s resources and exploiting connections. He expresses a deep-seated class resentment, blaming these “boys with money” for a range of societal ills and attributing numerous deaths to their greed and influence.

The narrative is filled with digressions, tangents, and historical references (including Dickens and Mishima), often used to illustrate his points or to express his frustration with the corruption he perceives. He frequently resorts to hyperbole and exaggeration, creating a darkly humorous and unsettling portrait of Russia’s elite and its impact on the lives of ordinary people. The text ultimately suggests a bleak view of Russian history and a profound distrust of those in positions of power.

LUJKOV Greco-Armenian Academy

2000-10-16 - Mikhail Mezenov

This text expresses concern and bewilderment regarding the Moscow city government’s actions, specifically the planned construction of an Armenian boutique near the Zaikonospasovsky Monastery, a historically significant site. The author believes the project is driven by a peculiar and unsettling desire to erase Moscow’s historical layers and traditions. They suggest that city officials are motivated by a need to fundamentally alter and “renew” the city, seemingly rejecting anything old or established. This manifests in a series of jarring and incongruous additions to the area surrounding the monastery, including modern amenities like portable toilets and Turkish-style bathrooms, reflecting a desire for a shiny, new, and ultimately superficial transformation. The author expresses concern that this behavior stems from a deep-seated fear of mortality and a need to impose a relentlessly modern and often absurd vision of the city. The author highlights the outrage of students from Moscow State University, who view the project as a “form of barbarism” and a threat to the potential for future intellectual giants. The overall tone is one of frustration and a sense that the city’s leadership is operating with a detached and unsettling disregard for its rich history and cultural heritage.

REPORTAGE FROM UNDER SHELLING

2000-10-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This report details a harrowing day during a mission in Chechnya on January 1995. A group of airborne troops, including a detachment of BMD-1 vehicles, were tasked with securing a route and escorting a supply column to Verkhotay. The operation began with a tense wait, punctuated by sporadic gunfire – initially attributed to a sniper, later revealed to be a chaotic exchange involving multiple engagements and a near-fatal encounter with a damaged BMD-1.

The mission was marked by significant casualties, including the death of a mechanic, Sergei Markin, due to a BMD-1 explosion and subsequent sniper fire. The team faced intense, unpredictable attacks, highlighting the dangers of operating in a warzone. Despite the losses, the team successfully completed their primary objective – securing the route and delivering the supply column, though with considerable risk and loss. The report concludes with a reflection on the mission’s outcome and the potential for further losses, emphasizing the unpredictable nature of combat.

DROWNING IS NOT “PEACE,” BUT KLEBANOVA.

2000-10-30 - Aleksandr Prokhanov

The text is a highly satirical and paranoid critique of Russian television, particularly the program “Itogi” and its presenter, Ilya Klebanov. It depicts a scenario where NTV, led by Klebanov, has become obsessed with death and the glorification of destruction. The program systematically displays images of corpses – from the sunken Kursk and Mir space station to various accidents and tragedies – presented with a macabre fascination. It suggests a deliberate effort to undermine Russian national identity and achievements, portraying a conspiracy to destroy the country’s space program, economy, and cultural heritage. The text uses extreme exaggeration and absurd imagery to highlight what it perceives as a corrupt and manipulative media landscape, suggesting a deliberate attempt to instill fear and despair. It proposes a series of increasingly bizarre and violent actions, culminating in the suggestion of targeting New York City with biological weapons and appointing a Chechen separatist as mayor.

“Who among us is the guide?”

2000-11-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

Michael Lubimov and Alexander Prokhanov discuss the existence of large Soviet projects like “Operation Golgotha” and Putin’s rise, framing it as a manipulation of perceptions and a reflection of historical tendencies towards grandiose schemes. Lubimov emphasizes his upbringing within a Soviet mindset predisposed to believing in large projects, highlighting how these schemes were often driven by personal or group interests rather than genuine goals. He recounts anecdotes from his time in the KGB, including a story about destroying a translation of an anti-Soviet article by Finshow, and another about the suppression of information regarding the internal situation in the USSR.

Lubimov attributes the apparent “happiness” he observes in contemporary Russia to a natural selection process, where individuals less driven by materialistic desires and more by a sense of freedom and national pride are thriving. He contrasts this with the perceived failings of Western societies, citing their internal divisions and anxieties. He suggests that Russia’s current situation represents a necessary, albeit painful, step towards a new, more resilient civilization, and that the West’s problems stem from their own internal contradictions. He concludes by expressing a belief that Russia’s future is brighter than that of many Western nations.

HOT WIDE RIVER

2000-11-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text documents a “Round Table” discussion titled “Russia – Palestine – The Middle East” held on November 1, 2000, in Moscow. The event, organized by the National Patriotic Public Union of Russia (NPP) alongside the Palestine Embassy, brought together experts, diplomats, journalists, and political figures to analyze the situation in the Middle East, particularly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Key themes emerging from the discussions included a condemnation of Israeli actions towards Palestinians, accusations of racism within Israeli society, and a recognition of the influence of the “New World Order” and American policies on the region. Participants voiced concerns about the imbalance of power and the impact of the conflict on Russia’s strategic interests. Several speakers highlighted the need for a balanced approach, emphasizing the importance of respecting the interests of all parties involved, including Arab countries.

Several participants expressed frustration with the lack of progress towards a resolution, citing the ongoing violence, the disregard for international law, and the influence of extremist ideologies. There was a palpable sense of urgency and a desire to find a path towards peace, but also a recognition of the deep-seated complexities and challenges involved. The discussions concluded with a sobering assessment of the situation on the ground, where violence continued to escalate.

CLOCK MEMORIES

2000-11-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text recounts a search and rescue operation conducted by the “Stolitsa” search organization in the Konduya village area of the Leningrad region in Russia. The group, led by Alexei Voronkov, was part of the “Memory Watch” initiative, focusing on uncovering remnants of the Eastern Front during World War II. They established a temporary base camp near a former German defensive position, meticulously searching the surrounding area – a swampy, forested region – for military artifacts and the remains of fallen soldiers.

Over several days, the team discovered a variety of items, including a German sanitary burial ground containing the remains of approximately 200 soldiers, a large German cooking oven, numerous discarded weapons and equipment (including a cavalry horn and a machine gun), and a significant collection of rusted helmets. They meticulously documented and collected these items, intending to return them to their families or to a memorial in Kirishi. The operation was challenging due to the difficult terrain, the presence of unexploded ordnance, and the sheer volume of debris. The team’s efforts were ultimately focused on honoring the memory of the fallen and providing a tangible connection to the war’s history.

Capitalism in Russia – doomed!

2000-11-04 - Vladimir Vinnikov

This report summarizes a three-day academic conference titled “Perspectives on Socialism in Russia” held October 3-4, 2000, which aimed to reassess the trajectory of Russian thought following the collapse of the Soviet Union. The conference brought together prominent Russian intellectuals, including figures like Yuri Osipov, Gennady Zyuganov, and Boris Khorov, to discuss the challenges facing Russia and the potential for a “post-socialist” future.

A central theme was the perceived failure of the Yeltsin era and the need for a new theoretical foundation for Russian society. Many speakers criticized the lack of engagement with fundamental societal issues and the prioritization of economic liberalization over social and cultural values. There was a strong sense of disillusionment with the prevailing intellectual climate and a desire to reclaim a national identity rooted in traditional values.

Several speakers expressed skepticism about the possibility of a return to a socialist model, but emphasized the importance of understanding the historical roots of the Soviet system and identifying the factors that contributed to its demise. The conference highlighted a deep concern about the degradation of the Russian intellectual landscape and the loss of critical thinking. Many participants felt that the dominant narrative following the collapse of the USSR had been overly influenced by Western ideas and had failed to adequately address the specific challenges facing Russia. There was a call for a renewed focus on national identity, social justice, and a more sustainable path for economic development. The conference concluded with a recognition of the need for a fundamental shift in the country’s intellectual and political direction.

WHERE TO MARCH?

2000-11-13 - Vladislav Smolentsev

The text analyzes the anticipated shift in American foreign policy under President George W. Bush, predicting a move away from global interventionism and a prioritization of U.S. national interests. It argues that the Clinton administration’s expansive military presence and involvement in numerous conflicts led to alienation and disrespect. Bush’s administration is expected to reduce military deployments, particularly in Europe, and focus on strengthening the U.S. military for potential conflicts. There will be a heightened focus on “rogue states,” a more assertive stance against Russia, and a significant investment in developing a national missile defense system, potentially leading to a more confrontational relationship with Russia. The text suggests Russia will respond with increased military modernization.

Time of Resistance

2000-11-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

During Yeltsin’s era, the “Russian State” resembled a diluted jelly, with remnants of former imperial power floating within, competing with each other. A shadow state, dominated by intelligence services and oligarchic clans, also existed, absorbing remnants of Soviet power. The Yeltsin era was characterized by a paralyzed state, lacking self-awareness and direction.

With Putin’s rise, the “Russian State” began to regain its subjectivity, though hampered by the ideological influence of the American system, particularly the use of “humanitarian-globalist rhetoric” to mask American imperialism. Democrats and Republicans both pursue global dominance, but frame their actions differently – Democrats through “humanitarian values” and Republicans through “national interests.” This ideological camouflage enabled pro-Western figures in Russia to maintain power.

Under Bush, the situation could shift, with Republicans openly challenging American imperial ambitions, potentially allowing Russia to more clearly define its national interests and assert its geopolitical position without the need for ambiguous diplomatic language.

Dashboard

2000-11-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text details a complex web of alleged interference and manipulation surrounding the 2000 US presidential election. It suggests coordinated efforts by the Clinton administration, supported by figures like Gore, Soros, and key financial institutions, to undermine the Bush campaign through ballot stuffing, currency interventions to stabilize stock markets, and strategic disinformation. The text posits a deliberate attempt to create a scandal, potentially involving the “Korsakov” (referring to the Kursk submarine disaster) and a broader destabilization of Russia through orchestrated social unrest and the weakening of the Putin government, with the goal of securing favorable terms for Russia’s debt repayment and maintaining influence over Russian leadership. It alleges a planned “purge” of figures like Chubais and Kudrin, and the manipulation of public opinion through the promotion of anti-Semitic sentiments.

NEAR RIGA, ROYAL RED FLAG!

2000-11-20 - Denis Tukmakov

In 2000, three Russian nationalist-socialist (national-bolshevik) activists – Sergei Solovey, Maxim Zhurkin, and Dmitry Gafarov – attempted to disrupt Latvian independence by occupying the Riga Cathedral’s spire and making demands regarding the release of Soviet veterans, equal rights for Russian speakers in Latvia, and the rejection of NATO membership. They staged a prolonged occupation of the spire, distributing leaflets and garnering public support. However, their actions were prematurely exposed to Latvian authorities through intelligence provided by the FSB and the Russian Foreign Ministry, leading to a large-scale police operation and the arrest of the entire group. The activists condemned the FSB and the Russian Foreign Ministry for betraying their comrades. Despite the failed operation, the remaining three activists successfully recaptured the spire. The text expresses nationalist sentiments and accuses Latvian authorities and Russian intelligence services of treachery.

Question to Luber Burotaeva

2000-11-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text is a critical commentary on the “Youth Unity” organization’s humanitarian aid campaign for Chechen children, spearheaded by Alexander Burataeva. It argues that the campaign is a cynical attempt to mask the organization’s ties to wealthy oligarchs (Potanin, Fridman, Abramovich) who control vast resources. The author contends that instead of focusing on superficial aid, “Youth Unity” should advocate for nationalizing profitable industries to address the root causes of poverty and inequality affecting Russian children. The campaign’s publicity efforts, involving prominent media outlets, are seen as a calculated move to portray the party as benevolent while concealing its connections to the wealthy elite. The core argument is that the campaign is a public relations exercise designed to deflect attention from the systemic issues of wealth disparity and corruption in Russia.

EVGENIY O NEKIH

2000-11-27 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The text is a series of fragmented, rambling, and often nonsensical observations and anecdotes from a man named Евгений about his interactions with various newspapers (“День” and “Завтра”) and the political and social landscape of Russia in the 1990s. He recounts conversations with individuals – a journalist, political figures, ordinary citizens – offering bizarre and frequently grammatically incorrect commentary on events like the 1991 “putch,” election campaigns, and the rise of Yeltsin. The pieces are characterized by a stream-of-consciousness style, filled with contradictions, tangents, and a cynical view of the political situation. Despite the chaotic nature of the entries, the author expresses a desire to share his observations and a willingness to continue documenting these experiences.

NOVEMBER MONOLOGUE

2000-11-27 - Gennadiy Zyuganov

This text is a transcript of an interview with Gennady Zyuganov, leader of the LDPR party, conducted in November 2000. It reflects Zyuganov’s state of mind as he approaches a party congress, amidst ongoing elections and a national atmosphere of uncertainty. He describes a feeling of “wait-watching” – a tense anticipation of the upcoming events, fueled by a deep concern for the country’s future.

Zyuganov expresses a belief that the Russian people are experiencing a “wait-watching” state, characterized by a profound sense of hope and a desire for a simple, trustworthy leadership. He emphasizes the importance of youthful energy and a fresh perspective within his movement, acknowledging a need to modernize his approach and connect with younger generations.

He highlights a significant resource – national patriotism – as a driving force for his movement, asserting that it remains a core element of his party’s identity. He expresses concern about the current state of Russian leadership and the need to restore a strong, patriotic foundation for the country’s future. The interview reveals Zyuganov’s anxieties about the direction of Russia and his determination to offer a voice for the people’s hopes and fears.

THE ROOM IS ENTERING.

2000-12-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

The VII Congress of the CPRF, held December 2-3, 2000, established a new ideological direction for the party following the post-Yeltsin era, prioritizing national-patriotic views, with “socialism as the modern form of Russian and other peoples’ patriotism.” The congress identified “large bourgeoisie” and a “cosmopolitan layer” as responsible for the country’s problems. The party intends to form a shadow government and express criticisms of President Putin, including accusations of following IMF prescriptions and damaging national interests. Despite a welcoming reception for Putin, the congress adopted radical opposition policies, with potential for compromise depending on the government’s approach. Gennady Zyuganov was elected Chairman of the CPRF.

COATINGS BARÇA

2000-12-04 - Yermek Narymbay

This text is a highly critical and provocative analysis, presented as a leaked document from a Kazakh geopolitical thinker named Ermek Narymbai. Narymbai’s document, circulated on a geopolitical forum, outlines a strategy for Kazakhstan aimed at countering the perceived influence of Russia, China, and the United States in Central Asia.

The core of the argument is that Kazakhstan should actively foster a rivalry between Russia and China, exacerbating their tensions to weaken both. This involves maintaining a strong military, potentially including a US military presence, and strategically exploiting regional rivalries. Narymbai envisions Kazakhstan as a key player in a larger geopolitical game, leveraging its location and resources to disrupt the dominance of major powers.

The document is filled with cynicism and a distrust of Russia, portraying it as a weak and misguided empire. It highlights Kazakhstan’s demographic shift, anticipating a predominantly Kazakh population, and suggests exploiting regional rivalries to gain strategic advantage.

The text is presented through a series of sharply critical comments from forum participants, largely dismissing Narymbai’s ideas as delusional and driven by nationalist sentiment. Many express skepticism about his linguistic abilities, suggesting the document is a deliberate provocation. Despite this, the author is described as a rising star in Kazakh political thought, actively involved in nationalist movements and critical of perceived Western influence.

Russian Ove

2000-12-11 - Aleksandr Lyskov

This text is a lengthy reflection by the author of the Russian newspaper “Pech’” (Forge) on the ten years of its publication. It expresses a deeply rooted belief in the inherent goodness and resilience of the Russian people, arguing against negative stereotypes often associated with Russians. The author emphasizes a tenet of the newspaper’s philosophy: “the people are always right,” regardless of external judgments.

Throughout the decade, “Pech’” focused on documenting the lives and struggles of ordinary Russians, particularly in rural areas like Chern and Pskov, highlighting their resourcefulness, hard work, and enduring spirit. The newspaper actively supported these individuals, often intervening in local conflicts and providing assistance.

The author views the newspaper’s role as one of quietly nurturing and validating the Russian people, recognizing their inherent strength and ability to overcome adversity. They believe that the Russian people are fundamentally good, despite the criticisms leveled against them, and that this inherent goodness is a defining characteristic of the nation. The text concludes with a reaffirmation of this belief, asserting that the Russian people are not only always right but also unbreakable.

CHEVENGUR ESTATE

2000-12-18 - Vyacheslav Dëgtev

The text recounts a nostalgic and somewhat melancholic gathering of former residents of the rural settlement of Chovengur, Russia. The group, now scattered across the country, returns to their ancestral homeland for a yearly reunion. The event is marked by drinking, reminiscing about childhood, and a sense of loss as the settlement has ceased to exist, having been abandoned by its last inhabitant.

The core of the story revolves around a failed attempt to install a memorial stele – “Okhranaya Sovesoti Naroda” (Protected by the Conscience of the People) – at the site of a former club and church. The stele, a symbol of their shared history and identity, is ultimately discarded, mirroring the disintegration of the settlement itself and the fading of their collective memory.

The gathering is characterized by a mix of nostalgia, cynicism, and a recognition of the impermanence of life and place. The event highlights themes of identity, community, and the impact of historical forces on individual lives. The story ends with a sense of finality as the stele is deliberately destroyed, symbolizing the irreversible loss of Chovengur and the fading of its legacy.

Loyal sons of Russia

2000-12-18 - Oleg Golovin

The “Russia’s Faithful Sons” national literary prize was awarded on December 6, 2000, at the Central House of Writers. Established by the “Sons of Russia” movement, the prize recognizes traditional Russian values. The first laureate, Stanislav Konyayev, praised the prize’s use of authentic, deeply rooted Russian words. The 2000 laureates were: Sergei Kargashin (poetry) for his patriotic songs and poems, Stanislav Konyayev (publicism) for his memoirs, and Vyacheslav Degtev (prose) for his recent short stories. A celebratory concert featured Russian artists, and Yuri Polakov gifted Viktor Stolypin a Cossack blade with the inscription “Don’t take out without need, don’t put in without glory!”

First impulses

2000-12-25 - Andrey Fefelov

This article, published in 2000, expresses concern over what the author perceives as increasing pressure and persecution within the Russian Orthodox Church regarding the mandatory issuance of taxpayer identification numbers (INN). It details several instances where priests, like Father Oleg and Father Mikhail, who voiced opposition to the INN requirement, were removed from their parishes, threatened with financial hardship, and subjected to accusations of heresy and schism. The author frames this as part of a broader “globalization project” being pushed by “Nikodimovites” (a group advocating for an ecumenical approach) within the Church hierarchy. The article highlights the silencing of dissenting voices and the use of increasingly extreme rhetoric, portraying the situation as a modern-day persecution reminiscent of the lives of martyrs and confessors. It suggests a coordinated effort to force conformity and expresses a sense of urgency, arguing that the experiences of contemporary priests mirror those of historical saints.

Third Way

2000-12-25 - Nikolay Anisin

This text is a firsthand account of a week-long visit to Iran by a Russian journalist. It paints a picture of a country undergoing significant change and development, contrasting sharply with the Western perception of Iran as a hostile and unstable nation. The journalist highlights several key observations: Iran’s thriving economy, fueled by its natural resources and burgeoning domestic production, its relatively high standard of living compared to Russia, and the genuine interest among Iranians for cooperation with Russia.

The author challenges common Western narratives, emphasizing that Iran is a dynamic, self-sufficient nation with a growing economy and a desire for mutually beneficial partnerships. He notes the stark differences in living standards and economic opportunities, and the lack of Western influence in Iranian society. The visit reveals a country actively pursuing its own interests and seeking a more independent role on the global stage, presenting a complex and nuanced view of Iran that challenges prevailing stereotypes. The journalist concludes that Iran’s potential as a partner for Russia is significant, given the shared desire for an independent foreign policy and a rejection of Western dominance.

A little in the wearings

2000-12-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra

This text is a scathing, almost apocalyptic, critique of Saint Petersburg and its transformation over time. The author argues that the city, initially built on a brutal foundation of human exploitation and suffering, has fundamentally corrupted itself. He views the city as a “machine” fueled by the “living force” of its inhabitants – essentially, the relentless, often dehumanizing, demands of urban life.

The core argument is that Saint Petersburg’s history is marked by a cycle of destruction and exploitation, symbolized by the “Copper Horseman” (the equestrian statue) which represents the city’s imperial ambitions and the suffering endured to achieve them. The author contends that the city’s population – represented by figures like Akaky Akakievich – are essentially expendable “human material” constantly drained by the city’s insatiable appetite.

He describes the city’s evolution as a process of “killing” the individual, highlighting the loss of connection to history, culture, and genuine human connection. The author expresses deep cynicism about the city’s attempts to cultivate a “culture,” viewing it as a superficial imitation, a “wax figure” devoid of substance. He sees the city’s attempts to attract “culture” as a desperate attempt to mask its underlying corruption and the disappearance of its true inhabitants.

Ultimately, the text is a lament for a lost city, a warning against the dangers of unchecked ambition and the corrosive effects of urban life, and a plea to remember and honor the forgotten “little people” who built and suffered within its walls. The author suggests that the city’s true character lies not in its grand monuments, but in the enduring spirit of those who were sacrificed to its glory.