Summary of a sample of Zavtra.ru articles published in 1997
LLM-generated content, may include inaccuracies
This page includes LLM-generated summaries of articles published on Russian weekly newspaper Zavtra. They may be useful for a first overview of the contents published by Zavtra, but they have not been reviewed and they almost certainly include inaccuracies.
Clicking on the title of each article will bring you to the original publication on Zavtra’s official website.
This page includes an LLM-generated summary of a random sample of 148 articles out of a total of 1 481 articles published in 1997 (coverage: 10%). For more context, details on how this was implemented, and links to other years, see the index page.
Action form
1997-01-06 - Vladimir Vinnikov
This text explores the concept of “style” as a fundamental relationship between culture and action, arguing that a decline in this “big style” is evident in contemporary Russia. It posits that style shapes our understanding of the world and fundamentally alters our being through our actions. The author critiques the post-modernist “polystylism” prevalent in Russia, highlighting a disconnect between theory and practice.
The core argument centers on the importance of purposeful action and the recognition of a “crisis of purpose” within Soviet and post-Soviet society. The author uses examples, including Soviet-era “serial” anecdotes (like Shirliuk and Chapayev) and contemporary phenomena like the “new Russians” and the rise of criminality, to illustrate this crisis.
Ultimately, the text suggests that a shift is needed towards a “style of great work,” emphasizing genuine action and productivity rather than superficial displays of style. It concludes with a call for a renewed focus on purposeful activity and a rejection of empty gestures, suggesting that a truly significant “style” can only emerge from a commitment to real work and a rejection of destructive tendencies.Postmodern times
1997-01-13 - Vladimir Bondarenko
The text is a 1997 analysis of post-modernism in Russia, arguing that it represents the “end of history” – a state where traditional ideologies, heroes, and grand narratives have been systematically rejected. The author contends that Russia, like much of the world, has fallen into this post-modern condition, characterized by a pervasive sense of irony, parody, and self-deprecation. Key themes include the dismissal of historical figures and events, the absence of leadership or decisive action, and a general lack of belief in any positive future. The author critiques prominent figures and cultural trends, including the work of writers like Viktor Astafiev and the rise of a “post-modern” artistic sensibility. Ultimately, the text expresses concern that Russia is trapped in this state, with young people increasingly rejecting post-modern cynicism in favor of a return to heroic ideals and leadership.
Actor Orlov Vasily
1997-01-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text explores the legacy of Konstantin Stanislavsky and his influence on Russian theatre, particularly through the work of actor Vasily Alexandrovich Orlov. It details Orlov’s exceptional performances, notably as Kulygin in Chekhov’s plays, highlighting his ability to embody realistic and complex characters, rejecting rigid “typecasting.” The text contrasts Stanislavsky’s approach – emphasizing an actor’s emotional connection and “feeling” as the primary driver of performance – with the idea that the actor should “go from themselves” to the role.
It emphasizes the importance of Chekhov’s plays and the Theatre Studio’s (MKhAT) commitment to portraying authentic human experiences. The text describes the collaborative and almost reverent relationship between Stanislavsky, Vasily Popov, and Orlov, illustrated by a memorable backstage encounter. It also outlines the ethical boundaries within Russian theatre, where characters are protected from external interference, mirroring the play’s own themes of privacy and inner life. Finally, it recounts the initial challenges and collaborative spirit surrounding the revival of Chekhov’s “Kulygin,” emphasizing the unique and profound connection Orlov forged with the role, solidifying his status as a pivotal figure in the history of Russian theatre.Asylum
1997-01-13 - Anatoliy Afanasʹyev
This excerpt from Anatoly Afanasiev’s novel “Shed of the Mind” depicts a surreal and unsettling encounter within a psychiatric institution. The story unfolds through the perspective of a man who finds himself inexplicably admitted to a bleak facility, where he interacts with a series of bizarre and emotionally detached characters, most notably Zinaida Petrovna, a nurse with a surprisingly intimate connection to him. The narrative is characterized by a dreamlike quality, with illogical events and conversations, highlighting themes of isolation, disorientation, and the fragility of identity. The encounter with Zinaida Petrovna is particularly significant, marked by a brief, intense moment of physical intimacy that further contributes to the story’s unsettling atmosphere. The excerpt establishes a core conflict – the protagonist’s struggle to understand his situation and his growing sense of alienation within this strange environment.
Dashboard
1997-01-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text, dated January 14, 1997, details a complex web of political maneuvering and strategic planning surrounding President Yeltsin and the Russian government. Key themes include intense political consultations among top officials regarding Yeltsin’s health and potential constitutional changes. There’s a significant focus on power struggles within the government, particularly between figures associated with Yeltsin (like Chubais) and those seeking to influence him (like Luzkhov).
The text reveals extensive, covert operations orchestrated by American intelligence agencies, aiming to destabilize governments in Belgrade and Sofia through “color revolutions.” American financial and corporate interests are deeply involved in restructuring Russian assets, including major banks, oil companies, and potentially even satellite and communications industries.
There’s a concerted effort to discredit and remove Yeltsin from power, fueled by anxieties about Russian nationalism and the influence of figures like Korzhakov. The text highlights a coordinated campaign of disinformation and propaganda, supported by both American and Russian actors, with the goal of manipulating public opinion and shaping political outcomes. Finally, it suggests a planned, and potentially orchestrated, shift in Russian policy, including a possible agreement with NATO and a strategy to preempt constitutional changes driven by Yeltsin’s declining health.OIL OF THE COLOR OF BLOOD
1997-01-13 - Marina Volchkova
This article, published in 1997, critiques the state of the Russian economy, specifically focusing on the oil industry. It highlights several interconnected issues: the privatization of major oil companies like Yukos and Sidanko, the strategic importance of the Kamchatka region for oil transport, and the resulting vulnerabilities within the Russian economy. The article argues that the government’s mismanagement of strategic reserves, coupled with the chaotic privatization process and the control of oil transit by Chechnya, created significant instability. It points to the tragic sinking of the tanker “Nakhodka” as a symptom of these problems, emphasizing the lack of oversight and the potential for exploitation. The author expresses concern about the concentration of power within the oil industry, the lack of revenue flowing to the Russian people, and the overall lack of accountability within the government. The piece paints a picture of a system rife with corruption and instability, driven by the control of a vital resource.
To the Kremlin!
1997-01-27 - Pëtr Alëshkin
The text recounts the final moments of Major Razin, a fighter pilot, who deliberately crashed his plane into the banks of the Moscow River during a training flight. Initially, Razin experienced a surge of patriotic fervor and a sense of fulfilling his duty for Russia and his people, fueled by the impending mission. However, a deep-seated anxiety and concern persisted, highlighted by his close relationship with Captain Pugachev and his family, including Razin’s children, Igor and Marina.
As the flight progressed, Razin’s thoughts turned to the potential consequences of his actions, particularly regarding his family’s future and the impact on his children. He wrestled with the realization that his actions would likely lead to further suffering and hardship for them.
Ultimately, Razin made the fateful decision to crash his plane, driven by a desperate desire to prevent further harm and a profound sense of disillusionment with the situation. The text concludes with the official recognition of Razin’s bravery and sacrifice, despite the tragic outcome of his actions.MOSCOW GRAFFITI IN THE ERA OF FISH
1997-01-27 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a series of reviews and observations about several graphic art exhibitions in Moscow during 1997. It begins with critiques of “Moscow Graphics in the Era of Fish,” a show featuring Dina Yelceva and Vladimir Luborov, finding both works flawed – Yelceva’s naive art lacking coherence and Luborov’s depicting a bleak rural scene as an insult to the Russian people. The text then shifts to a review of a large international graphic exhibition at the Central House of Artists (CDH), highlighting over 500 works from various Soviet and Eastern European artists, with a dominant focus on landscape and genre scenes, and noting the challenges faced by artists in the current market. Finally, it details a smaller exhibition by the Moscow Graphics Association (MOSHa), emphasizing the limited opportunities for artists and concluding with a celebratory banquet and reflections on the difficulties of organizing artistic events.
TREACHEROUS
1997-02-03 - Vladislav Shurygin
The text recounts a reconnaissance mission in the mountains of the Caucasus, undertaken by a small group of Russian soldiers. The mission’s primary goal was to “strengthen the established order” – essentially, to conduct a covert operation against Chechen insurgents. The soldiers, led by Captain Shurygin, describe their methodical approach, emphasizing discipline, attention to detail, and a surprising capacity for empathy towards their enemy.
Throughout the mission, the group encounters various challenges, including ambushes, the discovery of a “Chechen” base, and the capture of a prisoner. Notably, the soldiers demonstrate a willingness to treat the prisoner with respect, ultimately deciding to release him, attributing this decision to the prisoner’s “Russian character” and their ability to feel compassion even for an enemy.
The narrative highlights the soldiers’ experience, their psychological resilience, and the complex dynamics within the group, showcasing a blend of military professionalism and human emotion amidst the harsh realities of war. The story concludes with the release of the prisoner, leaving a sense of bittersweet reflection on the nature of conflict and the unexpected connections forged within it.What was, was.
1997-02-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text recounts the author’s experiences as a writer in the Soviet Union from the late 1960s through the 1980s, focusing on the insidious influence of Western culture and, more significantly, the deliberate manipulation of Soviet society by pro-Western forces. The narrative details a concerted effort, allegedly orchestrated by figures like Allen Dulles, to undermine the USSR through the introduction of “pseudo-culture,” primarily American popular culture, and the infiltration of Soviet institutions by agents of influence, including Jewish intellectuals and figures associated with organizations like Mossad.
The author describes a climate of ideological struggle, fueled by a perceived “cultural invasion” and the actions of “agents of influence” within the Communist Party and cultural organizations. He details his own attempts to resist this influence, alongside other writers who opposed the “consolidation” policy imposed by the Soviet leadership, which he viewed as a surrender to Western pressure. He recounts a specific incident involving a letter he drafted criticizing the situation, which was intercepted by the Committee for State Security (KGB) and subsequently used to discredit him and other dissenting writers.
The narrative highlights the author’s frustration with the manipulation of public opinion, the suppression of genuine artistic expression, and the pervasive presence of pro-Western ideologies within the Soviet cultural landscape. He describes a complex web of relationships and betrayals, involving figures within the Communist Party, the KGB, and various cultural organizations, all seemingly working to undermine the Soviet Union from within. The text concludes with a reflection on the ongoing struggle between genuine artistic expression and the forces of cultural manipulation, and a sobering assessment of the impact of these forces on Soviet society.Premiere: The limit of the Russian Revolution has not been reached.
1997-02-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text presents a darkly satirical and paranoid vision of Russia in 1997, suggesting a desperate attempt to prepare for a “Russian Revolution” – a catastrophic upheaval. It describes a clandestine operation involving prominent figures (politicians, bankers, media personalities, military officials) who are secretly relocating to a massive, custom-built “Ark” (Ковчег) designed to house them and a select group of individuals in the event of a violent revolution.
The Ark is being financed by major banks and populated with individuals from various sectors of society, including those considered enemies of the current regime. The underlying premise is that a popular uprising is inevitable and that this group is preparing to survive and potentially rebuild Russia after a violent revolution, possibly even relocating to Ararat to repopulate.
The text uses vivid, hyperbolic language to depict a deeply distrustful and volatile atmosphere, fueled by widespread anger and resentment towards the government. It suggests a sense of impending doom and a belief that a violent revolution is not just possible, but almost predetermined, and that the elite are desperately trying to escape its consequences. The Ark is presented as a last resort, a means of preserving a select few amidst a chaotic and destructive event.BRIGHT MEMORY OF THE DISTINGUISHED RUSSIAN POET
1997-02-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The provided text is a collection of recollections and tributes to the Russian poet Vladimir Sokolov. It’s comprised of excerpts from interviews, essays, and reflections from various individuals who knew and admired him. Sokolov is portrayed as a deeply rooted, classically-influenced poet, characterized by his unwavering connection to Russia, his spiritual depth, and his resistance to superficial trends in contemporary poetry. Many of the contributors emphasize his profound musicality, his ability to evoke a sense of timelessness, and his quiet dignity in the face of personal and societal challenges. Several individuals highlight his resistance to commercialism and his commitment to preserving a traditional, spiritually-oriented poetic voice. Recurring themes include his enduring love for Russia, his spiritual grounding, and the importance of preserving a genuine, uncorrupted poetic sensibility. The text paints a picture of Sokolov as a significant and enduring figure in Russian literature, respected for his integrity and artistic vision.
February 23rd
1997-02-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
On February 23rd, the newspaper celebrates the Day of the Soviet Army and Navy. A veteran, Mikhail Titov, gifted the newspaper a military award on the 50th anniversary of Victory Day. The newspaper will continue to fight against enemies of the Fatherland until justice is served. The newspaper wishes all patriots a celebratory holiday, honoring the traditions of previous generations.
Cutting-edge (headline: CHUBAYS as a Mirror of the Russian Revolution)
1997-03-03 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text presents a highly critical and conspiratorial view of events following the collapse of the Soviet Union, focusing on the roles of figures like Yegor Gaidar (implied as “Чубайс”), Yevgeny Primakov (“Черномырдина”), and others in exacerbating economic and social problems in Russia. It depicts a deliberate plan by these individuals, aided by bankers and Western influence, to exploit the chaos and consolidate power, leading to widespread poverty, social unrest, and ultimately, a new revolutionary upheaval. The author argues that the public is being manipulated through misinformation and that a genuine opposition is lacking. The solution proposed is for the people to directly engage with the issues, bypassing the established political structures and confronting the perceived oppressors directly. The overall tone is apocalyptic, suggesting a bleak future for Russia if the current trajectory continues.
Forgotten Marshal
1997-03-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Former Soviet Minister of Defence, Marshal Dmitry Yazov, is being sidelined by the Russian government, mirroring the fate of Marshal Zhukov, who was also illegally dismissed from service. Yazov, along with only four other Marshals of the Soviet Union remaining, is now living a modest life, stripped of privileges and seen as a symbol of loyalty to the Fatherland by Vladimir Zhirinovsky and the Russian people. His efforts to prevent the collapse of the Soviet Union were unsuccessful, and he experienced a similar fate to Zhukov, with his wife tragically dying in a car accident.
Flies on the Constitutio
1997-03-10 - Mariya Mamikonyan
This text, written in 1997, analyzes the escalating political instability in Russia, primarily focusing on the ongoing tensions surrounding Chechnya and the broader implications for the country’s federal structure. The author argues that a series of events, including President Yeltsin’s public appearance and the appointment of a like-minded Constitutional Court chairman, have exacerbated existing problems.
A central theme is the perceived “error” in the Chechen war, a revelation that significantly undermined Yeltsin’s attempts to discredit him. The author highlights the strategic importance of this admission, recognizing it as a key factor in shifting the political landscape.
The text explores a growing trend of regional defiance, with numerous governors challenging federal authority and seeking greater autonomy, fueled by a lack of trust in the central government. This is intertwined with a resurgence of separatist sentiments, particularly concerning Chechnya, where calls for greater self-determination and even the creation of a Russian republic are gaining traction.
Several prominent figures, including Mikhail Shaimiev, advocate for constitutional reforms that would grant greater rights and autonomy to regions, often echoing Mikhail Gefter’s ideas for a confederated Russia. The author suggests that these efforts, combined with the ongoing instability, are contributing to a deliberate dismantling of the Russian Federation.
Ultimately, the piece paints a picture of a Russia teetering on the brink of disintegration, with regional leaders exploiting the situation to advance their own agendas, often guided by a nostalgic vision of a unified Russia, but one fundamentally reshaped by regional power. The author concludes that the situation is being deliberately manipulated, with the goal of fundamentally altering the country’s political and territorial structure.Natalia Rozhkova
1997-03-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The poem explores themes of loss, memory, and the passage of time through fragmented imagery and recurring motifs. It depicts a cyclical existence marked by fleeting moments, fading memories, and a sense of impending doom. The speaker experiences a series of brief encounters – a dying fire, a cold night, a lonely mother, and ultimately, a return to a familiar, yet ultimately empty, routine. Recurring elements like the moon, rain, and the sound of a harmonica suggest a relentless, melancholic journey. The poem culminates in a final farewell, emphasizing the inevitability of endings and the desire for connection amidst isolation.
From the Patriotic Information Burea
1997-03-17 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
The text describes a growing wave of protests across Russia, escalating from passive resistance to active measures like blocking transportation and utilities. It predicts devastating consequences from the ongoing reforms, leading to increased hardship and mortality, and encouraging open defiance. A large-scale march is planned, with slogans criticizing key figures and the reforms themselves. The text calls for the removal of “reformist criminals” and the establishment of a government of popular trust.
Dashboard
1997-03-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a highly fragmented and speculative collection of intelligence reports and analyses circulating in the Russian political landscape in early 1997. It details a complex web of power struggles within the Yeltsin administration, primarily between factions led by figures like Anatoly Chubais and Boris Yeltsin himself, alongside external actors like Gorbachev, and foreign intelligence services, particularly those of Turkey and Iran.
The core narrative revolves around a deliberate effort to destabilize Russia and divide it along ethnic and regional lines. This is being orchestrated through a combination of political manipulation, disinformation campaigns, and the promotion of separatist agendas. Key elements include:
- Power Struggles: Intense infighting within the Russian government, driven by personal ambitions, ideological differences, and control over resources.
- External Interference: Active involvement of foreign intelligence services (Turkey, Iran, Germany) in supporting separatist movements and undermining Russian sovereignty.
- Separatist Agendas: Promotion of separatist movements in the Caucasus and Central Asia, aiming to create a new “Caucasian Confederation” with potential ties to Turkey and Ukraine.
- Economic Manipulation: Plans to exploit Russia’s economic vulnerabilities, including the potential for currency devaluation and the redirection of energy resources.
- Geopolitical Strategy: A broader strategy to weaken Russia’s influence in the region and potentially recreate elements of the Soviet Union through a federalized structure.
Fake on ORT
1997-03-17 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
In March 1997, a fraudulent broadcast by Vladimir Doroshenko falsely claimed Russian helicopter pilots were dropping dead soldiers from helicopters in Chechnya. This deception is attributed to enemy propaganda and reflects the moral character of Doroshenko, who is accused of being willing to distort public values for financial gain. The Ministry of Defense should respond to this provocation.
And no debts!
1997-03-17 - Valeriy Fateyev
This text is a scathing critique of the ongoing debate surrounding the return of cultural property seized by the Soviet Union from Germany after World War II. It argues that the insistence on returning these “trophies” is rooted in the enduring, and frankly alarming, nationalistic instincts of Germany, particularly those reminiscent of figures like Tacitus. The author contends that the Soviet Union rightfully acquired these items as compensation for the immense damage inflicted by German aggression, and that demands for their return are driven by a refusal to acknowledge responsibility for this destruction.
The text highlights a series of historical events and figures to support this argument, including the Teheran, Yalta, and Potsdam conferences, the involvement of prominent scholars like Graabar and Vavilov, and the continued presence of neo-Nazi sentiments within Germany. It points to ongoing acts of vandalism and hate crimes perpetrated by extremist groups, emphasizing that the current demands for restitution are not a genuine effort at reconciliation but rather a continuation of historical aggression.
Crucially, the author stresses the lack of legal basis for these claims, citing the 1995 New York conference which affirmed that discussions about returning the items were morally and legally unacceptable without considering Russia’s losses. The text concludes with a call for a new international convention to hold aggressors accountable for the destruction of cultural heritage, drawing on the UN Charter to underscore the permanence of these claims.WATTLE BEANS
1997-03-24 - Aleksandr Lyskov
The text describes a cynical and politically charged scenario involving key figures in post-Soviet Russia – Nemyotov, Chubais, and Chernomyrdin – and a system of “shunts” (organ transplants) used to influence and control the government. Nemyotov, a rising political figure, is being strategically “donated” to the government through these transplants to gain power, while Chubais, representing banking capital, and the increasingly weakened Chernomyrdin, representing a reformed, but still manipulated, system, are being managed through this process. The “shunts” are likened to a draining of resources from the new government, with the older “shunts” failing and new ones being introduced with a two-year lifespan. The text portrays a power struggle, highlighting the manipulation and control exerted by Chubais and the strategic use of Nemyotov, alongside the declining influence of Chernomyrdin and the chaotic attempts to stabilize the economy.
FLASH AND NOTHING CENTRAL BANK
1997-03-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text, written in 1997, details the economic situation in Russia, primarily focusing on the role and challenges of the Central Bank (ЦБ) and the Ministry of Finance (Минфин). It highlights a series of interconnected issues including the problematic use of векселя (bills of exchange), the influence of foreign models (particularly the British and American), and the deep-seated economic crisis.
The core argument is that the Central Bank, under the leadership of S. Dubinin, is failing to effectively address the crisis due to its reliance on outdated, simplistic techniques – primarily selling rubles for dollars – and its inability to fully develop a functioning domestic market. The reliance on векселя, coupled with the dominance of imports and a struggling export sector, creates a precarious situation.
Several key points are made: the Ministry of Finance is struggling with a severe budget deficit, the Central Bank is hampered by a lack of authority and influence, and the broader economic landscape is characterized by a lack of dynamism and a reliance on foreign models that aren’t suited to Russia’s circumstances.
The text suggests two potential solutions: a drastic reduction in government spending or a concerted effort to develop a robust internal market, with the Central Bank playing a crucial role in establishing a functioning domestic currency system – essentially, a second “Mongolfier” to support domestic demand. Finally, the text proposes a new approach for the opposition, suggesting they should actively challenge the government’s policies, but only if the Central Bank is simultaneously taking steps to foster a thriving internal market.(ANNOUNCEMENTS)
1997-03-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
On April 8, 1997, poet Igor Lypin will hold a creative evening at the Central House of the Russian Army Chamber Hall (Ploshchad Kommuny, house 2) to present his new book, “She Is Called Russia,” published by “Golos” (Moscow, 1997). The event will be hosted by Valery Ganichev, Chairman of the Union of Russian Writers. The event begins at 6:30 PM. Contact information: 923-65-31, 246-64-51.
YELTSIN, LIKE PETRA THE FIRST’S NIGHT SLIPPER
1997-03-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a satirical critique of Russian President Boris Yeltsin, comparing him unfavorably to Peter the Great. It argues that Yeltsin has dismantled the achievements of Peter the Great, squandering Russia’s wealth, destroying industry and culture, and generally behaving as a corrupt and incompetent ruler. The comparison is made through vivid, often absurd imagery – Yeltsin is depicted as a fraudulent imitation of Peter, with a decaying, worthless costume, a plastic throne, and a hollow, empty personality. The text emphasizes the contrast between Peter’s ambitious, transformative actions and Yeltsin’s perceived failures, concluding with a pessimistic outlook and a return to Pushkin’s call to arms.
Who is that boy?
1997-03-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This transcript, delivered by Vladimir Zhirinovsky, is a scathing critique of Boris Yeltsin’s leadership and the state of Russia in the 1990s. Zhirinovsky argues that Yeltsin’s government is riddled with corruption, incompetence, and a deliberate disregard for the well-being of the Russian people. He uses a series of specific examples – including the “boy” (a young man who appeared to support Yeltsin), the economic mismanagement of the Nizhny Novgorod region, the collapse of industries like the Sormovsky shipyard, rising crime rates, drug addiction, and the manipulation of statistics – to illustrate his claims.
Zhirinovsky accuses Yeltsin’s inner circle – a network of “Boris” figures – of actively benefiting from the country’s decline, highlighting instances of embezzlement and the suppression of political opposition, exemplified by the imprisonment of businessman Klementyev. He suggests a deliberate conspiracy to protect these figures and maintain control. Finally, he makes a shocking accusation: that Yeltsin’s own inner circle was involved in planning his assassination. The entire speech is a passionate, accusatory indictment of the Yeltsin era.Wind on the waves!
1997-04-01 - Vladimir Bondarenko
This text is a firsthand account by Vladimir Bondarenko describing a massive, spontaneous anti-Yeltsin demonstration on Dvorцова Square in St. Petersburg in March 1997. The demonstration, fueled by widespread discontent with the government, economic hardship, and rising prices, drew a crowd of over 30,000 people. Bondarenko highlights the city’s transformation into a hotbed of resistance, noting its industrial and population significance and the stark contrast with the wealthier, more prosperous Moscow.
The account details the chaotic and passionate nature of the protest, featuring a diverse group of participants including disgruntled workers, students, nationalists, and even figures like Slava Marichev. The governor, Yakovlev, was largely ignored and ridiculed by the crowd. Bondarenko emphasizes the city’s transformation into a site of resistance, comparing the situation to the Albanian situation and suggesting a need to “learn from the Albanians” – to prepare for a fight against Yeltsin. The article concludes with a celebratory assessment of the demonstration as a successful “first lesson” in Russian resistance, symbolized by the headline “Russian, learn Albanian!”For Lukashenko – into the 21st Century!
1997-04-01 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
This text outlines the complex and evolving relationship between Russia and Belarus, focusing on the ongoing attempts to forge a union despite significant obstacles and competing viewpoints. It details three primary projects: one centered around formal institutionalization and technological integration, another actively opposing Belarusian President Lukashenko, and a third supporting Lukashenko’s vision.
The discussion highlights the significant media manipulation surrounding the issue, with mainstream Russian outlets deliberately marginalizing the project. Key figures, including Alexander Prokhanov and Oleg Rumyantsev, analyze the historical stages of the Belarus-Russia project, noting its initial optimism, subsequent setbacks due to political maneuvering, and the eventual “blef” or bluff surrounding the project.
The text emphasizes the importance of a genuine, grassroots support for the union, recognizing that the project’s success hinges on a shared vision and a willingness to overcome political divisions. It suggests that the current media landscape actively works against this, fueling a counter-narrative aimed at undermining Lukashenko and the broader union effort. Ultimately, the text argues that despite the challenges, the underlying desire for a closer relationship between the two nations remains strong and that a successful union is achievable if the right conditions – primarily a shift in the media narrative and a commitment to genuine collaboration – are met.STUDIO “KRAKH”
1997-04-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text recounts the history of the “Centranuchfilm” studio, established in the 1940s in Khimki-Khovrino, Moscow, during the post-war period. Initially a highly successful and innovative studio producing scientific, educational, and military films, it was instrumental in training soldiers and disseminating scientific knowledge. Key figures like Georgiy Mel’nik, Marshal Zhukov, and Bulgakov played crucial roles in its development and funding. The studio’s output was remarkable, producing over 100 films annually and pioneering techniques like combined, animation, and space-related filmmaking. However, following the decline of Soviet ideology and the associated funding, the studio drastically reduced its output and fell into disrepair, with most of its skilled staff facing poverty and unemployment. The text paints a poignant picture of a once-great institution now reduced to a shadow of its former self, highlighting the tragic fate of its dedicated filmmakers and the broader consequences of ideological shifts and economic hardship.
Smoke from the Kuzbass cauldro
1997-04-01 - Nikolay Anisin
In Prokhopyevsk, a mining town, transport ceased to operate on March 27th, with 15,000 people gathering on the main square, including a delegation marching eight kilometers from the Thyрган district. Miners supported Yeltsin’s regime, which provided for them until their needs diminished. A miner, Sergei Soludanov, was fatally injured by a live shell, and his family received no compensation for his funeral, marking a shift in the regime’s attitude. Growing discontent led to calls for elections and protests against Yeltsin, Prime Minister Chernomyrdin, and Chubais. The local administration fled protests, and the region was increasingly driven by political demands. The situation in the Kuzbass region was described as a “smoking pot” directed towards the Kremlin, signifying growing unrest and opposition.
No!
1997-04-01 - Aleksandr Boroday
A large, predominantly Cossack, protest took place in Rostov-on-Don and surrounding areas in Southern Russia, expressing resistance to the government and demanding action against Chechen expansion. The demonstrations involved burning effigies of figures like Nemtsov and Chubais, and were led by the CPRF. Miners in several cities also staged protests, with government officials offering concessions to maintain order. The events signify a unified and defiant stance against the perceived occupation regime in Southern Russia.
advertisemen
1997-04-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The sixth issue of the Moscow Writers’ “Literary Crossings” oral newspaper will be held on April 11th at 18:30 in the Conference Hall of the Moscow Branch of the Union of Russian Writers (B. Nikitskaya, 50/5; “Barrikadnaya” metro station). The event will feature speakers including priests and writers, discussing “The Pillar and Affirmation of Truth…” focusing on the heroes of Russia in the 20th century: Fr. P. Florensky, Archbishop Luka (Voyno-Yasenetsky), and Fr. Anatoly (from Grozny). Speakers include O. Andronik, V. Bondarenko, T. Glushkova, L. Malceva, V. Nikitin, P. Palamarchuk, Fr. Filipp, A. Ryzhov, P. V. Florensky, and T. Shutova. The event will be hosted by G. Mitin. Admission is free.
KOROBEYNIKI – THAT’S US!
1997-04-08 - Mikhail Mezentsev
The text describes a performance art piece by the “Korebnyiki” (Little Boxes) theatre group, a satirical and chaotic street performance involving young men dressed as cardboard cutouts of prominent Russian figures – Yeltsin, Chernomyrdin, and others. They move through Moscow crowds, deliberately provoking reactions and engaging in a bizarre, almost ritualistic interaction with the public. The performance utilizes a chaotic, repetitive movement, deliberately disrupting the flow of pedestrian traffic and eliciting amusement and confusion. The group’s aim seems to be to create a spectacle, commenting on Russian politics and society through this absurd and confrontational art form. The performance culminates in a seemingly random, almost accidental destruction of the cardboard figures, further emphasizing the ephemeral and ultimately meaningless nature of the situation. The group views themselves as a “theatre of mass agitation,” drawing inspiration from Russian folklore and aiming to create a “theatre of mass” experience.
VETERANS – IN FORMATION
1997-04-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The Coordinating Council of the Union of Patriotic Organizations of Russia (NPSR) rejected a proposal by a veterans’ group to establish a “Union of Veterans of Russia” under the NPSR, deeming it unnecessary due to the existing unified veterans’ organization in Russia. The Presidium decided to establish a Committee on Veterans Affairs within the NPSR, which would coordinate with existing veteran organizations to promote unity and support for veterans in the name of restoring the Russian state and providing social protection.
Western Unconventionality (Russia and the World)
1997-04-08 - Sergey Kurginyan
This text, written in 1997, analyzes the evolving geopolitical landscape following the collapse of the Soviet Union, primarily focusing on Russia’s relationship with the West, particularly the United States. It critiques the prevailing Western approach, embodied by figures like Condoleezza Rice (referred to as “Олбрайт”), arguing that it’s driven by a desire to control Russia’s direction and prevent it from becoming a significant global power.
The author expresses skepticism about the rapid expansion of NATO, viewing it as a deliberate attempt to isolate and diminish Russia. He highlights the role of figures like Yevgeny Primakov, suggesting he was manipulated into facilitating NATO expansion for personal gain rather than strategic Russian interests. The text argues that Russia’s attempts to engage with the West were hampered by a lack of internal unity and a failure to address fundamental issues within the country.
It emphasizes the importance of Russia’s internal development and the need for a consolidated nation capable of reclaiming its historical legacy. The author suggests that Russia’s geopolitical ambitions are constrained by a complex web of international relationships, including those with China, the “third world,” and the remnants of the Soviet bloc.
Ultimately, the text advocates for a more cautious and strategic approach for Russia, urging it to avoid being dictated to by Western agendas and to focus on building a strong and independent future. It concludes with a pessimistic assessment of Russia’s prospects, suggesting that its attempts to navigate the new world order will be fraught with challenges and require a fundamental shift in its internal dynamics.BELOVEZHT-2
1997-04-08 - Aleksandr Prokudin
The text is a cynical commentary on the signing of the Belarus-Russia Union Treaty (Belovezh-2) and the surrounding political maneuvering. It argues that the treaty was not a genuine attempt at cooperation, but rather a carefully orchestrated scheme by Western forces – particularly through figures like Chubais, Nemtsov, and Yavlinsky – to prevent a strong, unified Russia. The author suggests that the treaty’s purpose was to maintain the disunity of Russia and prevent a resurgence of Soviet-era alliances. The “young wolves,” representing Western interests, were used to create a climate of fear and opposition, distracting from the true goals of the agreement. The author views the entire process as a deliberate manipulation of public opinion and a strategic move to undermine Russia’s potential for a strong, independent future.
WANT TO BE A DEPUTY – BE ONE!
1997-04-08 - Dmitriy Agranovskiy
This text recounts the experiences of Dmitry Agranov and his team’s campaign to become city council members in Electrostal, Russia, in 1997. They employed a grassroots strategy of door-to-door campaigning, focusing on direct engagement with residents, particularly older voters, and emphasizing their commitment to traditional values and a rejection of “reform.” The team, comprised of four individuals, utilized a simple, labor-intensive approach, prioritizing genuine conversations over flashy promises. They faced skepticism and occasional bizarre encounters, but ultimately secured four seats on the council, noting that most voters were older individuals who prioritized the interests of the nation over personal gain. The campaign highlighted a disconnect between younger, reform-oriented politicians and the concerns of the older generation, and emphasized the importance of direct engagement and a focus on core values. The author concludes by encouraging young communists and patriots to join the CPRF and NPSR, asserting that their time is coming.
VICE-PREMIER ON THE RUN…
1997-04-08 - Aleksandr Boroday
The text argues that Shamil Basayev’s appointment as First Vice Premier of Chechnya signifies a new, violent phase in the conflict. Basayev, a terrorist and murderer of Russian women, is now the dominant figure, supported by influential Chechen clans and seeking a share in the Caspian oil pipeline. This move, facilitated by figures like Rybkin, legitimizes Basayev and signals a readiness for renewed warfare against Russia. The author suggests Basayev’s motivations are driven by ambition and a desire for lasting notoriety, and predicts further bloodshed across Russian regions.
cutting-edge (headline: BRIBING THE PRESIDENT)
1997-04-14 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a scathing critique of Russian President Yeltsin and his administration, portraying them as deeply corrupt and exploitative. It argues that Yeltsin inherited a massive bribe from enemies of Russia, perpetuated by a network of powerful figures including figures like Chubais, Schumeyko, and others involved in illicit dealings with foreign entities and the exploitation of Russian resources. The author uses vivid imagery and accusations of theft, corruption, and manipulation to depict Yeltsin’s regime as a criminal enterprise, draining the nation’s wealth and resources while presenting a false image of prosperity to the Russian people. The overall tone is one of outrage and condemnation, suggesting a profound betrayal of the Russian people and a systematic dismantling of the country’s future.
RETURN OF BITTERNESS
1997-04-14 - Galina Orekhanova
The play “The Return of the Bitter” by Galina Orekhanova is a review of a production by the Moscow Art Theatre (MKhAT) of Maxim Gorky’s “The Zhukovs,” directed by Alexei Morozov. The production, featuring performances by actors like Valeri Gatayev, Valentina Klemen’tseva, and Tatiana Doronina, explores themes of moral decay and the stagnation of Russian society, particularly in the early 20th century.
The play highlights the conflict between generations, symbolized by characters like Antipa Zhukov (played by Valeri Gatayev), a man consumed by greed and a desire for social status, and Sofia, a woman of intelligence and spiritual depth. The production emphasizes the importance of faith, human connection, and the struggle for a better future, mirroring Gorky’s own concerns about the decline of Russian society.
The staging, with its detailed sets and evocative music, creates a powerful atmosphere, and the actors’ performances, particularly Doronina as Sofia, resonate with the audience, evoking a sense of national sorrow and a yearning for change. The production is seen as a relevant and insightful commentary on the ongoing challenges facing Russia, prompting reflection on the nation’s past and its potential for a brighter future. The play’s success is attributed to the MKhAT’s commitment to exploring contemporary issues through Gorky’s timeless works.In the Black Parchment of Ancient Russia
1997-04-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a collection of short, fragmented scenes and vignettes, primarily set in a bleak, rural landscape reminiscent of ancient Russia. It explores themes of loss, isolation, poverty, and the enduring presence of the past. Recurring motifs include a woman in black robes (“черная парча”), a sense of decay and ruin, and a yearning for connection and salvation. The scenes shift between a wealthy Parisian society and a desolate, almost mythical, rural setting. Characters appear in states of distress and vulnerability, often unable to help themselves or others. There’s a sense of a world where beauty and hope are consumed by darkness and hardship, with a recurring image of a woman in black robes representing a lost or forgotten past. The overall tone is melancholic and haunting, suggesting a world where dreams and aspirations are ultimately unattainable.
Degenerates in power.
1997-04-21 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
This text is a scathing, satirical critique of Russian political figures and the state of Russia, framed through a series of increasingly bizarre and grotesque metaphors. It identifies four “degenerative periods” characterized by incompetent, corrupt, and destructive leaders.
The first three periods are represented by figures like Burbulis, Shelov-Koveyaev, and Chernomyrdin, each embodying a specific type of corruption and incompetence – from the initial collapse of the state to the exploitation of the Russian people and the destruction of the economy. The author uses vivid imagery, comparing these figures to monstrous, decaying entities, like a “hairless, half-rotted mammoth” or a “skeleton of a Russian child.”
The final period is symbolized by a medal featuring the face of Chubais and a child’s skeleton, representing a complete loss of control and a descent into a state of moral and economic ruin. The text concludes with a darkly humorous list of enduring torment for those who perpetuate this decline – enduring the criticisms of specific media personalities.Autumn Observations
1997-04-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text, dated April 22-17, 1997, offers a bleak and cynical assessment of the political situation in Russia during a period of intense instability and upheaval. It details a series of escalating events – from the attempted manipulation of Chernomyrdin’s wealth to teacher kidnappings demanding teacher’s salaries, the rise of Nemtsov as a “white dove” figure, and the disastrous “Чудовищный” budget crisis. The author highlights the manipulative tactics employed by figures like Chubais, Yeltsin, and Nemtsov, portraying them as engaging in a cynical game of political theater, mimicking “young reformers” while attempting to distance themselves from past failures.
The core argument is that these events are not a genuine attempt at reform, but rather a calculated effort to destabilize the government and potentially trigger a new crisis, echoing the tumultuous events of 1991 and 1993. The author expresses deep skepticism about the motivations of key players, suggesting they are primarily focused on consolidating power through chaos.
Several specific incidents are detailed, including the rise of radical protest movements (like “committees to save” and “terrorist teachers”), the growing tensions between the President, the Duma, and the government, and the increasing involvement of regional leaders seeking greater autonomy. The text suggests a pattern of provocation and manipulation, with the potential for a repeat of the 1991 and 1993 crises. Ultimately, the author paints a picture of a Russia teetering on the brink, with powerful figures exploiting the situation for their own gain, and with the potential for a violent and unpredictable outcome.What’s with Sakharov here?
1997-04-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text expresses skepticism about the planned renaming of a square in St. Petersburg to “Square of Academic Sakharov.” It highlights that Sakharov’s fame was largely built outside of Leningrad, contrasting his achievements with those of scientists like Mendeleev and Lomonosov who were associated with the area. The author criticizes the initiative, particularly given the financial difficulties faced by the Academy of Sciences, and suggests the idea of a statue depicting Sakharov as a scavenger would be an inappropriate and absurd tribute.
Truly Christ is risen!
1997-04-28 - otets Dmitriy Dudko
Despite current hardships, the text emphasizes the enduring hope of the Resurrection of Christ and the eventual resurrection of Russia. It urges Russians to proclaim “Christ is risen!” with faith, acknowledging present suffering but anticipating a future of eternal joy. The text calls for forgiveness, particularly towards former adversaries, while simultaneously warning against succumbing to evil influences. It highlights the transformative power of faith, promising eternal life and urging unwavering belief in the resurrection, mirroring the words of St. Seraphim of Sarov.
OP-LY!
1997-04-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text, dated April 17, 1997, analyzes the economic situation in Russia under the leadership of Yegor Chernomyrdin and, particularly, the rise of Anatoly Chubais. It details a “monster budget crisis” orchestrated by Chubais, involving budget cuts, a shift in power within the government, and reliance on Eurobonds and World Bank loans. The article critiques the government’s approach, highlighting the increasing debt burden on enterprises, particularly in the energy sector, and the manipulation of the banking system through Sberbank’s redirection of savings. It argues that the crisis was largely driven by a lack of genuine economic reform and the dominance of natural monopolies, specifically in the energy sector, which were being heavily influenced by the government. The author suggests that a genuine solution would involve developing a robust вексельный (bill of exchange) market, but that this was being neglected by federal authorities, and that the situation was being exacerbated by a lack of transparency and accountability. Ultimately, the piece paints a picture of a government prioritizing short-term political gains over long-term economic stability, and a system where powerful individuals were manipulating the economy for their own benefit.
Creator of the Holiday
1997-04-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This NTV correspondent interview with conductor Eduard Gulbis discusses his first performance in St. Petersburg, specifically Tchaikovsky’s “Eugene Onegin.” Gulbis expresses frustration with the current state of Russian classical music, lamenting the lack of opportunities for musicians and the decline of its prominence. He contrasts this with his successful creation of the Rachmaninoff Symphony Orchestra in Moscow. The interview then shifts to a scene from Puccini’s “Tosca,” highlighting the audience’s initial hesitancy towards live opera, followed by a powerful depiction of the tragic fate of Butterfly, culminating in Gulbis’s ability to unite the orchestra, singers, and audience through his conducting.
SPETSNAZ AKBAR!
1997-05-05 - Boris Karpov
This text is a fragmented, reflective account of a military journalist’s experiences in Chechnya during the late 1990s, primarily focusing on the rise of radical Islamic separatism and the complex, often contradictory, attitudes of the Chechen people. It’s a series of observations and recollections, colored by disillusionment and a sense of historical irony.
The core theme revolves around the escalating use of “Allahu Akbar” as a rallying cry by Chechen fighters, initially a desperate attempt to gain sympathy and support, but quickly becoming a symbol of extremism and defiance. The author notes the increasing intensity of this cry, reflecting the growing desperation and violence of the conflict. He observes the psychological impact on the soldiers, their attempts to respond with “Jesus is Risen!” or “Special Forces, Allah Akbar!” and the resulting outrage among the local population.
The text explores the breakdown of trust and the shifting loyalties of the Chechen people. The author recounts conversations with civilians, including a woman who initially accused Russian soldiers of being “hostages” and later invoked historical grievances, and the nostalgic longing for a “Soviet-like” life, even as the fighters embraced radical Islam. He describes the psychological manipulation employed by the Chechen leadership, using historical narratives and religious rhetoric to fuel the conflict.
The author highlights the dangers of religious extremism, noting the imposition of strict Islamic laws, including the threat of death for apostates, and the manipulation of religious symbols for political gain. He reflects on the legacy of Imam Shamil and the irony of the Chechen fighters quoting him while simultaneously rejecting the allegiance to Russia.
Ultimately, the text is a sobering account of a conflict fueled by religious fervor, historical grievances, and the breakdown of social order, leaving the reader with a sense of unease and a reflection on the complexities of identity, loyalty, and the enduring power of propaganda.DRY OARS
1997-05-05 - Yuriy Makunin
The author describes witnessing the demolition of the School of Academic Rowing on the Strelka, a historically significant location for Russian rowing. He attributes this destruction to a planned transformation into a Peter the Great museum, orchestrated by authorities and ignoring the concerns of rowing figures. A veteran rowing coach explains that the decision is already made and that protests are futile. The author questions the inaction of sports officials, including the President of the Russian Olympic Committee and the Minister of Sport, regarding the fate of this “gem of Russian sport.” He expresses frustration with their perceived indifference and prioritization of their own comfort over the preservation of a vital sporting institution.
ONLY TOGETHER
1997-05-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The “Donskoy Zemlyache” (Donbas Region Association) was recently established in Moscow by Ukrainian citizens from the Donbas region who live and work in Russia. This organization, registered with the Russian Ministry of Justice, aims to foster unity and cooperation among its members, who represent various professions. Николай Гурьевич КОВАЛЬ is the current chairman. The organization plans to be presented at the Russia Concert Hall on a festive May day.
What’s the argument about?
1997-05-05 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text argues against proposals to redesign Moscow’s Red Square, specifically to remove the Lenin Mausoleum. The author contends that the opposition to the Mausoleum is driven by political motives, not historical concerns. He argues that the Mausoleum, designed by architects Shusev and Kazakov, has fundamentally altered the square, creating a more dignified and balanced space. The Mausoleum’s construction, with its high-quality materials and unique design, has established it as a globally significant architectural landmark. The author criticizes those advocating for the removal of the Mausoleum as being politically motivated and lacking an understanding of the architectural and historical significance of the space. He emphasizes the importance of preserving the Mausoleum’s status as a protected monument, supported by UNESCO, and highlights the political calculations behind the opposition.
You copied me on the channel.
1997-05-12 - Olʹga Genkina
This text is a reminiscence by Olga Genkina about Eduard Sagalaev, a prominent television figure from the 1990s. It details Sagalaev’s rise and fall, beginning with his success in the youth editorial roles at ЦТ (All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company) and his subsequent work on “Vzglyad” (The View) program. The narrative charts his ambition, his attempts to establish his own television company (TV-6), and his eventual decline marked by excessive indulgence, a shift in lifestyle, and a public scandal.
The piece highlights Sagalaev’s initial brilliance and innovative ideas, particularly the “Vzglyad” and “Vstrechi v Ostan kino” (Meetings in Ostankino) formats, which were later revived. However, it emphasizes his self-destruction through overindulgence, a loss of focus, and ultimately, a failure to maintain his earlier success. The text concludes with a reflection on Sagalaev’s current diminished status and the fact that his ideas are now being repackaged and utilized by contemporary television programs, suggesting a bittersweet recognition of his past influence.Alexander Lukashenko: FROM BREST TO VLADIVOSTOK
1997-05-12 - Aleksandr Lukashenko
This text is a transcript of a lengthy interview with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, conducted in Minsk shortly before a crucial discussion regarding the Russia-Belarus Union. The core of the interview centers on Lukashenko’s vision for this union, framed as a battle between forces aligned with “good” and “evil,” prioritizing Slavic unity and rejecting Western influence.
Lukashenko argues that the union’s strength lies in its pragmatic approach, rejecting overly ambitious goals and focusing on tangible benefits like economic integration and access to Western markets. He expresses skepticism about Western intentions, viewing them as driven by a desire to isolate and weaken Russia and Belarus. He emphasizes the importance of a strong, independent Belarus, rejecting any attempts to impose a “one-size-fits-all” model.
Crucially, Lukashenko attributes his strength to a deep-seated sense of responsibility and a desire to serve his people, fueled by the support he receives from the Belarusian population. He dismisses personal ambition, stating his primary goal is to contribute positively to the union’s success. He also expresses concern about potential manipulation by Western actors, particularly regarding the union’s future and the possibility of a compromised “alternative” agreement. Ultimately, he frames his actions as driven by a commitment to preserving Belarus’s sovereignty and fostering a strong, independent Slavic alliance.various…
1997-05-19 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The International Slavic Centre in Chernihiv is hosting a creative evening with journalist Vladimir Bondarenko. Simultaneously, the Laris Solovyov Studio at the GITIS Theatre Academy is offering intensive one-month courses on voice and movement based on international theatre techniques, aimed at actors, speakers, journalists, businesspeople, and politicians with communication difficulties. The studio also forms groups for students applying to theatre universities and offers on-site training. The studio’s artistic director is a renowned actress with experience in “Modern Theatre” and MKhate, and training is paid. The editorial staff of “Zavtra” expresses condolences to their friend and colleague, publisher Nikolai Mishin, following the death of his mother, Evdokiya Denisovna.
“Agency”Day”“
1997-05-19 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a collection of satirical and critical comments about Russian politicians and events in 1997. It mocks President Yeltsin’s approval of the “Seven Troubles” program, criticizes the “Division of Proceeds” law, refers to imprisonment of corrupt officials as “organ transplants,” mocks Boris Nemtsov’s poverty, suggests Viktor Chernomyrdin’s distress before filing taxes, questions the origins of the Rodionov Army, claims that communication with Lebed impacted Kasparov’s abilities, and uses a derogatory comparison of Kiselev’s treatment of his face.
from the editorial team
1997-05-19 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text discusses two artists, Viktor Kazarin and Kirill Sokolov, who operate outside mainstream artistic and political trends. Both artists, known for their independent approaches, are featured in a publication that explores diverse perspectives on Russian culture, particularly during a time of cultural change. Kazarin, based in Moscow, represents a Russian worldview, while Sokolov, living and working in England, offers an external perspective on Russian and Soviet art. The publication emphasizes the complexity and multi-faceted nature of Russian culture, defined by shared values rather than stylistic forms.
Preceden
1997-05-19 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text, dated May 20, 1997, analyzes the complex and precarious situation surrounding the conflict between Moldova and the Transnistria region. It details the key events leading up to the signing of the Moscow Memorandum, a document intended to normalize relations between the two sides. The author highlights the significant external involvement, primarily from Russia, Ukraine, and the OSCE, and the role of powerful actors like NATO and the European Union.
The core issue is the unresolved conflict stemming from Moldova’s initial aspirations for unification with Romania and the subsequent emergence of Transnistria as a separatist entity. The text argues that the situation is characterized by a “precedent” – the creation of an independent Transnistria – which has created a volatile and unpredictable geopolitical landscape.
Several key factors contribute to this instability: the reluctance of all parties to definitively resolve the conflict, the diverse and often conflicting interests of external actors (Russia, Ukraine, the OSCE, and NATO), and the inherent difficulties in reconciling competing claims regarding sovereignty, territorial integrity, and self-determination. The author emphasizes that the situation is not simply a regional conflict but a microcosm of broader geopolitical tensions and the challenges of managing post-Soviet transitions. The document concludes with a pessimistic assessment of Russia’s attempts to leverage this situation for geopolitical gain, suggesting that it will likely exacerbate tensions and create further instability.Between two hostile races…
1997-05-19 - M. Mamikonyan
This text is a scathing critique of the 1997 Russian-Chechen peace agreement and the figures involved, primarily Boris Березовский and Udugov, along with broader geopolitical analyses surrounding the conflict. The author argues that the agreement is a carefully constructed illusion, built on lies and designed to serve external interests, particularly those of Western powers and figures like Boris Abramovich, who are portrayed as manipulating events for personal gain.
The core argument is that the “peace” is a smokescreen, masking a deeper game involving the manipulation of religious and geopolitical forces – specifically, the framing of Islam as a “Great Satan” to justify Western intervention. The author contends that figures like Березовский and Udugov are not genuinely concerned with the welfare of Chechens but are instead pawns in a larger scheme to exploit the situation for strategic advantage.
The text highlights the dangers of accepting simplistic narratives and the importance of critical thinking. It suggests that Russia’s role should not be to “hold a shield between hostile races” but to protect its own territory and interests, recognizing the potential for manipulation and external influence. The author ultimately concludes that the situation is far more complex and dangerous than it appears, and that Russia must maintain a clear-eyed perspective to avoid becoming a victim of geopolitical machinations. The piece is filled with cynical observations about the motivations of key players and a deep distrust of Western intentions.IN PALESTINE
1997-05-26 - Valeriy Ganichev
This text recounts a journalist’s experience visiting Palestine, specifically focusing on his visit to Jerusalem and the sites associated with the life and death of Jesus Christ. The journey begins with a frustrating and intrusive border crossing experience in Jordan, highlighting the difficulties and security measures encountered when entering Palestine and Israel.
The core of the narrative details a deeply personal and somewhat cynical exploration of the Holy Land. The author describes a series of encounters with Palestinian officials and residents, portraying a scene of constant surveillance, questioning, and a general sense of being treated as a suspect. He details the intrusive border checks, the lengthy searches of his belongings, and the feeling of being constantly scrutinized.
The text then focuses on the religious sites in Jerusalem, particularly the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, where the author describes the overwhelming crowds and the intense atmosphere of devotion. He details his visit to the Grotto of Gethsemane, the location of Jesus’s last supper and arrest, and the tomb of Christ, emphasizing the profound sense of history and spirituality associated with these locations.
Throughout the journey, the author expresses a mixture of awe and frustration, reflecting on the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the challenges of experiencing the Holy Land as a visitor. He notes the stark contrast between the religious significance of the sites and the ongoing political tensions. The text concludes with a reflection on the experience, acknowledging the profound impact of visiting these sacred places while also recognizing the difficulties and limitations of observing them from an outsider’s perspective.General mistake
1997-05-26 - Vladislav Shurygin
This text is a scathing critique of President Yeltsin’s handling of the military reform and the subsequent removal of Defense Minister and Chief of the General Staff, Rodionov. It argues that Yeltsin, through the manipulation of figures like Chubais and Patrusov, orchestrated Rodionov’s downfall by feeding him a distorted narrative of the army’s decline and isolating him from key decision-makers. The author suggests that Chubais and Patrusov were actively involved in a pre-planned scenario to consolidate power, utilizing a staged “Council of Defense” to swiftly remove Rodionov and potentially target other figures like the Minister of Internal Affairs, Anatoly Kulikov. The text portrays Yeltsin as cynical and manipulative, prioritizing power over genuine reform and highlighting the corruption and abuse of power within the Kremlin.
Return health to the Fatherland!
1997-05-26 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a lengthy statement, a “Call to Action,” issued by the Fourth World Russian People’s Council in May 1997, expressing deep concern about the deteriorating health and spiritual well-being of the Russian population. It identifies a crisis characterized by declining birth rates, rising mortality (particularly from accidents, addictions, and mental health issues), reduced life expectancy, and a decline in traditional values.
The Council attributes these problems to factors including economic hardship, reduced healthcare funding, the influence of destructive ideologies (paganism, sects), the pervasive impact of mass media, and a lack of national unity.
It proposes a series of urgent measures, including prioritizing healthcare funding (at least 5% of GDP), developing a national health strategy, combating alcoholism and drug abuse, protecting children from moral corruption, strengthening the role of the Russian Orthodox Church, and promoting traditional Russian culture and values. The Council advocates for parliamentary hearings, the creation of a national health program, and a renewed focus on the spiritual and physical health of the Russian people.A THIEF MUST SIT IN PRISON. BUT OTHERS ARE SENT TO PRISON.
1997-05-26 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text describes the lives of prisoners in a Russian penal system, highlighting the different categories of inmates – seasoned criminals, ideological prisoners, and those driven to despair by circumstance. It details the fates of several individuals, including Alexander Стефанов, Yuri Perkhin, and the prosecutor Yuriushin, illustrating how the prison system can impact individuals’ lives and fortunes. The text suggests a critical perspective on the Russian justice system and its consequences.
Unequal marriage
1997-06-02 - P. Pritula
The text describes a situation in Pskov, Russia, in 1997, where a municipal initiative group is attempting to hold a referendum to remove the mayor, Anatoly Prokhofev, due to widespread dissatisfaction with his leadership. The city has experienced economic decline, rampant corruption, and a lack of responsiveness to the needs of its citizens, exacerbated by the mayor’s support for “anti-people” reforms. Despite attempts to gather over 14,000 signatures in support of the referendum, the city administration and local council attempted to invalidate the signatures, citing issues with the signatories and failing to provide a full list of rejected votes. The situation is framed as a struggle against an “anti-people” regime, mirroring historical resistance, and is supported by the National Patriotic Union of Russia. The initiative group is actively seeking support and believes they will ultimately succeed in achieving a referendum and restoring local governance.
With You – “Our Contemporary”
1997-06-02 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
“Наш современник” is a widely-read literary journal focusing on contemporary Russian issues and history. The journal plans to publish a variety of works, including novels exploring Russian history, memoirs, essays, and poetry. Key themes include the Soviet era, contemporary social and political issues, and historical analysis. The journal aims to provide a deep and critical examination of Russia’s past and present, with a focus on understanding the nation’s soul and its place in the world. It intends to offer a platform for diverse voices and perspectives, and to maintain its position as the largest and most accessible literary journal in Russia.
From the Diary
1997-06-02 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
The text is a diary entry reflecting on aging, loss, and the enduring beauty of the world, specifically focusing on a rain-soaked, autumnal scene in Pushkin’s estate, the “Alley of Anna Kern.” The author contemplates the decay of ancient lime trees, reminiscent of old horses, and their connection to past events – Pushkin’s romance with Anna Kern. He mourns the passing of loved ones, including his friend Boris Skobeltsyn, and the broader passage of time. Despite the ambiguity of life’s meaning, he finds solace in love – Pushkin’s love for Kern, the trees’ acceptance of the rain, and his own affection for his friend, ultimately directed towards Russia.
How many times we could have won.
1997-06-09 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a collection of disparate fragments, primarily poetic reflections and excerpts, exploring themes of memory, loss, victory, defeat, and the nature of historical figures. It’s a highly fragmented and associative work, jumping between historical figures like Sulla, Хетты, and fictional scenarios. Recurring motifs include the idea of “winning” or “losing,” the importance of memory, and the unsettling nature of dreams and visions. The text frequently contrasts grand historical narratives with personal, almost surreal experiences, particularly through recurring dream sequences. There’s a sense of longing for a lost or unattainable victory, coupled with a preoccupation with the consequences of both success and failure. The text utilizes vivid imagery – particularly of light, darkness, and landscapes – to evoke a sense of melancholy and the enduring power of the past. It’s a meditation on the cyclical nature of history and the difficulty of truly understanding or controlling the forces that shape human destiny.
From the Patriotic Information Burea
1997-06-09 - Aleksandr Prokhanov
The text, published in 1997, alleges a political crisis in Primorye, Russia, caused by President Yeltsin and Chubais. It claims Governor Naizdratenko was effectively removed from office by Chubais’s emissary, Savostyan, and the FSB. The crisis is attributed to Yeltsin’s and Chubais’s “reforms,” which have impoverished the region and ceded Russian territories to China, alongside a continuous political interference from the center. The text calls for solidarity from regional governors and emphasizes the importance of supporting Naizdratenko, who represents patriotic interests, against the backdrop of ideological and political conflicts.
Kolomyanka bells
1997-06-09 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
A group of students from the Moscow International Film School visited Kolomna in April 1997 to rehearse their plays. They stayed at a school for children with intellectual disabilities, where a student’s simple question about Yevgeny Yeltzin highlighted the town’s unique preservation of history, contrasting with Moscow’s decline. The students discovered Kolomna’s remarkably well-preserved architecture, including ancient wooden houses and a wall resembling the Moscow Kremlin. They felt energized by the historical atmosphere and successfully performed their play, “Moscow Meetings,” for the children, who were deeply moved. The experience left a lasting impression on the students, and they frequently recalled Kolomna before their departure.
Agency “Day”
1997-06-23 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text describes a satirical situation involving prostitutes, a bathhouse, and government officials. Prostitutes who cleaned for a man named Kovalev are now offering to clean for Minister Dorenko. The Minister of Justice is referred to as “one Kovalev less,” and the Minister of Justice is jokingly told to “wash him in the bath.” The “Cabinet” where clients are taken is referred to as a “Cabinet of Ministers.”
GRAVE DIGGERS
1997-06-23 - Vladimir Bushin
This text is a scathing critique of Russia’s leadership, particularly Yeltsin and his successors, following the dismantling of the Soviet Union. The author, Vladimir Bushin, expresses deep frustration with what he perceives as the provincialism, incompetence, and lack of understanding displayed by these figures. He argues that they are attempting to create a superficial “celebration of independence” by mimicking American traditions, but without genuine historical context or national identity.
The core of the piece is a lament for the loss of a strong, national spirit, fueled by the author’s belief that Yeltsin and his team are fundamentally incapable of grasping Russia’s true character. He uses a series of historical examples – the failed attempts to create a “Day of Independence” based on past events – to illustrate this point.
The author highlights a pattern of superficial gestures and attempts to emulate Western models, often driven by personal gain and a lack of genuine understanding. He criticizes the lavish spending associated with these events and the perceived provincialism of the leadership.
The text repeatedly references numerous individuals – including Yuri Karyakin, Oles AdamoVICH, Anatoly Sobchak, and Alexander Ivanov – who have also advocated for the removal of Lenin’s remains from the Mausoleum, demonstrating a widespread, albeit often misguided, desire to confront the legacy of the Soviet era. The author concludes by urging Yeltsin, Sobchak, and Karyakin to reflect on their actions and the consequences of their leadership.Antipozner-97
1997-06-30 - Yuriy Putrin
On June 30, 1997, the “Antipozner” activist group held a street event near the Ostankino pond to gauge public opinion on NTV, ORT, and RTR television channels. Over 2000 people were surveyed, and the results ranked NTV, ORT, and RTR based on their perceived “manipulative” nature. NTV received the highest score (3753 points), followed by ORT (3498 points) and RTR (1841 points). Three television programs – “Vesti,” “Itogi,” and “Thema” – were also ranked based on public opinion, with “Vesti” leading. The most disliked television personalities were identified as Vladimir Kiselyov, followed by Giorgi Svanidze and Aleksandr Doroshenko. A poem was also presented, criticizing the Ostankino television tower.
ROYAL CURD
1997-07-07 - Nikolay Petrakov
This “Blitz” article, written by Alexander Petrakov in 1997, explores a complex and seemingly orchestrated campaign surrounding the revival of the Russian monarchy. It posits that a deliberate strategy, involving figures like Vladimir Kiselev and utilizing tactics like the planned destruction of monuments to Nicholas II and Peter I, is underway. The aim is to manipulate public opinion, fostering a nostalgic yearning for the monarchy while simultaneously undermining communist symbols like the Mausoleum and Lenin.
Petrakov argues that this operation is driven by a network of individuals – including figures like Filipp Bobkov and potentially linked to events like the Moscow trolleybus bombings – who are employing sophisticated techniques, reminiscent of intelligence operations, to achieve this goal. The campaign involves a carefully constructed “noise” – a deliberate attempt to stir public anxiety and confusion – to ultimately facilitate the restoration of the monarchy. The article suggests a shadowy group, dubbed “Psychoz,” is actively pursuing this agenda, utilizing explosive devices and psychological manipulation to achieve its objectives.SELF-WOUNDING? NO, FIGHT!
1997-07-07 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Aman Tuleev, after being appointed governor of the Kemerovo region and preparing for his move to the Kuzbass region, met with editors Alexander Prokhanov and Valentin Chikin from “Zavtra” and “Sovetskaya Rossiya” newspapers.
“MK” ON THE CASE
1997-07-07 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a highly critical and chaotic account of a celebration organized by the “Moscow Komsomol” (MK) newspaper. The author, Elena Bidnyak, describes a bizarre and unsettling event at the Luzhniki stadium, featuring bizarre performances, nonsensical music (“be-be” and “mu-mu”), and increasingly disturbing behavior from the attendees.
The event is characterized by a complete lack of quality – the music is awful, the performances are chaotic, and the crowd is behaving in a shockingly inappropriate and degenerate manner. There’s a focus on the decline of popular rock groups, the bizarre behavior of the attendees (including public indecency and the throwing of objects), and a general sense of decay and moral degradation.
The author uses vivid and often grotesque imagery to depict the scene, emphasizing the chaotic and unsettling nature of the celebration and her own feeling of bewilderment and discomfort. The entire experience is presented as a disturbing and surreal “nightmare.”NATO is not needed for him!
1997-07-07 - Viktor Filatov
Voivosh Шешель is a Serbian nationalist and prominent figure in the Serbian Radical Party, widely considered the most popular politician in Yugoslavia. He’s a staunch critic of NATO expansion and holds a strong belief in Serbian national identity and resistance.
He’s described as a powerful and influential figure, having been imprisoned multiple times under various regimes, and currently holds a position as a city councilor in Zemun, Serbia. He’s known for his confrontational approach and strong anti-Western stance, particularly against NATO.
His political strategy centers on resisting perceived foreign influence, advocating for a close relationship with Russia, and promoting Serbian national identity. He views NATO expansion as a threat to Serbia and aims to build a strong, independent Serbia, prioritizing a close alliance with Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States. He believes in a strong Serbian national identity and is focused on resisting perceived foreign influence, particularly from the West.Where does “New Course” lead?
1997-07-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a highly cynical and fragmented analysis of the political situation in Russia during the summer and autumn of 1997. It’s a series of observations and predictions from several participants regarding the instability of the Yeltsin administration and the maneuvering of various political factions.
The core argument is that the current political landscape is nearing its breaking point, characterized by a complete exhaustion of reform efforts and a deeply fractured political environment. Several key figures – including Yeltsin, Chubais, Beriev, and others – are seen as playing a role in a complex, often contradictory, game of power.
The text predicts a “forced march” or “final push” in the autumn, likely involving a reshuffle of the government and potentially a shift in leadership. It suggests that this push will be driven by a combination of factors, including the waning influence of Yeltsin, the maneuvering of regional barons, and the ongoing conflict between different political factions (particularly those aligned with the military-industrial complex and those associated with Western influence).
Several participants view the situation as a “puppet show” or “game” with key players like Beriev acting as “transmission links” between different power centers. There’s a strong sense of cynicism, with many participants believing that the situation is driven by personal ambitions and short-term gains rather than any genuine commitment to reform or the well-being of the country. The text emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamics of this “game” to anticipate future developments. It concludes with a call for reflection and observation before the “final push” occurs.WE ARE NOT A COLONY!
1997-07-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The “Anti-Colonial League” has been officially registered as “Citizens for National Security,” a public movement opposing foreign colonization of the country. The contact phone number for the League is (095) 292-52-01.
From the editors
1997-07-21 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text discusses a significant dialogue concerning the identity of Russia and its relationship with diverse populations, particularly the Russian-Jewish dialogue. The conversation began with Vladimir Bondarenko’s article and was continued by Mark Rudinstein, Tancred Golenspolsky, and Sergei Voronin, focusing on understanding modern Russia and its culture. The editors express their willingness to continue this objective and respectful discussion.
MARSHAL - TO THE HERO
1997-07-21 - Dmitriy Yazov
This letter is a heartfelt birthday greeting from Marshal D.T. Yazov to Vladimir Karpov, a legendary Soviet разведчик (intelligence officer) and Hero of the Soviet Union. Karpov’s life was marked by extraordinary experiences: wrongful arrest and imprisonment during the war, a unique release from a штрафная рота (disciplinary battalion) for his bravery, and a remarkable military career spanning 25 years. He excelled in reconnaissance, intelligence, and military academies, culminating in command roles and significant battlefield achievements. After his military service, Karpov transitioned to a successful literary career, becoming a respected journalist, editor, and ultimately, the Secretary and later Chairman of the Union of Soviet Writers. He achieved numerous literary awards and international recognition. The letter expresses deep admiration for Karpov’s resilience, dedication, and multifaceted achievements, celebrating his life as a soldier, a writer, and a patriot. Yazov concludes by wishing Karpov continued success and reiterates the importance of remembering the sacrifices made during the war.
DEATH OF THE PATRIARCH
1997-07-28 - Vladimir Lichutin
Here’s a summary of the provided text, “Death of the Patriarch” by Vladimir Lituchin:
This lengthy, historical novel fragment, “Death of the Patriarch,” chronicles the life and eventual death of Patriarch Nikon of Moscow, spanning from 1681 to his passing. The narrative traces Nikon’s journey from his initial reforms within the Russian Orthodox Church to his increasingly strained relationship with Tsar Feodor Alekseyevich and ultimately, his exile and death.
The story is presented as a largely autobiographical account by Vladimir Lituchin, detailing his own experiences and observations during this tumultuous period of religious and political upheaval in Russia. Lituchin portrays Nikon as a complex and deeply flawed figure, simultaneously a visionary reformer and a stubborn, often cruel, man.
The narrative highlights the social and political context of the time, including the rise of Peter the Great, the ensuing schism within the Church, and the violent conflicts that erupted as a result. Lituchin explores themes of faith, authority, and the clash between tradition and progress.
The story is marked by a sense of melancholy and disillusionment, reflecting Lituchin’s own spiritual struggles and his growing awareness of the corruption and hypocrisy within the Church. The final scenes depict Nikon’s burial alongside the crucifixion site in Jerusalem, a poignant and symbolic end to a life dedicated to reform, yet ultimately consumed by conflict and misunderstanding.Dashboard
1997-07-28 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a collection of fragmented intelligence reports and analyses from the late 1990s, primarily focusing on the turbulent political landscape of Russia following the collapse of the Soviet Union. It details a complex web of power struggles within the Yeltsin administration, particularly involving figures like Yevgeny Primakov, Viktor Chernomyrdin, Boris Berezovsky, and Vladimir Potanin.
Key themes include:
- US Intervention: The United States is secretly providing substantial funding and technical support to bolster Russia’s nuclear infrastructure, ostensibly for peaceful and scientific purposes, but with the strategic goal of gaining “nuclear control” and potentially triggering a shift in power during a crisis.
- Internal Power Struggles: Intense infighting exists within the Russian government, with various factions vying for influence and control, particularly concerning the privatization of state assets and the management of key industries like telecommunications (through figures like Potanin).
- Psychological Analysis: A team of psychiatrists and psychologists assess President Yeltsin’s mental state, concluding he suffers from “psychoneuronal disorders” and lacks control over his statements, suggesting external manipulation.
- Information Warfare: There’s a concerted effort to discredit Berezovsky and Chernomyrdin through the dissemination of damaging information via media outlets and the strategic use of compromising material.
- Strategic Asset Control: The US is actively attempting to control key Russian assets, particularly in the telecommunications sector, with the potential to significantly impact the balance of power.
- Political Maneuvering: Various factions, including those aligned with Yeltsin and those associated with Potanin, are engaged in complex negotiations and strategic alliances.
- Election Strategy: Experts advise maintaining a cautious, “wait-and-see” approach in political campaigns, avoiding confrontation and relying on traditional, less confrontational tactics.
HUNTING THE WOLVES
1997-08-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a lengthy, nostalgic defense of Viktor Volkov, a former head of the Chernsky District Administration in the Tula region of Russia. It’s a scathing critique of “Izvestia,” a long-standing, now-defunct liberal newspaper, and its persistent campaign to discredit Volkov. Volkov is portrayed as a genuinely patriotic and effective administrator who prioritized the needs of his rural community and resisted the pressures of Moscow-based liberal influence, particularly from “Izvestia.” The author recounts numerous instances of “Izvestia’s” harassment, including fabricated accusations of corruption, manipulation of funds, and obstruction of national security efforts during the Chechen conflict. These accusations are presented as absurd and driven by a desire to undermine Volkov’s success. The text highlights Volkov’s resilience, unwavering commitment to his community, and his ability to effectively counter the smear campaigns of “Izvestia.” It emphasizes his practical achievements – building homes, supporting local businesses, and safeguarding the region from external threats – and portrays him as a victim of ideological bias and relentless negativity. The author expresses admiration for Volkov’s character and views him as a representative of authentic Russian values, contrasting him with the perceived arrogance and manipulative tendencies of the liberal elite.
JOKHAR AKBAR?
1997-08-04 - Vladislav Shurygin
The text discusses the persistent rumors of the survival of Chechen President Akhmat Kadyrov (Dzhokhar Dudayev) and the widespread belief in his resurrection within Chechnya. Despite multiple reports of his death, fueled by figures like Shamil Basayev and Zelimkhan Yandarbiev, and supported by financial backing and organizational efforts, the rumors continue. These rumors are strategically beneficial to various parties, including Moscow, which uses them to maintain influence over Shmaghadyrov, and to various factions within Chechnya. The author questions who benefits from the continued belief in Dudayev’s survival and expresses concern that if Dudayev were to reappear, he would be portrayed similarly to religious figures like Jesus, Muhammad, and Buddha by pro-government media.
Debunking the myth
1997-08-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text details the publication of Gennady Zyuganov’s autobiography, “My Russia,” in the United States in 1997, shortly after the Russian presidential elections. The book’s release is viewed as a strategic move by the publisher, “M.E. Sharpe,” capitalizing on a perceived informational vacuum in the American public’s understanding of Russian politics and the left-patriotic opposition.
The core argument is that the book’s publication serves to challenge the dominant Western narrative surrounding Russia – specifically, the myth of a successful, irreversible transition to a liberal, Western-aligned model, and the perceived strength of the Yeltsin regime. It aims to provide a counter-narrative, exposing the ongoing challenges faced by the Communist Party of Russia and highlighting the continued relevance of left-patriotic forces.
The author, Boris Zanegin, believes the book will penetrate the anti-communist biases ingrained in American consciousness and offer a more accurate portrayal of Russia’s political landscape. He sees the publication as a step towards fostering understanding between the US and a future socialist Russia.
The text also notes the strategic timing of the release, coinciding with the election results, and the publisher’s intention to make the book accessible through a mass-market edition. It highlights the potential for the book to influence academic and analytical circles, and expresses optimism about its contribution to improved relations between the two countries. Finally, the text acknowledges the complexities within the Russian left, particularly the divisions within the Communist Party, and suggests that the book’s impact will depend on its ability to reach a broad audience and challenge established assumptions.Insider Trading - Chubais
1997-08-04 - Nikolay Mikhaylov
This text is a scathing critique of the economic and social situation in Norilsk, Russia, primarily focusing on the Norilsk Nickel mining and metallurgical complex and the role of figures like Vladimir Chuprunov and Vladimir Potanin. It details a history of mismanagement, corruption, and exploitation stemming from a series of flawed economic reforms and privatization efforts initiated in the 1990s.
The core argument is that despite significant mineral wealth and productive capacity, Norilsk’s economy was systematically dismantled through a combination of state-controlled privatization under Vladimir Chuprunov’s “Norilsk Nickel” (a structure designed to concentrate power and wealth) and subsequent asset stripping by entities like Omskbank (ONEXIM Bank) and its associated financial networks. This resulted in massive financial losses for the company, widespread debt, and the decline of the city’s industrial base and social infrastructure.
The text highlights a pattern of control and manipulation, where revenue from the sale of nickel, copper, and other metals was not reinvested in the company or the region, but instead used to pay off debts, fund the personal enrichment of key figures, and ultimately, to maintain a system of control. The author emphasizes the lack of accountability and the failure of regulatory bodies to intervene effectively.
A key element of the critique is the “Norilsk Nickel” structure itself, designed to consolidate power and prevent independent oversight. The text also points to the exploitation of “Norilskgazprom,” the gas supplier to the complex, with significant debts going unpaid. The author concludes with a sense of impending disaster, suggesting that without fundamental changes – including external management and a halt to the flawed privatization model – Norilsk faces economic collapse.CHAPEL OF THE HOLY
1997-08-04 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text details the initiative of the “Fund for the Unity of Orthodox Peoples” to construct a chapel dedicated to the Holy Princes Boris and Gleb on Moscow’s Arbatskaya Square. This chapel is intended to replace the original church, which was demolished in 1930 after being deemed a hindrance to traffic and part of a city planning scheme. The church’s destruction was initiated by the Hamavniki district council and the Moscow Administration. The new chapel design incorporates a side chapel dedicated to St. Theron (later renamed St. Mary Magdalene), mirroring the fate of the previously demolished St. Theron’s Church. The project, championed by architect Yuri Vylegzhanin, aims to serve as a visible symbol of reconciliation and unity, particularly given the Princes Boris and Gleb were the first Russian Orthodox saints canonized after suffering during a period of internal conflict. The initiative has gained support from prominent figures including Patriarch Alexy II and various government bodies, with the hope of broader public involvement as a tangible representation of repentance and unity within the Russian Orthodox Church.
GUARANTOR BANKRUPTCY
1997-08-11 - Vladimir Vinnikov
The article, written by Vladimir Vinnikov, critiques the actions of President Yeltsin and his administration, particularly the recent currency redenomination. It argues that Russia’s economic situation – characterized by massive debt, declining production, and dependence on the IMF – is a direct result of Yeltsin’s policies, including privatization, the sale of Eastern European assets, and the dismantling of the Soviet Union. The redenomination is viewed as a deceptive tactic to conceal the country’s financial woes and potentially increase the money supply, effectively delaying bankruptcy. The author uses the analogy of a bankrupt gambler (“garant”) to illustrate Yeltsin’s situation and questions who will guarantee the dubious “reforms” he championed. The article suggests that the redenomination is a desperate attempt to avoid acknowledging the severity of Russia’s economic problems and raises concerns about the future stability of the situation.
DANCES ON BLOOD
1997-08-11 - Vladislav Shurygin
This text is a cynical commentary on recent funeral rituals for murdered police officers in Moscow, framing them as staged displays of “victory” for organized crime over law and morality. The author criticizes the lack of genuine investigation into high-profile murders (like those of Talakov, Liseev, and Kvelidzi) and suggests that the current police force and judicial system are deeply corrupted and complicit with criminal groups. The author argues that these elaborate funerals, attended by prominent figures, are a cover for the impunity enjoyed by criminals, fueled by bribery, corruption, and a breakdown of accountability within the law enforcement and judicial systems. The piece expresses a bleak view of Russia’s state of law and order, portraying the funerals as celebrations of criminal success rather than genuine mourning and justice.
As far as I am concerned…
1997-08-11 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text presents two contrasting viewpoints on the state of inter-ethnic relations in Russia following the 1993 Constitution. Vladimir Zhironovsky argues that the constitution, combined with post-Soviet events like the Chechen wars and the suppression of national movements (exemplified by the prosecution of K.S. Smirnov-Ostašvili), exacerbated existing tensions. He advocates for a radical restructuring of the federation, including the abolition of national republics and the introduction of privileges for representatives of indigenous populations, alongside a strong emphasis on protecting Russian national identity and combating “anti-patriotic propaganda.” He believes the key issue is a fundamental shift away from the “trading civilization” of the West and a return to traditional values, particularly Orthodox Christianity.
Ruslan Hasbulatov offers a more pessimistic assessment, attributing the deterioration of inter-ethnic relations to Russia’s adoption of Western-influenced values and the rise of a “trading civilization.” He believes the situation is worsened by the influence of the legal system, which he sees as promoting a secular, “humanistic” worldview at the expense of religious faith. He calls for a return to religious principles, specifically Islam, and advocates for a legal system that prioritizes religious freedom and the preservation of traditional values, rejecting the influence of the Russian Orthodox Church. He criticizes the new Law on Freedom of Conscience and suggests that the legal system is fundamentally flawed. Finally, Rashidshah, a representative of the Union of Muslims of Russia, echoes Hasbulatov’s sentiment, emphasizing the importance of adhering to Islamic principles and rejecting the influence of Western values and the Russian Orthodox Church.ALFRED’S WEALTH
1997-08-18 - Oleg Golovin
The text discusses the escape of Alfred Koch to the United States, comparing it to the escape of Rudolf Hess. It criticizes figures like Yegor Chernomyrdin and Vladislav Chubais for their support of Koch, contrasting it with the actions of young reformers who received lucrative payments. The author highlights the corruption surrounding deals like “Svyazinvest” and “Norilsk Nickel,” pointing to the involvement of figures like Vladimir Potanin and George Soros. It suggests that the actions of these individuals are driven by personal gain rather than genuine reform, comparing them to corrupt figures like Boris Berezovsky and Alexander Mametkhidze. The author expresses skepticism about the government’s support of Koch and anticipates a potential shift in alliances as rivals target Koch.
Agency “Day”
1997-08-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The article “Agentstvo Dnya” discusses the book “Boris Yeltsin: From Dawn to Dusk” by Korzhakov as a significant contribution to the study of insects. It also notes a holographic portrait of Peter the Great and Academician Sakharov in the Chubais office, describing Yeltsin’s historical space as oppressive and dark.
Dashboard
1997-08-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a highly fragmented and speculative collection of intelligence reports and rumors circulating in the late 1990s, primarily concerning the political and economic turmoil in Russia during the Yeltsin era. It details a complex web of plots, assassinations, and manipulations involving figures like Boris Nemtsov, Viktor Chernomyrdin, and Anatoly Chubays.
Key themes include: a planned assassination of Vice-Governor Manevicha orchestrated by Moscow figures for political reasons, not privatization; a complex scheme involving Soros, Saudi financiers, and Chechen warlords to “redirect” President Maschado away from Boris Yeltsin; attempts to destabilize Yeltsin through various means, including a damaging video campaign orchestrated by “the Nizhny Novgorod group”; and a series of geopolitical maneuvers aimed at isolating Russia and creating opportunities for financial gain, particularly through the redirection of Ukrainian gas and oil routes.
The reports are filled with unsubstantiated claims, speculation, and shifting alliances, suggesting a climate of paranoia and intense power struggles. They also highlight the involvement of intelligence services and the use of disinformation to influence events.YES, DON’T BE FOOLING AROUND… THEATER
1997-08-25 - Yevgeniy Odintsov
Вера Попова was a legendary Russian actress renowned for her profound understanding and passionate delivery of complex characters. Her talent lay in her ability to capture the essence of human emotion and experience, drawing upon a deep well of Russian literary tradition and a unique, intuitive connection to the theatrical arts. She possessed a distinctive rhythmic understanding of time and communication, characterized by a fervent, almost mystical approach to her craft. Her performances, spanning both Russian and Western repertoire, were marked by a meticulous economy of expression and a powerful, enduring impact, solidifying her place as a singular and irreplaceable figure in Russian intellectual and theatrical culture.
HOLY RUSSIA IN THE HEAVENS
1997-09-01 - Yuriy Kuznetsov
The text is a collection of short, evocative pieces exploring themes of Russian identity, memory, loss, and the supernatural. It includes “СВЯТАЯ РУСЬ НА НЕБЕСАХ” (Holy Russia in the Heavens), a poem about a fallen people connected to the stars and light, alongside “КОСЫНКА” (Kosynka – a blue kerchief), which uses the image of the kerchief as a symbol of Russian womanhood and loss. “РУБАШКА” (Shirt) describes a miraculous shirt created by the earth, and “СВЕЧА В ЗАБРОШЕННОЙ ЧАСОВНЕ” (Candle in a Abandoned Chapel) depicts a moment of religious awe and warning. Other pieces, like “КУВШИН” (Kușin – sitting), “СЛЕД ЧЕЛОВЕКА” (Trace of a Man), “РУЧЕЙ” (Stream), and “ОБЛАКА” (Clouds), further develop these themes through imagery of nature, memory, and the uncanny. The overall effect is a fragmented, dreamlike exploration of Russia’s soul and its connection to the divine.
“Agency”Day”“
1997-09-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The article “Agentstvo Dnya” reports on several events: a naming ceremony (bide) for each antelope at Moscow’s zoo to mark the city’s 850th anniversary, the death of legendary host Vrunov, and journalist Kiselyov’s participation in the celebration of Moscow’s sesquicentennial (150th anniversary).
SHEEP OR GOATS?
1997-09-08 - Yuriy Ivanov
This text is a satirical recounting of a hypothetical meeting between the US Presidential team and a memoirist, Yuri Korzhakov, detailing his observations of Boris Yeltsin and his inner circle. The core of the piece is a darkly humorous comparison of the two groups – the pragmatic, problem-solving US team and the chaotic, self-destructive Yeltsin entourage. Korzhakov’s account is portrayed as brutally honest and revealing, highlighting Yeltsin’s alcoholism, incompetence, and bizarre decision-making processes, culminating in absurd proposals like using lasers to blind Congressmen. The text emphasizes the contrast between the two groups’ approaches, portraying the US team as rational and focused, while Yeltsin’s circle is depicted as utterly illogical and prone to outlandish schemes. Ultimately, the piece serves as a pointed critique of Yeltsin’s leadership and the dysfunction within his administration, presented through a comedic and exaggerated lens.
ROYAL HOSPITALITY
1997-09-08 - Denis Tukmakov
In 1997, amidst global tragedies, Moscow hosted a lavish festival attended by 177 international delegations, seeking refuge from disasters and conflicts. These delegations, including presidents from various nations, were primarily welcomed by Moscow Mayor Yegor Yakovlevich Luzhkov, rather than President Yeltsin. The festival was characterized by extravagant displays, gifts (such as a new cathedral and mosque), and a sense of imperial revival, with Moscow positioning itself as a leading force preparing for expansion and military campaigns. The event was populated by a diverse and somewhat dubious group of attendees, including celebrities, diplomats, and potentially illicit figures, reflecting a chaotic and grandiose celebration.
Before daw
1997-09-08 - Vladimir Vinnikov
This text, written in 1997 by Vladimir Vinnikov, is a cynical and critical reflection on Russia’s recent history, particularly the events surrounding the 850th anniversary of Moscow and the ongoing disillusionment of the Russian people. It argues that the celebrations were a hollow attempt to mask a deeply flawed and decaying system. The author uses the historical parallels of the Time of Troubles and the Yeltsin era to suggest that Russia is repeating cycles of upheaval and misrule. He sees the public’s reaction to the anniversary celebrations – a massive, orchestrated demonstration – as a symptom of widespread apathy and a growing rejection of the “царя Бориса” (Boris Yeltsin) and the “реформы” (reforms) that followed. The piece highlights a sense of lost opportunity and missed potential, suggesting that the people were too late to grasp the chance for genuine change. It’s a pessimistic view, portraying a nation struggling to find its identity and direction, with a growing disconnect between the symbols of power and the reality of the situation. The author uses historical figures and events to illustrate the cyclical nature of Russian history and the enduring frustration of the populace.
I don’t believe in such “reforms”!
1997-09-15 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a lengthy interview with retired General Dmitry Yakovlevich Zhovich, reflecting on the evolution of the Soviet and Russian armed forces and criticizing contemporary leadership. Yakovlevich expresses deep concern about the current state of the military, attributing it to a lack of strategic thinking, a reliance on political maneuvering, and a disregard for the historical experience of the armed forces. He highlights a key theme: the disconnect between political leadership and the practical realities of military management.
He details his experiences during the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Afghan War, and the reforms under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, emphasizing the importance of thorough planning, clear objectives, and a deep understanding of military capabilities. He criticizes the current leadership’s tendency to prioritize short-term political gains over long-term strategic considerations, pointing to the chaotic and poorly coordinated events surrounding the Chechen conflict as a prime example.
Yakovlevich expresses a profound skepticism about the current political climate, believing that the military is being used as a tool for political expediency rather than a force for national security. He laments the lack of respect for military expertise and the tendency to surround the President with sycophants rather than experienced officers. He concludes with a pessimistic assessment of the future of the Russian armed forces, arguing that without a fundamental shift in leadership and a renewed commitment to strategic thinking, the military will continue to be a source of instability and weakness.MOTHERS ARE IN PRISON…
1997-09-15 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a darkly comedic and surreal portrait of two women, a former local newspaper editor and a mother of a convicted murderer. The editor, a former ideological figure, has become consumed by a bizarre obsession with her son’s fate and the broader criminal landscape of Russia. She’s spiraling into delusion, crafting increasingly absurd “theses” filled with cynical observations about crime and power, and attempting to influence the legal process through increasingly desperate means. Simultaneously, the mother, a grieving and emotionally fragile woman, offers a stark counterpoint, clinging to a distorted sense of connection with her son and seeking solace in superficial gestures of support. The narrative is characterized by a detached, almost clinical tone, highlighting the absurdity of their situations and the breakdown of their realities. Ultimately, the story explores themes of guilt, delusion, and the corrosive effects of power and corruption, presented through a fragmented and unsettling lens.
GO 37th!
1997-09-15 - Viktor Filatov
This text expresses deep concern and anger regarding the perceived dismantling of the Russian military education system and the potential for Russia to be weakened by foreign influence. It argues that the Soviet military academies were uniquely effective due to their rigorous training, focus on strategic thinking, and the selection of talented individuals. The author fears that the current trend – dismantling these institutions, replacing them with foreign-influenced training, and focusing on low-level resistance – will leave Russia vulnerable.
The core argument is that Russia should adopt a guerilla warfare strategy, utilizing decentralized, mobile units to disrupt enemy infrastructure and communications, mirroring the tactics used by the Iraqi resistance against the coalition forces. The author views the loss of the traditional military academies as a catastrophic blow, emphasizing the importance of preserving Russia’s strategic thinking and military prowess through unconventional methods. The text frames the situation as a battle for control of key infrastructure and resources, with the ultimate goal of undermining the enemy’s ability to wage war.Explosion at the end of the tunnel.
1997-09-22 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The article, “Blast at the End of the Tunnel,” by Igor Feofanov, explores the vulnerability of Moscow’s metro system to terrorist attacks. It argues that the metro is an exceptionally attractive target due to its high passenger density, enclosed spaces, and the potential for devastating consequences – death from shrapnel, burial by collapsing ceilings, fires, and panic-induced casualties.
The author contends that despite security measures like document checks and metal detector sweeps, these efforts are often insufficient and ineffective, particularly against sophisticated or improvised explosive devices. He criticizes the reliance on a “Russian ‘avos’”—a sense of fatalism and assumption that everything will be alright—and questions the effectiveness of law enforcement, citing the unsolved murders of Litvinenko and Kholodov as evidence of systemic failures.
Furthermore, the article highlights the diverse range of potential attackers, from Chechen militants to Ukrainian nationalists and extremist groups, suggesting that complete control or negotiation is impossible. The author concludes that despite the inherent risks, millions of Muscovites continue to use the metro daily, driven by a pragmatic acceptance of the danger and a lack of viable alternatives.Pyrrhic victory
1997-09-29 - Mikhail Titov
The House of Soviets is blackened by sorrow, having been shot at by tanks. The Kantemirovites—traitors to Russia—committed a heinous crime, tarnishing the combat glory and the honor of their fathers. Fat, contemptible scoundrels feasted on Russian blood, celebrating a Pyrrhic victory.
…His defining moments
1997-09-29 - Vladimir Bondarenko
This text reflects on the enduring mythos surrounding the October 1993 events in Russia, specifically the defense of the White House. It argues that the events, despite being a largely unsuccessful defense against a democratically elected government, have become a powerful and enduring symbol of resistance, heroism, and the defense of individual liberty.
The author contends that the key figures involved – a diverse group of intellectuals, writers, and activists – were motivated by a genuine desire for freedom and a rejection of authoritarianism, rather than a specific political agenda. They represent a “heroic po[r]ush,” a beautiful, almost mythical, impulse to resist oppression.
Despite the defeat, the text emphasizes the lasting impact of this “heroic po[r]ush” on Russian culture and identity. It highlights how the events have been continually romanticized and celebrated through art, literature, and memory, solidifying the figures involved as enduring symbols of resistance. The author suggests that this mythos continues to influence contemporary Russian society, providing a source of inspiration and a reminder of the importance of defending fundamental rights. The text ultimately portrays the October 1993 events not as a historical failure, but as a potent and ongoing narrative of Russian heroism and resistance.That’s how it was.
1997-09-29 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The poem expresses outrage and condemnation of the 1993 events, specifically the shelling of the Congress of People’s Deputies (House of the Soviets) and the violence perpetrated by Russian forces. It criticizes corruption and profiteering within the government and expresses a desire for a return to a traditional, Orthodox Russia, rejecting promises of material wealth and private property. The speaker vows not to forgive the actions of those involved.
Byzantine in the State
1997-09-29 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a highly critical and cynical analysis of the political situation in Russia in the autumn of 1997, drawing heavily on parallels to the 1993 crisis. It argues that the current instability is a deliberate provocation orchestrated by various factions, primarily centered around a return to the tactics and dynamics of the 1993 confrontation between the President and the Supreme Soviet.
The author contends that figures like Zyunov are deliberately employing inflammatory rhetoric (“главарь преступной клики”) and destabilizing actions (like the “открытое письмо” to senators and the creation of the Rohlin DPA) to create chaos and ultimately seize power. The author sees a deliberate attempt to recreate the conditions that led to the 1993 crisis, utilizing tactics such as manipulating public opinion, exploiting economic hardship, and provoking conflict between institutions.
Key elements of the analysis include:
- Replay of 1993: The text repeatedly draws parallels between the current situation and the 1993 crisis, suggesting a conscious effort to recreate the conditions that led to the conflict.
- Provocative Rhetoric: Zyunov’s use of terms like “главарь преступной клики” is presented as a deliberate provocation.
- Manipulation of Institutions: The creation of the Rohlin DPA and the “открытое письмо” are seen as attempts to destabilize the government and the Duma.
- Role of the Military and Intelligence: The author suggests that elements within the military and intelligence services are actively involved in orchestrating the chaos.
- Exploitation of Economic Hardship: The ongoing economic problems are presented as a tool for manipulation and destabilization.
- Potential for Violence: The text hints at the possibility of escalating violence, drawing on the events of 1993.
And I shall proclaim!
1997-09-29 - Vladislav Shurygin
This text is a deeply unsettling and philosophical reflection on justice, retribution, and the consequences of power. It explores the idea that there’s a cosmic, impartial reckoning for actions, particularly those committed during periods of extreme political upheaval like the 1993 Russian coup. The author uses the story of the events surrounding the storming of the White House to illustrate this point, detailing the fates of key figures involved – including those who ordered the attack, those who participated, and those who profited from the chaos.
The core argument is that those who abused their power and contributed to the violence and suffering will ultimately face a judgment, not necessarily by earthly authorities, but by a higher, more fundamental force. The text emphasizes the cyclical nature of power and the inevitable downfall of those who wield it unjustly. It’s filled with vivid imagery and unsettling details, particularly concerning the suffering of individuals and the grotesque distortions of human nature that emerge during times of crisis. The text ultimately suggests a bleak, almost apocalyptic view of human history, where justice is a constant, inescapable force, and where the pursuit of power inevitably leads to ruin. It’s a meditation on the enduring themes of guilt, responsibility, and the terrifying possibility that there is no escape from the consequences of one’s actions.Think, express distrust towards the government!
1997-10-06 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The State Duma should express distrust in the government, rejecting “reformers” as executioners and their budget.
FACE MASKS
1997-10-06 - Aleksandr Lyskov
The text is a cynical critique of Boris Yeltsin’s leadership and the manufactured crises he created to maintain power. It argues that Yeltsin’s attempts to project an image of a tough, law-and-order figure were entirely performative and ineffective. The author uses the example of the fabricated scandal involving the mayor of Leninsk-Kuznetsk, Konakhin, to illustrate how Yeltsin manipulated public opinion and deployed a series of increasingly weak “sparring partners” – like Konakhin and other local figures – to create the illusion of control. The author suggests that Yeltsin’s attempts to suppress genuine resistance, embodied by individuals like Konakhin who challenged his policies, were ultimately futile, highlighting a fundamental disconnect between Yeltsin’s image and the reality of Russian society’s resistance to his reforms. The piece concludes that Yeltsin’s power was based on a manufactured crisis and a lack of genuine understanding of the Russian people’s values and resistance.
Battle at Nigh
1997-10-13 - Sergey Kurginyan
This text is a scathing critique of Western perceptions and actions regarding Russia, particularly focusing on the influence of figures like Robert Gates and James Woolsey. It argues that Western assessments, fueled by a flawed understanding of Russia’s history and current situation, have actively contributed to a climate of hostility and, ultimately, a disastrous outcome.
Here’s a breakdown of the key arguments:
- Western Misinterpretations: The author contends that Western figures have consistently misconstrued Russia’s motivations and actions, attributing them to criminal intent rather than strategic considerations.
- The “Night Battle” Metaphor: The core concept is the “Night Battle,” representing a prolonged period of destructive influence and manipulation by Western forces. This battle is fueled by a failure to understand Russia’s perspective and a deliberate effort to undermine its stability.
- The Role of Specific Figures: The text names specific individuals (Gates, Woolsey, Burg, etc.) as key architects of this negative influence.
- A Call to Action: It urges a shift in Western thinking, advocating for a more nuanced and empathetic approach to Russia, recognizing the potential for a catastrophic outcome if the current trajectory continues.
- Critique of Western “Intervention”: The author views Western actions as a deliberate attempt to destabilize Russia, framing it as a “night battle” against a nation perceived as inherently criminal.
Oleg SHESTINSKY
1997-10-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a series of fragmented reflections and observations, primarily written in 1997, exploring themes of disillusionment, societal decay, and the loss of ideals in Russia following the collapse of the Soviet Union. It’s characterized by a cynical and often darkly humorous tone, filled with vivid imagery and metaphors. The author contrasts the grandeur of the past with the grim realities of the present, depicting a Russia fractured by corruption, inequality, and a loss of collective memory. Recurring motifs include the “life on a thread,” the corruption of artistic and intellectual pursuits, and the struggle for survival amidst chaos. The author reflects on personal experiences – including involvement in the 1993 Moscow barricades – and observes the behavior of various groups within Russian society, from artists and intellectuals to merchants and those living on the fringes of Moscow. There’s a sense of lament for a lost Russia, a yearning for authenticity, and a critical assessment of the new, often cynical, order. The text is less a cohesive narrative and more a collection of snapshots, reflecting a deeply troubled and observant perspective.
Advance with a hint.
1997-10-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a 1997 commentary criticizing a “dramatic” and potentially dangerous presidential figure. It suggests the president’s provocative statements and behavior, fueled by a fear of a “third coming” and potential political instability, are alarming. The author advocates for immediate action – a legal intervention like a prosecutor’s inquiry or a Constitutional Court challenge – to prevent further escalation and potential political division, referencing past events and a desire to curb the president’s “bullying” rhetoric.
In the country – tragedy, in the hall – comedy…
1997-10-13 - Denis Tukmakov
The article critiques the atmosphere within the State Duma during a budget discussion, portraying it as a comedy due to the Premier, Chernomyrdin’s, inappropriate behavior and the journalists’ amusement. It argues that this frivolous environment undermines the seriousness of the budget debate and the country’s economic situation. The author contrasts this with the past, where parliamentarians would confront the government forcefully. He questions the integrity of opposition deputies who engage in seemingly subservient behavior towards the government, suggesting a lack of respect for voters and journalists. Ultimately, the piece calls for deputies to demonstrate honesty and integrity in their actions.
Agency “Day”
1997-10-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
In 1997, news reported that Mayor Sobchak was mistakenly transferred to Leninskoye, and Mayor Konakhin underwent heart surgery. Vladimir Zhirinovsky glued himself to his seat in the Duma to protest against Viktor Stroev. Former reformer Trakhin reappeared with a makeshift solution. During a budget vote, Viktor Kobszon’s wig came loose. Moscow Mayor Luzkhov threatened to cut off utilities and restrict federal access. Deputies Sevastyanov and Chernomyrdin were observed embracing as if they were married. Yeltsin negotiated with Kozyrev and Shirak in Strasbourg. Yastrzemsky was “mocked” by Kostikova. A suitcase containing $500,000, previously taken from the Kremlin, was returned to Evstafiev with wheels. The “Yabloko” faction was likened to a disreputable tavern where an intoxicated pharmacist offered advice on governing the country.
THREE EMPIRES of contemporary art (CHAOS)
1997-10-13 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This 1997 article by Mirion Potapov, “Three Kingdoms of Contemporary Art (Chaos),” offers a vibrant and somewhat cynical snapshot of the Moscow art scene. It describes a fractured landscape divided into two distinct groups: the “Zubrats” – powerful, wealthy figures with connections to government, international organizations, and established art institutions, and the “Marats” – a younger, more rebellious group advocating for accessible and free art. The Zubrats, likened to court jesters, prioritize spectacle and patronage, while the Marats champion anonymity and public engagement.
The article highlights a burgeoning underground movement of artists creating art for free and in public spaces, driven by a desire for genuine artistic expression rather than commercial gain. Despite facing financial hardship, this group is gaining momentum, supported by musicians and young printers. Potapov portrays a scene of intense competition, shifting alliances, and ultimately, a belief that art belongs to the people, rather than being dictated by wealth and power. The piece emphasizes the chaotic and dynamic nature of the art world, suggesting a future where grassroots creativity will ultimately prevail.RUBLE-SKV, FIRE! (GENSHTAB GAZETY “ZAVTRA”)
1997-10-20 - Viktor Filatov
This text is a highly conspiratorial and critical analysis of Russia’s economic situation, primarily blaming the United States and its influence for the decline of the Russian ruble. It argues that the ruble is being deliberately devalued through a complex network of manipulation involving dollar payments, false currency production, and the actions of key figures within the Russian government. The author posits that the U.S. utilizes a “dollar-soldier” strategy, employing financial pressure and deception to destabilize Russia. It suggests a deliberate plan, allegedly orchestrated by figures like Rothschild and orchestrated through organizations like the CIA, to undermine the ruble and control Russia’s economy. The text proposes a radical solution: a public declaration of the ruble’s value at $3 per unit, timed for 24 hours, as a direct challenge to this alleged conspiracy. The overall tone is one of deep distrust and accusation, portraying Russia as a victim of a global financial war.
Nizhnekamsky Primipals
1997-10-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
In 1997, at Nizhnekamenskшина Tire Plant, a complex scheme of large-scale tire theft was uncovered. Multiple criminal groups, led by figures like Nadezhа Savina and Любовь Карелина, systematically stole tires by diverting them through the factory’s drainage system, railway transport, and by manipulating shipping documents. The scheme involved falsifying paperwork, using the factory’s sewage system to dispose of stolen tires, and employing railway workers to transport them. Several individuals were arrested and convicted for their roles in this elaborate fraud, which involved stealing over three billion rubles worth of tires.
There is, comrade… foul!
1997-10-20 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This short story depicts a disturbing and unsettling incident within a Soviet military academy. A first-year cadet, Viktor Petrov, is fatally shot by another cadet, Vasily Chernnykh, during a late-night patrol. The shooting stems from a complex chain of events: Chernnykh’s gambling debts, a proposition offered to Petrov involving marijuana, and a breakdown in discipline and oversight within the academy. The narrative highlights the corruption, apathy, and lack of accountability prevalent within the Soviet military system, where personal failings and debts could lead to tragic consequences. The story emphasizes the dehumanizing nature of the system, reducing individuals to mere instruments and highlighting the disconnect between ideals of patriotism and the reality of bureaucratic corruption and violence. The final lines reveal the outcome – Chernnykh and Petrov are both dismissed from the academy, illustrating the system’s indifference to individual fates.
From the editors
1997-10-27 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
A congress of Russian scientists and engineers held on October 17th at the Parliamentary Center demonstrated a significantly stronger and more critical response to reforms compared to a previous congress of creative intellectuals. Scientists, led by figures like Anatoly Rakitov and supported by others including Lev Abalkin and Victor Pokrovsky, voiced strong opposition to the government and its policies, demanding the resignation of the President and Government. This reaction stemmed from a perceived bleak state of Russian science and industry under the current leadership. The congress successfully challenged the government’s course, offering alternative perspectives and a clear “no” to the reforms, signaling a shift in priorities for the future of Russia.
AT THE LENIN MUSEUM
1997-11-03 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
On November 4, 1997, a final conference titled “80 Years of October: Lessons of History and Modernity” took place at the V.I. Lenin Museum in Gorokhi, Russia. Participants discussed the current situation in Russia as a bourgeois- comprador counter-revolution and a serious ideological-political crisis within the modern communist movement. They emphasized the enduring significance of the Great October Revolution and criticized the destruction of Soviet-era cultural artifacts by the ruling political regime, calling for a broad discussion involving the patriotic opposition.
FIFTH COLUMN – ON THE FIFTH CHANNEL
1997-11-03 - Vladimir Bondarenko
The text expresses frustration with the programming and direction of the “Culture” television channel in Russia. The author argues that the channel has become dominated by a “liberal-cosmopolitan” viewpoint, excluding genuine Russian national culture and traditions. He criticizes the channel’s leadership, particularly Mikhail Shvyddykh, and the composition of its advisory board, which he deems overly influenced by Western-leaning figures. The author proposes a solution: a daily “Hour of Russian Culture” featuring prominent Russian artists and intellectuals, alongside a separate advisory board. He views the channel’s current trajectory as detrimental to Russian culture and identity, characterizing it as a “fifth column” undermining Russian spiritual values.
Without any storm being spoken.
1997-11-03 - Georgiy Sudovtsev
The author, Georgiy Sudovtsev, argues that Russia is strategically conceding territory, particularly the Southern Kurils, to Japan due to economic pressures and geopolitical considerations. He believes this is similar to the “Chechen experience,” where Russia gained assets while maintaining a facade of strength. The author highlights Japan’s economic power, particularly its debt to the United States, and the looming threat of China. He points to a timeline involving promises from Japan regarding the Kurils and upcoming Russian presidential elections as part of a calculated strategy.
Dashboard
1997-11-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text details a complex web of political maneuvering and strategic calculations occurring in Russia during 1997, primarily surrounding Boris Yeltsin’s leadership and the shifting dynamics of the opposition. Key elements include Yeltsin’s orchestrated “integration” of Boris Березовский into a political maneuver designed to discredit himself and the NPSR, culminating in a staged “alliance” with Alexander Селезнев, effectively removing him as a potential presidential candidate. The text outlines a plan involving the radical reshaping of the Communist Party, potentially including a symbolic “reburial” of Lenin, and a shift towards a “monetarist” budget. Simultaneously, there are indications of destabilization efforts, including orchestrated stock market declines influenced by figures like George Сорос, and preparations for criminal activity targeting Березовский’s associates. Furthermore, the text reveals a strategic shift involving concessions to China, specifically regarding border points, and ongoing concerns about narcotics trafficking in Chechnya. Finally, it describes a coordinated effort to undermine Yeltsin’s authority through financial manipulation and intelligence operations.
Russians from all countries, unite!
1997-11-10 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Nikolai Lysenko reflects on his time in prison and the failure of the Russian nationalist movement. He believes the key issue was a lack of unity and strategic action among Russian patriots, highlighting how the situation was exploited by external forces and the government. Lysenko plans to establish a charitable foundation to support imprisoned Russian nationalists and expresses his continued trust in Sergei Baburin as a reliable figure within the opposition. He criticizes the current state of the Russian prison system, describing it as a brutal and dehumanizing environment that fosters resentment and fuels anti-government sentiment. He emphasizes the need for a unified national strategy and expresses disappointment that the opportunity to leverage his case for broader nationalist mobilization was missed.
THE COURT IS UNFAIR
1997-11-17 - Ye. Podoprigora
In 1997, a text by E. Podoprigora details the trial of Igor Semenov, a Russian patriot, in Oryol. Semenov, formerly awarded commemorative watches by Marshal Yazyov, was arrested in 1994 following the murder of his ex-wife and her son. Despite initial confessions from the killers implicating Semenov, the prosecution shifted the focus to accusations of antisemitism and anti-Zionism, alleging these stemmed from his leadership roles within the Russian National Unity movement. The trial was characterized by numerous procedural violations and was spearheaded by a former deputy governor, supported by activists and the local Jewish community.
We came out of one fire…
1997-11-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This transcript is a lengthy and intense exchange between Svetlana Goracheva and Alexander Prokhanov, primarily focusing on the state of the National Patriotic Opposition and their approach to navigating the current political landscape in Russia. Goracheva expresses deep frustration and disillusionment with the direction the opposition has taken, particularly regarding compromises and a perceived lack of strategic vision.
She criticizes the perceived “softening” of the opposition, highlighting a shift towards pragmatic compromises that she believes have diluted their core values and purpose. She emphasizes the importance of unwavering principles and a clear, forceful stance against what she sees as corruption and the erosion of Russian national identity.
A central theme is the “White House” incident and the subsequent personal sacrifices made by Goracheva, framing her experience as a testament to her unwavering commitment to defending Russia. She expresses a deep sense of loss and regret over the perceived abandonment of core values and a growing sense of isolation within the opposition.
Goracheva stresses the need for a more combative and strategic approach, advocating for a focus on mobilizing public opinion, exposing corruption, and resisting what she views as the destructive influence of Western values. She believes the opposition has lost its nerve and needs to rediscover its strength and resolve. The conversation ends with a shared sense of concern for the future of Russia and a determination to continue fighting for its values, despite the challenges.Bitter hangover
1997-11-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This lengthy text is a cynical and critical analysis of the Russian media’s role during the First Chechen War (1994-1996). The author, a former military officer, argues that the Russian media actively fueled the conflict and contributed to the disastrous outcome. He contends that the media engaged in a deliberate “psychological war” against the Russian army, portraying federal troops as “brutal” and promoting the image of Chechen leaders like Dudayev as heroic figures.
The author highlights several specific examples of this manipulation, including the media’s focus on “war crimes” committed by Russian forces, the promotion of separatist propaganda, and the creation of a negative image of Russian soldiers – portraying them as confused, impoverished, and demoralized. He criticizes the media’s reliance on sensationalism and the use of figures like Movladi Udugov, a former journalist who became a key figure in the Chechen separatist movement, to amplify the conflict.
The author expresses deep frustration with the media’s role, arguing that it was not simply a reflection of the situation but an active participant in creating and exacerbating the crisis. He suggests that the media’s behavior was driven by a combination of factors, including a desire for attention, a lack of critical thinking, and a willingness to exploit the conflict for political gain. Ultimately, the author concludes that the media’s actions contributed to the failure to resolve the conflict and the subsequent suffering of both Russians and Chechens.BELORUSSIKIY PROYEKT” SOUZ
1997-11-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text details the long and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to build a new theater, originally named “Na Yuzhozapade,” in Moscow, spearheaded by Belarusian actor Valery Belyokovich. The project began in the 1990s with a small, community-built theater and evolved into a complex endeavor involving architectural designs, negotiations with the Moscow government, and attempts to secure funding from various sources, including potential sponsors. Despite a promising design by architect Alexander Vedenkin and initial approvals, funding issues and bureaucratic delays repeatedly stalled the project. The story highlights the challenges of securing resources for cultural initiatives and the shifting priorities of the Russian government. Ultimately, the project was abandoned, though the author notes a positive development – increased cultural investment in Belarus, leading to the opening of new theaters and plans for a Belarusian cultural center in Moscow, potentially built on the same site as the stalled theater.
About Vladimir Bogatyr’s Book “Word of the Chem”
1997-11-24 - otets Dmitriy Dudko
The author, Dm. Dudko, recommends rereading Vladimir Bogatyrev’s “Word Father’s” collection of poems. He initially found the poems challenging, perceiving Bogatyrev as a prose writer rather than a poet. However, after experiencing the poems read aloud by Bogatyrev himself, he recognized their profound beauty and spiritual depth. Bogatyrev’s unique style, characterized by a deeply personal and emotive delivery, resonated powerfully with the reader. The author believes that repeated readings and listening to Bogatyrev’s rendition would evoke a significant spiritual impression, potentially prompting reflection and even repentance.
SOCIUM
1997-11-24 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The Committee of the Public Council of the “Bratskoye” microdistrict, along with representatives of various environmental and political organizations in Moscow, formally address high-ranking officials, demanding action regarding the actions of SZAO (South-West Administrative District) Prefect V.A. Kozlov. Kozlov is accused of pursuing a destructive urban development plan without considering public opinion or decisions from the Moscow Prosecutor’s Office and the Tagansky District Court. Specifically, he authorized the destruction of a historical monument, negatively impacting the surrounding environment and a children’s hospital, approved the removal of a 200-meter sanitary zone along the Moscow Ring Road for cottage construction, established a hazardous chemical production facility near residential buildings, and allowed for an illegal landfill polluting the Bratonka River and the Moscow-Ok River basin. The Committee expresses its lack of trust in Kozlov and demands his replacement with a qualified professional.
VERSION OF BETRAYAL
1997-12-01 - Nikolay Anisin
This text is a satirical commentary on political maneuvering and deception, primarily focusing on the potential for Russia to concede territory to Moldova through the actions of figures like Duma Speaker Gennady Seleznev. The core argument is that Seleznev is not genuinely interested in fostering Russian-Moldovan relations, but rather is being manipulated by Moldova’s President, Petre Luchinsky, a former Politburo member, and other influential Duma members.
Luchinsky, seeking to bolster his own power and potentially align Moldova with NATO, is leveraging Seleznev’s desire to appease these figures. Seleznev, in turn, is deliberately misrepresenting the positions of his parliamentary partners, particularly the “Socialist Unity” faction, to create the illusion of support for ratifying a basic treaty that would ultimately benefit Luchinsky.
The text highlights a cynical game of deception, where genuine concerns about Russian-Moldovan relations are deliberately obscured to achieve personal gain. The satirical tone emphasizes the absurdity of the situation and the manipulative tactics employed by all parties involved. The author suggests that if Seleznev’s deception is not exposed, then the first version of the story – that he is being manipulated – is the most likely truth.YURIY POBEDONOSEC
1997-12-01 - Vladimir Bondarenko
This text is a lengthy, enthusiastic, and somewhat nostalgic tribute to Yuri Medvedev, a publisher and cultural figure, written in 1997. The author, a newspaper editor, details Medvedev’s long and varied career, highlighting his passion for Slavic mythology, Russian history, and the future of Russia. He portrays Medvedev as a visionary and tireless worker, constantly undertaking ambitious projects, often in the face of criticism and skepticism. The piece emphasizes Medvedev’s dedication to publishing works that counter Western cultural influence and promote a distinctly Russian identity. It celebrates his efforts to revive Russian fantasy literature, publish Slavic mythology, and support projects like the “Museum of Slavic Cultures.” The author expresses hope for Medvedev’s continued success and a brighter future for Russia, framing his work as crucial during a challenging period. The text includes references to Medvedev’s collaborations, publications, and a specific artwork by Viktor Chernovolenko, and concludes with a heartfelt birthday greeting and wishes for continued success.
On the role of “weak impulse”
1997-12-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text, dated October 2–12–97, is a pessimistic analysis of the global financial situation, particularly concerning the impact on Russia. The author argues that a series of financial crises – originating in Hong Kong, then spreading through Japan, Brazil, and Korea – were triggered by a deliberate attempt by the United States to destabilize the global financial system, specifically the dominance of the US dollar.
The US, through actions involving major banks and speculative attacks, aimed to weaken the dollar and shift global financial power towards the emerging economic centers of Asia. This was achieved by orchestrating a series of financial shocks, causing widespread instability and triggering a domino effect across global markets, including Russia.
The author expresses concern that Russia, due to its relatively small and weakly integrated financial system, is vulnerable to this “weak impulse” and could be dragged into the crisis. He advocates for a shift in Russia’s economic policy, focusing on supporting large domestic corporations and strategically engaging with the emerging regional economic blocs, rather than remaining reliant on Western financial markets. The author views the situation as a deliberate manipulation and a warning sign for Russia to pursue a more independent and strategically focused economic path.Time for the bibliophobes.
1997-12-01 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The article “Time for Librarians” by Igor Feofanov reflects on the dire state of Russian libraries and the information landscape in the 1990s. It argues that, mirroring the decline of the Assyrian Empire, a focus on short-term gains and material wealth has led to the neglect of crucial cultural and intellectual resources. The author highlights the legacy of the great Assyrian king Ashurbanipal, who established a vast library, and contrasts it with the current situation where libraries are crumbling due to a lack of funding, mismanagement, and a decline in national priorities.
The piece emphasizes the critical importance of information and knowledge for a nation’s future, drawing a parallel to the Assyrian understanding that control over people rested not just in military might, but in the wisdom contained within written records. The author laments the lack of investment in libraries, the fragmented nature of the Soviet-era system, and the resulting inability to effectively manage and disseminate information.
He criticizes the influence of foreign aid, often tied to political agendas rather than genuine support for cultural institutions, and expresses concern about the impact of this neglect on Russia’s national security and intellectual development. The article concludes with a poignant reflection on the fate of the Assyrian Empire, suggesting that a similar decline awaits Russia if it continues to prioritize material wealth over the preservation of knowledge and culture.OPTIMISM TRADITION
1997-12-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text is a transcript of a dialogue between Alexander Prokhanov and Egyptian Ambassador Reda Ahmed Shehata, discussing Egypt’s role in the Middle East and its relationship with Russia. The core of the conversation revolves around Egypt’s historical legacy – a civilization built on agriculture and openness to diverse cultures – and how this legacy informs its current foreign policy and its ambitions for the future.
Shehata emphasizes Egypt’s independent foreign policy, its commitment to social justice and economic freedom, and its significant role in the region’s history. He highlights Egypt’s ability to “digest” different cultures and its ongoing efforts to maintain stability in a volatile area. He frames Egypt’s current actions, particularly its relationship with Russia, as a continuation of this historical tradition.
Prokhanov explores the roots of contemporary conflict, attributing it to a breakdown of traditional values and a rejection of established norms. He stresses the importance of understanding Egypt’s historical experience – its ability to absorb and integrate diverse influences – as a key to navigating the challenges of the modern world. The conversation concludes with a reflection on the enduring connection between the land and its people, and the importance of preserving historical traditions in the face of global instability.SKVÉRNA
1997-12-08 - Sergey Kurginyan
This text is a scathing and highly critical analysis of the political situation in Russia in late 1997, primarily focusing on the fallout from the assassination attempt on businessman and journalist Alexander Litvinenko. The author, S. Kurginyan, argues that the situation is deeply corrupted, characterized by a manipulative and cynical use of information and a blurring of lines between legitimate opposition and criminal activity.
Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
- The Litvinenko Affair as a Symptom: The author views the Litvinenko case as a manifestation of a broader, deeply ingrained corruption within the Russian political system. He believes it was deliberately orchestrated to destabilize the government.
- Skepticism Towards Official Narratives: Kurginyan expresses profound distrust of official accounts, particularly those presented by the media and the government. He sees a pattern of manipulation and disinformation.
- Characterizing Key Figures: He offers a highly critical assessment of figures like Alexander Litvinenko, portraying him as a pawn in a larger game. He also describes key figures within the government, including Yevgeny Primakov and Vladimir Putin, as being involved in a cynical and manipulative power struggle.
- The “Postmodern” Game: The author uses the term “postmodern” to describe the tactics employed by those involved, characterized by a deliberate blurring of truth and falsehood, a reliance on speculation and rumor, and a cynical manipulation of public opinion. He sees this as a dangerous trend, where facts are treated as mere “visible appearances” to be manipulated for political gain.
- A Call for Critical Thinking: Kurginyan urges readers to be highly skeptical and to resist attempts to be manipulated by the media and political actors. He emphasizes the importance of independent thinking and a willingness to challenge official narratives.
- A Pessimistic Outlook: The overall tone is deeply pessimistic, suggesting that the situation is far more complex and dangerous than it appears on the surface.
What a beautiful Formosa.
1997-12-08 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
This text details a snapshot of geopolitical relations in late 1997, primarily focusing on Taiwan’s evolving relationship with China and the United States. The visit between President Clinton and Chinese President Jiang Zemin resulted in a compromise agreement, including China’s accession to the Zangger Committee, commitments to control chemical exports, and a deal to purchase 50 Boeing passenger aircraft. However, the agreement reaffirmed the “One China” policy and the US commitment to it, a point of significant concern for Taiwan.
The text highlights Taiwan’s pragmatic approach, driven largely by economic ties with China, particularly through investment and trade, which now constituted a substantial portion of its foreign commerce. There’s a growing recognition within Taiwan that its future depends on navigating this complex relationship, with a desire to cultivate relationships with other nations in the Asia-Pacific region, including Russia, to diversify its diplomatic and economic portfolio. The US interest in Taiwan’s security, particularly regarding missile defense systems, is viewed with skepticism, seen as a tool to further escalate tensions between China and the US. The author emphasizes the urgency for Taiwan to address the long-term issue of reunification, suggesting that delaying action will only lead to less favorable terms in negotiations with China.DEATH FOR THE MOTHERLAND
1997-12-15 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Alexander Chekalin, born in the 1930s in the Lipetsk region of Russia, was a successful Soviet partisan scout during World War II. He distinguished himself within the “Forward” partisan detachment, known for his intelligence gathering and participation in sabotage operations. Despite his success, he was eventually captured and executed by the NKVD, reportedly with a defiant final thought of Stalin’s name. Posthumously awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union in 1942, Chekalin became a national icon. However, in the 1990s, doubts emerged regarding his true identity and motivations, though the author maintains his unwavering loyalty to the Soviet state and Stalin.
Mykhailo Zabolytskyi
1997-12-15 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text describes a fantastical city in Georgia, where buffalo stand like ancient gods and buildings are constructed from primitive stones. The author reflects on how this isolated place shaped the soul’s initial structure, recalling youthful observations of the landscape and the people. As night falls, a celebratory song and hymn, “Мравамжамиер,” are sung, uniting Georgians and Svans in a shared moment of camaraderie and goodwill.
untitled
1997-12-15 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Stalin proclaimed, “Work in the USSR is a matter of honor, courage, and heroism!”
Time teaches us.
1997-12-22 - otets Dmitriy Dudko
This text, written in 1997, is a deeply reflective and somewhat pessimistic commentary on contemporary Russia’s situation, particularly concerning its vulnerability to manipulation and spiritual decay. The author expresses concern about the Russian people’s inherent do-gooding nature, which he sees as a weakness exploited by external and internal enemies. He argues that Russia’s problems stem not from external forces alone, but from a failure to trust and rely on the “inner strength” – a spiritual and moral foundation – that has historically sustained the nation.
The core of the text revolves around the idea that Russia’s salvation lies in embracing faith and a humble, selfless approach, rejecting the temptations of wealth, ambition, and superficial achievements. The author criticizes the manipulation of public opinion through advertising and the pursuit of worldly recognition, viewing them as destructive forces. He emphasizes the importance of inner transformation and a quiet, unassuming life, aligning oneself with God’s will.
He expresses skepticism about contemporary figures seeking prominence and rewards, suggesting that these pursuits are ultimately empty. The author urges a return to traditional values, a reliance on faith, and a recognition of the spiritual forces at play, warning against being swayed by external pressures and the allure of material success. Ultimately, the text is a call for spiritual renewal and a rejection of superficial values in the face of a perceived crisis.DECLARATION OF HIS HOLINESS PATRIARCH ALEXII II OF ALL RUSSIA
1997-12-22 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
In 1997, Patriarch Alexy II directly appealed to President Boris Yeltsin and Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzkhov, urging them to address what he perceived as the offense against the Russian people. He called for reconciliation within the Russian people, distinct from opposition to Christianity. The text questions whether Yeltsin and Luzkhov would respond to the Patriarch’s direct plea and explores the potential consequences for relations between the Church and the government if they did not.
Literature Day
1997-12-22 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
Issue 6 of “Den’ Literatury” (December 23, 1997) features articles including Igor Shafarevich on the decline of science and culture, an interview with Boris Ekimov, a polemic with other writers, an analysis of new literary figures, poetry by Nikolai Troykin, and an interview with theater leader Valery Belyokovich. The magazine is available from “Zavtra” newspaper and its editorial office.
We are united by Pushkin.
1997-12-22 - Aleksandr Lukashenko
The text is a speech by the President of the Republic of Belarus to a delegation of Russian writers in 1997. He expresses gratitude for their visit and emphasizes the importance of cultural and spiritual unity between Belarus and Russia, particularly through the legacy of writers like Pushkin. He criticizes the rise of “without-soul” trends, commercialization of literature, and the dominance of superficial content in publishing. He advocates for direct cultural exchange, support for high-quality literature, and the preservation of a shared cultural space, highlighting ongoing efforts to maintain state-funded publishing and support for Belarusian authors. He proposes establishing direct book distribution channels between Belarus and Russia and encourages the development of joint cultural projects, including celebrating Pushkin.
Yuri Melentiev
1997-12-22 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a memorial announcement regarding the death of Yuri Melentyev, a writer, cultural figure, and public servant. It expresses grief and acknowledges his significant contributions to Russian culture. The signatories offer condolences and express hope for the realization of his aspirations for the future.
It is necessary to have new resistance.
1997-12-22 - Igorʹ Shafarevich
This text is a dialogue between Igor Shaferevich and Vladimir Bondarenko, published in 1997, reflecting on the state of Russia. Shaferevich expresses concern over a perceived “total collapse” of Russia, citing pessimistic predictions from journalists like Julietto Kieza and Peter Reddaway, as well as prominent economists. He argues that a significant “qualitative revolution” – a breakdown of national identity and a systematic sale of the country’s resources – has occurred.
Shafarevich criticizes the government’s actions, particularly the rampant corruption and the humiliation of Russia in Chechnya, highlighting the loss of control over the economy and the erosion of national pride. He contrasts this with the achievements of the Soviet era, particularly the development of a strong scientific and industrial base.
He expresses skepticism about the opposition’s role, arguing that it has become absorbed into a colonial system, merely seeking to occupy administrative positions. Shafarevich emphasizes the importance of restoring a sense of national unity and purpose, suggesting that the current situation represents a fundamental crisis of identity. He contrasts this with the historical resilience of Russia, drawing parallels to the Greek city-states and the Roman Empire, and argues that the key to Russia’s future lies in reclaiming its national spirit and resisting the forces of disintegration. He concludes by questioning the current government’s ability to address the nation’s problems and expressing a pessimistic outlook for the country’s future.THE FEMID DEVICE HAS MALFUNCTIONED…
1997-12-25 - Aleksandr Lyskov
The text is a cynical commentary on the 1997 speech given by Igor Chubais to Russian lawyers, framed as a performance orchestrated to appease them. It criticizes Chubais’s superficial and patronizing approach, comparing him to a clown and highlighting the plight of honest prosecutors and investigators who are ignored and mistreated. The author contrasts Chubais’s lenient treatment of Chubais with the harsh treatment of individuals like Genka Konyakhin, a convicted criminal, emphasizing the hypocrisy and injustice within the Russian legal system. The overall tone is one of disillusionment and scorn towards those in power.
Without a dispute.
1997-12-25 - Redaktsiya Zavtra
The text is a collection of poems by Leonid Lavonsky, exploring themes of loss, disillusionment, the decay of Russia, and the struggle between good and evil. Many poems depict a bleak and fragmented Russia, characterized by corruption, social breakdown, and a sense of spiritual emptiness. Recurring images include death, decay, the destruction of nature, and the struggle against a pervasive sense of darkness. There’s a strong sense of mourning for a lost past and a questioning of faith and morality. The poems often employ stark imagery and a pessimistic tone, reflecting a critical view of society and a profound sense of sorrow. Several poems focus on the contrast between a decaying physical landscape and a spiritual void.